Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 27 Nov 2012

Written Answers Nos. 203-226

Financial Institutions Support Scheme

Questions (203)

Jim Daly

Question:

203. Deputy Jim Daly asked the Minister for Finance the amount received form each bank operating in the State in terms of Revenue to the Exchequer to include cost of guarantee, operating taxes, income taxes paid on behalf of staff and so on, with a view to establishing what each institution is contributing to the Exchequer for each of the past three years, for each of the institutions, itemising each tax heading individually; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52275/12]

View answer

Written answers

I assume the Deputy’s question refers to those banks participating in the Government guarantee schemes and reference to the ‘cost of the guarantee’ relates to the Credit Institutions Financial Support Scheme 2008 (CIFS Scheme) which was in operation between 30 September, 2008 and 29 September, 2010, and the Eligible Liabilities Guarantee Scheme (ELG Scheme) which came into operation on 9 December, 2009, and has a current issuance end-date of 31 December, 2012. Fees are paid by the Participating Institutions in the bank guarantee scheme on a quarterly basis in arrears; the latest payments received are in respect of Q3/2012, ending September, 2012.

The list of Participating Institutions including subsidiaries covered by the ELG Scheme can be accessed on the NTMA website:

www.ntma.ie/business-areas/funding-and-debt-management/eligible-liabilities-guarantee-scheme/participating-institutions/

The total fees received to end-September, 2012, from the covered banks including subsidiaries in respect of both the CIFS and ELG Schemes amount in total to €3.589bn. This amount comprises €758.4m. in respect of the CIFS and €2,830.3m. in respect of the ELG Scheme.

A breakdown of fees paid by year for each of the covered banks including subsidiaries can be seen in the tables below.

ELG fees paid to date by Participating Institutions

€millions

IL&P

BoI

AIB

IBRC

EBS

Total

2010

95.9

275.5

299.3

149.9

34.2

854.8

2011

172.9

448.7

464.9

85.5

62.6

1234.6

2012

122.8

301.9

256.6

20.4

39.2

740.9

Total

391.6

1026.1

1020.8

255.8

136.0

2830.3

CIFS fees paid to date by Covered Institutions

€millions

IL&P

BoI

AIB

Anglo

EBS

INBS

Postbank

Total

2008

-

32.3

-

37.9

-

-

0.004

70.20

2009

35.4

138.1

174.7

94.8

9.7

23.8

0.020

476.52

2010

14.8

68.3

58.3

54.9

5.9

8.8

0.015

211.01

2011

-

-

-

0.7

-

-

-

.70

Total

50.2

238.7

233.0

188.3

15.6

32.6

0.039

758.43

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that for reasons of taxpayer confidentiality they are not in a position to provide the taxation information on an individual basis as sought by the Deputy.

The aggregate figures available in respect of the yield of corporation tax and PREM (tax, PRSI and levy contributions including USC paid over by employers) from the covered institutions in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011 are as follows:

-

2011

2010

2009

CT

€2,420,432

€139,405

€4,593,057

PREM

€555,656,455

€519,726,633

€515,829,035

IBRC Investigations

Questions (204, 205)

Finian McGrath

Question:

204. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the due diligence that was undertaken before appointing Alpha Group to recover assets of the Quinn Group; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52284/12]

View answer

Finian McGrath

Question:

205. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the moneys paid to the Alpha Group for the recovery of assets of the Quinn Group; the guarantees that have been given for the moneys paid up front; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52285/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 204 and 205 together.

I have been advised that IBRC considered numerous alternative recovery strategies for all of the Quinn International Property Group assets in Russia and one asset in the Ukraine. This included the consideration of a number of acceptable business partners for this purpose. The Bank received many expressions of interest from both intermediaries and principals in assisting the Bank with the recovery of those assets. Fundamental to the Bank’s decision making process in this regard was the quality and financial strength of potential partners, their track record in recovering value from distressed assets in both Russia and the Ukraine and advice the Bank received from numerous independent government and non-government sources in these jurisdictions. Following a comprehensive analysis of all considerations, IBRC concluded that recommending a joint venture with A1 represented the most economically advantageous outcome for the Bank, the State and by extension the Irish taxpayer.

I have been informed that IBRC has not paid any money upfront in relation to its joint venture with A1. The joint venture with A1 involves significant initial monetary commitments by A1 and a waterfall structure to incentivise maximum recovery.

I have also been advised IBRC will not be disclosing any further details regarding the appointment of A1 due to the commercial sensitivities associated with the work to be undertaken and the associated risk that such disclosures may have a detrimental impact on the Bank’s efforts to maximise loan recoveries. In addition, as these matters relate to on-going litigation, it would be inappropriate for the Bank to comment any further.

Mortgage Interest Relief Application

Questions (206)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

206. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding an application for mortgage interest relief in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Wexford, if the application has been processed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52289/12]

View answer

Written answers

This is a matter for the Revenue Commissioners who are responsible for the administration of mortgage interest relief through the tax relief at source (TRS) system. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that an application for mortgage interest relief was received from the person concerned on 30 April 2012. The application was processed by Revenue on 1 May and forwarded to the lender who applied mortgage interest relief of €40.92 with effect from October. The lender has confirmed to Revenue that arrears of €254.32, for the period April to September, will shortly be applied to the loan account.

NAMA Operations

Questions (207)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

207. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the number of people that have taken up National Assets Management Agency's 80:20 deferred payment initiative scheme. [52296/12]

View answer

Written answers

NAMA advises that to date the sale of 81 houses with a combined value of over €15 million have been sold under the 80:20 Deferred Payment Initiative, which was launched on a pilot basis on 8th May in respect to 115 houses and extended on 15th October to an additional 180 houses.

NAMA Investigations

Questions (208)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

208. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the number of investigations currently underway in National Assets Management Agency; the number of people being investigated; the reason for these investigations and the person conducting them. [52297/12]

View answer

Written answers

This is an operational matter for NAMA but I am advised by NAMA that no investigations are currently underway.

Tax Code

Questions (209)

John Lyons

Question:

209. Deputy John Lyons asked the Minister for Finance his views on a report (details supplied) on pension tax reliefs which highlighted the extent of tax subsidisation of the pensions of higher income earners; if he has any plans to reduce the current threshold and maximum pension pot allowable for tax relief; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52308/12]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware of the recently published report referred to by the Deputy. I assume that in his question the Deputy is referring to the annual earnings cap which operates in conjunction with age-related percentage limits to determine the annual amount of tax-relievable contributions that can be made by an employee or individual to pension savings and to the maximum allowable pension fund for tax purposes at retirement (the Standard Fund Threshold - SFT). I would point out that the scale of pension saving reliefs available to higher earners, in particular, has been significantly restricted over recent years. The SFT was reduced from over €5.4 million to €2.3m in Budget and Finance Act 2011 while the annual earnings cap which operates in conjunction with age-related percentage limits to determine the annual amount of tax-relievable pension contributions has also been reduced over a period from its peak of over €275,000 in 2008 to its current level of €115,000 per annum.

In my 2012 Budget speech in December last, I said that the incentive regime for supplementary pension provision will have to be reformed to make the system sustainable and more equitable over the long term. I said that my Department and the Revenue Commissioners would work with the various stakeholders in the next year to develop workable solutions. On foot of this, a broad informal consultation was undertaken this year across a spectrum of stakeholders in the pensions sector to establish their views on further changes to the incentive regime for pension saving.

I will give due consideration to the views of all interested parties in the context of any proposals I may make to Government regarding the incentive regime for pension saving.

Budget 2013

Questions (210)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

210. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he intends to factor in any possible deals or resolution of the promissory note payments into Budget 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52310/12]

View answer

Written answers

The fiscal forecasts contained in the recent Medium-Term Fiscal Statement (MTFS), published on 14 November, assumed Exchequer cash payments of €3,060 million and €25 million respectively for the IBRC and EBS Promissory Notes in each of the years 2013 – 2015. These payments are accounted for as part of non-voted capital expenditure in Table 3.3 on page 26 of the MTFS. As the Deputy will be aware, the Government has been working very hard to secure a deal on Irish bank debt and a key item on the agenda in that regard is the issue of the Promissory Notes. Technical discussions are ongoing. Were there to be any change to the Promissory Notes in advance of Budget day, this would be factored into the Budget.

Banking Sector Regulation

Questions (211)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

211. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance when he expects the new EU rules on banking supervision to be implemented; if the new bank supervision system is in place in 2013, if he will factor the impact of such a development into Budget 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52312/12]

View answer

Written answers

Support for the establishment of Banking Union was given at the highest political level at the Summit of Heads of State & Government of the Euro Area. The principle of breaking the link between the sovereigns and banks has been agreed by Heads of State and Government. In September the Commission presented legislative proposals for a single supervisory mechanism conferring powers on the ECB for the supervision of all banks in the euro area, with a mechanism for non-euro countries to join on a voluntary basis. The European Council discussed the SSM at its October meeting in the context of a report from President Van Rompuy on work being carried out on the Future of Economic and Monetary Union. The timetable set in the October Council conclusions envisages agreement being reached on "the legislative framework" for SSM by end of the year. The imperative is to move ahead urgently to implement all of the important decisions taken on 29 June. I am working with ministers from the other Member States at the Ecofin Council to bring about the SSM. My officials are engaged in technical negotiations on the SSM proposal, the implementation of which is a perquisite for the ESM to make direct recapitalisations in banks. The Deputy is aware that the June Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the Euro area stated that when the SSM is in "place for banks in the euro area the ESM could, following a regular decision, have the possibility to recapitalize banks directly." It went on to state that "The Eurogroup will examine the situation of the Irish financial sector with the view of further improving the sustainability of the well-performing adjustment programme."

The timeframe set by the October Council is for the SSM to be fully operational during 2013. It is important that there is no rolling back on commitments made by the Heads of State and Government. In that context I note that the President of the ECB Mario Draghi indicated at the Council that it would take 6-12 months to get the supervisor up and running. This is realistic and the final text should clearly confirm this timeframe for the full implementation of the regulation, with the ECB assuming supervision of the most significant institutions by 1 July 2013 and the remaining credit institutions in Member States by 1 January 2014 at the latest. My officials are working on intensive negotiations at a high level to reach agreement on the SSM proposal within the deadline set by the October Council. I share the view of the President of the European Council Van Rompuy that Europe must not loose the sense of urgency in taking action to stabilize the euro.

It is anticipated that the single supervisory mechanism will be funded through industry fees and as such there should not be any budgetary impact. The establishment of the single supervisory mechanism is a crucial and significant first step to completing the banking union. The banking union will also require further work to develop a common system for deposit guarantees and an integrated crisis management framework, while negotiations on the bank capital requirements (CRD IV) should also be concluded as called for by the Heads of State and Government at the October European Council.

Tax Code

Questions (212)

Regina Doherty

Question:

212. Deputy Regina Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if the relevant contract tax continues to apply to school Board of Managements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52326/12]

View answer

Written answers

Relevant Contracts Tax (RCT) is a withholding tax system that operates in the construction, forestry and meat processing sectors. Principal contractors are defined in section 530A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 as including “any board or body established by or under statute … and funded wholly or mainly out of funds provided by the Oireachtas”. As such, school Boards of Management are principal contractors for the purposes of RCT and are required to operate RCT. From 1 January 2012, the Revenue Commissioners have substantially modernised the operation of RCT following the introduction of a dedicated online facility which offers principal contractors a fast, efficient and paper free system. This has streamlined the process for the submission of information and payments to the Revenue Commissioners and has had the effect of significantly reducing the administrative burden associated with RCT.

Tax Compliance

Questions (213, 214)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

213. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance if he will support the introduction of country by country accounting and if he will work towards the inclusion of secrecy jurisdictions in the Council of Europe/OECD Multilateral Convention on Tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52349/12]

View answer

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

214. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance as per recommendations of the recent OECD/IMF/UN (2011) report, if he will carry out a spill over analysis of tax policy here to ensure that it is not negatively impacting on the revenue take of the developing countries [52350/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 213 and 214 together.

There has been increased interest in recent years from civic society groups, the EU and the OECD etc, on how to improve the transparency and tax compliance of multinational companies operating in developing countries, with a particular focus on the extractive industries.

In support of these objectives it has been proposed that multinational enterprises report on a country by country basis their annual financial statements. Recently there has been some agreement at EU level to support the introduction of country by country reporting in the form of the Accounting and Transparency Directives.

Ireland continues to support the ongoing work at EU and OECD level on tax and development issues including work on country by country reporting. In relation to the OECD/IMF/UN report, for such an analysis to be effective it should be carried out at an international level and Ireland stands ready to participate in any such analysis.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme

Questions (215)

Heather Humphreys

Question:

215. Deputy Heather Humphreys asked the Minister for Finance the public representatives on the board of directors of AIB, Bank of Ireland, Irish Banking Resolution Corporation and Permanent TSB; the person to whom they are accountable; if they have given a report on their progress to date; their brief; their term in office; their remuneration; if they have any input into salary levels of current employees in excess of €100,000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52432/12]

View answer

Written answers

The legal position is that any director appointed to the board of the covered institutions whether under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Scheme 2008 or otherwise is subject to the requirements of company law in relation to the discharge of their responsibilities as a company director. As such, the director is legally bound to act in what he or she believes are the interests of the separate legal entity that is the institution itself. To address the scope for actual and perceived conflicts between the fiduciary duties of the directors of financial institutions under company law and the wider public interest in circumstances where those institutions have received financial support from the State, legal clarity, not just to the role of the public interest director but to that of the entire boards of those institutions, was provided under Section 48 of the Credit Institutions (Stabilisation) Act 2010. It provides that the overriding duty of directors of the covered institutions relates to the public interest as set out in the Act. Accordingly, public interest directors do not have a formal reporting relationship to the Minister or to the Department of Finance and therefore no formal report has been produced by them for either the Minister or the Department of Finance. As stated in my reply to PQ 49478/12 there are currently no public interest directors on the board of IBRC. However all appointments to the board of the bank are approved by the Minister for Finance under the terms and conditions attaching to the nationalisation of the bank. The Minister for Finance has extensive powers in relation to the appointment and removal of Chairpersons, CEO’s and ordinary board members under the Anglo Irish Bank Act 2009. Mr Alan Dukes had been appointed as a public interest director in December 2008 and was made Chairman of Anglo Irish Bank in June 2010.

I have previously provided information on the remuneration and the terms in office of the public interest directors, including in response to PQ 49980/12. For the record the public interest directors, their dates of appointment/resignation and the fees they earned in 2011 are shown in the table below:

Bank

Public Interest Directors

Date of Appointment/Resignation

Fees 2011 €

AIB

Mr Dick Spring

Mr Declan Collier

January 2009

January 2009/June 2012

59,000

71,000

BOI

Mr Tom Considine

Mr Joe Walsh

January 2009

January 2009

90,000

79,000

PTSB

Ms Margaret Hayes

Mr Ray MacSharry

December 2008

December 2008

64,000

56,000

Dr Michael Somers is a Government Nominee (not a Public Interest Director) appointed to the AIB board on 14 January 2010 under the terms of the NPRFC’s investment of €3.5bn in AIB of May 2009.

The public interest directors at Bank of Ireland do not have a specified time in office as stated in response to PQ 49476/12. The same situation applies to the public interest directors at AIB. In PTSB, as stated in PQ 49482/12 the public interest directors were appointed until 30 September 2010 but have remained since that date as a replacement Government guarantee scheme has remained in place since then. The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company require each director to retire every third year but in practice each public interest director has been subject to re-election by shareholders at each AGM since their appointment.

In general the setting of remuneration policies at the covered institutions rests with the Remuneration Committee of each institution. The terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee are accessible on the website of each institution. These can be found at:

AIB: http://www.aib.ie/servlet/BlobServer/document.pdf?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1136826158582&blobcol=urlfile&blobtable=AIB_Download&blobheader=application/pdf&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=document.pdf

Bank of Ireland:

http://www.bankofireland.com/about-boi-group/corporate-governance/court-committees/terms-of-reference/

PTSB:

http://www.irishlifepermanent.com/corporate-responsibility/corporate-governance/board-committees.aspx

Both Bank of Ireland and PTSB have a public interest director sitting on the Remuneration Committee. The public interest director will have a vote on decisions being considered by the Remuneration Committee but they do not have any powers to veto such a decision, nor can they act unilaterally to address salaries paid to particular employees. In the case of AIB there is currently no public interest director on the Remuneration Committee. Declan Collier, who was a public interest director of AIB, served on the Remuneration Committee until his resignation from the board in June 2012.

As the Deputy will be aware officials in my Department have been working with Mercer on a remuneration review of the covered banks. The report will provide a comprehensive and professional analysis of remuneration structures and levels across the covered banks both now and before the onset of the banking crisis.

NAMA Operations

Questions (216, 217, 218, 219)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

216. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to the announcement by the National Asset Management Agency on 23 May 2012 in which it said that it would invest €2bn in its developments over the next four years, if he will confirm the volume and value of approved investments to date corresponding to this plan; if he will confirm the value of investment actually drawn-down from approvals to date. [52440/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

217. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to the announcement by the National Asset Management Agency on 23 May 2012 in which it said that it would invest €2bn in its developments over the next four years, if he will provide a schedule showing the planned investment by year in 2012, 2013 2014, 2015 and beyond; and if he will provide an overview of the control mechanism National Asset Management Agency has in place to monitor progress in meeting the planned investment. [52441/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

218. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to the announcement by the National Asset Management Agency on 23 May 20123 in which it said that it would invest €2bn in its developments over the next four year, if this planned investment is additional to so-called working capital and other advances made by National Asset Management Agency to developers which at February 2012 had totalled €980 million of advances and €740 million of drawndowns, and if so, if he will provide an updated tally of approved and drawn-down advances, split by region. [52442/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

219. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to the announcement by the National Asset Management Agency on 23 May 2012 in which it said that it would invest €2bn in its developments over the next four years, if National Asset Management Agency has been consulted to establish if legislators might be able to facilitate NAMA in delivering this planned investment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52443/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 216 to 219, inclusive, together.

The National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) announced on 23rd May that it plans to invest, given the right opportunities, at least €2 billion in development capital in order to preserve, enhance and complete commercial and residential projects in Ireland over the period to 2016. NAMA stated at the time that this includes the completion of properties which are currently under development and the development of land in anticipation of future supply shortages and demand.

Prior to the announcement NAMA had already committed over €500 million in new working capital and development capital advances for projects which are located in Ireland. NAMA advises that the €2 billion investment announced in May is in addition to this prior investment.

The €2 billion investment forms part of NAMA’s wider operations and is accounted for in the normal manner. The advances and drawdowns by region are set out hereunder from inception to end-September 2012; this figure includes the February 2012 amounts quoted by the Deputy.

New Advance Approvals of €1.5 billion are split between:

Approved Credit Advances by Area

% Total

ROI

41%

GB

51%

NI

1%

Other

7%

Actual drawdown payments of €927 million are split between:

Actual Drawdown Payments by Area

% Total

ROI

46%

GB

46%

NI

1%

Other

7%

NAMA’s Annual Report and Financial Statements for the period to end-December 2011 contains extensive information on its working capital and development capital advances, including the structures and mechanisms in place to ensure the delivery of projects in line with proven and anticipated market demand and NAMA’s commercial mandate to maximise the return on its acquired bank assets on behalf of the Irish taxpayer. In this regard, NAMA advises that it is currently assessing a wide range of projects that may be suitable for development by reference to projected demand. Decisions to invest will be based on those projects which are considered most likely to generate a strong commercial return to the taxpayer. NAMA advises that as project appraisal is still on-going it is not possible to provide the schedule sought by the Deputy. NAMA advises that it engages, as appropriate, with public bodies, including government departments, state agencies such as the IDA and local authorities, in both the identification and delivery of critical infrastructure development planning linked to this and other investment activities.

IBRC Investigations

Questions (220)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

220. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to a report in a national newspaper that the chief executive officer of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (details supplied) has stated in relation to a reported bid for assets under the control of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation, it is the bank's policy not to continue relations with organisations that attempt to apply pressure by threatening to make communications public; if he will confirm the number of organisations with which IBRC is not continuing relations as a result of this policy. [52444/12]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised that IBRC adheres to a structured procurement process for the appointment of all its advisors. This procurement process is open, objective and transparent and is subject to the Bank’s governance processes including oversight through a regular reporting process by the main Board of the Bank. The Bank have a responsibility to make commercial decisions in the ordinary course of business and will not allow these decisions to be affected by undue influence. I have been informed that IBRC at all times seeks to maximise returns for the Irish taxpayer.

NAMA Operations

Questions (221)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

221. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to a report in a national newspaper that the chief executive officer of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (details supplied) has stated in relation to a reported bid for assets under the control of IBRC, it is the bank's policy not to continue relations with organisations that attempt to apply pressure by threatening to make communications public, if he will confirm if the National Asset Management Agency has a similar policy, and if so, if he will confirm the number of organisations with which NAMA is not continuing relations as a result of any such similar policy. [52445/12]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that NAMA has no such policy in place and deals with all genuine counterparties in a professional manner.

NAMA Debtor Agreements

Questions (222, 223)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

222. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to a report in a Sunday newspaper, if he will confirm the maximum salary approved by the National Asset Management Agency at Harcourt Developments is €200,000. [52446/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

223. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm the maximum annual remuneration approved by the National Asset Management Agency at any of its developers, inclusive of pension contribution, consultancy fees and allowances. [52447/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 222 and 223 together.

I am advised by the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) that information relating to its debtors and properties within their control is, within the meaning of Sections 99 and 202 of the NAMA Act 2009, confidential and that it is therefore precluded from discussing such matters.

As detailed in a response to the Deputy Gerry Adams (Ref No: 39693/12, 20th September 2012), NAMA has no agreements in place with debtor principals which authorise them to retain total remuneration in excess of €200,000 from their assets or businesses.

IBRC Investigations

Questions (224)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

224. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an explanation for the contrast between practice at the National Asset Management Agency where salaries of their borrowers are closely monitored and practice at the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation where there is no such monitoring at all. [52448/12]

View answer

Written answers

The overriding mandate of IBRC is to maximise the recovery of loans on behalf of the State. I have been advised that the Bank seeks to work constructively and consensually with each borrower to identify the most appropriate approach available to it in order to maximise the repayment of the loan. The process followed in managing the recovery process is to assess fully all aspects of a borrower’s circumstances to establish the most appropriate repayment strategy. This assessment includes consideration of debt, asset, income/salary and lifestyle considerations. Agreements that are ultimately reached for agreed repayment plans are judged and enforced to provide the best commercial outcome for the shareholder.

In circumstances where consensual agreements cannot be reached the alternative of receivership, examinership or liquidation is pursued resulting in rigorous enforcement of all recovery options and rights.

Banking Sector Remuneration

Questions (225, 226)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

225. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in respect of the appointment of Mercer in June 2012 to examine pay levels across banking institutions, if he will provide the terms of reference attaching to the appointment; the timescales for the production of research or reports; if such timescales form part of the contract with Mercer, the estimated fees payable to Mercer and a copy of any associated tender document, and an overview of the cost and description of any additional resources provided by the him or his Department to Mercer to facilitate the completion of the work. [52449/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

226. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in respect of the appointment of Mercer in June 2012 to examine pay levels across banking institutions, if salaries at the Central Bank of Ireland and National Asset Management Agency were included in the scope of the Mercer work when that company was appointed in June 2012. [52450/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 225 and 226 together.

The Deputy should note that I have already provided the information he seeks when responding to his parliamentary questions of 15th November 2012 (Ref No. 50509/12) & 20th November 2012 (Ref No. 51025/12).

For his convenience I am including the information below.

“The Deputies will be aware that my Department is presently engaged in a Review of Remuneration Practices and Frameworks at the covered institutions. I have recently engaged, as I informed the Opposition Spokespersons on Finance, the services of Mercer (Ireland) Limited following a limited competitive tender competition to assist my Department in bringing this exercise to a conclusion. The estimated cost of the review, at this stage, is approximately €120,000.

The object of the review is to thoroughly review all remuneration practices at the covered institutions with the object of simplifying remuneration and compensation structures, discouraging excessive risk-taking and to better align pay and reward to long term value creation. Present Government policy on remuneration dictates that no employee, at the covered institutions may receive more than €500,000 (excluding pension contributions) per annum and remains in force.

Numerous engagements by my officials and Mercer have taken place since the awarding of the contract. I am expecting the consultant’s report to be delivered by year end whereupon consultations with the various stakeholders will commence.

As I have said previously, I fully recognise that there is a real public interest in the levels of remuneration at the covered institutions and have committed to placing the details underpinning the review into the public domain”.

In relation to his further question on additional resources, no such resources have been provided by me or my Department to Mercer to facilitate the completion of the work.

As the review involves the Covered Institutions the Central Bank of Ireland & the National Asset Management Agency are not included in its remit.

Top
Share