Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 7 Nov 2007

Vol. 187 No. 14

Search and Rescue Service.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for giving me the opportunity to speak on this matter this evening and I thank the Minister of State for coming to the House to respond to my ongoing concern about an issue that is relevant to him and his constituency. The sinking of a fishing vessel is something with which people in my area are very familiar. Some families whose members were on the Carrigatine know at first hand the feelings of those who suffered losses in the Maggie B and Père Charles disasters. It is tough for entire communities when victims are not found. I hope there may be good news for the families of the crew of the Père Charles in the coming hours.

I mention this because the emergency services are usually involved in marine incidents, some of which have the potential to turn into tragedies. When something goes wrong a great onus is placed on volunteers in the RNLI and other organisations to respond and save lives. Phil Coulter wrote about their great work in his composition "Home from the Sea", which included the refrain "Carry us safely home from the sea." As with all emergency services, not enough thought is put into the service until disaster threatens. I wish, therefore, to put on record my disappointment at the lack of priority that has been afforded to the issue of a breakwater for the RNLI at Buncrana, County Donegal.

The existing group of RNLI volunteers have distinguished themselves over the years by their achievements and their dedication to the people of the north west. They have never turned their backs on call-outs for any reasons of their own. Their work, however, has been seriously impeded by silting at Buncrana Harbour. The crew has earned the right to bigger boats that are as safe, fast and modern as those of any other station of the RNLI fleet, but its ability to use the boats has been increasingly restricted. There have been incidents in which the RNLI volunteers themselves have been almost in need of rescue. This is unfair. Volunteers who give of themselves in the course of trying to assist others should not be constantly battling to access their own boats in a safe manner. Over the years, there has been a threat to withdraw the boats from the organisation, which would be a true scandal if it were allowed to happen.

The quest to have this problem addressed goes back many years. There have been many and varied attempts to dredge the area in order to free it for use by the RNLI, which is to all intents and purposes the only user of the facility. This did not work, as the sand returned as speedily as it was being removed. Frankly, it was a waste of money. In March 2004 Donegal County Council, which is responsible for Buncrana Harbour, received approval for the construction of a breakwater. This would be a real solution for the RNLI. However, the approval was accompanied by a huge valuation on the lease. This could not be justified in view of the limited use of the facility and the lack of any obvious new marine activity in the harbour. Years later, the Department of Finance agreed that if the council could confirm that the breakwater was for the exclusive use of the RNLI it would waive the rental charge, or if the RNLI was a part-user there would be a reduced rental charge relative to the percentage used.

It is very simple. The only group that needs the facility is the RNLI. The need was urgent in the past and remains urgent now. Moneys were in place both from the Department and from the local council to build the breakwater, but time has ticked by and it is only by great fortune that disaster has not been visited upon us due to the inability of the emergency services to attend to a distress call. Some people have tried to muddy the waters on this issue and, indeed, to throw mud. The fact remains that a lease for the sole use of the RNLI could easily have a clause inserted stating that if the usage of the breakwater should change the Department of Finance or the Department of Transport will have the right to increase the rental charge. This is not rocket science. It would be easy for people in the Departments to add clauses to protect the Departments.

At present our tourism organisations seem to place no value on marine leisure, although in time that may change. I hope in the future to see increasing use of our rivers, lakes and seas. When that happens, there will be a need to re-evaluate who pays what. However, in the meantime, there is a real problem which urgently requires a solution. I ask the Minister of State to tell me that this problem is now solved and that our emergency services can go back to what they do best, which is saving others, rather than worrying about how to do it.

I thank the Senator for raising this issue.

There are two aspects to this matter. The first relates to siltation at the harbour. A dumping at sea permit was issued to Donegal County Council on 22 December 2006 to facilitate maintenance dredging. I understand that the maintenance dredging has taken place and I will refer to this in more detail in a few moments.

The second aspect of this matter is the drafting and acceptance by the relevant parties of a lease in respect of the proposed breakwater at Buncrana. The council requested a reduction or total waiver of foreshore charges on the basis that the facility was to be used only by the RNLI. Following extensive discussions and as an exceptional matter, the Department, with the agreement of the Department of Finance, informed the council that it would consider waiving the rental charges if the council could confirm that the proposed facility would be for the exclusive use of the RNLI. In addition, the council was informed that if it was unable to confirm that the facility would be used exclusively by the RNLI, the Department was prepared to apply a reduced rental charge based on the ratio of usage of the facility by the RNLI.

On 20 December 2006 the council confirmed that the facility proposed at Buncrana Harbour was solely for the use of the RNLI and was not being constructed for the benefit of any other party. On foot of this confirmation, the Department entered into detailed discussions and correspondence with the Office of the Chief State Solicitor with a view to preparing an appropriate draft lease which would best facilitate the council's proposal while safeguarding the State's ongoing interest in the management and protection of the foreshore in the public interest.

The draft lease will involve the insertion of specific conditions which will reflect the fact that the arrangements involved are unusual and are based on the need to provide a permanent location for the RNLI which will enable the launch of its boat on a 24-hour basis. The Department's discussions with the Chief State Solicitor's office have focused on the public interest provisions of the Foreshore Acts, the arrangements which the council will need to make with the RNLI and other legal issues designed to protect the interests of all parties. The lease, when drafted, will require the agreement of all relevant parties.

A meeting between the Donegal county manager and myself, together with officials of the Department, took place on 25 September 2007 to discuss in some detail both aspects of this matter. Of primary concern to my Department is that the RNLI is in a position to launch its lifeboat without difficulty, and in this regard my officials sought clarification on the position regarding dredging at the harbour. At this meeting the county manager undertook to confirm that the dredging in respect of which my Department had issued a dumping at sea permit had in fact taken place. The county manager has since confirmed, in a letter of 26 October 2007, that dredging took place in the harbour in May of this year and, furthermore, has acknowledged that the council is working closely with the Department to monitor the need for dredging at the harbour in order to maintain conditions which enable the RNLI lifeboat service to operate as safely and as efficiently as possible. The Department will continue, in consultation with its specialist advisers, to assess with urgency any applications for dumping at sea permits which are required for the disposal of spoil arising from necessary dredging operations, and its engineering division will of course provide all possible assistance to the council in monitoring siltation at the harbour.

The second issue, namely the property management aspect of the proposed breakwater, was also discussed at the meeting with the county manager. The county manager has confirmed in writing that Donegal County Council currently has no plans to develop a public marina in Lough Swilly nor does Donegal County Council wish to activate a foreshore approval in Buncrana to develop a public marina in Lough Swilly.

My Department met with officials of the CSSO last Friday, with a view to advancing preparation of the appropriate lease. As already indicated, the specific conditions of the lease will need to reflect the fact that the arrangements involved are unusual and are designed specifically to facilitate the RNLI. In this connection, one of the options which my Department will have to consider is the possibility of offering a lease directly to the RNLI. It is understood that arrangements along these lines would be acceptable to the council. In this regard, on foot of legal advice, my Department has sought an early meeting with the RNLI which, Senator Keaveney will be happy to hear, takes place tomorrow. However, there are other options which will also have to be explored from a legal perspective.

The matter of this lease is being given urgent attention at administrative and legal level and while ultimately the final lease will have to be agreed by all relevant parties, I am confident that we are near finality in this issue.

I thank the Minister of State for his response. Should the lease issue be resolved, is he confident that the money remains available for the provision of the breakwater at this point in time, given that I asked the same question of the council on Monday and was given a positive assurance on the co-funding?

I can assure Senator Keaveney that money is not an issue. As soon as we have the legalities sorted out we will then be in a position to proceed as she requests.

Top
Share