Skip to main content
Normal View

Special Committee Corporation Tax Bill, 1975 debate -
Wednesday, 18 Feb 1976

SECTION 25.

With the permission of the Chair, I propose to take amendments Nos. 7 and 8 together.

I move amendment No. 7:

In page 30, in subsection (5), line 52, after "Case IV of Schedule D " to insert the following:

" for the year of assessment in which the subsequent accounting period ends on an amount the income tax on which at the standard rate for the said year of assessment is equal to the amount of the said tax credit and this assessment shall be".

They are both drafting amendments. The company may claim under this section to have its franked investment income treated as if it were profits for certain purposes, for example, a set-off of trading losses. If having obtained payment of a tax credit in this way, it subsequently claims to have the amount so allowed carried forward for the subsequent accounting period instead of set-off against franked investment income, it is provided in this section that the tax credit paid be "clawed-back" by means of an assessment under Case IV of Schedule D.

The purpose of the first amendment is to clarify the form which such an assessment must take. It must be for the year of assessment in which that subsequent accounting period ends and must be of an amount which, when charged at the standard rate, produces an amount equal to the tax credit.

The second amendment is designed to ensure that an amount included in such an assessment is not treated as income for any other purpose. We circulated examples of the operation of section 25.

Amendment agreed to.

I move amendment No. 8:

In page 31, after subsection (6) to insert a new subsection as follows:

" (7) Any amount on which by virtue of this section income tax is charged on a company by an assessment under Case IV of Schedule D shall not be regarded as income of the company for any purpose of the Tax Acts.".

Amendment agreed to.
Question proposed: " That section 25, as amended, stand part of the Bill."

On the examples, there is a sentence: " The £350 tax credit paid by the Revenue to the company will be recovered from it by an assessment to income tax." But income tax is gone.

This is a word used in the explanatory memorandum which would be carefully avoided in the Act. Is that it?

It is the income tax rate that is used.

It is not strictly correct to say that the income tax is totally gone for companies.

You would use the income tax machinery for making this adjustment, but income tax as such will not be there.

Therefore, the concept of income tax remains in corporation profit tax law. Although, it is being charged as the one tax and has a certain advantage, the Minister will still think in terms of something analogous to CPT on the one hand and income tax on the other.

I did not quite get that. Income tax will no longer apply to the profits of a company. In order to make these adjustments where losses occur, in order to allow set-offs, the income tax machinery will be used for the purposes of calculating what would be the appropriate set-off.

That is fine. It is merely using the income tax machinery for the purposes of computation?

There is no such thing as an incidence of income tax in addition, or in exceptional cases?

Question put and agreed to.
Top
Share