Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 14 Jul 2011

Vol. 209 No. 9

A Vision for Change: Statements

I welcome this opportunity to make a statement to the House on A Vision for Change. While I will read the official speech as there are details contained in it which the House needs to know, I hope the debate which will ensue will be more free-flowing.

In 2006, A Vision for Change was widely welcomed as a progressive, evidence based and realistic document which proposed a new model of service delivery which would be patient centred, flexible and community based. Although progress on implementation has been slower than expected, it is important to recognise and acknowledge that in many parts of the country, services are pressing ahead with developing new ways of working and initiatives to implement A Vision for Change.

Progress on implementation to date includes the following: a 17% decline in the number of patients resident in Irish psychiatric facilities since 2006; fewer admissions, including involuntary admissions to approved centres; the number of patients readmitted to hospital has shown a year-on-year reduction since 2001, and this reduction points to an improvement in community based services; the length of stay in approved centres has reduced, so that in 2010, 48% of patients were discharged within two weeks of admission; the child and adolescent mental health service has seen a very significant improvement, with 61 mental health teams now in place around the country; bed capacity for children and adolescents has increased from 12 beds in 2007 to 52, with further developments planned which will bring capacity to 66 by 2012; and the increase in bed capacity is reflected in a 37% decrease in admissions of children to adult units since 2008.

Despite the slowdown in the economy, work on the capital programme is continuing. Work on the Linn Dara child and adolescent mental health day facility in Cherry Orchard, Dublin is close to completion, acute admissions to St. Brendan's, Grangegorman have ceased and enabling works are under way on the development of a 54-bed replacement long-stay facility as part of the Grangegorman redevelopment project. In addition, an application for planning permission has been submitted for an acute inpatient psychiatric unit at Beaumont Hospital to replace the unit at St. Ita's, Portrane. The closure of the long-stay accommodation at St. Senan's, Wexford, will be completed during 2011-12, with the implementation of an approximately €16 million capital investment programme. A residential unit is under construction in Clonmel which will allow for the closure of St. Luke's Hospital and community services are being developed which will provide alternatives to inpatient admissions. A community nursing unit has opened in Ballinasloe and the long stay patients have been transferred there from St. Brigid's Hospital.

The active involvement of service users is one of the most significant reforms that have taken place in our mental health services in recent years. The establishment of the National Service Users Executive is one of the major success stories of A Vision for Change and service users are now actively engaged in the planning and development of services. Service users have a unique insight into the experience of mental illness and have a greater understanding of mental health and service needs and, therefore, have much to contribute. NSUE's 2010 second opinion report, "Always Look on the Bright side of Life", was published in January and the findings of the report provide real evidence that our services are improving and, importantly, that the recovery ethos underpins that service.

In recognition of improved services, NSUE awards were made to three services: Loughrea-Athenry community health services for best community mental health team; to Tara Suite mental health day centre, Dunshaughlin, for best day hospital-day centre; and to west Cork mental health services for most improved service. The results of the survey of service users show that services are improving in some areas and while there is scope for improvement, services are moving in the right direction.

The remit of the Office for Disability and Mental Health, established within the Department of Health in January 2008, includes bringing a new impetus to the implementation of A Vision for Change and to work in partnership with the HSE and other stakeholders, including other Departments, to drive implementation. The director of the office is a member of the senior officials group on social inclusion, which monitors progress on the Government's commitments on social policy. The Office for Disability and Mental Health is also participating in the development by the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government of a housing strategy for people with disabilities which will have a particular emphasis on the housing needs of people with mental health difficulties.

Within the HSE, the assistant national director with responsibility for mental health ensures the delivery of mental health services in line with legislation and Government policy. Executive clinical directors have also been appointed to lead reform in catchment areas serving populations of 350,000 to 400,000, which is in line with the recommendations in A Vision for Change.

Implementing A Vision for Change will involve using our existing resources more efficiently and effectively. It will require the reallocation and remodelling of existing resources to move away from care in institutions to providing care in alternative settings or in the individual's home. The focal point of modern mental health services should be within a community setting and thus the further development of community based facilities is the priority. Almost 90% of mental health needs are dealt with at primary care level and this Government is committed to developing closer links between mental health services and primary care, which is a key recommendation in A Vision for Change.

Centres which house primary care and mental health professionals will provide the full range of care for individuals and will represent a significant step forward for service users and their families. Having community mental health teams collocated with primary care teams will also help to build and cement closer relationships which will benefit service users and their families, carers and professionals alike.

Budget 2011 gave special consideration to the mental health sector through a reduction of 1.8% in the allocation of funding for this sector. An additional €1 million in 2011 was approved for the HSE's national office for suicide prevention. This funding will enable the office to build on initiatives to date and bring added momentum and new impetus to its activities to address the increasing incidence of deaths by suicide.

We must change our attitudes and our thinking about mental health; we need to create an environment that recognises and treats people with mental health problems similarly to other health needs. We must put out the message that it is okay not to be okay. It is only by openly speaking about mental health that we will change attitudes and normalise mental illness. In light of this, as part of See Change, the national stigma reduction campaign, I was pleased to launch the Make a Ripple campaign, which aims to recruit a dedicated online community of ambassadors, advocates, story tellers and volunteers who can help to push the campaign's objectives and messages on to the national agenda. I hope this campaign will contribute to eliminating the stigma so often associated with mental illness.

Looking to the future, I assure the House that my priority as Minister for State with responsibility for mental health will be to further advance the implementation of A Vision for Change. I am aware that annual reports of the independent monitoring group for A Vision for Change have highlighted concerns with the absence of a detailed, timelined and costed implementation plan and with the lack of effective leadership within the HSE to implement its recommendations. I have therefore asked the HSE to prepare an implementation plan which will identify specific recommendations of A Vision for Change to be progressed over the next three years, with timelines, detailed costs and persons responsible for implementation.

I am also in discussions with my officials with a view to establishing a directorate within the HSE to drive implementation and I hope to be in a position to make a decision on this over the coming months. I assure the House that this Government is committed to reforming our mental health care services and the implementation of A Vision for Change. This commitment was clearly shown in the programme for Government which provides that €35 million will be ring-fenced annually in future budgets to develop community mental health care services and to ensure early access to more appropriate services for adults and children.

I look forward to listening to the contributions from Senators. While we have A Vision for Change as a template, there are times when we need flexibility in service delivery. As I read more about this area, I realise how little we know about it.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House and this opportunity to make a few brief points on this important issue. I look forward to hearing from the professionals in the House who have experience of this issue.

A Vision for Change was embraced by the previous Government as policy and we all want to see it followed. I pay tribute to the former Minister of State, Mr. John Maloney, who in a difficult time did a good job in beginning the processes that set out his ambitions.

Much good work has been done. The Minister of State highlighted a number of new facilities and additional places that have come on-stream. I also welcome the way we are moving away from the old model of daunting buildings that seemed more like something from a horror film rather than a place to care for those with an illness.

The changed focus to a community-based model is welcome, with mental health conditions viewed now as illnesses and the realisation that it is okay not to be okay. The See Change initiative will help to ensure people are accepted if they are depressed or suffering from mental health problems. I recall the advertisements on television and feel they were helpful to those who had difficulties. A close friend suffered from a panic disorder that led to hyperventilation, a condition that affects one in three people. Inevitably people would ask him why he was panicking or depressed. It was like asking what the winning lottery numbers would be.

It is incredible that people would ask those questions of people who are unfortunate enough to have this condition, which is extremely common. It is an issue of informing and educating people and through schemes like See Change we can begin to tackle it.

In regard to the Reach Out scheme, in terms of suicide prevention, while an additional €1 million was made available to it, no amount of money is too great to allocate to addressing this issue in any given year. If there are suicide prevention initiatives that cannot be afforded, I believe any of us in this House would gladly pay more in tax or otherwise, if the money accruing therefrom was ring-fenced specifically for that area. No mountain is too high in tackling that issue. When we consider the number of people who die from suicide every year versus our reaction to dealing with high the incidence of road deaths and the great progress that has been made in reducing the number of road deaths, we should, even in these desperate financial and economic times, ensure that we make whatever resources are required available and ring-fence them specifically for that area.

There is a huge concern about resources. I know the Minister of State's commitment to the job at hand and that if resources were not an issue, she would have the recommendations in A Vision for Change implemented in a very short period. I do not doubt her commitment and I am not being remotely political about this as we all know where we are, why we are there and so on, but the resourcing of the implementation of A Vision for Change overall will be an issue. In the most recent report the implementation body acknowledged and welcomed that funds from the sale of former facilities will be of assistance in implementing A Vision for Change. From my involvement in the auctioneering business, I know that no sale of any property is taking place. There will not be any money from that source unless from a State institution or a body of some other description that was purchasing these lands. There is no speculative development for former hospitals or this kind of initiative. To claim that resourcing will come from the sale of such facilities concerns me as to the timeframe involved. If we had 20 years, I do not believe we could sell property and get a level of support and resourcing that is needed for the implementation of the ambitions laid out in A Vision for Change.

In addition, the moratorium on staff recruitment in the HSE is very worrying, particularly with 1,000 psychiatric nurses having retired between 2009 and 2010. I am told that another 1,000 may be eligible to retire in the next year or so. That is very worrying. I am sure the Minister of State and the Minister would like to assist in this respect but it will be a question of whether the Minister for Finance will allow it. Is the Minister of State in a position to commit to the preservation of funding attached to any of the mental health posts in which staff may retire in the year ahead to ensure such funding remains in place? That would be extremely important.

The big question is one of resourcing. I am not convinced that A Vision for Change can be implemented with the resourcing available to us. If the Minister of State agrees with that, what are our alternatives? There will have to be a longer timeframe for the overall implementation of it. I have a concern about its resourcing.

I wish to raise a final point, on which I am aware Senator Colm Burke agrees, which perhaps I should have raised on the Order of Business. The Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health and Children is currently meeting. As is the case with our health services generally where general management and good co-ordination is needed, that is also needed in the management of business of these Houses. The Child Care (Amendment) Bill is being debated in the Dáil, a debate on mental health services is taking place here and the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health and Children is meeting in a committee room downstairs. I am sure there are members of that committee here and that Deputies attending that meeting who would like to be present for the debate in the Dáil. We should manage our business a little better.

I thank the Chair for the opportunity to make these points and I would appreciate a reply from the Minister of State on them.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House and I am pleased that we have this opportunity to discuss this report and the wider issue of mental health services provision here. It is said that a society is judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members. This must be the guiding principle of our society and the Government. This must be held most true when it comes to how we care for people suffering with mental health issues.

The original A Vision for Change document summarised the vision for mental health services in Ireland as follows: "Service providers should work in partnership with service users and their families, and facilitate recovery and reintegration through the provision of accessible, comprehensive and community-based mental health services." It also contained the following aspiration: "Each citizen should have access to local, specialised and comprehensive mental health service provision that is of the highest standard." These are most laudable and worthy goals, which we must realise for we have a special duty to those who require these services, a duty we must live up to.

This is the fifth annual report and its conclusions contain a mixture of welcome news and worrying updates. The openings of new adult child and adolescent mental health care facilities in Dublin, Cork and Galway must be welcomed as signs of real progress. Similarly, the closure and imminent closure of outdated facilities and services in Wexford, Dublin, Tipperary, Galway and Donegal as well as the partial closure of similar services in Kerry, Carlow and Kilkenny are further signs of the change in mental health treatment in this country with the move to more appropriate community-based services. Many of these services and facilities belonged to a past era and were wholly out of place in a modern, community-based, patient-focused mental health service.

While some of these developments were part of A Vision for Change, the impetus for some of them were caused by the conditions set by the Mental Health Commission, MHC, and for this reason it should be commended.

On the issue of financing, the previous Government must be credited with granting the metal health services with derogation from the budget cuts last year when it only reduced funding by 1.8%. A further issue on the financing of A Vision for Change is that, unfortunately, in a manner similar to the fair deal, it was to be based on property bubble expectations. A considerable proportion of the funding for reform and new developments and facilities was expected to come from the sale of land and buildings. While this may have appeared to be a sensible idea at the time, the collapse of the property market has disappointingly resulted in the projected amount of money not being realised. This is a very serious issue regarding the implementation of A Vision for Change and I ask the Minister of State to outline what provision is being made to ensure that the recommendations for the implementation of the original A Vision for Change will be properly financed.

I would also like to raise the recommendations this report makes on the structure of mental health services administration in this country. It repeats the assertion made in previous progress reports that there is an urgent need to establish a full directorate of mental health care services within the HSE, to which the Minister of State referred. Is there is a timescale for the formation of this structure? The absence of a directorate has led to the current state of affairs within the HSE vis-à-vis mental health services whereby there is no person or body with direct, sole responsibility for the implementation of the targets set out in A Vision for Change.The was covered in the Minister of State’s script but it is important that the directorate would be set up at an early date. I hope that the directorate which will be established soon will be given the full range of powers and responsibilities recommended in this report. These are that it must have authority in the reconfiguration of existing services and the development of new mental health services in accordance with A Vision for Change, and it must have control of existing and new mental health care resources.

A further report with reference to the structural issues is the committee's recommendation that a specific mental health component be included in the special delivery unitestablished by the Minister for Health in the Department. Is it the Minister of State's intention to implement that recommendation?

I wish to deal with some points in the report that are a cause of some concern. My colleague, Senator MacSharry, referred to the issue of staffing levels. An exemption to the moratorium on public service recruitment was granted in respect of 100 psychiatric nurse positions but more than 1,000 nurses retired last year and a further 1,100 are due to retire this year. The progress report states that mental health care is experiencing a disproportionate decrease in the number of posts compared with other areas of the health service and this undermines the full implementation of the model of services described in A Vision for Change. I ask the Minister of State to outline what measures are being considered to address this issue. Previous annual progress reports have criticised a disappointing lack of progress in the specialist services of forensic mental health care, rehabilitation and recovery, eating disorders, psychiatry for older people, severe mental illness, substance abuse problems and intellectual disabilities. I hope the Minister of State addresses this worrying lack of progress at the earliest opportunity.

The original strategy envisioned in A Vision for Change involves 99 multidisciplinary child and adult mental health service teams. Five years into the ten-year plan, the HSE reports that 61 teams are in place, comprising 56 community teams, two day hospital teams and three paediatric hospital liaison teams. Under the strategy, teams consist of a psychologist, social worker, nurse and occupational therapist under clinical direction of a child psychiatrist. Amnesty International Ireland director, Colm O'Gorman, recently stated that the staff levels on many of these teams is one third less than required for efficient operation. I ask the Minister of State to clarify the position.

The report also recommends that a legislative framework be considered to fully implement A Vision for Change. While I do not want to restrict the Minister of State's role in relation to reform and administration of mental health services, I ask whether such an initiative is under active consideration in her Department and if she is in favour of legislation.

As the report notes, there is now an urgent need for the Government to turn its attention to the services used by some of the most vulnerable people in society. I acknowledge the considerable progress that has been made but more is required. I wish the Minister of State well in her effort to meet the targets.

During my campaign for election to the Seanad, I learned about a team that was set up in County Leitrim to deal with families who are concerned about relatives at risk of suicide and depression. Three people are employed in an on-call service to meet those concerned. The service appears to be working well and perhaps the Minister of State could investigate whether it provides a model that could be implemented elsewhere. We are going through difficult times and we need to address the problem of suicide, just as a previous Government addressed the issue of road traffic accidents by putting in place a comprehensive education programme.

Top
Share