I propose to take Questions Nos. 327 and 328 together.
The initial target of the expenditure review initiative was to review all expenditure programmes over a three year period. However, a review of the process by the expenditure review central steering committee, ERCSC, in the Department of Finance in 2000-01 found that this target had been over-ambitious and that a more focused approach to the selection of review topics was required. This view was supported by a Comptroller and Auditor General value for money study of the expenditure review initiative in 2001 which proposed that a more realistic target should be set, taking into account the level of evaluative capacity in departments generally.
In June 2001 the Government decided, inter alia, that the Department of Finance and individual Departments-offices should compile and agree a work plan of review topics based on specific selection criteria set out in the Comptroller and Auditor General’s report. Subsequently, in May 2002 the Government approved a schedule of expenditure review topics proposed for the first year of the next three-year planning horizon, 2002-2004, and noted the topics proposed for 2003 and 2004. In April 2003, the ERCSC requested Departments-offices to update their expenditure review plans, again in consultation with the Department of Finance. The committee emphasised the Government’s selection criteria and advised that Departments-offices should select a small number of programmes-areas involving major policy issues or significant levels of expenditure. On foot of this process, revised expenditure review plans were drawn up by Departments-offices.
This Department has completed six expenditure reviews from 1997 to date. Summary details are listed in the following table, together with the subheads to which each review relates. Three of the Department's reviews are being prepared for publication: BIM ice plants, fishery harbours and coast protection. It is at the discretion of the Department whether to publish these reviews and lay them before the Houses of the Oireachtas since this is not required for reviews listed in the 1997-2001 phase. The reviews will be placed on the Department's Internet site, and simultaneously laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas.
The Department has also completed two further reviews. It is a matter for the Department of Agriculture and Food to publish the review of the forestry structural programme as the function transferred to that Department on 1 January 2004. The review of the inland fisheries programme will not be published until the high level review of the inland fisheries sector is completed. Both reviews have been forwarded to the committee.
Three other reviews are under way or about to commence, those on marine research, the national seabed survey and on alternative energy and energy conservation.