Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 26 Oct 2017

Vol. 253 No. 17

Commencement Matters

Schools Building Projects Status

St. Molaga's national school in Balbriggan has 463 pupils. Balbriggan is the fastest growing town in Ireland and it has the youngest population in the State. Since 2000, the school has been accommodated in 16 prefabricated buildings because of its growing population. They were to have been a temporary solution, but 17 years later they are still there. Three extra classrooms are needed now, plus special education rooms. The drop in the pupil-teacher ratio as announced in the budget means that extra classrooms will be needed next year and in the following years. The projected enrolment will increase the need for more classrooms year on year. The feeder school is Ss Peter and Paul junior school. The pupils there will go to St. Molaga's. They are not just names on a waiting list.

A total of 52% of the pupils are educated in prefabs, and 56% of the teaching staff work in prefabs. Those students and staff are isolated from the main building. They are too cold in the winter and too hot in the summer. They walk to the main school building in all kinds of weather, which is not satisfactory. They cannot engage in interactive learning because the prefabs are too small for the kids to spread out on the ground. The windows in the prefabs are leaking which creates a fire hazard because there are electrical items plugged in there. It is very unsatisfactory. This school has been on the Department of Education and Skills major building works list for 2019-21 but it has not received any correspondence from the Department. At what stage is the planning process? Where will the building be and when will the first sod be turned? This is needed urgently in St. Molaga's. I would appreciate an update on that.

I thank Senator Clifford-Lee for sharing her time. I raised this issue on the Order of Business yesterday. This situation is intolerable for the children and the teachers. I will not reiterate Senator Clifford-Lee's words which so clearly outlined the problems.

Yesterday, I visited the school after I left here. The portacabins or prefabs are in a desperate state. They have been repaired, patched up and repainted numerous times. As Senator Clifford-Lee has pointed out, we know exactly how many people will come from Ss Peter and Paul junior national school as it is a feeder school for St. Molaga's senior national school. On top of that, there is already a waiting list. Balbriggan is an area that will grow further so we need this school. The building project has been left on the long finger since 2000. The portacabins were erected as temporary structures in anticipation of a new school.

I had a discussion with the school principal, Ms Pauline Costello, yesterday. I learned that the school has contacted the Department of Education and Skills and been informed that despite the fact that the school is on the building list for 2019-21, no imminent action is anticipated. Therefore, no design team will be put in place and there no possibility that planning permission will be sought. I hope that the project will be addressed in a speedy and aggressive fashion.

Yesterday, I stood at the entrance of the school. In one corner of the entrance, which is a draughty area every time the door is opened, two special needs children were being taught by a teacher. The location is utterly unsatisfactory. The other corner of the entrance is supposed to house the quiet area and sensory room. That cannot be provided in such circumstances. There is also an open site with no security.

We welcome the reduction in the pupil-teacher ratio and new changes in terms of special needs. All of that is to nought in St. Molaga's national school as it cannot cope with what it has. The school has not got the facilities to deliver the excellence that the teachers are capable of delivering and want to deliver. The teachers want to give our children who are our future the best possible start in life.

The Minister sends his apologies for not being here this morning.

I thank Senators Clifford-Lee and Reilly for raising this matter as it provides me with an opportunity to outline the current position in terms of the accommodation needs of St. Molaga's national school, Balbriggan, County. Dublin. As both Senators will be aware, St. Molaga's is a co-educational national school that caters for pupils from third to sixth class. The school has a current enrolment complement of 462 pupils and a mainstream staffing complement of 17 mainstream teachers. In addition, the school has seven special education support posts and two special classes approved by the National Council for Special Education that cater for pupils with specific learning disabilities.

As the Senators may be aware, in order to plan for school provision and analyse the relevant demographic data, the Department divides the country into 314 school planning areas. The Department regularly carries out nationwide demographic exercises at primary and post-primary levels to determine where additional school accommodation is needed.

St. Molaga's national school is located in the Balbriggan school planning area. The area comprises 11 primary schools with ten catering for junior infant intake. St. Molaga's national school is a senior school that caters for boys and girls from third to sixth class.

The demographic data for the Balbriggan school planning area, as with other school planning areas nationwide, is constantly kept under review by the Department that takes into account updated child benefit and enrolment data. It is anticipated that decisions based on these exercises will be announced before year end.

In that regard, the Department's six-year construction programme 2016-21 aims to prioritise new building projects and major extensions, including special schools, in areas where demographic need has been established by the Department. In addition, the construction programme also provides for devolved funding for additional classrooms for schools, including special schools, where an immediate accommodation requirement has been identified, or where an additional teacher has been appointed. In this regard, a project for St. Molaga's national school is included in the Department's construction programme to primarily replace existing temporary accommodation with permanent accommodation. In that regard I understand that the Department is currently preparing a project brief. This process will include consultation with the relevant stakeholders, which includes the school authorities and the school patron, regarding the extent of the accommodation required to meet the needs of the school. The completion of the project will facilitate the project to be progressed into the architectural planning stage, which now includes the appointment of a design team.

I thank both Senators for giving me an opportunity to outline the current position regarding the proposed major school project at St. Molaga's national school. I also confirm the Department's commitment to progressing the project for the school.

I shall allow a very brief comment by both Senators.

I thank the Minister of State for his reply. Before I start, I wish to acknowledge the presence of Debbie Lynch and Sinéad Creamer who are seated in the Gallery. They are parents who have children attending the school and are very involved in this project.

St. Molaga's school has educated generations of children in Balbriggan. The school has built up a great history and culture. It has an excellent reputation and excellent school results. We acknowledge that there have been a lot of new schools built in Balbriggan. However, it is essential that St. Molaga's, which has existed for a long time, is not forgotten in the mix.

The Minister of State has stated that a consultation will begin but did not stipulate a timeline, which is the problem. The people in St. Molaga's need a definite timeline so they can plan and structure activities. His response is unsatisfactory and I would like him to address the actual timeline.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing the debate. I also welcome our guests in the Gallery from St. Molaga's who are parents.

I wish to say three things. One line in the presentation stuck out. It reads: "In that regard I understand that the Department is currently preparing a project brief." That information has not seeped through to the school, which has been given a flat nothing and as recently as a few days ago.

I call on the Minister of State and his Minister to get the building section in the Department to immediately engage with St. Molaga's on the timelines, design and consultation for the project, and to proceed as quickly as possible to the appointment of architects.

Finally, I will bring the following issue up with the Minister at a meeting that I anticipate will happen shortly in the context of other schools in Fingal. St. Molaga's requires urgent action to be taken. We are supposed to be living in a republic of equal opportunity. The children at St. Molaga's are not getting the same opportunity as other children in Balbriggan and elsewhere where new schools have been completed. I congratulate the Government on the school completions. St. Molaga's has been left for far too long. The children and their parents deserve better.

The Department is currently preparing a project brief. To be quite frank, I do not know when the brief will be completed but I have been told that it will be put in place by the year's end.

I can say that officials from the Department contacted the school's principal during the summer months about the project brief for the school, the school's long-term project and projected staffing requirements. I am not sure why that information did not filter through to the Senators.

No, I meant action was my message.

In the context of increasing staffing at the school, the Department has advised the school that it would be open to dealing with any application for immediate needs.

It is anticipated that the decisions based on the exercises, that I mentioned earlier, and criteria laid down would be in place by the end of the year. The Department has said that the school is included in its construction programme to primarily replace existing classrooms. The Department is in contact with the school. If the Senators need a further update either the Minister or myself will be delighted to give one in the next couple of weeks. My information, having spoken to the officials, is that the school is seen as a priority and the officials have been in contact with the school to deal with such a priority.

Briefly, a Chathaoirligh, if I could just mention-----

I cannot let the Senator in again, please.

A very brief comment otherwise I will have to break precedent.

The Minister of State has said that the school can submit an application if there is an immediate need. The people concerned do not want a temporary solution. They got a temporary solution 17 years ago and now need a permanent solution.

It will be a permanent solution.

This debate reminds me of a situation I dealt with in west Cork nearly 20 years ago when I was a Deputy. At the time I was told by a certain Minister that the provision of portacabins and temporary accommodation would never be seen again and they would be done away with. In one situation, a cost-benefit analysis showed that renting 14 portacabins over 12 years almost cost the same as building a new school.

Absolutely, yes.

There is also the cost of heating them.

It is economic nonsense. In my position, I cannot say too much. I thank the Minister of State and both Senators for their comments. This issue will come back again in January or February if we do not have progress for the school and for the two Senators in question. I thank the two Senators for sharing time.

Marine Resources

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Michael D'Arcy.

Let me set the matter in context. Sir David Attenborough has called for the world to cut back on its use of plastics in order to protect the oceans. A recent investigation carried out by The Guardian established that consumers around the world bought 1 million plastic bottles every minute. Plastic production is set to double in the next 20 years and quadruple by 2050. Around the world more than 8 million tonnes of plastic leak into the oceans. A recent study found that billions of people around the globe were drinking water contaminated by plastic.

A year ago this week I introduced a Bill, the Micro-plastics and Micro-bead Pollution Prevention Bill 2016, with the support of the Civic Engagement Group in the Seanad. The aim of the legislation was to address the growing problem of micro-plastic pollution in the oceans, rivers and seas. In spite of warm statements of support for the principles of the Bill from the then Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government, Deputy Simon Coveney, the Government, together with Fianna Fáil, voted it down. In speaking against it the then Minister promised action on micro-beads within one year, together with a new regime to establish a number of much needed marine protected areas. At a seminar hosted by Sustainable Water Action Network in April this year he once again gave assurances that the Government was working on and would soon publish an oceans Bill to finally create a coherent network of marine protected areas, MPAs, to protect the oceans and bring us into compliance with the EU marine strategy framework directive. One year on there is no sign of either. Micro-plastics pollution is a serious problem and since this time last year we have seen a large number of new reports on the negative impact of micro-plastics on the marine environment, filling much of the previous data gap. In June the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, published a report that found that exposure to micro-plastics in drinking water and food prepared with contaminated water posed a risk to human health and wildlife.

The Green Party's Bill would have introduced the concept of micro-plastic pollution into Irish law for the first time and allowed us to show some leadership. It would have banished all products containing micro-beads from the shelves and obliged the EPA to perform and publish annual tests for micro-plastic pollution. The Minister would have been obliged to present the EPA's findings to the Oireachtas, together with solutions.

The Government claimed that a ban would be contrary to EU Single Market rules, but during the debate it highlighted exceptions to the rules. The then Minister, Deputy Simon Coveney, illustrated this by writing to Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner, Karmenu Vella, to say Ireland would act on the issue. It seemed that the Government was genuine in its commitment to tackle plastic and micro-plastic pollution and, to its credit, it engaged in a public consultation process on the issue early this year. The Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment, Deputy Denis Naughten, even told his colleagues at the Council of Ministers that Ireland would not wait for EU measures on micro-plastics but would press ahead with its own legislation to tackle the problem. The subsequent Labour Party Bill tabled by Deputy Sean Sherlock to ban micro-beads was allowed to pass the first hurdle in the Dáil and is still being considered, yet progress has since stalled.

What is most serious is that there is absolutely no sign in the Government's autumn legislative agenda of the oceans Bill, something the Green Party would greatly welcome. We have seen the Minister, Deputy Denis Naughten, recently oppose the joint Green Party-Labour Party effort to introduce a deposit recycling system and a ban on non-recyclable or non-compostable single use plastics. What is the status of the oceans Bill? Is the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government working on it and what will be its scope? Will efforts be made by the Government to begin the process of tackling plastic marine waste and protecting key habitats? Clearly, Government statements that protection of the environment from plastic pollution was a priority have not been reflected in the actions taken to date. The European Union has been informed; the public consultation process has been concluded and many promises have been made. Therefore, I ask the Minister of State to tell where the oceans Bill is.

I thank the Senator for highlighting these important marine environmental issues. I know that she is passionate about the marine environment and all of the issues connected with it, as was evidenced by the debate on the Private Members' Bill she introduced in this House in November 2016 to prohibit micro-beads.

On the proposed legislation on micro-beads, work has been ongoing on the matter in the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government which has responsibility for it. In February it launched an online public consultation process on a proposed legislative ban on certain products containing plastic micro-beads. It received just over 3,000 responses. The volume and diversity of the responses received suggest civil society and relevant stakeholders are extremely interested in these matters and, more broadly, show an awareness of marine environmental matters. The Department is in the process of assessing the very large volume of submissions received and this exercise will inform the subsequent process of legislative development. As highlighted in previous debates on this issue, any proposed national prohibition on products containing micro-beads which might have implications for the principle of the free movement of goods in the European Union would require the approval of the European Commission and be required to be compatible with EU Single Market rules. The Department will forward the required notifications to the European Commission and the World Trade Organization, WTO, as soon as the relevant draft legislation has been developed to a sufficient point.

The Government is committed to development of primary legislation to provide for the creation of a network of marine protected areas, MPAs, in accordance with the requirements of the marine strategy framework directive. Of course, as the Senator will be aware, with regard to special spatial protection measures for the marine environment, we are not starting with a blank canvas. There is already a significant number of protected areas under the EU birds and habitats directives which are regulated by my colleague, the Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht. They include a significant number of special areas of conservation and special protected areas. The intention is to add new types of marine spatial protection measures to the existing measures and, over time, provide for the designation of a coherent and representative network of marine protected areas. The intention is to allow for the designation of various types of marine protected area by regulation, including their geographical delineation and the provision of the necessary special protection measures required for the marine protected area in question.

These regulations will identify what human activities, if any, need to be managed, or limited, in each potential marine protected area, MPA, and will identify the time periods where such restrictions apply.

In terms of legislation, the approach is to include the provisions regarding marine protected areas in the forthcoming maritime area and foreshore (amendment) Bill which is being developed by the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. That Department is awaiting further advice from the Attorney General on this legislation. As the process of implementation of any legislation is of paramount importance, it is envisaged that this legislation will also provide for enforcement powers and create penalties for offences where they do not currently exist in law.

Leaving aside the current work on microbeads and marine protected areas, the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government develops marine environment policy, principally through the implementation of the marine strategy framework directive, MSFD. The MSFD forms the basis of our sustainable interaction with our marine environment. The purpose of the MSFD is to integrate environmental considerations into all aspects of marine policy and activity in order that we maintain or reach a point of good environmental status, or GES, in our seas and oceans and, thereafter, that we ensure that this status is maintained through sustainable use of our seas. The directive requires that we assess our marine environment, develop GES targets and indicators, monitor our environment in light of these, and, where necessary, introduce a programme of measures to address issues affecting GES being achieved.

I am pleased to inform the House that the Department has started preparation for the second cycle of the multi-cycle, multi-phase marine strategy framework directive. A good deal of knowledge has been gained in the initial cycle of the process, and it is intended to build on this experience for the second cycle. This will see improved descriptions of all aspects of the marine environment and the environmental targets associated with them. The second cycle will also see the development of a more effective monitoring programme and programme of measures. The Department also intends to address gaps identified subject to financial constraints, science-knowledge advances and technological developments.

We are over time but the Senator may make a brief comment.

I will be brief. I thank the Minister of State for that reply, which I appreciate. With regard to the marine strategy framework directive, the Minister talked about the environment. With marine plastics, and particularly microplastics and microbeads, we are now talking about human health. These plastics are being found in the crustacea, the little shrimp and different foods we eat here in Ireland. They were found in studies by the Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, GMIT, and by the National University of Ireland, Galway, NUIG. This is an issue not just of the global environment but of human health. That is why it is vital that we address it as a matter of urgency.

I am sure the Senator will raise the matter again in the new year. It is an ongoing process and I wish her well. I thank the Minister of State.

Arts Funding

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Griffin, to the House. Senator Warfield has four minutes, or less, if possible, to outline his case.

I thank the Minister of State for coming into the House. I raise the announcement by Fáilte Ireland that a funding agreement has been reached with local authorities. The new funding arrangement will replace Fáilte Ireland's annual regional festivals and participative events programme next year. Fáilte Ireland has informed applicants and promoters seeking that funding that they should now apply directly to the local authority.

I want to talk about diverse funding streams for the arts. It is important that we maintain those funding streams. Doing so protects creativity, ensures transparency and provides greater safeguards for artists in the event of Government cuts. This unique funding stream from Fáilte Ireland supports countless medium and small-sized festivals across the State that enrich communities, and it is a core part of existing structures. As it stands, Fáilte Ireland funds festivals it sees as strategic in nature. The size of the local authority has no bearing. Fáilte Ireland invested €2.3 million in 33 festivals and events this year. Those festivals were not spread across the 31 local authorities, so I wonder how the funding will now be distributed.

I have some questions for the Minister of State. Will he clarify if he has been briefed by Fáilte Ireland and if has met the Minister, Deputy Heather Humphreys? Will he give us assurances that the current programme will stay true to its objectives? Will he guarantee that funding allocations will be free from political decision-making and that the arm's length principle will be upheld? If a given local authority becomes a guarantor for administering this programme, will it take the opportunity to reduce its own arts budget in light of what may be seen as a surplus amount on its books?

I thank Senator Warfield for agreeing to defer this Commencement matter until this morning. It is much appreciated.

I thank the Senator for raising this matter, which is of huge interest to a large number of groups throughout the country whose members are currently recipients of Fáilte Ireland funding as well as their local authority funding. As Ministers, I and my colleague, the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Ross, set national tourism policy to grow a competitive and sustainable tourism industry. While our Department provides the funding for investment in tourism, it is not directly involved in the administration of funding programmes or in the development of tourism experiences. In that context, Fáilte Ireland has operational responsibility for these matters.

Senator Warfield will be aware that the Government’s tourism policy, People, Place and Policy, Growing Tourism to 2025, was published in 2015. It recognises the important role that local authorities play in tourism. That encompasses many elements, including infrastructural development, the provision of amenities and attractions, and the funding of events. Focusing on local government, People, Place and Policy, Growing Tourism to 2025 commits to an enhanced role for local authorities and recognition of the contribution of communities to tourism. Subsequently, the Department published the Tourism Action Plan 2016-2018. The local government sector is a key partner in regard to the action plan.

Arising from the action plan, Fáilte Ireland reviewed its regional festivals and participative events programme with a view to identifying a role for local authorities in the administration of regional festival funding in line with an enhanced tourism role for local authorities. The review has now been completed and Fáilte Ireland and the local authorities have established a funding agreement to bring greater focus to the development of regional festivals and participative events. This new funding arrangement will replace Fáilte Ireland’s existing annual regional festivals and participative events programme for 2018. Accordingly, Fáilte Ireland is transferring funding currently provided under its competitive regional festivals and participative events programme directly to local authorities, based on the equivalent 2017 funding awarded to individual regional festivals.

This new funding arrangement aims to simplify the application process for applicants. Organisations seeking funding for a local festival will now only have to apply to one State body rather than to two. All applicants and promoters seeking funding for 2018 should now apply directly to their local city or county council. Furthermore, local authorities' knowledge and experience of local assets, strengths and history at city and county level means they are best placed to target funding to those festivals and participative events which have the potential to attract additional visitors to local communities within their area. The local government sector already makes a significant contribution to the development of the tourist experience in each local area in numerous ways, including through supporting festivals and events. This new funding arrangement between Fáilte Ireland and the local authorities will strengthen that role.

At the heart of this is trying to cut out the duplication for who are in many cases volunteers making the applications. Given that Fáilte Ireland, relatively speaking, is administering smaller grants, the actual cost of administering the grants in many cases is higher than the grants being paid out. The local authorities, which have an enhanced role, have very good mechanisms and the local knowledge to administer the grants. That system is working well at local authority level.

I take on board what the Senator said in regard to the arts. I will discuss that with the Minister, Deputy Heather Humphreys. I have met Fáilte Ireland. I meet it regularly, as does the Minister, Deputy Ross. I believe this is the way forward in terms of how we administer grants, but I will liaise closely with the Minister, Deputy Humphreys.

I will relay to her the Senator's observations and concerns as to how funding will be administered to recipients in future.

I thank the Minister of State for his response and welcome his commitment to start that conversation with the Minister. His reply seemed to suggest the changes will not have any bearing on existing funding for the arts via local authorities. The arms length principle is an integral element of the artistic process and ensures good governance and freedom in the creation and curation of work. I recognise the importance of simplifying the application process. I thank the Minister of State for his assurances on this matter.

Road Projects Status

I welcome the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Shane Ross, back to his alma mater.

I will be as brief as I can given that we are running late. Will the Minister undertake to prioritise funding for the Bandon southern relief road when his Department makes its submission on the next national investment plan? I raised the same issue in December last year when I asked that this project be brought forward for priority funding.

Bandon town has seen major upheaval in recent years. Having been flooded on several occasions, we are currently halfway through a major flood relief scheme. In addition, a public realm project, implementation of which is to commence in 2019, will increase and enhance the town centre as a public realm. Notwithstanding these welcome developments, the key problem for the town remains the volume of traffic passing through it, with anything from 9,000 to 14,000 vehicle movements per day. This level of through traffic is choking the town, with a significant proportion of movements comprising heavy goods vehicles whose size and capacity are unsuited to a town centre. We need an overall plan to ensure traffic is moved out of the centre so that the town can develop in accordance with its potential. Some 6,500 people live in Bandon and the county development plan envisages an increase in population of 1,000 over the next ten years. We must have a plan in place to ensure traffic is diverted from the town centre.

The proposal for an extension of the Bandon southern relief road involves constructing a bridge over the R63 road, which would override the existing steep terrain, after which a 2.5 km single carriageway would be built connecting on to the western part of the town. The approximate cost of the project is some €7.5 million, which is a small investment in the greater scheme of things. It would, however, represent a major investment in facilitating the development of the area. Bandon is the gateway to west Cork, with anyone wishing to go west having to go through it. If we can increase the potential for traffic to flow more easily through the town, there will be a broader economic benefit to the whole of west Cork. This key infrastructural project will allow Bandon and the surrounding towns to flourish. It involves an extension to the bypass, something that has been mooted for many years, as the Cathaoirleach knows. Will the Minister prioritise the necessary funding for the benefit of Bandon and the entire west Cork area?

I thank Senator Lombard for raising this important issue and commend him on making such a strong case for the Bandon southern relief road. I agree with his comments regarding the volumes of through traffic and his observation that the town serves as a gateway to west Cork, which I visited recently. The argument he makes has a great deal of merit but I dispute his claim that the projected cost of €7.5 million is very little in the greater scheme of things. Whenever people look at what is apparently the large budget for roads, they conclude that the allocation they are seeking for their particular project is relatively small. However, it must be borne in mind that we do not have enough money not just for capital projects but also for current expenditure. Senator Lombard's project will be competing with many other proposals, which is not to say it is ruled out. My Department and I will take into consideration the arguments he has made previously and the very strong case he has made today in the context of submissions regarding the ten-year national investment plan.

As Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, I have responsibility for overall policy and funding in respect of the national roads programme. The planning, design and implementation of individual national road projects is a matter for Transport Infrastructure Ireland, TII, under the Roads Acts 1993 to 2015, in conjunction with the local authorities concerned. Within its capital budget, the assessment and prioritisation of individual projects is a matter in the first instance for TII in accordance with section 19 of the Roads Act. Ireland has just under 100,000 km of road in its network, and the maintenance and improvement of national, regional and local roads places a substantial financial burden on local authorities and on the Exchequer. The national financial position following the financial crisis necessitated very large reductions in the Exchequer funding available for roads expenditure. For this reason, the focus had to be on maintenance and renewal rather than major new improvements in recent years. I envisage this emphasis on maintaining existing assets will continue into the next capital plan programme.

The Building on Recovery Capital Plan 2016-2021 and the capital plan review allocations mark a significant step forward in terms of restoring funding to the levels needed to maintain the road network in a "steady state" condition and allowing for some investment in road improvement schemes. The allocations and planned projects for the first years of the proposed ten-year plan will align with the existing capital plan as supplemented under the capital plan review. As part of that review, additional funding is being made available to allow Transport Infrastructure Ireland to develop a pipeline for future projects. As all capital projects are subject to appraisal in line with the requirements of the public spending code and my Department's capital appraisal framework, I do not envisage a list of projects being put forward for consideration as part of the ten-year plan but rather a budget requested which would allow TII to advance suitable major and minor national road projects, once project appraisal and planning work is satisfactorily completed. It would, therefore, be premature to take a view on the prioritisation of individual projects, including the Bandon southern relief road. As I am sure the Senator appreciates, there continue to be many competing demands for available resources both within the transport sector and across other economic sectors. However, I assure him that in the light of his presentations today, I will ensure the Bandon project is considered on its merits.

I thank the Minister for his response. It is important that a roadmap and timeline should be in place for these projects because people need to have some idea as to when development will commence. Whether it is local authorities planning the development of towns through county development plans or members of the general public, people need clarity as to what precisely is proposed to be done, including timelines for core projects.

I am sure this is an issue that will be raised again either in this House or the other House.

Sitting suspended at 11.20 a.m. and resumed at 11.30 a.m.
Top
Share