Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 27 Apr 1994

Vol. 140 No. 3

Adjournment Matter. - Ashbourne (County Meath) Water Supply.

I apologise for my lateness, I was watching with interest and thought Senator Roche would go on until 8 p.m. Thank you, a Leas-Chathaoirligh, for the opportunity to raise this issue of the funding of a major scheme, the east Meath regional water supply scheme.

The Minister is aware that over a long period Meath County Council has been making representations to the Department for funds to put this scheme together. On numerous occasions representations were made by the locals and local representatives. A number of deputations were accepted and meetings were held in the Department of the Environment with the Minister for the Environment. Some time in February this year following one of these meetings, a decision was made and the Minister, Deputy Smith, informed some members of the delegation that £2.61 million would be provided for part of the scheme but the remainder of the funds had to be found locally.

I find the overall situation and the result of the meeting amazing. Since the foundation of the State the funding of these schemes has always been provided by the Department. In this case an application was made, the meeting took place with no official from the county council present and when three weeks later the March meeting of Meath County Council took place, no details had yet been sent from the Department of the Environment to state that this money had been approved. There was a row there about it, even though some of the people who attended the meeting had informed the general public that they had secured this funding; yet three weeks later there was still no word.

Following that pressure a letter was sent to some of the representatives who were at the meeting which then found its way to the local media, and six hours later the council were informed. The letter stated as follows:

I am directed by the Minister for the Environment to refer to the preliminary proposal for the Meath East Regional water supply scheme currently under examination in my Department. The Minister is prepared to allocate a maximum sum of £2.61 million for the provision of the scheme to the town of Ashbourne only, excluding the other areas that were included in the application. [Excluding Dun-shaughlin, Ratoath, Curragha and Dunboyne.] No further grants will be approved in respect of this work and additional costs must be borne locally. Before proceeding to contract document stage, please confirm your agreement to the proposals set out above.

Never in the history of the State has such a letter been sent to a local authority. It sets a precedent and if it is accepted, local people who pay for the building of their own houses, residential property tax, water rates and all the other charges, will have to fund the extra 10 per cent. If the Minister tells us later that the council may have to provide these funds, where will we get the funds to cover the extra cost? Will we increase our water charges by another 15 per cent or 20 per cent a year? That is the only revenue we have.

I wish the Minister to tell us tonight whether this scheme will be fully funded by the Department. Is it intended to change the policy of funding these major schemes now and in the future so that only 90 per cent of the funds will be made available? If that is the case, the people will have to take up the slack of the 10 per cent funding that was made available to the Department under the national plan. I wish the Minister to inform us of the situation because we in Meath County Council, and I as a Member of that body, will not accept funding on the basis that we must come up with the balance of the funds.

In 1982 there was a major investment of £2.4 million in the water supply scheme in this area which was fully funded by the then Government. Representations were made by me and other elected representatives at the time and we were given 100 per cent funding. I do not see why or how we can allow ourselves be put in a position where we would get 90 per cent funding because if this happens, it is a watershed for every other local authority, and I would not like to see that happening. I hope the Minister will enlighten all local authorities on this major issue.

Wexford): I thank Senator Farrelly for raising this matter in the Seanad today.

My Department is aware of the problems associated with the existing water supply to the town of Ashbourne. This town has in the past suffered water shortages as a result of being located at the extreme end of the east Meath regional water supply scheme. In response to this water supply problem, Meath County Council developed a borehole source at Curragha, which was to serve Ashbourne and the surrounding areas.

However, the yield from the Curragha borehole source, while being adequate in quantity, was not of an acceptable standard for drinking water. This groundwater source has a high iron and manganese content which caused frequent discoloration of the Ashbourne water supply. Consequently in November 1993 my Department approved, at a cost of £100,000, the installation of a filtration plant and chlorine residual unit. The purpose of this is to reduce iron and manganese levels in the water supply below the maximum admissible concentrations as required by the European Union Regulations and reduce the amount of sediment from these elements which was getting into the system.

This work was completed in March 1994, the unit became operational recently and I understand the water quality has improved significantly. I would stress that these works were carried out as an interim measure to effect an immediate improvement in the quality of the Ashbourne water supply pending consideration of the quantity difficulties/distribution network by Meath County Council and my Department.

Meath County Council has submitted a proposal to my Department to deal with the distribution difficulties and the council has been advised that the Minister is prepared to provide a maximum budget of £2.61 million for these works, on the condition that any additional costs would be borne locally.

This offer was made to Meath County Council by the Minister, Deputy Smith, following representations made to him by a deputation of concerned local people. This scheme was not on my Department's national priority list, but the Minister considered that a way forward could be found either through stringent cost control of it, or by a local contribution to reduce Exchequer outlay. The alternative would be simply to refuse any approval to the scheme or to put it on hold, as unfortunately has to be done for many schemes around the country given the excess of demands over finance available.

Is Senator Farrelly saying that this offer is unacceptable and that he would prefer the people of Ashbourne to wait, perhaps indefinitely, for unconditional financial provision to be made for the scheme? He should be clear on this matter.

There are many well justified water service proposals competing for funds. Innovative solutions may help us to ease some of this pressure and to enable some schemes to progress ahead of schedule. What is certain is that if public representatives indulge in making automatic objections to new solutions this will not bring water to people now waiting for it.

If Meath County Council agree to this arrangement, the scheme could then proceed to contract document stage. It is, however, a matter for Meath County Council to determine how the scheme can be managed within the specified budget or, failing this, how any balance of cost should be met.

May I ask a brief question?

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

You may ask one very brief question, Senator.

May I ask the Minister if this is the first time such a proposal was put to any local authority in the country?

(Wexford): No, there are a number of precedents for this. There is a new circular going out to local authorities shortly explaining such schemes. Only recently in my constituency on the extension of a main drainage scheme, a number of people contributed a substantial amount of money to meet half the costs of the extension.

This will become known as the Wallace charge.

The Seanad adjourned at 7.50 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 28 April 1994.

Top
Share