Skip to main content
Normal View

SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE, EQUALITY, DEFENCE AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS debate -
Wednesday, 16 Jun 2010

Council of Europe Convention: Motion

We can proceed with the meeting in public session. The purpose of today's meeting is to consider the motion that Dáil Éireann approves, in accordance with Article 29.5.2° of Bunreacht na hÉireann, the terms of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings, and to consider the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2008.

The committee will now consider the motion referred to it by Dáil Éireann on 25 May 2010:

That Dáil Éireann approves in accordance with Article 29.5.2 of Bunreacht na hÉireann, the terms of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings, a copy of which was laid before Dáil Éireann on 13th May, 2010.

I welcome the Minister for Justice and Law Reform, Deputy Dermot Ahern, and his officials, who are attending to assist in our consideration of the motion. Before I ask the Minister to begin, I wish to advise everyone that we will receive a short presentation, which will be followed by a question and answer session.

Ireland signed the convention on 13 April 2007 and it entered into force on 1 February. It entered into force for Ireland on the first day of the month following the period of three months after the depositing of our instrument of ratification. Approval is now being sought to ratify the convention as well as the necessary legislative and administrative measures required to give it effect, all of which are now in place. The criminal law provisions in the convention have been given effect to by the Criminal Law (Human Trafficking) Act 2008 which became operational on 7 June 2008. Some of the support provisions, including a period of recovery and reflection of 60 days, will be given statutory effect in the immigration, residence and protection Bill when it is republished and enacted. In the interim they are provided on an administrative basis since the commencement of the 2008 Act.

A legislative amendment is required to enable the Legal Aid Board to provide legal advice on a statutory basis to victims, or alleged victims, of trafficking in respect of any matters that arise for the person under the 2008 Act or in respect of offences under other legislation committed in the course of, or in connection with, human trafficking. The proposed amendment is contained in the civil law (miscellaneous provisions) Bill which is being drafted. In the interim, the Legal Aid Board is providing such assistance on an administrative basis.

The Deputies will see from the briefing note that my Department, in co-operation with a number of Departments and agencies, and with the support of the community and voluntary sector, has also put in place a number of key measures to tackle this crime.

I would now like to highlight some of the main provisions of the convention such as the definition of trafficking as set out at Article 4 in the convention. Article 5 deals with the prevention of trafficking. State parties are required to take measures to establish or strengthen national co-ordination between the various public authorities, non-governmental organisations and members of civil society in the prevention of trafficking and the protection of victims. It also requires state parties to take measures aimed at awareness-raising for persons vulnerable to trafficking and for front line personnel. Article 6 deals with measures to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation, including measures such as research, awareness-raising, targeted information campaigns and educational programmes. Articles 7, 8 and 9 set out the measures to be taken to strengthen border control and to ensure the validity and security of travel or identity documents.

Article 10 provides that state parties shall take measures to ensure that victims are identified in order to provide them with the necessary supports and to avoid the possibility of a victim being removed from a state as a person illegally present in the state. It also provides for special protection measures for children. Article 11 deals with the protection of the private life and identity of a victim, particularly child victims.

Article 12 provides that victims of trafficking are to be given physical and psychological assistance and support for their recovery and reintegration into society. The assistance to be provided must include accommodation; psychological and material assistance; medical treatment; translation and interpretation facilities, where necessary; counselling and information; assistance to enable their rights and interests to be presented and considered at appropriate stages of criminal proceedings against offenders; and access to education for children. The victims' safety and protection needs must also be taken into account. Victims lawfully resident must be authorised to have access to the labour market, to vocational training and education in accordance with rules adopted by state parties. This article also provides for measures to be taken to co-operate with non-governmental organisations and civil society in the provision of assistance to victims.

Article 13 deals with the provision of a recovery and reflection period of at least 30 days where there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person is a victim of trafficking. The convention provides that this period should be sufficient to allow the victim time to recover and escape from the influence of the traffickers and to take an informed decision regarding their possible co-operation with the authorities. Article 14 provides that a renewable residence permit shall issue to victims in one or other of the two following situations or in both — where the competent authority considers that their stay is necessary owing to their personal situation or if their stay is necessary for the purpose of their co-operation with the authorities in investigation or criminal proceedings. A residence permit for a child victim should always be issued in accordance with the best interests of the child.

Article 15 deals with access to information on relevant judicial and administrative proceedings for victims, the right to legal assistance and free legal aid in accordance with conditions under internal law, and also the right of victims to compensation. Article 16 sets out the measures to be taken to assist a victim who wishes to return voluntarily to his or her country of origin. It also sets outs measures to be taken in the case of the non-voluntary return of a victim.

Chapter IV deals with substantive criminal law provisions, the majority of which have been given effect to in the 2008 Act. Chapter V deals with investigation, prosecution and procedural law. Among other provisions, it sets out measures to be taken to ensure the protection of victims, witnesses and others who collaborate with judicial authorities including the protection of a victim's identity during court proceedings. It also provides for special protection measures to be afforded to child victims, taking into account the best interests of the child. Article 29 requires a state to establish specialised authorities and co-ordinating bodies in the fight against human trafficking and the protection of victims.

Chapter VI deals with international co-operation and co-operation with civil society. Chapter VII sets out the monitoring mechanism for implementation of the convention. Chapters VIII, IX and X deal with the relationship between the convention and other international instruments, amendments to the convention and clauses on the signature and entry into force of the convention.

I am satisfied that all of the structures are now in place to comply with the provisions of the convention and it is now time to proceed to ratify it. Our ratification of this convention means we will become part of a European-wide agreement which sets minimum standards for protecting and supporting trafficking victims. It will strengthen our ability to protect victims of this heinous crime and deter the criminals who make large profits from the misery of others.

I thank the Minister for his presentation. I will be supporting the motion. At the end of the last meeting the Minister gave figures regarding suspected victims of trafficking. He said that of the suspected victims of trafficking, 25 had been referred to the refugee legal service. Why is there a discrepancy between the 66 suspected victims of trafficking 60 of whom were from outside the EU, yet only 25 were referred to the refugee legal service?

I understand the balance were part of the asylum system and would have got assistance under that area.

Does this mean the 25 were not asylum applicants?

I was at another meeting and I do not want to go over the ground covered by my colleagues in the earlier session. I ask about the amendment required to enable the Legal Aid Board to give legal advice in the circumstances outlined. From the Minister's script I am unclear how that is being done.

The Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill is relevant in this context. I am especially concerned about how organisations at the coalface see the operation of the recovery and reflection period practice. The Minister told us that owing to the number of amendments to this Bill, he considers — perhaps correctly — that it may be best to withdraw it and start again. It was proposed to publish it before the summer recess to allow us to go into committee on it over the summer period. Given the length of time we have been awaiting this legislation and given the amount of work done on it in this room over a period of 12 separate days, it is disappointing to hear that the Minister's assessment now is that the Bill will not be published and Second Stage will not be taken before the summer recess, which means that it will fall way back in the legislative calendar again. What is the Minister's best assessment of that now?

This was supposed to be a key statute. Everybody concerned with it and many who were not directly concerned with it appreciate its significance and why it is so urgently needed given that some other problems cannot be dealt with in the absence of statutory provision. We are now slipping back to publishing it in the Michaelmas term, with a new Second Stage and then back into committee. It has fallen considerably behind the anticipation of people who had put so much effort into it, made submissions to the committee, attended the Committee Stage debates and all the rest.

The legal aid issue will be dealt with by means of an amendment to the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill. As I have explained, we wanted that Bill to be passed before 24 June but the Opposition felt there was too much in it to pass it before that date. We removed the sections of the Bill providing for the licensing of the national convention centre and passed them as a separate Bill. We will publish the civil law (miscellaneous provisions) Bill shortly. It will include an amendment to put the administrative situation with the Legal Aid Board on a statutory basis.

Will the Legal Aid Board be able to act administratively in the interim?

It is giving advice on criminal prosecutions to people who are involved in dealing with human trafficking. We have already given an undertaking to allow it to do so. It will be able to do so on a statutory basis when we pass the Bill I have mentioned. I said earlier, in the Deputy's absence, that the new immigration Bill will be considered by the Cabinet next week. We hope to publish it. We will probably be able to publish it. The Attorney General may need to make a number of small technical amendments after the Cabinet has approved what is likely to be a fairly complex Bill. It is unlikely that the Second Stage debate on the legislation will be held before the summer recess. I want to have a number of Bills passed by then. Like Deputy Rabbitte, I would be disappointed if we were unable to make quick progress with the Bill. I thought I had reached agreement with the Deputy, who has said publicly in a broadsheet that he is suspicious of me. At a meeting I had with him and other Deputies, I gave them an option when we were talking about what we should do. I did not foist anything on them before they made their judgments on what approach they would take. I think there was a general consensus that it was better to withdraw the Bill and introduce a new Bill, on the basis that we would get it through reasonably quickly. I understood that Deputies would not introduce a plethora of new amendments on Committee Stage. While we might not agree on a number of net issues, I thought we could deal with them. My understanding was that if we withdrew the Bill and reintroduced it with the many amendments that have been targeted, and on which we have given Deputies a briefing, we could fast-track this legislation. It is in the interests of the State and the people who come before the immigration system to have this legislation in place.

I do not disagree with what the Minister has said. However, there was an expectation that we would dispose of Second Stage before the summer recess.

Perhaps we can do so.

The Minister knows the way it is with broadsheets. I think the Minister told the same broadsheet that he cannot remember ever having made a mistake. One has to do one's best when one is dealing with broadsheets.

What else can one do?

We have completed our consideration of the motion. Is it agreed that there should be no further debate on the matter by Dáil Éireann? Agreed.

Top
Share