Skip to main content
Normal View

Industrial Development.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 15 November 2006

Wednesday, 15 November 2006

Questions (11)

Phil Hogan

Question:

74 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the fact that according to Forfás’s Statement on the Costs of Doing Business in Ireland, key business input costs that weaken Ireland’s overall cost competitiveness include property costs, utility costs, particularly electricity, mobile calls, waste disposal and key non-discretionary services, including information technology services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38044/06]

View answer

Oral answers (7 contributions)

The National Competitiveness Council, NCC, recently published its Statement on the Costs of Doing Business in Ireland. The publication outlines the key findings of research looking at the cost of doing business at four locations in Ireland — Dublin, Cork, Galway and Limerick — and comparing these to international centres such as Bangalore, Boston and Copenhagen. The data is for one period only, January 2006, but will be updated in two subsequent reports in 2007 and 2008.

The chairman of the NCC recognises that Ireland's competitive position remains favourable. The NCC's recent annual report noted that economic growth in 2005 was one and a half times the average EU 15 GDP growth between 2000-2004 and Ireland is ranked first in the EU 15 for entrepreneurial activity. Ireland ranks highly in the UN's human development index. For 2005, we are eighth in the OECD group and third in the NCC's benchmarking group. This reflects several improvements, including the elimination of employment, improvements in life expectancy and raised life satisfaction. In addition, a recent Price Waterhouse Coopers survey ranks Ireland second in the world in terms of ease of paying taxes, while the World Bank continues to regard our regulatory environment as benign, ranking us tenth out of 175 countries. Ireland has made significant progress both over time and relative to other countries in terms of increasing secondary school participation rates. At 86.1% we now exceed the Lisbon target of 85%.

The NCC Statement on the Costs of Doing Business in Ireland states that it is notable that most successful countries in terms of wealth are generally expensive. In this respect, the report shows that labour costs at 59% dominate firms' business costs. These were followed by property costs at 11%, utility costs at 9% and transport costs at 4%. All other costs accounted for 17% of total costs.

The NCC's cost profiles demonstrate the importance of labour costs for firms across all sectors. However, the analysis by the NCC shows that labour costs, taxes and transport costs are competitive when compared to benchmarked locations in the EU 15 economies or in the United States. Labour costs in manufacturing are marginally more competitive than in the services sectors, compared to other EU 15 and US cities.

The NCC acknowledges that our cost competitiveness is also supported by relatively low taxes on labour. The research highlights the fact that Irish cities show the greatest cost competitiveness compared to others that were looked at in medical technologies, engineering and food processing. These are important sectors for economic development.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

The report underlines the competitive position of a large part of our economy.

Looking at the cost of business across all business sectors reviewed, Irish cities are on average 15% more cost competitive than the average of other high income cities. It is inevitable that we will have a higher cost base than low cost cities examined such as Bangalore, but I am confident that our broadest competitive position will remain robust and particularly in those sectors of the economy which will drive economic growth and employment.

Based on the Minister's reply, I am not sure if he has seen this report. This is what it looks like. One would have expected him to acknowledge that there is a problem with our competitiveness. A number of issues go back to 2001 when the NCC briefed the Taoiseach and Tánaiste on Ireland's deteriorating competitive circumstances under a number of headings. I draw the Minister's attention to the conclusions and policy implications of the NCC, which is chaired by the eminent Dr. Don Thornhill. It suggests:

Ireland ranks among the most expensive of the locations surveyed for electricity,water . . . waste disposal, and key non-discretionary services, especially IT services, accountancy and legal fees. In terms of policy implications, this paper suggests that addressing the infrastructure needs of the Irish economy and tackling the high cost of services must be a key priority for the Government. In addition, property costs, both of construction and of rental, appear out of line with our competitors.

It states that "together with a risk of the decline in the value of the dollar against the euro, these challenges present a potential threat to jobs and growth in internationally trading sectors of the Irish economy, upon which we all depend", particularly manufacturing. That is an indictment of the cost of doing business in Ireland. I therefore ask the Minister to have another go at answering the question he was asked and to suggest the measures he will take to bring us more into line with the competition we face.

I answered the question by giving a balanced perspective on the issue. Deputy Hogan is overly concentrating on the negative.

Forfás is a Government body.

We are aware of the energy issue. That is why the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy Noel Dempsey, produced a Green Paper on energy and has brought in a number of initiatives in that area. Our main energy problem is our high dependence on fossil fuels. I am on a Cabinet sub-committee on the issue.

We are concerned on an ongoing basis about energy prices and its effect on our competitiveness. That is not news. It is interesting that regional areas such as Cork, Limerick and Galway are quite competitive on labour costs in relation to the EU 15 and the US cities. Ireland is not in the same cost frame as Bangalore, for example, nor should we expect to be. However, the report states that compared to other cities in the EU 15 and the United States, Irish wage costs are almost 20% lower. We have cost competitive advantages in some areas. Deputy Hogan has identified areas in which we have cost competitive pressures and challenges, particularly in utilities, and I am not arguing against that point.

Overall, the report suggests that labour is the dominant cost while utilities comprise approximately 9%. Nonetheless, the cost of utilities is a key agenda item for Government. Our construction industry and property market have had unprecedented scale and pace of growth. Every economic analyst has made different predictions about this for years, but they have not happened. It reflects, as one economist recently said, a robust employment situation. People have bought houses because we have unprecedented employment levels. Utility costs are an ongoing issue, particularly waste disposal, energy and mobile communication charges, and we will continue to work on making those more competitive.

Ireland is significantly more cost competitive on transport than the most expensive locations throughout the world. It is a balance. We are doing very well in some areas and not so well in others. Based on any international benchmark, however, the overall picture suggests Ireland is doing very well in competitiveness terms, but that is not a reason to be complacent.

I acknowledge that, economically, Ireland is on a strong growth curve and we have a low level of unemployment. However, every report published in the past year in particular signals the pressure this jurisdiction will come under in terms of competitiveness from eastern European and Far Eastern locations and that the level of investment in this country will come under greater scrutiny — it is being scrutinised already from the viewpoint of relocation because of the high cost of doing business here. I am disappointed the Minister has no plan.

The Government had an opportunity last week when the Opposition tabled an amendment to have regular reviews of utility costs imposed on the energy regulator, rather than the annual review, but the Minister chose not to take that on board. Will he suggest any policy for the future as regards the regulation of public utilities, for example, whereby the policy remit of the regime could be changed to reduce costs for small businesses in particular, as well as consumers, to bring them into line with what we ought to expect? An increase of 90% in electricity prices over the past four years, for example, is not something that can easily be explained to people with more costly bills this week.

It can be explained when one considers our dependence on fossil fuels. That is where the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy Noel Dempsey, and the Minister for Finance, Deputy Cowen, moved in last year's budget in terms of incentivising indigenous renewables and alternatives to our fossil fuel dependency. That is ultimately the way forward, as well as the national energy efficiency savings programme which has been launched by the Minister, Deputy Noel Dempsey. We are working with him on these issues. We advance the competitiveness agenda, advocating on its behalf in tandem with enterprise. He is very well aware of that and has produced a Green Paper, which represents vision in dealing with the energy issue. However, there are global issues to be considered as well and it is not something that is entirely within our command. Elements of it certainly are and we are working on those.

I reiterate that we are taking nothing for granted. Our view is that to sustain economic competitiveness and underpin the job creation we have witnessed in recent times, we need to invest significantly in research and investment, third level education and the workplace skills base of the economy. These are areas where we score well, competitively, and we need to continue to reinvest in them and enhance the levels and quality of such investment into the future.

Top
Share