Skip to main content
Normal View

Decentralisation Programme.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 2 June 2004

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

Questions (89, 90, 91, 92, 93)

John Bruton

Question:

82 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she has had a risk assessment carried out on possible consequential risks to the effectiveness of services provided by each Department or agency under her aegis which is to relocate under the Government’s decentralisation programme; if not, the reason therefor; and if so, if the risk assessment will be published, furnished to the Comptroller and Auditor General and accessible under the Freedom of Information Act 1997. [16842/04]

View answer

John Bruton

Question:

83 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if the Secretary General of her Department has provided her with advice in pursuance of the Secretary General’s responsibility as Accounting Officer under public finance procedures as set out in table 2 of the Mullarkey report; and if not, if she has requested such advice from the Secretary General. [16857/04]

View answer

John Bruton

Question:

85 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she will take steps to ensure that the annual report of her Department will contain a risk assessment of decentralisation, as it affects her Department or agencies under its aegis, dealing with strategic, operational, financial and reputational risks as set out in paragraph 6.31 of the Mullarkey report. [16887/04]

View answer

John Bruton

Question:

86 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if the audit committee of her Department will consider a risk assessment with regard to strategic, operational, financial and reputational risks of the implementation of the Government’s decentralisation proposals as they affect her Department or its agencies; and if not, the reason therefor, in view of the recommendation of the Mullarkey committee that such risk assessment be carried out. [16902/04]

View answer

John Bruton

Question:

87 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if her Secretary General has tendered advice to her in pursuance of his personal responsibility as Secretary General under public financial procedures for economy and efficiency in the administration of her Department on the impact in the short or long-term on the economy and the efficiency of administration of her Department or its agencies arising from the Government’s proposals for decentralisation. [16960/04]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to answer Questions Nos. 82, 83 and 85 to 87, inclusive, together.

As part of the decentralisation programme announced by the Minister for Finance in his budget 2004 speech, a minimum of 250 staff of my Department are to decentralise to Carlow. Four agencies operating under the aegis of my Department, FÁS, the National Standards Authority of Ireland, the Health and Safety Authority and Enterprise Ireland, will also be relocating to Birr, Arklow, Thomastown and Shannon, respectively. A decentralisation implementation committee has been established within my Department to develop the decentralisation proposals and to drive the process across the Department and its agencies. The Secretary General of my Department, as Accounting Officer, is responsible for adherence to public financial procedures and ensuring that there is an effective system of corporate governance in place. The Secretary General provides advice to me on an ongoing basis as Accounting Officer.

I am satisfied that there are adequate systems of internal financial control in place in my Department to ensure compliance with public financial procedures. In March 2004, the Secretary General of my Department, as Accounting Officer, signed a statement on internal financial control in respect of the 2003 appropriation account, acknowledging responsibility for ensuring that an effective system of internal financial controls is in place, maintained and operated by the Department. As has been the situation until now, the Secretary General will continue to keep me apprised of the impacts of decentralisation on my Department.

In accordance with the timetable set out in the Mullarkey report, my Department is currently in the process of putting in place a risk management programme which will be rolled out throughout my Department beginning in June 2004. As the Mullarkey report envisages, this risk management programme is designed to deal with strategic, operational, financial and reputational risks whether related to decentralisation or otherwise and provides a process for managing risks which arise.

My Department and the relevant agencies along with all other decentralising public bodies, are currently finalising decentralisation implementation plans, as required by the report of the decentralisation implementation group, the Flynn group. These are initial plans which will require further development as additional information emerges in relation to the people, property and business issues identified in the implementation group's report. In particular, information emerging from the central applications facility in terms of staff numbers and grades electing to transfer to decentralising Departments and agencies will be crucial to the development of risk assessment and risk mitigation strategies.

Many of the areas of my Department identified for decentralisation to Carlow have already undergone business process re-engineering exercises in the recent past. These BPRs will need to be revisited in the context of decentralisation. Moves to enhance the use of ICT are also underway and offer the prospect of greater efficiencies and effectiveness in the delivery of services to be decentralised. Following the preparation of the implementation plans, an overall assessment framework, which will assess direct and indirect risks, threats to, and opportunities for synergies between my Department's offices and its agencies following decentralisation will be progressed.

Given the overall risk assessment framework proposed, there are currently no plans for the audit committee to undertake a separate risk assessment of the impact of decentralisation on the Department's activities. I do not consider that my Department's annual report would be the most appropriate means of publication of decentralisation assessment reports. These reports will be made available to all key stakeholders.

Top
Share