I am serious. That is the legislation it is proposed to introduce in the House in the coming weeks. We will sit a full week next week, although we will sit late on Wednesday to allow people to attend the Arbour Hill ceremonies. We will also sit a full week the week after. After that, I am open to consultation. Senator Fitzgerald also asked about statements on a number of issues. I will attempt to facilitate him if time can be found. I have made a number of commitments in that regard which I will try to honour.
Senator Henry asked about the Geneva Conventions (Amendment) Bill, 1997. I do not think it is proposed to deal with it in this session.
Senator Maloney raised the issue of safety in the fishing fleet. There will be a number of debates dealing with the fishing industry and he has an opportunity then to pursue the matter further.
Senator McGowan is correct that the procedure agreed for statements on matters of importance could be made more flexible to allow other Members to take part and I will raise the matter at the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. The Senator has possibly raised the issue of the Foyle Fisheries before on the Adjournment. It is an important issue but also a very specific one which might be amenable to being raised on the Adjournment.
Senator Sherlock raised the issue of people with disabilities. The record of this Government is one which can be defended, but on the other hand no Government can probably ever do enough for people with disabilities and I would welcome a short debate on the matter, if possible.
Senator Quinn asked an important question. The Food Safety Bill is not at a stage where it can be debated but the point he made is extremely serious and I will convey the text of it to the relevant Minister. As of now, it is not proposed to publish the Bill within the next two weeks.
The Senator also asked about the report of the all-party review group on the Seanad — I will not call it the O'Kennedy report. It is important and I have read it. It takes into account many points made in this House during our lengthy debate on the subject. It offers a map or charter of what a second House should be doing in the next century. There are details in it I think are slightly daft, but it also has a number of good ideas. It is worthy of the fullest debate by this House, but I suspect it is not an issue exercising the minds of the electorate at present and will probably have to await the autumn.
Senator Mary Kelly raised an interesting point about the flying of flags on public buildings. Perhaps we do not fly the flag on a sufficient number of them. There is something very fine about the national flag flying on a good public building but something awful about a dirty, soiled and grubby national flag flying outside a hotel or private building. People frequently fly the flag in a way which brings it into disrepute.
All parties join in Senator O'Kennedy's tribute to the SDLP. Over the years it has fought the hard fight, sustained the heat of battle and has some of the finest people we have ever met. Our good wishes go to them, as they do to all parties which stand for peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland.
Senator Townsend asked about the Irish Life dispute. All parties would like to see a prompt resolution as it has gone on for too long.