Skip to main content
Normal View

Tax Code.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 11 May 2004

Tuesday, 11 May 2004

Questions (125, 126)

John Cregan

Question:

155 Mr. Cregan asked the Minister for Finance the levels of capital acquisitions tax which apply between unmarried siblings living together all their lives; when these levels were introduced or last revised; if there is a concession when an estate is passed onto a next generation, for example, nieces or nephews; if there is a backdated concession for siblings when capital acquisitions tax was paid ten years ago on the death of one, before the most recent revision, and when capital acquisitions tax must now be paid again on the death of the last of three siblings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13555/04]

View answer

Written answers

Capital acquisitions tax is charged at a flat rate of 20% on the excess of the tax free threshold, known as the group threshold, applicable to a gift or inheritance taken by a person. In arriving at the group threshold for a gift or inheritance received by a person on or after 1 December 1999 from a brother or sister, all gifts and inheritances received by that person since 5 December 1991 from persons in the same group must be taken into account. This is an aggregation of gifts and inheritances from persons in the same group. A beneficiary's brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, lineal ancestors and lineal descendants other than a child, or a minor child of a deceased child, such as grandparents and grandchildren, are all in the same group. This group has a tax-free threshold of €45,644 for gifts and inheritances taken in 2004 having been increased by an indexation factor each year since the year 2000.

Where a dwelling house is taken by way of a gift or inheritance from a brother or sister, a capital acquisitions tax exemption applies if that dwelling-house was occupied continuously by the beneficiary as his or her only or main residence for a period of three years prior to the date of the gift or inheritance. The beneficiary must not have an interest in any other residential property. It is also a condition of the exemption that the beneficiary must own and reside in the dwelling house for six years after the date of the gift or inheritance. This condition does not apply where the beneficiary is over 55 years or where the beneficiary is unable to comply with the residence requirements for reasons outside his or her control, for example, due to work obligations or hospitalisation.

A relief from capital acquisitions tax applies where a gift or inheritance of business assets is taken by a nephew or niece who worked substantially on a full-time basis in that business for his or her aunt or uncle for a period of five years prior to the date of the gift or inheritance. A nephew or niece who qualifies for this relief is entitled to the same tax-free threshold as if he or she were a son or daughter of the disponer. This threshold is €456,438 for gifts and inheritances taken in the year 2004.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the capital acquisitions tax code does not allow a credit for tax paid in respect of an event against the capital acquisitions tax liability arising on any subsequent event. In a situation where three siblings are living together, on the death of one of them, a capital acquisitions tax liability can arise in respect of the resulting inheritance. The tax paid is not allowed as a credit against any capital acquisitions tax liability arising on a subsequent death.

Capital acquisitions tax becomes due and payable on the valuation date in respect of the inheritances taken on the death of each of the three siblings. The valuation date in the case of an inheritance is the date when the executor or administrator of an estate is entitled to distribute the property to a beneficiary. If Deputy Cregan has a particular case or set of circumstances in mind, he may wish to contact the Revenue Commissioners for further clarification.

John Cregan

Question:

156 Mr. Cregan asked the Minister for Finance the concessions, tax relief and grants which are made available throughout the taxation system to persons or companies for the provision of child care for themselves or for their employees; if, in view of the less favourable increase in child benefit over the past two years, providing tax relief on child care payments is under consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13556/04]

View answer

Over the past number of years the Government has considered carefully the whole area of child care. The core objective of Government policy in the area of child support is to provide assistance which will offer real choice to parents and which will benefit all children. It has been decided that child benefit will be the main fiscal instrument through which support will be provided to parents with dependent children. Child benefit provides assistance to all parents in whatever caring choices are most appropriate for them and their children. Unlike tax relief, it provides support to parents irrespective of their income status.

In line with this policy approach, the Government commenced a major initiative to increase substantially the rates of child benefit. In 2001, the rate for the first and second child was increased by almost €32 per month and by €38 per month for the third and subsequent children. This represented an increase of more than 50% on the rates prevailing in 2000. Similar monetary increases were provided in 2002. Further increases were implemented in 2003. In the 2004 Budget Statement, I announced additional increases of €6 and €8 per month respectively which came into effect from last month. These increases are around double the projected inflation rate for this year. Since 1997, child benefit rates have increased by more than 230% compared to a projected increase of inflation of only 28% over the period 1997 to 2004.

There is an exemption to the usual benefit-in-kind provisions for employees who enjoy free or subsidised child care facilities provided by their employers. The exemption also applies if an employer provides child care facilities jointly with others. In such circumstances, the employer must be wholly or partly responsible for both financing and managing the child care facility. However, the employer may opt not to be involved in the management of the child care service. In such circumstances, the benefit-in-kind exemption will be restricted to cases where the employer provides financial support for items of capital expenditure and equipment but not other costs incurred by the employer. This provision was introduced to make the scheme more attractive to employers who did not want the job of managing the facility.

Child care services are generally exempt from VAT, so no VAT should be chargeable on fees levied by crèches. The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell, has overall responsibility for the formulation of policy on child care. The supply of formal child care places is being stimulated through a programme of investment under the national development plan equal opportunities child care programme with the funding of almost €437 million provided by his Department and the EU. The purpose of this capital and staffing support funding is to provide almost 27,000 new child care places and to support existing places. This funding and the recent increases in child benefit are a significant financial commitment and clearly show the Government's continuing support for the child care sector.

I am satisfied that the Government is providing sufficient support to parents to assist them in meeting the caring costs of their children and to increase the overall supply of child care places which will also help moderate the costs of child care.

Top
Share