Skip to main content
Normal View

Human Rights Issues.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 2 February 2005

Wednesday, 2 February 2005

Questions (109, 110, 111)

Tom Hayes

Question:

149 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the Government has raised the issue of the detention and torture of prisoners in Peru with the Peruvian Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [2626/05]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware that Amnesty International has stated that the treatment of prisoners in the Challapalca Maximum Security Prison in the department of Tacna, Peru amounts to cruel, inhuman and degrading ill-treatment and that it has expressed concern about reports that these prisoners have been subjected to physical and psychological violence, as well as enduring harsh climatic conditions. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights is also reported to have been highly critical of the conditions in the prison. I presume that the Deputy is referring to these reports. Ireland, together with its EU partners, continues to monitor the process towards peace and reconciliation, as well as the other efforts to improve human rights and democracy in Peru.

In the Declaration of Guadalajara, which was adopted during the recent Irish Presidency, the countries of the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean, including Peru, reiterated their commitment to the promotion and protection of all human rights. I understand that last year the prison authorities in Peru were reported to be committed to closing Challapalca Prison. While Ireland does not have a resident embassy in Peru, I have asked our non-resident ambassador, based in Mexico City, to request the local EU Presidency in Lima to inform us about the current situation regarding the prison, following any necessary approach to the Peruvian authorities.

Eamon Ryan

Question:

150 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the efforts he has made on behalf of a person (details supplied); his views on whether the parliamentary procedures used to convict and sentence this person fell far short of internationally recognised standards; his further views on Amnesty International’s opinion that this person should face trial by an independent and impartial court; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [2812/05]

View answer

I refer the Deputy to my reply to Question No. 457 of 26 January 2005, a copy of which can be seen below for information.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

457 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will take all appropriate steps to urge the Zimbabwean authorities to secure the release of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1408/05]

View answer

I am aware of and have been closely following the case of Mr. Roy Bennett, the Movement for Democratic Change, MDC, opposition Member of Parliament, who was sentenced by the Zimbabwean Parliament last October to 12 months imprisonment with labour. A number of aspects of the case give rise to concern, including the apparently arbitrary procedures employed in Mr. Bennett's trial and conviction by a committee of the Zimbabwean Parliament rather than by an ordinary court, where the maximum penalty applicable would have been a small fine. While it is not possible to condone the action for which Mr. Bennett was sentenced, it is clear that the sentence imposed was politically motivated and wholly disproportionate to the offence committed.

The imprisonment of Mr. Bennett is one of many incidents in an overall pattern of harassment, intimidation and violence which opposition politicians and supporters have faced in Zimbabwe for some years now. Regrettably, the overall human rights situation in Zimbabwe continues to deteriorate, with arbitrary arrests and ongoing politically inspired violence. Legislation has just been enacted by the Zimbabwean Parliament which will impose serious restrictions on the activities of human rights NGOs operating in Zimbabwe.

Ireland and its EU partners are continuing to take the lead in highlighting the serious human rights situation in Zimbabwe, including through tabling a resolution on the issue at the recent session of the UN General Assembly. We will continue, through EU Ambassadors in Harare, to press for the repeal of repressive legislation and an end to attacks on basic freedoms by the Zimbabwean authorities. Such political reforms are crucial if there is to be any prospect of free and fair parliamentary elections in Zimbabwe next March, carried out in accordance with the Principles and Guidelines on Democratic Elections adopted by the Southern African Development Community Summit in Mauritius last August.

The Government has been active in ensuring that EU Ambassadors in Zimbabwe continue to monitor Mr. Bennett's case closely with a view to the EU intervening on behalf of members of the opposition in Zimbabwe, including Mr. Bennett, who have been unfairly imprisoned.

Question No. 151 answered with QuestionNo. 109.
Top
Share