Skip to main content
Normal View

SELECT COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD debate -
Wednesday, 6 Apr 2005

Rotterdam Convention: Motion.

I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture and Food, Deputy Brendan Smith, and his officials. This is the Minister of State's first meeting since taking over his current position. On behalf of the committee, I wish him well in his work. I am aware that he has proven himself a very active Minister of State hitherto and I know that, as in the past, he will be of assistance to the committee and its members.

The select committee has been asked to consider the following motion:

That Dáil Éireann approve in accordance with Article 29.5.2° of Bunreacht na hÉireann the accession by Ireland to the Rotterdam Convention on the prior informed consent procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade.

I ask the Minister of State to make his opening remarks, which will be followed by questions from members.

I thank the Chairman for his welcome. I have wanted to thank him and all members for facilitating us with a meeting today to enable this convention to be ratified.

The Department of Agriculture and Food is arranging for Ireland to accede to the Rotterdam Convention on the prior informed consent, PIC, procedure, for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade. For the Government to have Ireland accede to the Rotterdam Convention, the approval of Dáil Éireann is required. It is for this reason that the motion is before the committee.

I wish to give some background information on the Rotterdam Convention. In September 1998, the Rotterdam Convention for the application of the prior informed consent, PIC, procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade was concluded and signed by 73 parties, including the European Union and all its member states, except Ireland. The number of member states at the time was 15. Since manufacture of those hazardous chemicals and pesticides does not occur in this country, Ireland was not among the original member states to ratify the convention. The convention, which is jointly chaired by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, UNFAO, plant protection service and the UN Environment Programme, or UNEP, came into force on 24 February 2004, having received the required 50 instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.

The convention has as its basic principle that the export of a banned or severely restricted chemical can take place only with the prior informed consent of the importing country. The convention's aim is to enhance promotion of the shared responsibility and co-operative efforts among parties in the international trade of such chemicals to protect human health and the environment from potential harm as well as contributing to their environmentally sound use. The chemicals subject to the prior informed consent procedure, of which there are currently 37, are listed in Annex 3 to the convention. Those chemicals are a mix of pesticides and industrial chemicals, with the majority in the former category. Since the Department of Agriculture and Food is responsible for the regulation of pesticides, and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, through the Health and Safety Authority, for the regulation of industrial chemicals, the decision is being sought by both relevant Ministers.

The provisions of the Rotterdam Convention are incorporated into EU legislation through Regulation (EC) 304/2003, as amended, concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals. The convention covers chemical substances in the form of both pesticides and industrial chemicals that have been either banned or severely restricted by governmental regulatory action for health or environmental reasons. It has been examined by the pesticides control service of the Department of Agriculture and Food regarding pesticides and by the Health and Safety Authority under the aegis of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment regarding industrial chemicals. Both are designated national authorities under the convention and it has been determined that the convention imposes an obligation on Ireland.

At present, none of the designated substances set out in Annex 3 to the convention is being manufactured here. Therefore, there are no regulatory implications for accession to the convention for Ireland. However, if the manufacture of one of the designated substances commences in Ireland, there will be an obligation on the country to comply with the convention by supplying information on the substance to the importing country and receiving the consent of that country before exporting the substance. Attendance at conferences of the parties to the convention will result in a charge to the State and a charge on public funds will, therefore, arise. In those circumstances, Article 29.5.2° of Bunreacht na hÉireann requires that Dáil Éireann approve the convention before the State may be bound by it.

Accession to the convention will not impose any other financial obligations on Ireland. The secretariat's budget is currently funded by a trust fund that receives contributions from several countries, including the EU, as well as transfers from the environment fund of UNEP and the regular programme resources of UNFAO.

All member states of the EU prior to enlargement, including Britain, have ratified or acceded to the convention. There are no negative implications in the context of North-South or east-west relations.

I have a list of questions for the Minister of State. This is a positive development. I know that it is mainly of a technical nature in respect of our country. Perhaps the Minister or his officials might state the penalties for a breach of the convention, for example, the illegal or inadvertent importation of one of the chemicals in question. I ask because of the recent controversy involving Sudan Red 1. If something similar happens in respect of some of these chemicals, is there a way to trace them back and impose penalties either on the country of origin or the manufacturers? Are Sudan Red 1 and related chemicals already included, or could they be, under the terms of this convention? Can it be amended to extend the list of chemicals that are included and will it include these types of chemicals, if that is feasible?

I have one other comment which is not directly related to this. I want to ask the Minister of State if his officials can return to the committee at a later date to discuss the food supplements directive on which the Advocate General at the European Court of Justice commented yesterday. That could have implications for the animal medicines regulations, which are far more prescriptive than those on the supplements. Perhaps the departmental officials could return to the committee on that issue on a separate occasion and brief members in respect of it.

I join the Chairman in welcoming the Minister of State. The committee looks forward to working with him in the future. I am happy to support the motion. I have just one question for the Minister of State which relates to the 37 chemicals or substances he stated are covered by the convention. While none of them is manufactured in Ireland, to what extent are these chemicals, substances or pesticides imported here? Will the Minister of State comment on that matter?

On Deputy Naughten's first question about non-compliance, Article 17 of the Rotterdam Convention states:

The Conference of the Parties shall, as soon as practicable, develop and approve procedures and institutional mechanisms for determining non-compliance with the provisions of this Convention and for treatment of Parties found to be in non-compliance.

We have latitude, with regard to export-import regulations under the European Union, to impose the relevant penalties as well.

As regards Deputy Ó Fearghaíl's question, no pesticides are being imported into Ireland that come under that category. One product is, however, being imported on the chemical products side, subject to the relevant regulations and conditions.

In reply to Deputy Naughten's question on food, I will again cite the convention. Article 3, which deals with the scope of the Rotterdam Convention, says it applies to banned or severely restricted chemicals as well as severely hazardous pesticide formulations. It does not apply to a number of areas, one of which is food.

I do not wish to split hairs, but Sudan Red 1 is not supposed to be used as a food chemical as it was in the recent instance. Does that fit into the category of severe chemicals or are Sudan Red 1 and related chemicals not of the standard that applies in this regard? I presume these are pretty noxious chemicals and that is the reason for their inclusion. Would Sudan Red 1 and related chemicals not be considered sufficiently noxious to be included in this type of category? On the issue of penalties, has there been a further conference to establish the type of penalties that need to be in place? The Minister of State quoted the convention but it does not include any penalties, an issue that seems to have been long-fingered at the time of the ratification.

On Deputy Naughten's point, Ireland will be represented at the relevant meetings of the Rotterdam Convention from now on. The particular area of non-compliance will be one of the issues to be addressed.

That has not yet been resolved.

No, it has not. As the Deputy is aware, the Food Safety Authority of Ireland which was involved in the Sudan Red 1 review, comes under the Department of Health and Children. To be absolutely correct on a technical matter such as this, it is preferable if we communicate further with the Deputy in writing. I do not wish to mislead the committee.

That is fair enough.

Either the Department of Agriculture and Food or the Department of Health and Children will come back to the committee directly on the subject matter of the Deputy's question.

Is that agreed? Agreed. I again thank the Minister of State and his officials for attending. Is there any other business?

I remind the Chairman that the Minister of State might come back to the committee in respect of the food supplement issue that I raised and clarify its relevance and implications, if any, as regards the directive on animal remedies.

I thank the Deputy. The Joint Committee on Agriculture and Food will commence its meeting at 3 p.m.

Top
Share