I commend to this House the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse Bill, 2000, which provides for the establishment, on a statutory basis, of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse. As Irish society enjoys the benefits of a thriving economy and the Irish, as a people, feel a new and stronger sense of confidence, as Irish culture thrives at home and internationally and as Ireland participates as an equal partner with our European neighbours, it is difficult for many, and some do not want to do so, to recall our not so distant past and its failures. High among those failures is the abuse of some of the most vulnerable in our society – children com mitted to institutions for their care and protection. That abuse occurred cannot be doubted and it has been determined by the criminal courts. We do not yet know with any certainty the extent, causes, circumstances and where responsibility for it should lie.
The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse Bill is intended to provide answers to those questions. More importantly, however, than that important objective is the objective of the commission to give those abused an opportunity to tell of that abuse in a dignified and sympathetic forum and to be heard by an experienced panel of people, specifically mandated by the representatives of the Irish people, the Houses of the Oireachtas, for that purpose.
When the commission has reported and been wound up, that will not be the end of the matter. There will continue to be a need to help those injured by abuse, for Irish society to come to terms with a part of our past we may prefer to forget and a solemn duty on all to play their part in ensuring that never again can children be exposed to hurt as they have in the past.
While a central element of the work of the commission will be to provide a forum for victims of abuse, it is essential that the commission has and is seen to have, a wider remit. That remit will include establishing all the circumstances relating to the operation of institutions covered by the Bill and their interaction with children and Irish society. It is necessary for a proper understanding of what occurred in institutions that they are placed as far as is practicable in the context of their time. This will involve reviewing the administrative and legislative framework within which industrial schools, reformatory schools and other institutions operated. It will involve appraisal of the systems of funding, supervision and regulation and is likely to involve consideration of the attitudes to children and child welfare predominant in Ireland during the period of the commission's inquiries.
While abuse and poor conditions have lately received most attention, and quite rightly have been condemned, that is unlikely to be the full story of institutional care. Many children found a place of refuge and safety in hard times in orphanages, reformatories or industrial schools and were well cared for. The commission must be told this story too and those who dedicated much of their lives to the care and education of children must be encouraged to come forward to the commission, if we are to reach anything close to a full understanding of what went wrong where abuse did occur. The commission report must be both comprehensive and balanced in all of its aspects, and this legislation will provide for such a balanced report.
The establishment of the commission on an administrative basis has been done previously. In preparing this legislation, the Government has sought to ensure objectivity in determining the terms of reference and the powers needed. The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse, chaired by the Honourable Ms Justice Mary Laffoy, was established by the Government on an administrative basis last May. The first task of this commission was to consider and make recommendations on broad terms of reference, as set out by the Government, and to recommend the powers it would need to fulfil such terms of reference.
The commission set out its findings in two reports to the Government in September and October of last year. These reports have been published. The recommendations of the commission's reports have been accepted without reservation by the Government. This Bill closely follows the recommendations in the report. From the beginning, this commission has been independent of the Government and will continue to be so throughout its operation.
The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse, now to be established in law, will have three primary functions: first, to listen to victims of childhood abuse who want to recount their experiences to a sympathetic forum; second, to investigate fully all allegations of abuse made to it, except where the victim does not wish for an investigation; and third, to publish a report on its findings to the general public.
In setting out the terms of reference for the commission, the Government placed no restrictions on the categories of abuse to be covered, either as regards the nature of abuse or the location at which it occurred. The commission recommended that all situations other than abuse in family settings be included in its remit. In the commission's view including abuse in families would potentially overwhelm cases of institutional abuse, but more importantly they felt that the kinds of issues which arise in abusive family situations are quite different from the issues arising in institutional abuse. They concluded that if abuse in families was included in the remit of the commission it could detrimentally affect the therapeutic benefit of the commission for victims of abuse in institutions. The commission has reached a reasonable conclusion in all the circumstances and the Government has acted on its recommendations.
The Bill now covers the following categories of abuse – sexual abuse, defined in very broad terms, physical abuse, involving the negligent, wilful or reckless infliction of physical injury on a child, or failure to prevent such injury to a child, failure to care for a child which results in serious impairment of his or her physical or mental development or behaviour and any other act or failure to act which seriously injures a child. In the course of the debate in the other House, Members proposed that additional terms such as pain, distress and fear be specifically included in the definition of abuse. It is preferable that the Bill should be as broad and general as possible rather than seek to list each kind of abuse in detail. The latter course could result in limiting the scope of the commission, rather than extending it as was the intention of the proposers of those amendments.
Some concern was also expressed as to whether the terms of reference of the commission, as set out in the Bill, are sufficiently broad to meet all situations where abuse may have occurred. For example, abuse may have occurred while a child, although in the care of an institution, was not actually in the institution. Many children would, for example, have spent time working on farms. Another example cited was a situation where a child may have been abused by a person not directly employed by an institution but who had access to the institution. The Bill was amended to meet those concerns where there was any doubt.
For the benefit of Members of this House, I want to clarify the position as it now stands. The Bill now provides for inquiring into abuse in the following circumstances: first, any abuse of a person resident in or attending an institution which occurred in the institution, whoever the abuser was – in other words, if the abuser was a visitor, a member of staff or any other person; second, abuse of a person outside the institution while the victim was resident in or attending the institution by a person involved in the operation of the institution or associated in any way with the institution.
A key objective of this Bill is to provide for the needs of those who have suffered abuse in industrial schools, reformatory schools, orphanages and similar places. For too long they have encountered opposition, hostility and indifference and it is high time that this changed. The commission to be established under the Bill will, as its core function, provide those who have been silenced for so long with an opportunity to give their account to an experienced and sympathetic forum. This telling and listening function, which is the therapeutic function of the commission, is the function to which everything else should be subordinated.
For some people, this therapeutic role will be all that they require of the commission, while others will also seek that their allegations be inquired into and perpetrators of abuse, where uncovered, be held accountable. In this case the therapeutic role will be complemented by an investigative role in the interests of establishing the truth and giving persons against whom allegations are made an opportunity to defend themselves.
To ensure that the two strands can be accommodated, the Bill provides for two committees – the confidential committee, which will provide a forum where people can recount their experiences on an entirely confidential basis, and the investigation committee. The latter committee will be specifically mandated to carry out a thorough and comprehensive inquiry into allegations and to establish responsibility at the level of the individual abuser, the institution and the management and regulatory authorities. It is the Government's intention that the committee will have available to it the resources and all the legal pow ers and protections it needs to do this. In particular the committee will have the kind of powers and protections which a court would have, including privilege for witnesses, compellability of witnesses, discovery of documents, taking evidence on oath and offences for failure to co-operate or for obstruction. This committee will also report to the commission.
The commission has a duty to publish a report within two years of its establishment and an interim report within 12 months. Members in the Dáil requested the inclusion of a clause requiring an interim report within 12 months. The commission is free to produce any interim reports it wishes, but an interim report will be required within 12 months. The publication of this report, containing the findings and recommendations of the commission, is an essential part of the service which the commission can render to victims of abuse and to our society as a whole.
The legislation provides that the report contain recommendations and specific findings. The commission will make recommendations in their report on how the effects of abuse suffered by individuals might be alleviated. They will also make recommendations on how future abuse can be reduced and prevented and how children can be protected. Senators should note that in the matter of recommendations the Bill provides the commission with absolute discretion. There are no areas denied to it, administrative, legislative or otherwise. This approach is an essential ingredient of the independence of the commission. Having heard the evidence from people alleging abuse and those accused of abuse, from other former residents of institutions, from those employed in institutions and those involved in management, from Government Departments and other public bodies, from experts in such areas as child care, sociology, psychology or history and from witnesses with an international perspective, the commission is in the best possible position to decide where it should make conclusions and recommendations within the very broad parameters laid down in the Bill.
The Bill provides that the commission will be able to make specific findings of fact in its report. It will also be empowered to identify institutions in which abuse occurred and the people responsible and may make findings in regard to the role and responsibility of management and regulatory authorities in its report. However, the report will not make findings on any individual case as these are likely to be matters which are or will be the subject of civil or criminal proceedings. This is based upon the recommendations made to the Government by the commission in its report in October. The commission specifically requested that the issue be treated in this way.
The power to name in a report that will be published individuals who the commission is satisfied have abused children is a significant power. The commission must have due regard to the rights of any person against whom allegations are made to his or her full entitlements to natural justice and due process. Within that context of regard for constitutional rights, it is right and reasonable that the commission should have the powers to name institutions where abuse was committed, or individuals who either committed abuse or who were involved in the general management or operation of an institution where abuse occurred. Anything less would, in the words of the commission, be "wholly anodyne" and a serious breach of faith with those who will brave the trauma of recounting their experiences. It would also be a serious abdication of responsibility to the institutions and people who provided a considerable service to the children entrusted to their care and the community and would allow them to be tarred with the same brush as those responsible, directly or indirectly, for abuse.
The commission will be entirely independent in carrying out its functions, a point specifically provided for in the Bill. Following on the recommendations in the commission's report on its terms of reference, the Bill provides for some key procedural issues and specifically requires the commission to bear in mind the difficulties posed for people in telling of abuse in childhood and imposes a duty on the commission to ensure that proceedings are conducted as informally as possible and that the atmosphere is sympathetic and understanding. These provisions are entirely consistent with the need to give victims a forum to tell of abuse and that in doing so they should not be exposed to the sometimes harsh and adversarial environment of a court.
Related in part to this desire to avoid undue formality and an adversarial environment in the commission meetings are the provisions in the Bill which provide that the hearings of the confidential committee and those of the investigation committee relating to allegations of abuse be held in private. This approach was recommended by the commission primarily on the grounds of fairness to those against whom allegations are made. In addition, the making of specific allegations in a public forum would greatly increase the adversarial elements in the process at the expense of the listening and therapeutic elements. In response to views expressed in the other House, the Bill now specifically refers to the importance of the commission and its committees conducting their hearings in public to the greatest extent practicable. Such public hearings will form an essential part of informing the public of the wider context in which allegations of abuse will be made.
The Government is committed to ensuring that a wide cross-section of people comes forward to the commission so that the final report can be as comprehensive as possible. In the case of former residents of institutions, in particular, many may have difficulty in covering the costs of coming to the commission. On top of the emotional stress which recounting events of the past might cause, this financial burden could be the last straw which makes them decide not to come to the commission. To help to alleviate this burden and encourage as many people as possible to come forward to the commission, the Bill provides for the drawing up of a scheme of expenses for witnesses. Under the provisions relating to expenses I will also prepare a scheme relating to the issue of legal expenses.
In principle, the Government accepts the view expressed in the commission's report on its terms of reference that an administrative scheme for legal expenses should be put in place. In devising a scheme under which legal fees will be paid, it will be necessary to strike a balance between the requirement of legal representation in some cases and the desirability of it in others, the therapeutic role of the commission and the objectives that the commission hearings be held as informally as possible. I have, during the course of Committee Stage debate on the Bill, published both the general and legal expenses scheme in draft form. Neither of these schemes will be finalised until after the enactment of the Bill and consultation with the commission. I am prepared to consider any reasonable proposals for amendments which are consistent with the objectives of the commission.
Last May the Taoiseach on behalf of the State and all citizens of the State extended an apology from the Government to the victims of childhood abuse for our collective failure to intervene, to detect their pain and to come to their rescue. The measures then announced as the Government's response to childhood abuse were widely welcomed and eagerly anticipated. Almost a year has passed and despite the excellent work done by the commission and others the legislation which will activate one of the key Government measures has not yet been enacted. For those not familiar with the legislative process there is understandable impatience and even disillusionment that their concerns are not being taken seriously enough.
I want to reassure such people that the Government is deadly earnest in its determination to give victims of abuse an opportunity to be heard and to establish what went wrong and why. I know that this House shares that objective. Accordingly, I trust that Members will appreciate why we are making every effort to pass this Bill before the recess. If we are unable to do so, the result will be further delay and further postponement of justice for those who have been abused. The sooner the commission can begin its work, the sooner the agony of waiting of the many people who want to give evidence to it can be ended.
I thank Members of Seanad Éireann for their co-operation in taking this important Bill in the busy period before the Easter recess. I commend the Bill to the House.