Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 4 Apr 2002

Vol. 169 No. 18

Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill, 2002: Second Stage.

Question proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

I commend to the Seanad the Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill, 2002, which addresses important issues relating to the registration of medical practitioners. This Bill represents a first step in the ongoing programme to update and revise the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978.

The public health service is dependent, above all else, on the people who provide the service. Without the health service staff who, week in week out, provide a high quality service it simply could not function. To ensure that the service had access to doctors of the highest quality, and that the interests of patients were treated as paramount, the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978, set out to regulate the practice of medicine in Ireland through the mechanism of the registration of medical practitioners. Under the Act the Medical Council was established as the statutory authority that oversees the registration and regulation of doctors and also evaluates the suitability of the medical education and training provided by any body within the State. The council's constitution and additional functions are set out in detail in the Act.

It has been recognised for some time that the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978, no longer meets the needs of a modern health service but it is intended that a new amendment to that Bill, which is a substantial piece of legislation, will be brought forward in the autumn. New legislation which will provide for the regulation of nursing and midwifery is currently being prepared and the preparation of draft heads of a Bill to govern the regulation of the professions allied to medicine is at an advanced stage. When passed, these Bills, along with the Bill to update the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978, will provide a legislative framework for the regulation of the health professionals that will ensure the highest level of competence among those who provide our health services.

In the national health strategy, Quality and Fairness – a Health System for You, a commitment was given to undertake an independent audit of functions and structures in the health system. The results of the audit of the Medical Council, Comhairle na nOspidéal and the Postgraduate Medical and Dental Board obviously will have to be taken into account in drafting the heads of the new Bill. Last month the Minister launched the national task force on medical staffing. The task force will examine the implementation of the medical manpower forum report and the Hanly report on the working hours of non-consultant hospital doctors. It will also examine the area of medical education and training.

The Medical Council has also brought forward a number of proposals for change. The council wants to improve its efficiency and delivery of services. It has also undertaken an exercise to set out a scheme for competence assurance for doctors. The proposed scheme will encompass continuous medical education, continuous professional development and clinical audit and peer review. The purpose of competence assurance is to ensure that doctors maintain the highest levels of competence and awareness of developments in their field of expertise. The Department of Health and Children will work closely with the Medical Council in further developing this scheme.

The new Act will also address issues surrounding the area of fitness to practice procedures. The streamlining of procedures and the appropriateness of committee structures will be examined. The question of the council's accountability and timely provision of relevant information to the Minister, employers and the public will be provided for.

There are, however, a number of priority issues that cannot wait until a new Act is passed and which must be addressed urgently to avoid any potential disruption to service delivery. It is for this reason that I present the Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill, 2002, to the House today. The most important amendment being proposed today is to section 27(2) of the current Act. Approximately 3,600 non-consultant hospital doctors are employed in the health service. Of this number approximately 1,600 are temporary registered doctors who come from outside the European Union. These doctors provide essential services in our hospitals and in some rural areas these doctors constitute over 60% of the NCHD cohort.

As many of these doctors joined the Irish health service before the implementation of the temporary registration assessment scheme, they have not sat the TRAS exam. This has affected their ability to move from the temporary register to the permanent register. Under the 1978 Act, only qualifications and training can be taken into account when considering applications for the permanent register. The current legislation, while recognising the training element, does not permit the Medical Council to give due regard to the relevant experience gained while working in the public health service by doctors applying for full registration, despite the fact that some temporary registered doctors have spent up to seven years working in the Irish public health service. At the same time graduates of Irish medical schools who have completed just one year of postgraduate internship can apply for full registration.

It should be noted that employers and regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions are only too happy to recruit and permanently register these doctors based on the experience they have gained while employed in the Irish health service. At a time when the Irish public hospital system is undertaking extensive recruitment initiatives to ensure that all medical posts are filled, we must ensure that every effort is made to retain the complement of doctors currently within our hospital service. Many of these temporary registered doctors are reaching the end of the period of temporary registration and may be lost to the Irish health service if we do not take action. In addition, changes in European Union law and a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice require us to take account of relevant experience gained within the EU when assessing applications from EU citizens for full registration.

The amending Bill also proposes a number of health care settings, such as community-based services and general practice, in which a doctor in training could and should gain very valuable experience and which, at present, are not approved for training purposes.

The Minister, Deputy Martin, is concerned to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place in certain areas of health care, such as cosmetic surgery for example, where doctors may be entering the jurisdiction for short periods to carry out such procedures. This is a matter of some concern to the Minister and it is our intention to deal with it in some detail in the comprehensive Bill to be brought forward later this year. It is accepted, however, that some urgent steps must be taken at this time and these are addressed in the amending Bill.

The main proposal contained in the Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill, 2002, is to allow validated professional experience to be taken into account in the assessment of applications for full registration on the Register of Medical Practitioners. Under current legislation, only training and qualifications can be acknowledged when considering such applications. This Bill will enable the Medical Council to make rules regarding applications for full registration in which relevant, validated experience will be taken into account as well as, or instead of, prescribed courses of training.

The amending Bill will allow doctors in training under intern registration and temporary registration to work in a variety of health care settings, to be specified by the Medical Council, whereas the current legislation confines these doctors to the acute hospital sector. The council will be enabled to make rules to regulate the type of health care setting where such training can be carried out. The Bill makes provision for any EU citizen who has obtained their primary medical degree within the EU to be granted internship registration in Ireland. At present, only graduates of Irish universities can undertake their internship registration in Ireland.

The Bill makes provision for the indefinite extension of temporary registration for a doctor who has made application for full registration. The period of temporary registration in this instance is extended until such time as a final decision is made with regard to the doctor's application for full registration. The Bill also makes provision for the Medical Council to make rules regarding temporary registration for doctors entering the jurisdiction to work for short periods. The council will also be enabled to make rules regarding those who employ or contract the services of such doctors.

Staffing requirements of hospitals and the deployment of staff within hospitals are primarily a matter for local management having regard to the services which hospitals are expected to provide. Particular staffing difficulties have been faced by the health services in recent years across a wide range of areas, particularly in the medical, paramedical and nursing areas. The Department of Health and Children, in conjunction with the health service employers agency, assists at national level with the development of a policy framework that will enable employers to identify vacancies, to locate, recruit and train suitable candidates for the vacant posts and to retain the staff in whom they have invested significant time and resources.

In the health strategy, under the action plan for people management, the Government set out its plan for the health service to become an employer of choice. In this regard the strategy commits the Government to investment in training and education for health sector staff; implementation of best practices in employment policies and procedures; building and enhancing the management function; improving the quality of working life for our health service staff; developing performance management; promoting improved industrial relations in the health sector; and developing the partnership approach further. Work on the action plan is already underway and is being undertaken in the context of partnership and consultation.

This amendment to the Medical Practitioners Act represents yet another measure to improve the working arrangements for non-consultant hospital doctors. On a broader front, the issues relating to the medical staffing of hospitals were addressed by the medical manpower forum. With particular regard to non-consultant hospital doctors, the forum sought to redress the imbalance between career posts and training posts, the need to improve postgraduate medical training to keep more Irish medical graduates in the country and the need to look at the position of women in medicine in Ireland with a view to reducing the number who leave medicine.

Furthermore, the national task force on medical staffing was established by the Minister, Deputy Martin, to prepare and cost an implementation plan for a new approach to hospital services, based on appropriately trained doctors providing patients with the highest quality service. The task force will prepare detailed implementation programmes based on the two key reports already mentioned which were published last year – the Hanly report and the report of the medical manpower forum. The implementation programme will be addressed in the context of the new health strategy, Quality and Fairness – A Health System for You, which was published last November.

Every analysis to date comes back to the same key point – we are overdependent on junior doctors who, while still in training, are required to provide 24 hour, seven day medical care under the formal supervision of individual consultants. A number of factors affect consultants' ability to be present on site at weekends, evenings and during the night. Patients in turn may have limited access to appropriate levels of senior clinical decision making, with implications for safety of diagnosis and treatment on the one hand and efficiency and cost-effectiveness on the other. As an independent entity, the task force is in a good position to develop a suitable cost-effective model which best meets patient safety and quality concerns, as well as contributing centrally to the two fundamental principles reflected in the title of the new health strategy, Quality and Fairness – A Health System for You. It also addresses some of the key national goals of the strategy, which relate to responsive and appropriate care and high performance.

Public health systems, demographics and lifestyles, technology and expectations are exhibiting an international pattern of unprecedented change and challenge, which urgently demand new methods. In preparing the new strategy, it was necessary to look critically and constructively at service issues such as the length of the working day and how we provide cover over this longer period; the redrawing of professional boundaries; organising care and service delivery around the patient rather than vice versa; and a much more dynamic and committed approach to managing quality. The health service will continue to make the case for additional investment, provided we can work collaboratively in making the necessary reforms to yield improved results.

The message from the medical profession expressing its willingness to be more flexible, while maintaining admirably high standards under pressure, is very much welcomed by the Government. Where there is a clear willingness to jointly reassess in a fundamental way some of the assumptions attached to the inadequate status quo, the Government's response can also be flexible. By adopting an open approach together to face change and modernisation, implementation of the strategy will ensure the best use of resources, the sharing of best practice across all disciplines and the provision of significant additional funding.

In addition to the steps already outlined, the Department of Health and Children has been working closely with the Departments of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Foreign Affairs in exploring how the processing of visas and work permits can be streamlined to assist health service employers with their recruiting drives. In this regard the possibility of extending the working visa-work authorisation scheme, which already applies to nurses, to other health service staff has been examined by the departmental group. The scheme would provide a more flexible mechanism for regulating the entry of non-EU and non-EEA citizens into Ireland for the purpose of working in the health service. It is hoped to progress this initiative in the very short term.

Health service providers and members of the public would like to have the best quality and range of services available. This is a worthy aspiration since service demands are triggered largely by issues such as demographic change – an increasing population that is living for longer and the continual and rapid developments in health technology. It is part of the role of the Minister for Health and Children to, in the first instance, measure the real need for additional services, taking account of public expectations as well as the expert view. A second and subsequent demand of that role is to bridge the gap between current provision and what is needed as speedily and efficiently as possible.

There has been a dramatic and well-documented increase in the provision of funding to the health service over the life of the Government. Gross non-capital expenditure has risen by 129% from 1997 to 2002. The Government is committed to maintaining sufficient support to empower professionals to continually improve the services in our hospitals and in the community in general. On the capital side, the high level of investment by the Government will continue over the period of the national development plan, demonstrating a considerable increase in capital investment relative to any previous historic period. Again, examining the level of capital funding provided over the life of the Government, 2002 boasts a capital funding allocation to the health sector that equals a 260% increase on the 1997 figure.

I am seeking the co-operation of the House in amending the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978, to allow for further revised registration arrangements for doctors. Whether originating in Ireland, Europe or beyond, there is no doubt that medical personnel are a major and key resource to the Irish health services, deserving of acknowledgement and support. This amending Bill, in conjunction with the main Bill later this year, will be key factors in ensuring that, in five years, there should no longer be shortages in those crucial disciplines which are currently holding back the development of much needed services. Molaim an Bille seo don Seanad, the Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill, 2002.

I welcome the Minister to the House. She has asked for our co-operation in passing this Bill and she will have it. In her speech, the Minister clearly outlined the need for this Bill. It is a very specific Bill that is precise in what it is proposed to do. Unlike speakers in the other House, I do not feel the need to wander over the entire spectrum of health issues in my short contribution.

The availability of a supply of properly qualified personnel for our health service is close to the centre of the current problems in the health service. I do not use the word "crisis" because I do not believe there is a crisis in the health service. We need to ensure a steady supply of qualified people and there should be flexibility in that. I do not know the proportion of non-Irish staff in our hospitals, but it must be almost as great as those who are Irish and this proportion is likely to increase. Our dependence on this category of professional will become even greater in the future.

I welcome the quality assurance schemes outlined by the Minister, which will be part of future legislation. Speaking for the universities, in the past we measured ourselves against the best Irish or British practice. Now we have to measure ourselves against best international practice. That is true of every area of professional activity now and medicine above all should operate within a framework of proper continuing quality assurance measurements. The next Minister, whoever that may be, will certainly get a warm welcome from all sides of the House when this legislation is introduced.

As the Minister said, this is urgent legislation and it represents a holding operation in some ways. Nobody could disagree with the objectives outlined by the Minister. The steps to increase the powers of the Medical Council should ensure there is a supply of personnel and the problems outlined by the Minister can be addressed as a matter of urgency. I have nothing more to say about the Bill. I may raise some specific questions on Committee Stage, but having said that I welcome the Bill and we will assist in its speedy passage.

I too welcome this Bill. It is important to keep the doctors in our employment and without this legislation, many doctors now working would complete their contracts and would have to leave. That would be a terrible blow to our health service because doctors represent a very precious commodity. It takes a long time for them to qualify and enter the health service, and we cannot afford to lose them.

I welcome the provision in the Bill allowing doctors to keep abreast of new training and facilities. Every day we hear of new surveys and research into various aspects of people's health. There are specialised areas dealing with various problems. It is important for the consultants to have time to educate themselves and refresh their knowledge in new facilities and methods.

I also welcome the fact that the capital funding provided during the life of the Government boasts a capital funding allocation to the health sector that equals an increase of 260% on the 1997 figure. This is refreshing for those of us who were on health boards when money was scarce and we had to pass tight budgets. Regardless of what Government was in power, in the North Western Health Board we lived within our budget. As I have said here before, in keeping within such a budget when we were in Opposition, I incurred the wrath of some within my party. However, I always believed it was wrong to play politics with the health service. The problems must be faced up to and we must make the best use of the money available to provide the best service. I am pleased to be able to boast that we always provided a good service in the north west and still do so.

When people complain now, it is not for more money. They want more facilities and equipment – the finance is there. A country without a good health service is lost. For those of us who are getting on in years it is important to know there is a medical service to look after us. I congratulate the Minister on the health strategy and the work he is doing in promoting a better health service. I congratulate him on bringing in this holding Bill, as Senator Manning called it, to ensure no doctors are lost from the service. I welcome the Bill and commend it to the House.

I welcome the Minister to the House. She gave a really splendid speech, but I wish we had the main Bill before us now rather than having to wait until the autumn. When the Government came to office new medical practitioners legislation was promised and I am extremely disappointed there has been such a delay in introducing it. At least the explanatory memorandum is honest in saying this Bill has to be brought forward as a matter of urgency. While I agree it needs to be introduced as a matter of urgency, I pointed out to the House over three years ago that we would arrive at a point where we would be bereft of non-EU doctors who are the main service providers in our health service because the Medical Council had changed its training regulations.

I know that the Medical Council has reservations about this Bill in regard to those getting permanent registration. More than three years ago the Medical Council decided that people with temporary registration could only be employed in approved training posts. When it examined the facilities for training in hospitals around the country, it decided some of them were inadequate for the proper training of doctors. In this Bill, we are ensuring that people can work in hospitals because they have permanent registration despite the fact that the Medical Council thinks those posts are not adequate for training and that some people in these posts require further training. So, we are giving permanent registration to people without proper training and not assessing their competence. This cannot be regarded as a good thing. Proper training is essential to have a proper health service and we know that many of the rural hospitals which are almost totally staffed by non-EU graduates, many of an excellent calibre, are not approved for training posts.

There are two types of non-EU doctors here. First, there are those who have come here from abroad and are charged extremely high fees from our medical schools to qualify here. Until very recently, when they qualified they were treated very shabbily by the system. There is a shortage of intern posts so non-EU graduates frequently found they had to work in supernumerary posts without payment so that they could obtain full registration here despite the fact that we had taken considerable money from them over the years. One brave non-national recently took a case under the equality legislation and won. All those now employed in these posts must be paid, and rightly so. I hope all those employed in such posts in the past will get the money to which they are entitled for the time they held our health service together.

The second group of non-EU doctors are those who qualified in their own countries. Many who come here are the brightest and the best. They come here for further training to perhaps get membership of the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Surgeons and to study in the various fields so that they can return to their countries and make a contribution. The service they give this country in the meantime is unbelievable, yet they have been outrageously exploited. My profession has played an important role in this.

The situation regarding temporary registration was very serious for them. For a certain number of years one could be registered temporarily here for only five years at a time when many training programmes were for six years. It meant they could not stay here long enough to fulfil the training programme on which they were trying to complete a postgraduate degree. A couple of years ago the period of years was extended to seven, which was an improvement. However, they were employed in the heaviest of the service jobs so that they frequently had insufficient time left to do the amount of study required to undertake their postgraduate degrees.

The Minister of State said that 98% of all posts in the service area at non-consultant doctor level have been filled. While this may be the case it is worrying how little competition there is for these posts. Sometimes there is none. It means that the authorities are very grateful if they can get anybody to take them up. We must remember that quality is important. It is not merely a question of filling the post. Last year there was commotion when it was found that a consultant psychiatrist, Dr. John Harding Price, who had been suspended from the medical register in England, was working in a post in the South Eastern Health Board. He was entitled to do so and I am sure Senators will be pleased to note that he was totally exonerated of the complaint made against him by the Medical Council and has been reinstated. It is important to note that he was the only applicant for that job. We are in a desperate situation in terms of getting people to fill posts in some parts of the country. We must take cognisance of this, especially as we will have to compete more and more with other countries for these people.

The Medical Council's efforts to improve training has been greatly hampered by the fact that there is such a shortage of consultants. At present we have one consultant for every 2,725 people. Sweden has one for every 607 while Norway has one for every 702. In this regard we are one of the worst countries in the EU. Given this, it is easy to see how difficult it is for people to get involved in properly training these trainees. In many hospitals no time is scheduled for consultants to give them proper training.

The Bill has done everything possible to ensure we will not be bereft of these people from 1 July. It is amazing we have managed to stagger so far with having most posts filled. The number of years before a permanent registration can be given has been reduced from four to two, which is a big reduction. While it is good to give credit for training in other areas, such as general practice and public health, there is a need to ensure there is quality assurance in these areas regarding the available training schemes. Public health doctors are up in arms about this. Again, we must be careful we do not give credit for training where people do not consider themselves to be in a proper position to give training. Huge improvement is required in this area. The recent letter from the second secretary in the Department of Finance to the Secretary General of the Department of Health and Children pointing out that we are not necessarily working towards a consultant provided service was a nice blow in the face. Again, it will seriously affect the amount of proper training which can be given to trainees in these posts.

I am not sure of the importance of the debate in the European Commission regarding the proposal for the simplification of rules to facilitate the free movement of qualified people, including doctors in the European Union. Apparently a directive is being worked on which would give automatic rights for doctors from all over Europe to work here. The Medical Council is concerned about this. As a self-regulating body, it has naturally been very proud of maintaining standards at the highest possible level. We want to be sure that consultation on the directive will involve not only the Minister but also the council.

Section 9 allows for other non-EU doctors who have completed their studies in medical schools abroad to do their internship here. Is this part of, or separate from, the directive and will the United Kingdom reciprocate in this area? A problem arose a few years ago when I met the Medical Council in London. Up to approximately four or five years ago it used to allow Irish graduates undertake their internship in the United Kingdom. It then changed its position and we were on weak ground to argue against the change because, as the Minister of State pointed out, the 1978 Act made it obligatory for a person who did an internship here to be a graduate of one of our medical schools. Has the United Kingdom now decided to reciprocate? This is a very important matter from a logistics point of view. If we are to allow outside graduates to come here it is only fair that our graduates should be allowed to work abroad. It may also mean that we could have a sudden and severe drain of people electing to do their internships in Great Britain or Northern Ireland. If the provisions of this legislation are enacted it is important we again contact the Medical Council in the United Kingdom to ensure, if possible, that there is reciprocation.

Non-EU graduates have been treated appallingly in this country. The head of the non-EU doctors committee of the Irish Medical Organisation recently wrote an article in which he stated:

The training system is fragmented and apartheid ridden. There are different fast-track pathways for the chosen few but a long and arduous road for others, with a career block at the end if those doctors choose to stay in the system. It is an open secret that some of the training programmes being offered to non-EU doctors are not for the same duration of training and do not lead to the same certification as their EU counterparts.

This is very serious because some of these training programmes, in which these people may now become involved because they are permanently registered, may not be suitable for certification under the Royal College of Physicians or the Royal College of Surgeons. This must be clearly pointed out before they join them. It means that although they may have permanent certification they may still be loath to take up these posts, which are holding our service together, because they will not have certification towards higher examination.

I wish I could give the Bill a bigger welcome. We are doing this for ourselves rather than for non-EU doctors, who have had an appalling time. The Minister of State's speech gives me some hope for the autumn but I wish the legislation had not been so delayed because we face constant problems due to the need to update the 1978 Act. Perhaps the Minister of State will be promoted if her side of the House is returned to Government, in which case we may further debate the legislation. I hope its provisions will be implemented but it is unacceptable that we should have to bend over backwards to ensure that the health service can be maintained by keeping these people in the service, no matter how good or bad it may be to their training or their future.

I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children, Deputy Hanafin, to this House. For the reasons stated by the Minister, this Bill should be passed quickly. I congratulate her on a splendid Second Stage speech on a Bill which is not before us and I hope that Bill will be brought before this House in the near future.

I am concerned that some people will think that, having stuck their finger in the dyke with this Bill, no further action is required. Enormous pressure is building within the health service. At this stage in the life of Seanad Éireann, I do not wish to presume that any of us will retain our seats, but I look forward to a discussion on the major Bill in the autumn. Such legislation is badly needed but it cannot take place in isolation. The Departments of Finance and Agriculture, Food and Rural Development are heading towards a consultant-delivered service. We are moving towards a situation where the teaching and training aspect of medical training is becoming supernumerary. If the quality of supervision is to be sustained, enormous changes in the structure of the health service are required. Unless we arrive at a satisfactory resolution of this problem, it will be difficult to maintain smaller rural hospitals. At a time when training is seen to be a life-long process, validation and the maintenance of skills are important.

I hope that when the Minister presents the wider Bill, more thought will be given to the role of other health care professionals, particularly nurses, who are shouldering much of the current strain on our health services. However, I commend this Bill and I encourage the Minister to follow up with the fuller legislation as quickly as possible.

Gabhaim buíochas leis na Seanadóirí as ucht na tacaíochta a thug siad don Bhille inniu. I accept that this Bill is a technical one but it should also be accepted that it gives due recognition to non-EU doctors who have been working in this State for a long time. Many of these doctors have not only given of their expertise, but they have also taken out Irish citizenship and still find that they are not permanently registered with the Medical Council. This Bill will facilitate the acceptance of such professionals whose contribution to the health service is acknowledged by all. We do not want to lose them.

This legislation allows the Medical Council to set down the rules governing the recognition of medical qualifications. That is why it is necessary for us to pass this Bill now. The criteria for medical qualifications should not be established by any Government and the Medical Council can now set out its own rules in this area. It will be up to the council to ensure that doctors are suitable for full registration. Such a procedure will guarantee the competency of doctors. The ball is now in the Medical Council's court. Of course, the council was extensively consulted during the drafting of this Bill and I am satisfied that its views have been taken on board by my Department.

I accept that Members are anxious that the main Bill be brought forward. It is extensive legislation and all the stakeholders must be consulted. The draft heads of the Bill are at an advanced stage, but there are issues which still need to be incorporated into it. I know that the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Martin, is confident that this Bill will be brought before the Oireachtas in the autumn.

Senator Henry raised the issue of competition for medical posts. It is true that 98% of such posts have been filled, but the issue at hand is not so much the number of posts filled as the number of applicants for each of them. The national task force is working on making posts more attractive to doctors, particularly those that are vacant in the regional hospitals. We also need to explore ways in which we can make work practices more flexible. This will encourage greater numbers of women who qualify as doctors to remain in the profession. It is worth noting that, since 1997, there has been a 30% increase in the number of consultant posts. That is a real improvement, but there are challenges that remain to be addressed.

In terms of EU recognition of medical qualifications, any action taken at EU level must be complied with by all member states, including the UK. This compliance also governs reciprocal arrangements.

In my opening statement, I referred to the role of other health professionals. There are other Bills in the making which will legislate for the nursing profession and regulate other professions allied to medicine. Legislation for the latter is at an advanced stage. I hope we will all be back here in the autumn to address the issues which arise from those Bills.

The most important aspect of this legislation is that it gives recognition to non-EU hospital doctors who are making a contribution to our hospital service. It also facilitates those EU doctors who need a speedier process of recognition. Irish medical students who have trained abroad will also be facilitated by this legislation. The technical detail of this Bill will ensure that the wider health service, particularly the patients, will benefit.

Question put and agreed to.

When is it proposed to take Committee Stage?

Now.

Agreed to take remaining stages today.

Top
Share