Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 17 Dec 1998

Vol. 157 No. 17

Child Abduction: Statements.

Like every other Member of the Oireachtas, I am concerned at the number of reports which have been recently made to the Garda concerning approaches being made to children by strangers while they were out playing or going to and from school. It is a sad reflection on the society in which we live. While we must not fall prey to hysteria, we must take these reports very seriously and we must put the safety of children first.

I have been informed by the Garda authorities that informal protocols exist between them and police forces in other jurisdictions with regard to the notification on arrival of convicted child abusers. I am also informed by the Garda authorities that the gardaí are taking each of these reports seriously, and that each of the incidents is being thoroughly investigated. While I am aware of speculation in the media concerning the reports, it is not the practice of the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform to comment in detail on any specific investigation except in the most exceptional of circumstances. All I propose to say in this case is I understand that the Garda investigations are at too early a stage for any concrete conclusions to be drawn as to the identity of the persons responsible. I am sure the House would agree with me that nothing should be said or done at this early stage which may have the effect of prejudicing the outcome of an ongoing Garda inquiry and neither would any of us want to compromise Garda operational initiatives. The gardaí must be given room to do their work.

Consequent on the need to raise public awareness to this problem, the Garda Press Office issued, on 11 December, a press release in relation to personal safety for children and young people. The press release reminded parents that with the long dark evenings and the approach of the school holidays, they should talk to their children about personal safety. In particular, parents should know the whereabouts of their children at all times, and try to avoid putting their children in a position where they have to wait alone outside school for collection. The gardaí also recommend that children should be reminded about their personal safety and be told specifically not to approach strangers in cars while travelling to or from school or while out playing; not to play alone or become isolated from other friends; to wear bright reflective clothing during the hours of darkness and, importantly, not to take sweets, lifts or talk to strangers without their parents consent.

I am aware that the Department of Education and Science has developed a range of programmes dealing with aspects of social and personal safety which form part of the ordinary curriculum in primary and post-primary schools. One such programme of which I am aware is the Stay Safe programme, which is taught in a number of primary schools.

I am sure the House will agree that every community should be vigilant and keep an eye on its children's safety. In terms of sharing community knowledge and in raising awareness, schemes such as Neighbourhood Watch and Community Alert can play an important role in this regard in relation to the sightings of persons acting suspiciously.

In the case of serious assaults of a sexual nature against children, the House will be aware that I published a discussion paper earlier this year on the law of sexual offences which includes a chapter on the sexual abuse of children. I am currently considering submissions on this document and I assure the House that this is an issue which the Government treats most seriously. My intention is to bring forward a set of comprehensive criminal law reform proposals in this area.

I have already indicated my intention to establish a register of sexual offenders to complement the existing recording arrangements in place by the gardaí. I have received a considerable number of submissions as to the nature of this register, for example, some would favour a register containing details of all sex offenders, others believe that the register should be confined to details of those convicted of paedophile type offences. I am carefully considering all the options in this respect before coming to a decision on the final shape of the register. The operation of the register raises very complex issues. Given that we have a written Constitution we may not have the same flexibility that other jurisdictions had in introducing a register.

We must realise, however, that this is a very difficult area for policing alone to address. We know that crimes committed by paedophiles are considered by society to be, perhaps, the most heinous of ail. Many consider this type of sex offender to be beyond redemption and research shows that recidivism rates for paedophiles are high. Paedophilia is a condition which predisposes individuals to have sexual desire towards children. There will, no doubt, be some paedophiles who have never committed a crime and who may be receiving some form of treatment for their condition but who have not come to the attention of the gardaí. The State's response to the serious problem of sex offending must be workable, legally and constitutionally sustainable while at the same time offering the best possible protection to children.

All convicted sex offenders who are in custody are encouraged and invited to apply to participate in the sex offender treatment programme in Arbour Hill Prison. Those who apply are considered by the treatment team but not all are found to be suitable. There are currently ten offenders undergoing this treatment and a further 26 are awaiting inclusion. While offenders who have completed their sentence cannot be compelled to accept supervision from the Probation and Welfare Service on release, there are almost 100 sex offenders now under mandatory supervision by the Probation and Welfare Service on foot of court orders. In the meantime I assure the House that any reports of attempted abductions are taken very seriously by the Garda Síochána.

I thank the Minister for attending the House. He has a busy schedule. I agree with him that to be constructive with regard to the problem of child abduction we need light and not heat in discussing the subject generally. It is difficult not to become emotive about this subject, but we do not necessarily do a service to the children of the country if we cannot debate it rationally. That is what we should try to do in this debate.

Headlines in recent newspaper reports saying that gardaí now believe that the 39 abduction attempts over the past ten weeks are related are startling. These have been mainly concentrated in the north County Kildare and west Dublin areas, with further reports from Portlaoise and Kilkenny. There is a serious message here.

I understand the gardaí have handed over their investigations to the detectives involved in Operation Trace, the detective unit involved in searching for women missing for some time in the southeast area, with inconclusive files still sitting on some desks.

I listened to what the Minister said in the Dáil in response to questions raised by Deputy Fitzgerald. I am concerned that we are too slow in our response to what must have been anticipated. With the establishment of a register of sexual offenders in Britain it should have been seen — I suggest it was seen — that, given that we share the same language and similar backgrounds, many of the paedophiles on that register would travel here where they would continue their heinous crimes. Given also that they could not move without their movements being tagged by the British police, they have travelled here in the belief that they will have greater freedom to continue preying on unsuspecting children.

When Britain established its register of sexual offenders we should have moved immediately and not waited until the British criminals and paedophiles travelled here where they are now, according to certain reports, trying to wreak havoc in certain parts.

I accept there are different parameters because of our written Constitution. However, given the Freedom of Information Act and the need to service public demands, any convicted paedophile who has not practised or responded to what would be termed a deviation in sexual orientation — I believe anything involving children is a deviation — do not concern us in this debate. We are concerned with active paedophiles who intend to abuse our children sexually and who have apparently attempted to abduct up to 39 children in ten weeks.

I understand they are all from Britain, although they have not been identified. There is a notorious criminal — whom I will not name because I do not wish to prejudice any court case that may arise in the future — who is allegedly living in the north County Kildare area and is signing on for unemployment assistance. He has been named in the media recently. The Garda Síochána have a bead on him but they cannot arrest him or question him until he commits a crime. We will have to wait until a child is sexually abused by a paedophile before the Garda can pick him up.

The Minister is doing too little too late. We need a register of paedophiles, perhaps one of all sex offenders. The Minister has yet to decide whether the register will cover all sex offenders or just paedophiles. Why have we waited until the problem arrived here before we made a move? Was the signal from the British authorities not sufficient? Was it not obvious that once they had established their register of sex offenders the problem would be transferred to this country and those criminals would jump ship and enter our jurisdiction where they can move with impunity and freedom until they commit an offence? At the moment some of the worst criminals who have committed the most horrific offences across the Irish Sea are roaming our country. How long will it take the Minister to establish the wherewithal to put this register in place? Can he instruct the Garda to put the structure and network in place, even pending possible legislation? Can he also confirm whether legislation is required to set up the register? The network and structures can be put in place now and I am sure he will get full co-operation from all sides of this House and Dáil Éireann in establishing and passing any legislation that he may need in this area. There would be no difficulty in recalling the Dáil in the first weeks of January if he would like to move on this issue as quickly as possible.

We have waited until the problem has become apparent and now it is all systems go. Why did we not move on this issue once the British established the necessity for a register, when it was obvious what the results of their register would be and the threat it would pose to Irish children? It is a very simple equation to be able to indicate that those offenders would leave the British jurisdiction because time caught up with them and they were identified on the register, and come here to abuse our children.

A special unit is being set up to investigate a suspected Irish paedophile ring. Can the Minister say whether the Garda have confirmed that a paedophile ring exists or are these individuals sole traders in terms of their criminal activities and their predatory activities against our children? How many British paedophiles are known to the Garda to be here evading the British register? How many of the abduction attempts that occurred over the past ten weeks are associated with Irish paedophiles? Can we also have details of the special unit being set up? Will it be different to "Operation Trace" or will it take on the onerous task of monitoring the recent attempted abductions?

The Minister has repeated what he said in the Dáil with regard to the stay safe codes our children are taught in school. At the moment children and young teenagers should not be allowed out on their own. This security measure places a huge burden on many parents but it should be carried until we know the extent of the problem and the Garda have the ability to apprehend suspected paedophiles who are preying on our children rather than having to wait until a crime has been committed. We have to underline this message and say it is not safe for any child to be out on his own. I would go further and say no one should walk alone in isolated areas. This is a particularly difficult situation for women who may, in some cases, find it harder to defend themselves and might be prey to sexual deviants other than paedophiles.

Established values and certainties that existed for generations have gone. We are now examining those certainties to see if they were the cause of the sexual abuse that appears to be so prevalent today. Much of the sexual abuse reported today is historic. It is only when people reach adulthood and have received counselling that they have the courage and strength to come forward and point the finger at their abusers. It is only when our courts have finally caught up with those abusers — and in most cases convicted them — that they have got their due. Unfortunately it is a case of too little and often too late because so many lives are destroyed by sexual abuse. Sexual abuse means a destroyed life. All the counselling in the world cannot put all the pieces together. Some people manage to cope but whether it is in childhood or in young adulthood that sexual abuse takes place a life is destroyed and a person's entitlement to happiness is stolen from them, particularly with regard to the joy of sexuality, mature sexuality and all that goes with consenting adults in relation to this area.

I am not sure why abuse seems so prevalent at the moment. Perhaps it is the historic number of cases that are before us. What set of values or code of conduct has resulted? Was there sexual repression here? Why are so many scandals reported in the media today? Is the rate of occurrence as bad today? In five, ten or 15 years time when we look back at these so called more liberal or enlightened times will we have the same number of abuse cases going through our courts? Is it an historic problem which we have finally lifted the lid on and had the courage to confront?

It is too early to say whether the changed values of today are good or bad. They are different values because the certainties are no longer in place but I am not sure what has replaced them. What we thought were values by which people could live and where our women, children and young boys were safe over the years, turned out not to be safe in all circumstances.

With regard to abuse in the Church, it pains me to say it appears that the celibate Catholic Church committed the greater number of abuses in the past. Teachers were also abusers. When we look at the abuse of power by people in authority with regard to children and young teenagers one wonders how we can teach values to young children. What is the correct message to give youngsters today? Sometimes parents despair with the removal of the certainties of the past, more liberal times and electronic communication and communication from all over the world giving conflicting messages in terms of morality and codes of ethics. What is the correct message? Was the past correct with the historic abuse that is being revealed now? Is greater freedom an honesty even if we have a different set of values today? Is that healthier? I do not have the answer I am simply posing these questions. This is a time of uncertainty and it is difficult for many parents and young people here to make the decisions and choices necessary by which to live their lives.

The Minister does not have an easy job, particularly in handling this issue. I am concerned about his tardiness in moving on the sex offenders register even though he has now assured us it will be put in place. He will have the full co-operation of this House in passing any legislation needed to get this register up and running. I would appreciate if he could respond in detail.

I thank the Minister for coming here today. I would appreciate if he would respond in detail on the special unit that has been put in place, the terms of reference of this special unit and whether we need to give any final messages, bearing in mind that we need light, not heat, on this subject, over the next weeks and months until we come to terms with the British paedophiles who have fled that jurisdiction to prey on our children. It is bad enough to have our own problems without being seen as a safe haven for paedophiles from other jurisdictions. We need answers from the Minister in this regard. Many people want assurances that everything possible is being done to deal with this problem.

Cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire. I called for this debate. I did not do so lightly; I gave the matter some consideration before I raised it in this House. I do not recall a situation whereby in a matter of weeks there were 39 reported cases of attempted child abduction. Today I spoke to two garda superintendents, one in my own town of Mullingar where there was an attempted abduction of a young girl a week or ten days ago. Two men in a car were involved in the incident which took place in Grange, near the gaelscoil. As the crow flies, I could throw a stone to the location from where I live.

Today I contacted the superintendent of the Garda Síochána in Cavan town. I regret that the figure contained in a report pertaining to the number of attempted abductions has now risen by another one. There was an attempted abduction of two young sisters, aged seven and nine, by a man in Cavan town, in close proximity to Saint Clare's national school. This occurred at approximately 3 p.m. yesterday. Thank God, a little seven year old came to the defence of her sister and walloped the attacker with her school bag. The attacker lost his nerve and fled because of the loud cries of the child. This attack occurred in the middle of the day in an urban area. This is a very serious problem. This is the stuff of which nightmares are made, especially as it pertains to parents and concerned members of society.

I am very concerned that a number of known paedophiles from Britain are living in this country. I refer to the individual mentioned by Senator Doyle. It is suspected that this individual has committed at least one murder. I do not want to be alarmist, but it worries me when I read reports of 39 or 40 cases of attempted child abduction in two months. I am speaking primarily as a parent of a fourteen and a half year old daughter. I shudder to think what would happen if that child, or anyone else's child, failed to return from school from an errand or from playing with friends. I do not think we can over-state the situation with which we are confronted. I am aware of abductions which are referred to as "tug of love" incidents between two estranged partners. In these cases perhaps the husband attempts to take forcibly the children of a particular union, or vice versa.

Recent reports of attempted child abductions in various parts of the country have given rise to fears about the existence of a paedophile ring. There is as yet no concrete evidence of such a ring. However, the gardaí have been sufficiently alarmed to issue a warning to parents regarding the number of incidents that have taken place in the past couple of months. Up until recently, child abduction was not a great problem in this country. It is a particular problem in the United States and elsewhere. Nonetheless it is a matter of concern, with 99 cases involving 164 children, representing an increase of approximately 14 per cent on 1996, being abducted last year. That figure has now increased. We are fortunate in having relatively few missing children compared to the United States, where more than 360,000 children are reported missing every year. Most abductions are a result of "tug of love" incidents, involving holiday romances in Mediterranean and African countries where it can be extremely difficult to get local police and the relevant authorities to treat cases seriously.

The fact that the Government has introduced the Protection of Children (Hague Convention) Bill demonstrates its commitment to protect children in such situations, particularly in abduction incidents when they are taken to another country. The Bill currently before the Dáil provides for children to be returned to their country of residence, where matters of custody and access can be settled by local courts. This will better protect children under easily identifiable rules of private international law.

Everyone will be aware of the Dutroux case in Belgium. This brought into focus the horrors of the abduction of children for sexual gratification and exploitation. The Protection of Children (Hague Convention) Bill will give a degree of extra protection to children, but the primary responsibility in this regard lies with parents. The Garda, in issuing its statement of warning to parents, emphasised how vital it is for them to be vigilant and to ensure their children are educated not to associate with strangers, nor travel to or from school, or on errands, by themselves. This country was known as the island of saints and scholars in bygone days. It is terrible that we now could make the opposite comment. I agree with Senator Doyle that men, women and children are no longer safe on the streets, roads and lanes. Society must be protected. The Minister, who is very pro-active, must take the necessary steps to ensure that society is protected, especially children and women. My views on attacks on old people are already on record, so I will not repeat them.

The Minister has been assured by the Garda that the force is taking the reports of attempted child abduction very seriously. However, there is no evidence to suggest that a paedophile ring is in operation. The current situation underlines the importance of such programmes run by the Department of Education and Science, such as "Stay Safe", which is taught in primary schools. It is imperative that local communities watch their children and that neighbourhood schemes such as the Neighbourhood Watch and Community Alert scheme are utilised to alert the gardaí where persons are acting suspiciously.

It is interesting to note that in all the cases reported recently, not one car registration has been taken. I know it is very difficult for a child to have the presence of mind to do this when they are approached by a potential attacker and when the person loses their nerve and jumps into their car and goes, but the child nevertheless should be instructed both at home and in school to endeavour, in so far as possible, to take the registration, the make and colour of the car. The Minister has published a discussion paper on sexual offences which, among other things, addresses the issue of sexual offences against children. He is currently considering a wide range of submissions from which a comprehensive set of criminal law proposals will be formulated. I earnestly look forward to that.

This current situation is again focused on the need for a register of sex offenders. The Minister has stated categorically that it is official policy to introduce a register but only after due consideration and in a way which is the most workable and effective, and "effective" is the operative word here. The Minister in response to a Private Members' Bill introduced in the other House some time ago indicated that this was being examined as a matter of priority. A wide range of proposals are being made on this issue from interested parties, which has highlighted this highly complex and difficult area.

I believe the Minister will bring forward very soon the register which will serve the purpose for which it is being created — the protection of our children from the vile desire of paedophiles, whether they come from across the water or are home grown. There can be no hiding place for those people. I pledge with the Minister to take any steps necessary to ensure the protection of children. I am delighted that the Fine Gael Party will support the Minister in a very positive way and I look forward to his proposals and response to my comments.

In conclusion may I say as a parent I am deeply disturbed about this situation. I know the gardaí are stretched to the limit and are trying to do their best, but there could be a Garda presence around secondary schools when children are returning home, especially at this time of year to ensure a safe journey home.

I want to thank the Minister for coming into the House and the Leader for providing time for this debate. It is one of the most important issues that has been raised for some time.

It is a very sad day for our society that we have to discuss a topic such as child abduction and the attempted child abductions in the last couple of weeks. Such a debate is extremely important so that scaremongering does not take place. We should at least make the public more aware of the facts. One never really thinks about an issue like this until it affects your own area. In my area yesterday local radio was taken over by the news of an attempted child abduction in County Cavan. In that case public awareness both of the parents and children is most important. I must compliment teachers who have introduced the Stay Safe programme in the primary schools as part of the curriculum. There is no doubt that the teaching of such a programme was beneficial to the two little girls involved in the attempted abduction because, despite their ordeal, they were both able to give a very indepth description of the person. They may not be very specific details but when you consider their ordeal, they must be highly commended for their bravery. Teachers now have the added strain of ensuring the safety of the children under their care until the parents collect them after school.

I agree with some of the sentiments expressed by Senator Doyle regarding sex offenders from the United Kingdom. In my view sex offenders are similar to drug pushers in the sense that if they are not welcomed in one area, they move to another area. Of course the natural move for a number of these sex offenders from the United Kingdom was to travel to Ireland. I give my full support to the Minister in drawing up a register of sex offenders because it is the only effective way to control these individuals in the long term. Over the coming weeks it is important that we continue our public awareness campaign, perhaps by using the media, to enlighten parents and children of these dangers until we get a programme in place.

I thank Senator Glynn for his contribution and I am glad to be able to share my views on this issue because anyone who is vulnerable, be it the elderly or children, has a profound effect on each of us. I do not envy the Minister his job but I hope our sentiments and the sentiments expressed in the other House will prove that action is needed as soon as possible. I hope that in the coming months we will be able to draw up a register of sex offenders. There are no words to describe these individuals. You could not call them people. Whatever it takes to apprehend or identify them, we must do everything in our power to protect our children and the future generation.

I know from experience that we have come a long way. At least we are now talking about issues like this. As a midwife — Senator Henry will know the hospital to which I am referring — on night duty I was instructed to guard the room where a child abduction was supposedly going to take place and prevent anybody entering. I do not know what I, a student midwife, could have done to prevent that happening but unfortunately, that was the amount of knowledge which any of us had. Thankfully in a number of hospitals video cameras are now installed. However, the case I mentioned happened only about five or six years ago. As I said, we have progressed in the sense that we now acknowledge there is a problem. Thankfully no abduction took place but who is to say it will not happen at some stage in the future, be it in maternity hospitals or outside schools.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for the opportunity to contribute to this debate and I wish the Minister luck in his endeavours.

I sympathise with Senator Leonard when she was given such instructions because, while it was only a few years ago, our thoughts were far more parochial. Fewer strangers came into hospitals and there was less risk of abduction of small children. When one sees the cases that occur in Britain, it is miraculous that there has only been one case in an Irish maternity hospital in the past few years.

It is terrible that we must pay such attention to the abduction of small children. However, it is important to remember that if a register of sex offenders is compiled it will not consist of strangers' names but of those of our neighbours. Unfortunately, children are nearly always attacked by people they know. The biggest problem in this country is incest. I do not look forward to such a register containing the names of incest offenders because they are the parents of the victims. It is an extremely sensitive issue so we must be careful. Will we just include the names of molesters who are strangers to the children? Will we include the neighbours and the parents? This is not an easy solution to a dreadful problem.

I am glad the Minister paid so much attention to this in the discussion document. There is a full chapter on the sexual abuse of children. Dreadful cases come before the courts each day. The lack of remorse in many of them is most depressing. It is important to remember that of the 100 sexual abusers in the Curragh, none is receiving treatment.

Ten of them are.

The Minister cannot make them have treatment; they must be willing to become involved in programmes. I understand that the response of those who become involved is quite good. It takes some time for many of them to see the error of their ways. I remember one man saying "but she enjoyed it". The court did not take the same view when the case came before it. It is a serious problem and I am delighted the Minister is giving it such careful attention.

Several speakers have mentioned teachers. It is most important that the stay safe programme is implemented in schools. Teachers usually have a good idea when something is going wrong for a child and if they see odd reactions to parts of the programme it can be most important.

As I have said on previous occasions, when we established the sexual assault unit in the Rotunda Hospital we thought we would be attending to victims of adult rape. However, within the first six weeks the unit was flooded with children under 14 years of age who were brought in by teachers. There was nowhere else to bring them. Temple Street Hospital and Our Lady's Hospital in Crumlin now have extremely busy units for children who are victims of sexual abuse.

We must also be careful to deal with the possibility of false accusations. A friend of mine, Fr. Shay Cullen, has been accused in the Philippines of raping a seven year old child whom he had taken into his care. I have known Shay for a long time and it was interesting to hear the equanimity with which he spoke on the radio recently. He said he was sure the case would be dropped because he had had to deal with this type of occurrence previously.

We must be careful to prevent hysteria being generated whereby people who are in positions of responsibility for children are falsely accused. That would be very sad. I am sure Members of the House will join me in hoping Fr. Cullen's situation in the Philippines will be resolved as soon as possible. He has done unbelievable work in that country over the past 20 years. Whatever level of child prostitution exists in this country it cannot compare with the levels that exist in the Philippines, Thailand, Kenya, Brazil and many other countries. Unfortunately, the list is long. I am sure the other Members share my concern about Fr. Cullen.

The Minister is having a long session in the Upper House this afternoon. I compliment my colleague, Senator Glynn, for taking the initiative in seeking this debate.

I must agree with the Minister's opening comments about the possibility of a hysterical reaction to reports such as that issued by the Garda Síochána. It is an unprecedented departure by the Garda to issue such a statement. I cannot remember any other occasion on which the organisation spoke out so forcefully and in such detail about an issue that is so sensitive for parents, society and for the Minister who has responsibility in this area.

Presumably, the statement is evidence of a real concern on the part of the Garda that this issue is now firmly on the agenda of its operational activities. I accept that due to the operational requirements of the Garda Síochána the Minister cannot offer details about the statement or the reason for it. We must take it at face value.

This problem is an indication of the breakdown of many of society's social mores. There is probably not a town or village in the country where some parents — I use the term advisedly — have not acted in a most irresponsible manner towards their children. On some occasions they probably have no idea where their children are. They might leave notes for children when they come home from school telling them to buy their evening meal in the local chip shop because the father is in the pub and the mother is gone off to play bingo. I have no wish to exaggerate that phenomenon but it must be a factor in this problem.

The glue that held society together for so many generations and the sense of family, which was so important in ensuring that members of families always knew the whereabouts of other family members, have broken down, especially in the urban environment in which many of us are now rearing families. That must also be a consideration. How does one address it? The Minister referred to one option, the initiatives being undertaken by his colleague, the Minister for Education and Science, in education and awareness.

Senator Glynn quoted statistics for the number of missing children in the United States — the total is about 300,000. Visitors to diners, restaurants or filling stations in the US will be familiar with the sight of photographs at these places of missing children. Beneath the photograph is the plea "have you seen this child?" People are also invited to make a donation to a national association which is attempting to find missing children, many of whom are abducted. Although the scale of the problem in America is huge, the numbers quoted by the Garda Síochána for Ireland are proportionately high.

The Minister will be aware that about nine months ago I accompanied a group of people who came to a meeting with him to propose the establishment of a missing persons bureau. The Minister has his own views on this matter. He quoted the statistics that were then available and pointed out that the vast majority of missing persons return within a year. Is he inclined to revisit that matter or is he satisfied with the current position? It is not directly related to the subject of this debate but it is a consequence of it. Is he satisfied that the structures in place to trace missing children and persons are adequate?

There are root causes of this problem. They include the increase in the number of parentless children and the role of the television, Nintendo 64 or Sony Playstation in replacing family and community involvement and the interaction between parents and their children. This means that children now receive much of their information from the television. Not all of it is the sort of thing to which we, as children, would ever have been allowed access. There is a need to look at regulation of this area.

The Minister will be aware that I have an obsession about amending the Video Recordings Act, 1994, specifically as it relates to video games which depict, in some instances, graphic violence. Children as young as six are being exposed to Japanese games such as "Mortal Combat" where simulated blood is seen gushing from severed limbs. That is not acceptable in any civilised society, yet the industry has been allowed to regulate itself.

It is now time, in light of the experience of recent years and the increase in child abductions, to examine the link with the images on our television and cinema screens. Censorship is for the common good but it is strange that a Brendan Grace comedy video must be submitted to the film censor for classification while a video game such as "Mortal Combat" can be sold with a sticker on it, which falls off in many cases, classifying it as for over 18s and yet being used by six and eight year olds. In case the House thinks I am exaggerating, the six and eight year olds in question are my own sons. When I went back to the shop and questioned them, they told me there was a sticker on the video. When I then pointed out that there was no sticker on it, they said that it must have fallen off. That is why I have a bee in my bonnet about this.

The House appreciates that the volume of legislation which has emanated from St. Stephen's Green since the Minister, Deputy O'Donoghue, entered office is such that it is difficult to place in the order of priorities one amendment to an existing Act. I know that and I am not criticising, I am trying to raise awareness of this issue so that something might be done about it.

I would be interested to know what measures are being taken to deal with violence and paedophilia on the Internet. Is the Garda involved with its colleagues in other parts of the world in the way in which the Minister has outlined it is regarding paedophilia generally? Internet pornography must be addressed. How to address it is exercising the minds of police forces all over the world and there seems to have been some success through pooling information. As can be seen on a regular basis in the newspapers, arrests are made of those peddling pornography on the Internet. The most recent case was in Sweden where a father was using his six year old daughter for graphic scenes which he then peddled on the Internet. The depths of depravity to which these people will lower themselves is beyond comprehension. It gives an indication of the evil and malevolence behind the mentality of people who use children for pornography.

Will the Minister consider running a series of television commercials aimed specifically at children to alert them to many of the points which he has outlined and which the Garda has publicised? A picture is worth a thousand words so it might be a worthwhile exercise to mount such a campaign on television.

I thank Senators who have contributed to what I regard as a very important debate. This is an area to which I have been giving attention for some time. In Opposition I put forward two Bills dealing with this area, one of which, dealing with the reportage of incest proceedings, was taken by the then Minister for Justice in this House to form the substance of the Criminal Law (Incest Proceedings) Bill, 1996. It was of considerable assistance at that time regarding attendance by health board officials and media reportage of the details of evidence in such cases.

The other Bill which I put forward, and which was accepted by the Government, was the Criminal Law (Sexual Jurisdiction) Bill, 1996. That legislation provides for the trial in this State of an individual who commits an offence of paedophilia in another jurisdiction, much the same as the Criminal Law (Jurisdiction) Act does for certain offences committed in the North or South, whereby offences can be tried in the different jurisdictions although the offence was not committed there.

I recently passed the Child Pornography Act which is regarded internationally as a model Act. It is excellent legislation which deals with the whole question of child pornography, its possession, dissemination and trafficking. It is an important contribution to our criminal law.

Senator Mooney requested that we examine the Internet. There is an expert group currently doing precisely that. I am of the view that action is required.

With regard to the problem which has been discussed here this evening, I agree that we do not want to create hysteria. Nonetheless, it is important that parents are vigilant. I understand that there have been over 40 reports to the Garda Síochána of attempted child abductions in recent times. That, of course, gives rise to concern.

The objective in my publishing the discussion paper on sexual offences was to generate discussion which is desirable in changing our criminal legislation fundamentally in the area of sexual offences. I have been heartened by the submissions which we have received and many of those contributions are quite enlightening. Indeed, some of the contributions made by Members of both Houses have been very enlightening and extremely helpful. As Senator Henry eloquently pointed out, formulating a register of sexual offenders or paedophiles is not a simple matter. It is very difficult. We have a written Constitution and there also other difficulties. The millions of questions that arise in connection with the formulation of a register must be answered and cogent reasons must be given for those answers before we proceed. We must first address the fundamental question of whether the register should be one of sexual offenders or one of only paedophiles. Having addressed that question, we must decide who should be on the register, how long a person's name should remain on it, who should have access to it and who should hold it. These are all important questions that impinge seriously on the matter.

In reply to Senator Avril Doyle's question, we must know the kind of register we will have before stating definitively whether legislation is required. An educated guess might be that legislation would be required. As I have stated, I am concerned about the problem.

Of course one would be concerned about the possibility of foreign paedophiles arriving on our shores when we have a common travel area with another country. In that respect, and in respect of a register generally, I am sending officials from my Department to Great Britain to discuss the issue of the register and to learn from any problems which have arisen there. I know they have had difficulties. In addition, I want to discuss with officials in Great Britain the matter of tracking paedophiles from one jurisdiction to the other. I stated earlier that there is an arrangement whereby information is given to Garda authorities.

The matter of treatment is important. There are ten places available in Arbour Hill prison. It is true that there are currently no treatment places in the Curragh, but I am examining the possibility of providing places there. Any sex offender will receive treatment in an Irish prison, Arbour Hill, before his release, provided he volunteers for the treatment and — this is very important — he is a suitable candidate for treatment. Experts in this area have expressed the view on more than one occasion that compulsory treatment is not effective. I intend to examine the matter of providing additional treatment places in the future, probably in the Curragh.

When discussing this issue, it is important to state that the breach of any fiduciary relationship is serious, whether it be a breach of trust by a parent towards a child in an incest case or by a member of the clergy or a teacher towards a child. However, it is equally important to state that the percentage of clergy who have been convicted of or involved in child abuse is very low. This is not stressed as often as it should be. The majority of priests and brothers have made an enormous contribution to Irish life. It is important to make that point as it is often not recognised. Rather than being child abusers, the clergy have often enhanced the lives of countless thousands of young Irish boys and girls. That is not to say there have not been clergy members involved in paedophilia. However, the majority of them have given enormous service to the Irish people. It is important the same is said of teachers, because it is the truth. It might not be a sensational truth, but it is still the truth.

The Garda Síochána is thoroughly investigating each report it receives and will continue to do so.

Is that a special unit of the Garda or just generally?

The Garda Síochána is dealing with this and obviously I leave the decision on how this should be operationally handled to the commissioner of the Garda Síochána, as is my obligation.

I trust my contribution has been of some assistance. I intend to press ahead with the formulation of a register. I will try to come to a reasoned decision as soon as possible. When I have done so, I will advise the Houses.

The statements are concluded. When is it proposed to sit again?

I thank the Minister for coming to the House and speaking to us on this important matter. It is proposed the House will sit at 10.30 a.m. on Friday, 18 December 1998.

Top
Share