Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Monday, 16 Dec 2013

Vol. 228 No. 7

Adjournment Matters

EU Funding

Táim an-bhuíoch don Aire Stáit as an cheist seo a thógáil ar an Athló. Tá a fhios ag an Aire Stáit go bhfuil ceisteanna ardaithe agam le fada anuas sna Tithe maidir le ceist na dteifeach agus mar sin de. Le déanaí, bhí airgead le fáil ó chuid de na cistí Eorpacha maidir le tacú le teifigh agus iad siúd atá ag lorg tearmainn anseo.

Some 250,000 people apply for asylum in the EU each year but the number of applicants is not equally distributed among EU countries. Some countries face larger strains on their reception capacities and asylum systems due to the disproportionately large influxes of asylum seekers into their territories. European solidarity with these EU countries is ensured through practical co-operation, harmonisation of legislation and the European Refugee Fund. The ERF had €630 million over the period from 2008 to 2013 which supported EU countries' efforts in receiving refugees and displaced persons and guaranteeing access to consistent, fair and effective asylum procedures. A new round of the ERF will be announced. The European Integration Fund supports immigrants who come into the State.

I have been a long-time critic of our direct provision system. That said, it is important we support refugees who come to our shores in any way we can. Under previous Administrations, we saw funding discontinued for groups such as the Galway Refugee Support Group, which meant support services were not in place for these very vulnerable people. The round of funding from the EIF and ERF closed recently.

There are a number of very prominent organisations which support these groups. I have been in contact with a number of them and I have been quite surprised that some of the more active ones have received negative answers from Pobal in regard to the applications they made for funding under the funds.

The reason I raise this is to clarify what criteria have been used by Pobal to determine which groups did or did not get funding under the EIF, or indicative funding under the EIF and the ERF. Which groups got funding and what levels of funding have been granted? I look forward to the Minister of State's reply and thank him again for staying.

Tá liosta de na grúpaí a fuair airgead anseo. Tá sé soiléir ón liosta cé hiad na daoine a fuair an t-airgead agus cé mhéid a tugadh dóibh. Glacann an tAire go bhfuil sé tábhachtach an díospóireacht seo a bheith againn.

The European Refugee Fund provides assistance for the reception of asylum seekers and the reception and integration of refugees, persons enjoying subsidiary protection and resettled persons. The European Fund for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals supports the integration of third country nationals other than persons who come within the target groups of the refugee fund.

The office for the promotion of migrant integration in the Department of Justice and Equality is the responsible authority for these funds and Pobal is the delegated authority. This means that Pobal deals with calls for proposals and the appraisal and selection process, among other issues.

A call for applications was advertised by Pobal with a closing date of 20 September. There were 27 applications under the refugee fund and 40 under the integration fund. The appraisal process consisted of an eligibility check followed by a full appraisal of those which came through that check. The eligibility check was to determine if the application related to the appropriate target group for the fund and if it had confirmation of the necessary matching funding. The required matching funding is 30% of the total cost but only 5% for projects addressing certain specific priorities.

The appraisal is carried out by an appraisal officer of Pobal in line with the selection criteria. The appraisal is then considered by an appraisal sub-committee in Pobal. Recommendations are then made to the board of Pobal for approval, following which they are sent to the Department of Justice and Equality.

The criteria were published on the Pobal website when the call was launched. These included capacity of the applicant, need for the project, outcomes for the target group, strategic fit and value for money. Each of these criteria was given equal weight. More detailed information is on the Pobal website.

Additional marks were awarded to applicants which could source matching funding greater than the minimum amounts required. The Minister wishes to stress that the assessment was done by Pobal. The Department accepted Pobal's assessment of the merits of the individual applications. On this basis and having regard to the amount of resources in the subhead D9 of the Department's Vote this year and next year, the Department approved 22 projects, of which 16 are under the European Integration Fund and six under the European Refugee Fund. These were chosen in strict order of merit based on the marks awarded. The total amounts of the grants payable to these projects are €1,039,445 in the case of the integration fund and €442,389 for the refugee fund.

The Minister has made arrangements to put details on the website and have them made available to the Senator. The Minister does not propose to publicise details of unsuccessful projects. By definition, these will not be in receipt of grants and, in these circumstances, it would be considered more appropriate that unsuccessful applicants disclose the fact of their application themselves if they wish to do so in particular in circumstances where they may be seeking funding from other sources.

The level of funding available has meant that choices have had to be made. Also, the fact a project was unsuccessful on this occasion does not mean it cannot succeed in the future. The unsuccessful applicants were informed by Pobal of the outcome of their application and if they have queries, they can contact that body and a member of staff will respond. If there are further concerns at that point, it is possible to seek a review of the decision and this will be carried out by persons who were not involved in the original assessment.

While geographical location was not a selection criterion, it should be noted that 12 of the projects selected are based in Dublin, two in Galway and one each in Carlow, Clare, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Louth, Mayo and Meath.

I thank the Minister of State for the information.

Is there a possibility that funding could still be available if that review is successful?

The answer is in the question. I do not know the specific answer but I will ask the Minister to respond to the Senator on that.

The Seanad adjourned at 12.20 a.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Tuesday, 17 December 2013.
Top
Share