The explanatory memorandum glosses over it very simply. The Minister is attempting here to insert a provision of a purely technical nature aimed at avoiding the necessity for officials of the Minister to attend court for the purpose of proving that an open season order made under section 24 or 25 was not in force at the time. The section says:
In any proceedings for an offence under this Act, it shall not be necessary to—
(a) negative by evidence the existence of any order under section 24 or 25 of this Act or any licence or permission under this Act,
(b) prove that any act which is the subject of the proceedings was not caused by or the result or effect of, or was not consequent upon any other thing lawfully done, . . .
The explanatory memorandum seeks to gloss over it by citing the simplest formula under which this could be invoked, whereas it actually applies to any offence.