Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 12 Feb 2019

Vol. 263 No. 11

Nithe i dtosach suíonna - Commencement Matters

Broadband Service Provision

I welcome the Minister to the House. It is always great when a senior Minister comes in to deal with this type of very serious issue. I do not want to give its name, but a small school in west Clare has a student who is visually impaired. A vital piece of equipment has been purchased between the school and the parents of the child, in order for him to access vital statistics from the whiteboard and to be able to operate on a level playing pitch with the other boys and girls in the school. This piece of equipment costs in the region of €4,000 to €5,000 and is available for the young person so he can progress with his learning.

We all want to see young people, whether they have disabilities or are able bodied, being able to go to integrated schools and benefit from the wonderful environment of a small rural school. However, this piece of equipment which cost so much money is rendered inoperable because there is no broadband. The broadband in the school is not at a suitable standard for this piece of equipment to work.

I have liaised with the broadband officer in Clare County Council, who has been out to the school, tested the lines and determined that the speed is totally inadequate to operate any kind of equipment, not to mention this particular piece of equipment. The nearest Eir connection is over 1 km away from the school.

I am raising this matter on the Commencement of the House today because I do not know what else to do. It is grossly unfair that a school in rural Ireland would not have broadband in the first instance. While I understand there are a number of schools in this situation, and something was done for many of them, there are some exceptional cases such as this where nothing is happening. What compounds the situation and makes it all the more urgent is the fact that there is a student whose parents want him to learn, yet who cannot learn because of his disability and because the equipment provided to him is rendered inoperable by the lack of broadband.

Gabhaim buíochas leis an Seanadóir fáchoinne an cheist thábhachtach seo. I welcome the opportunity to provide an update on the status of broadband services in schools. The delivery of high quality Internet connectivity for all schools is a key objective of my Department. It is accepted that good connectivity is essential to ensure that schools can progress the embedding of digital technologies in teaching and learning and facilitate the implementation of new and revised curriculums. An interdepartmental group involving my Department and officials from the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment is working to determine how best to address high-speed broadband connectivity to all primary schools. This group will take account of developments in the Government's national broadband plan and its associated intervention strategy, which targets areas for the State intervention element of the national broadband plan.

Broadband capacity can vary due to geographical location and local available infrastructure, which can impact on the level of service that can be provided. The policy of my Department is to offer the best quality connectivity to all schools in line with the technical solutions available in the school location. In terms of the broadband services in the school referred to by the Senator, it should be noted that the school is located in the national broadband plan intervention area and services in this area are targeted under the national broadband plan. This school currently has a service which provides broadband speeds of up to 3 Mbps on a DSL line.

In an effort to improve services to the school, it was recently the subject of a broadband mini-competition organised by the Department. The provision of service to the school has been awarded to a wireless service provider, which will deliver upgraded speeds of 17 Mbps. The provider is currently working with the school to arrange installation and to deliver this improved service to the school.

To assist children with particular educational needs, the Department operates a scheme of grants towards the purpose of essential assistive technology. Equipment under the scheme is provided for children with more complex disabilities who, in order to access the school curriculum, require essential specialist equipment. Funding was provided under this scheme to the school in the case referred to by the Senator. It should be noted that the equipment provided does not require an ongoing broadband connection to facilitate access to the curriculum. If the school has concerns or needs advice, it may consult the visiting teacher service of the NCSE, which will be able to assist.

Under the current schools broadband programme, the Department's practice is to review constantly the availability of broadband with the aim of improving services to all primary schools as broadband connectivity improves throughout the country.

I thank the Minister. It is certainly news to me that an organisation is engaging with the school because I understood that was not the case. Perhaps it has started engaging in recent days. When the IT section of Clare County Council tested the lines going into the school, it found that the speed was just 1 Mbps, which is very poor. I would appreciate it if the Minister could use his good offices to double-check with the provider, come back to my office with an update on the situation and, most important, provide a timeline for when this equipment will be operable.

That is a reasonable request. With regard to whatever information is available to me, I will certainly ensure the Senator will be able to connect with the school and, hopefully, with the contractor who has won the tender for the wireless option. Wireless has been a solution for rural Ireland for many years. It is not the preferred solution if one is trying to get up to 1,000 Mbps. A similar scheme has been announced by SIRO in the larger towns. Ennis in County Clare might have been covered by that. There are other options through Eir and through copper connectivity. The focus in the short to medium term - not the medium to long term - has to be on the national broadband plan. The schools that are not getting broadband at the moment will be covered by that. It is important. I appreciate the Senator's decision to raise this matter. It is about equality of access. People cannot be discriminated against just because of geography. That is the reason I wanted to come to the House. If there is anything the officials in the Department of Education and Skills can do to expedite this, I will be happy to ensure it is done. Gabhaim buíochas arís leis an Seanadóir fá choinne an cheist seo a ardú. Beidh mé sásta na sonraí ó mo chuid oifigigh a chur in iúl don Seanadóir. Beidh mé i dteagmháil leis.

Go raibh maith agat.

Garda Stations

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Stanton, back to the House.

I thank the Minister of State for coming to the House to debate this important issue.

I am looking for an update on the reopening of Rush Garda station. Rush station was one of the six Garda stations that were announced in November 2017 to be reopened as part of a pilot project. That was November 2017 and now we are in February 2019 and I am looking for an update. The people of Rush were delighted when it was announced they would get their Garda station back. They severely felt the loss of the Garda station and the diminishing of the Garda numbers in north County Dublin.

In case the Minister of State does not know, Rush is a small coastal town in north County Dublin with a population of some 10,000. It has grown rapidly in recent years and that growth is set to continue. Like all of north County Dublin, the population is exploding there, but we have seen a 20% decline in Garda numbers in the area. This particular Garda station was closed back in 2012. The people in Rush are very anxious about their personal security and the security within the town. We were very happy when this reopening was announced. I would like an update on what stage it is at. The last time I raised this issue was in May 2018 and at that point there was a discussion between the OPW and An Garda Síochána with regard to an assessment of needs. I was informed that this assessment was nearing an end. I would appreciate if the Minister of State could give us an update and, as far as possible, a timeline for when we could see Rush Garda station open.

I acknowledge the serious interest taken by the Senator in this matter. I know that she is speaking about a very nice part of north County Dublin. I compliment the Senator on her work for the people there. The Minister, Deputy Flanagan, sends his regrets as he cannot be here today due to other commitments.

I believe we will see him later.

I am sure you will.

The Senator will be aware that A Programme for a Partnership Government commits to a pilot scheme to reopen six Garda stations, urban and rural, to determine the possible positive impacts that such openings would have on criminal activity, with special emphasis on burglaries, thefts and public order. The Garda Commissioner's final report, which is available on my Department's website, recommends that Rush Garda station be reopened along with the following stations: Ballinspittle, County Cork; Bawnboy, County Cavan; Leighlinbridge, County Carlow; Donard, County Wicklow; and Stepaside, County Dublin.

It is important to recognise that the programme of replacement and refurbishment of Garda accommodation is progressed by the Garda authorities working in close co-operation with the Office of Public Works. The OPW has the responsibility for the provision and maintenance of Garda accommodation. The Minister for Justice and Equality has no direct role in these matters, as the Senator will appreciate. The Minister has been informed, however, that at the outset of the pilot reopening process the Garda authorities provided a brief of requirements to the OPW on the reopening of each of these six Garda stations and requested that the OPW carry out technical surveys to determine the works necessary to enable the stations to reopen.

The Senator is aware that following the consideration of the OPW technical surveys of each of the six stations, the Commissioner identified the organisation's preferred way forward bearing in mind operational needs, costs, timeframe for delivery and other factors. Engagement between the OPW and An Garda Síochána has continued, providing further necessary detail to allow the pilot programme of reopenings to proceed to the next stage of implementation.

As the works required at each station are different it can be expected that the six stations will be reopened at different times. The Department has been informed that the necessary works were completed at Donard station in December 2018 and the station has now been handed over to An Garda Síochána by the OPW.

Finalisation of design planning, where required, and the procurement for works at each of the five remaining stations included in the pilot programme are at different stages but are being processed by the OPW in conjunction with An Garda Síochána in line with all applicable processes and procedures. In advance of today's debate the Minister requested an update from the OPW and the Garda authorities specifically on progress on Rush Garda station. From the OPW we understand that a revised brief of requirements regarding Rush station was received from An Garda Síochána in August 2018. We are informed that the OPW prepared and submitted a proposed plan to the Garda authorities for review and that a final design plan was agreed and signed off in December 2018. We are informed that the OPW is currently preparing tender documents to procure the required works at Rush station via the OPW measured term maintenance contract. Some interim minor maintenance works such as clearing pathways and so on will be carried out by the OPW regional office in advance of those works. The OPW has said it expects works to be complete and the Rush station to be handed over to An Garda Síochána by this year, summer 2019. After the handover of the building the exact date of reopening of the station will be an operational matter for An Garda Síochána.

I assure the Senator that implementation of a pilot Garda station reopening project and reopening of all relevant stations will be pursued as a priority. The Office of Public Works expects that work will be completed in all remaining stations this year. I hope that is useful to the Senator.

I thank the Minister of State for his comprehensive answer. It is great that the project is progressing at this rate. I am pleased the Minister of State has given a final date of summer 2019. I have tried to pin down the Minister on several occasions. Obviously, things were progressing. It is good the Department is moving towards the final point in this and I note the tender documents are being prepared. It would be assumed that relatively minor works remain to be done on the Garda station if the Minister of State envisages the handover taking place this summer. I hope that An Garda Síochána can staff the station at that stage. I will make a request to the Minister to provide extra Garda resources for north County Dublin, including extra Garda cars and the other resources that the Garda needs. There is no point having the Garda station reopened if there are not enough resources in place. I thank the Minister of State for the update. I appreciate it.

I compliment the Senator on her interest in pursuing this important matter and I thank her for raising it. Again, I assure her of the Government's commitment to the pilot Garda station reopening scheme, which is intended to determine possible positive impacts that such openings would have on criminal activity. That is the reason it is going ahead.

As I have said, An Garda Síochána and the OPW are working closely together to allow for the reopening of the stations concerned, including the station in Rush. I have heard the Senator's views and I reassure her that the OPW and Garda authorities are working closely together to allow for the reopening of each of the six stations. The station in Donard has been completed and has been handed over and the others will hopefully be completed this year as well.

It is not possible for me to say at this stage when exactly Rush Garda station will reopen because that is a matter for the Garda Commissioner. I am informed by the OPW that the necessary remedial works will be completed by the summer of this year. Staffing and other resources are matters for the Commissioner and the Minister has no direct role in directing that, as such. The exact opening date is an operational matter for An Garda Síochána. I thank the Senator for her interest and for raising this matter.

Passport Applications

I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Deputy McEntee.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for selecting this Commencement matter. I was contacted recently by an Irish woman whose British wife recently gave birth to their son, who was conceived through assisted human reproduction methods. They are both legally recognised as parents in Britain on all statutory documents, including the birth certificate. However, when the Irish mother, who is the non-biological mother, wished to apply for an Irish passport for her child, she was told that she was not recognised as a mother under law and, therefore, was not entitled to apply for an Irish passport for her child.

The reply from the Department to a recent parliamentary question that I submitted through Deputy Crowe confirmed the position and stated that, for the purposes of Irish law and with specific reference to the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, a parent is understood to mean either the mother or father of the child. It further stated that for the purposes of Irish law the mother of a child is the person who gives birth to the child or a female adopter of the child. What this means in reality is that same-sex parents are excluded. These parents frequently rely on assisted human reproduction methods to conceive. Parents who are legally recognised and hold Irish citizenship cannot extend their citizenship rights in the same manner as everyone else.

This is clear discrimination and a very real denial of rights and would certainly not withstand legal challenge.

It bears some resemblance to the time when we did not have marriage equality, before we held the referendum on civil marriage equality, and the relationship of couples who had been married elsewhere was relegated to a civil partnership in this State. As the Minister of State knows, the Zappone and Gilligan case was an example of that. The referendum that followed brought with it very hurtful conversations on the validity of same-sex parent-led families, when posters stating "Every child deserves a mother and a father" were put up around the State. The people's vote said that there is no single proposition for a family in Ireland, only diversity.

We urgently need relevant legislation to catch up and it is unacceptable that a passport form in this day and age would ask for a mother and a father and exclude same-sex parents. There is also an unprecedented demand for Irish passports so we have to ensure that our passport laws are robust and that we are not leaving anyone behind. Does the Minister of State agree that the Act needs to be updated and will the Government bring forward such legislation in this term?

I thank the Senator for raising what is a very important issue. While much of my response is quite technical in outlining the situation as it stands, the Senator has brought it back to what it should be about, namely, families, children and their parents. While he, I and many others would recognise both people in the example he gave as parents, the letter of the law says otherwise. We have to work to bring about change, as we have done in the past and as the Senator outlined.

All passports are issued in accordance with the provisions of the Passports Act 2008, as amended. Pursuant to section 7 of the Act, a passport cannot be issued unless the Minister is satisfied that the person is an Irish citizen and as to the identity of the person. Citizenship is governed by the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, which is under the responsibility of the Minister for Justice and Equality. Legislative measures relating to citizenship do not fall within the remit of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. I will therefore confine my remarks to an explanation of the current citizenship legislation under which the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade operates. I will also explain the current legislative situation relating to guardianship of children.

The Department, specifically the passport service, is tasked with processing passport applications in line with the requirements of the Passports Act. The passport service has received several applications from same-sex married couples seeking to obtain Irish passports for their children born abroad and, in giving due consideration to these applications, has rightly raised a number of issues relating to both citizenship and guardianship with the relevant Departments and the Office of the Attorney General.

I would like to set out the current legislation on citizenship. Section 7 of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, addresses citizenship by descent and provides that a person is an Irish citizen from birth if at the time of his or her birth either parent was an Irish citizen, although an additional requirement of registration is imposed in respect of children born outside the island of Ireland where the Irish citizen parent was also born outside the island of Ireland.

For the purposes of the 1956 Act, a parent is understood to mean either the "mother" or "father" of the child. For the purpose of Irish law, the mother of a child is the person who gives birth to the child or a female adopter of a child. In general, the "father" is the person identified as the genetic father of the child or a male adopter.

The passport service has received passport applications for children born outside the State to same-sex couples where one member of the couple is an Irish citizen and the other is not. Following consideration of the 1956 Act, the passport service understands that, under the current legislation, where the Irish citizen is neither the birth mother nor the genetic father or neither the male nor female adopter of the child, the child does not qualify for Irish citizenship by descent. The passport service sought and received advice on its understanding of the 1956 Act from the Office of the Attorney General.

While the passport service's understanding was confirmed, the Office of the Attorney General was of the view that further confirmation from the Department of Justice and Equality was required.

The passport service has sought clarification from the Department of Justice and Equality on this and many other related matters, including the effect on citizenship of Parts 2 and 3 of the Children and Family Relationships Act 2015, once commenced by the Minister for Health.

I would like to outline the current legal status and position on guardianship. There are particular provisions in the Passport Act dealing with applications for children. Under the terms of the Act, the passport service requires the consent of a guardian or guardians before issuing a passport for a child under the age of 18 years, subject to very limited exceptions. Section 14(1) of the Act provides, "The Minister shall, before issuing a passport to a child, be satisfied on reasonable grounds that where a child has two guardians, each guardian of the child, and where a child has two or more guardians, at least two of those, consent to the issuing of a passport for the child". In line with section 2 of the Act, "guardianship" is a term with a defined legal meaning. For the purposes of that section, "a guardian" means a person who, first, is a guardian of the child pursuant to the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 and, second, is appointed to be a guardian by either the child, deed, or will or order of court in the State and has not been removed from that office. In cases where a child has only one guardian within the meaning of the legislation, the guardian is required to complete a sole guardian affidavit to confirm that there is no other person to confirm that no other person holds guardianship rights in respect of the child applying for a passport. This is necessary in order to verify that the requirements for guardian consent have been satisfied. It is my understanding the Minister for Health has recently met civil society representative groups from the LGBTI community to discuss a range of issues, including the rights of same-sex couples and their children. I will bring this debate to the attention of the Minister, the Minister for Justice and Equality and my colleague, the Tánaiste, Deputy Coveney. This is an issue we need to address and it is an area in which I would like to see further progression.

I hope the Minister of State will appreciate that she has provided a lot of information and that I will not be able to extract the key points in just one minute.

I might give the Senator some latitude.

People have a reasonable expectation, after the big national conversation we had on foot of the referendum, that relevant obstacles will be dealt with. This does not affect a huge number of people, but there is an expectation that the obstacles will be removed. Often, when working on LGBT rights, people are surprised because we have had that national conversation to hear that certain issues have not been sorted out or dealt with. However, these issues still arise; this is not the only such circumstance. Legislation only allows mothers to avail of adoptive leave; therefore, two men who adopt do not have shared or equal adoptive leave entitlements. This is but one of many issues which include the Children and Family Relationships Act. I will keep in touch with the Minister of State and her office and appreciate her response.

There have been recent discussions on this matter which do not just follow on from the Attorney General's request for further clarification from the Department. There have been other legislative developments, led by the Department of Justice and Equality, the Department of Health and the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection which will I hope have a positive impact in this area in dealing with some of the concerns that have been raised. Most importantly, there must be continued engagement with civil society groups on the issues faced by same-sex couples to try to address some of the outstanding issues raised by the Senator. I am happy to engage with my colleagues and, on a personal level, with the Senator to progress them further.

Housing Provision

Last Saturday I marched with the communities of Sandymount, Ringsend and Irishtown on Pearse Street because of the fear of the loss of social and affordable units within them. Last week there was an announcement that the 40 housing units to be provided in the South Lotts Road area, which is in a strategic development zone, SDZ, were to be provided instead in Rialto. The units were to be part of the community gain from the SDZ covered under Part V of the legislation. Following on from the media coverage of the issue, it was announced by senior officials at Dublin City Council that there would be no social housing in Dublin 2, Dublin 4 or Dublin 6 without a special case being made for it.

Another senior official said there would be no affordable housing in Dublin 2, Dublin 4 or Dublin 6. The best they can expect is to build them out in the suburbs. This has led to fears, which I can understand, that the 350 social units promised for the strategic development zone in Poolbeg West will not be delivered, never mind the 550 affordable and affordable rental homes promised by the then Minister, Deputy Coveney.

The deposits have been paid on the sites in the strategic development zone, SDZ, in Poolbeg West and on the Poolbeg Peninsula. Some €30 million has been set aside for a bridge over the River Dodder to give access to the Poolbeg West development site. The taxpayers paid for the decontamination of the site and there is a blank cheque from the Department for the plinth that has to be put in place but which is, so far, uncosted.

It is unacceptable for senior city council officials to say there will be no social or affordable housing in these areas and to be left unchallenged by the Department. The previous Minister, Deputy Coveney, gave a firm commitment to the delivery of 900 units and this is written into the strategic development zone plan that is before An Bord Pleanála at the moment. Fine Gael has been saying that the housing crisis can only be solved by delivery but we know there is a strong lobby for going higher. I do not necessarily have a problem with height or density but there are three strategic development zones in the Docklands - the North Lotts, the South Lotts and Poolbeg West. There is speculation that building on the North Lotts will go higher. The Minister needs to take note of the fact that strategic development zones have clear objectives and integrated planning schemes. If one goes higher in one location one has to do the same for all developments in that location and if one increases commercial development, one also has to increase residential, and vice versa. With the height strategy outlined by the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, Deputy Eoghan Murphy, the Government is running the risk of undermining the three strategic development zones. The outcome will be that over 5,000 units in this city will be delayed.

I am not sure if the Government has the competence to manage this issue. All I see in the attempts to increase the supply of housing is mistake after mistake. There have been three delays in supply, all caused by the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. These were the change in apartment sizes, the change in car parking spaces and the change relating to the height strategy. All led to further planning applications, even though developments of over 100 units can go straight to An Bord Pleanála. There has been delay after delay with applications being withdrawn.

I will try to deal with the question that was asked, as well as the ten other questions that were added in during the Senator's contribution.

They are related issues.

My role regarding Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000 is to provide the policy and legislative framework, while the day-to-day administration and operation of Part V are a matter for the local authorities. Senator Humphreys will, no doubt, be aware that following an independent review of Part V, completed in 2014, which included a detailed and lengthy consultation process and which took into account the general housing market trends at that time, the requirement was reduced from 20% to 10%, effective from 1 September 2015.

My Department subsequently issued statutory guidelines to local authorities on the amended Part V rules. These guidelines recommended that the acquisition of units on the development site be the preferred option for local authorities. However, each local authority must make sure its Part V agreements constitute the best use of financial resources available and that unit sizes meet social housing requirements.

My Department considers all requests from local authorities for sanction for funding of the acquisition of units under Part V in light of construction costs in the area, and also one of the key aims of Part V, general social integration, which is very important.

Senators will know that Part V is just one constituent part of the significant efforts being made by this Government to deliver the social housing supports that Ireland needs in the coming years. These efforts are backed up by an unprecedented level of investment under the Rebuilding Ireland action plan. More than €6 billion of taxpayers' money will be spent during the lifetime of that plan delivering in excess of 50,000 social housing homes, as well as many more supports through the private rental market. Part V homes are expected to deliver just under 5,000 of the overall total and as the construction sector recovers and delivery increases, so too does our dividend in terms of Part V. It is encouraging to see their numbers increase year on year because they not only deliver additional stock but make a vital contribution, as I mentioned, in terms of promoting social integration and developing more positive sustainable communities - a benefit to all of Irish society. I know Senator Humphreys agrees with that. That is probably part of what the debate on this Commencement matter is about, namely, to ensure that we still achieve that.

We are very much about delivering the social housing we need as a nation. We are also very well aware of the need to build those sustainable mixed tenure communities all over Ireland. In general, this approach works well across the country. Unfortunately there are occasions when our two key objectives of increased delivery and social integration can come into some conflict. When this happens we must be pragmatic, constructive and seek to strike the right balance. Such a scenario tends to happen in what might be termed more "high-end" developments.

As to areas such as the Dublin Docklands, all options for the delivery of Part V homes are explored, including the most cost-effective way of delivering much-needed social housing units in these specific electoral areas. Alternatives can, if required, be explored, particularly off-site development nearby which delivers more homes for the same price. In other words, there is the option in some scenarios for some land swaps or for some land to be given in terms of housing. My Department is committed to working with the council to help find that balance and to deliver solutions that increase our social housing stock in the places where they are needed but at a price that is acceptable to the Exchequer. That is a decision that has to be made locally as we tease through the different sites.

On the Deputy's attempt to suggest that changes we have made with respect to apartment sizes, car parking spaces, and height strategy are delaying matters, we have to make necessary changes to effect the overall supply of housing now and well into the future. We have the Rebuilding Ireland document, which is a strategy for social housing and housing in general. We are reaching all the targets set in terms of what we want to deliver, both in the private sector and the public sector. We are bang on target right across the board. The Central Statistics Office figures confirmed that last week.

Furthermore, the changes we have made might in some cases on different sites generate new applications, but it has been confirmed that the overall supply of housing is up by 25%. Commencement notices are up by more than 50%. With respect to some sites, there will be chop and change but the overall delivery is up and the trend is positive.

We believe the changes we have made regarding the height strategy, car parking spaces and so on will increase the supply and mix of housing coming onstream which we badly need. Those are changes that were probably put off for many years by previous Governments but we have made them now and I have no doubt they will effect supply in a positive way in the future. One can select one or two sites and argue over them but we have had to make decisions in the round to increase the supply of housing well into the future.

The Minister of State clearly knows what I have said to him. Council officials have probably blown the whistle on him if they are saying there will be no social or affordable housing in the areas of Dublin 2, 4 and 6. They are already implementing that policy. The Minister of State mentioned provision in an off-site development nearby. That is not what happened in the South Lotts strategic development zone. The units are being provided in Rialto, a different housing area, more than 3 km away. Therefore, the Minister of State, with respect to any of the answers he has given, has not satisfied my concerns. He has confirmed that the community's fears in this respect are real. The 350 social units on the Poolbeg West site are now in danger. The Minister of State's commitment to the 550 social and affordable units is now questionable.

I have asked the Minister of State for clear answers but he has not given any. He has avoided a straight answer. I will give him a clear warning. If there are changes in the strategic development zones, that may very well undermine all the strategic development zones not only in Dublin but across the country and cause a further worsening of the housing crisis.

The Minister of State and the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, Deputy Eoghan Murphy, are in charge of housing and have a responsibility to deliver on the objectives of the SDZ, but they are not doing so. They have allowed the officials in Dublin City Council to choose not a nearby off-site location but a distant off-site location. This is not acceptable to the communities of Ringsend, Irishtown and Pearse Street and the Government must pull its socks up and start to deliver on the objectives of the SDZ and under Part V which clearly states there can be an off-site allocation but that it must be nearby. That is not happening in the city and it is not the intention of the Department's officials for it to happen in the city. The Government needs to wake up and smell the roses.

On the Dublin docklands and Part V, the cost of purchasing units in the docklands area can often far exceed the cost ceilings we try to maintain. In some cases, land and development costs are extremely high, the units have a high specification or there are high management fees for services such a a concierge, gyms and so on beyond what the Department generally funds through the local authorities. In some cases, the purchase would not be deemed to be value for money, leading the city council to determine that off-site provision be considered to comply with Part V. For example, it determined that on-site affordability was not possible at the Capital Dock development and procured the Part V units off-site in Rialto.

Rialto is not nearby.

There is another development under consideration by the city council, namely, the Landings as part of Project Wave, which will deliver 30 units on-site. The cost of these units will also be high, at more than €400,000 per unit, but the council considers them to be good value for money compared to the estimated cost of sourcing and possibly upgrading on-site units. While the Department has asked the council to consider alternative options for the delivery of the Part V portion of the development, the council is preparing a submission to the Department which will restate the suitability and affordability of the on-site units. The council is, therefore, making a case.

I stress that in the case of Part V projects and certain areas of high pressure, site by site decisions must be made in conjunction with the local authorities and the Department. Dublin City Council has eight active developments in the docklands area to which Part V applies and we are working through them. Three of the developments have received planning permission, while the city council has made contact with the other developers. In general, for Part V projects, delivery is agreed at commencement stage of the planning application. It is not the case that we are making only general comments. The Senator is perhaps trying to make a different argument. We must work through each site, which is what we are trying to do as well as we can.

There are 1,720 planning applications, but there have been only 26 deliveries-----

The Senator does not have an opportunity to respond.

Sitting suspended at 3.20 p.m. and resumed at 3.35 p.m.
Top
Share