Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 31 Jan 2013

Written Answers Nos. 62 - 69

Property Taxation Application

Questions (62)

Michael McGrath

Question:

62. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance when the Revenue Commissioners intend to write to homeowners in relation to the local property tax; the number of letters expected to be issued; if the letters will provide an indicative valuation of the property for the homeowner; if a homeowner is immune from any further action by Revenue if the homeowner accepts the valuation placed on the property by Revenue; if he will provide details of the way Revenue will arrive at the indicative valuation of each individual property; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4851/13]

View answer

Written answers

The legislation governing Local Property Tax (LPT) is contained in Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 and was signed into law by the President on 26 December 2012. The Act sets out how the tax is to be administered, how a residential property is to be valued for LPT purposes and provides for the making of a Revenue Estimate. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that they are compiling a comprehensive Register of residential properties in the State that will be used to correspond with all property owners. Based on Census 2011 data, produced by the Central Statistics Office, there are an estimated 1.99 million residential dwellings in the State. Revenue is currently refining the LPT Register to identify those properties owned by local authorities and approved housing bodies and will liaise directly with these organisations in respect of LPT arising on these properties. I am further advised by the Revenue Commissioners that some individuals and companies will receive their LPT return electronically via the Revenue Online Service (ROS). Accordingly, the number of paper returns expected to issue to owners of residential properties will be confirmed over the coming weeks, but is expected to be of the order of 1.6 million. This general issue of paper LPT returns to property owners will commence in March 2013.

I am further informed by the Revenue Commissioners that LPT is a self-assessment tax so in the first instance it is a matter for the property owner to calculate the tax due based on his or her assessment of the chargeable value of the property. I would like to clarify that the Revenue Commissioners will not be involved, as a matter of routine, in valuing properties. However, I am advised that they are actively preparing valuation guidance which, taken together with a liable person’s own knowledge of their property, will assist them in assessing its value and that these will be made available as soon as possible. The guidance will include drawing property owners’ attention to the publicly available PSRA property price register which includes some 62,000 of reasonably recent property prices, and a method to help property owners establish average/indicative values for properties in different locations. As I have previously advised the House, where the Revenue guidance is used in an honest manner, the property valuation will not be challenged by Revenue in accordance with its normal Customer Service Charter.

As part of the general issue of LPT returns by Revenue, property owners will also receive an information booklet and a Revenue Estimate of LPT. The Revenue Estimate is not based on a valuation of each owner’s individual property nor should it be regarded as an accurate calculation of the amount of LPT that they should pay. Once the property owner meets their obligations by valuing their property, submitting their return and advising Revenue of their payment method within the relevant time limits, the Revenue Estimate of LPT notified to them is no longer relevant. On the other hand, where a property owner does not submit an LPT return by the due date, the LPT legislation provides that Revenue can enforce collection of the Revenue Estimate. If a property owner pays the Revenue Estimate instead of submitting their LPT return they will not be immune from further action. The property owner is still required to submit a self-assessed LPT return.

Departmental Agencies Board Appointments

Questions (63)

Billy Kelleher

Question:

63. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the number of organisations or agencies under the aegis of his Department that have vacancies on their board; the length of time any such vacancies have been unfilled; the number of vacancies that have been advertised; the number of applications to fill such vacancies that have been received; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4859/13]

View answer

Written answers

The following table is the response to the Deputy’s question.

Name of Body

No of vacancies and date vacancy arose

No of advertised vacancies

No of applications received

Central Bank Commission

1 vacancy (31st Dec 2011)

Expressions of interest sought

Approximately 19

National Treasury Management Agemcy Advisory Committee

Three vacancies

1 from 01 May 2012

2 from 01 Jan 2012

Expressions of interest were sought for these vacancies

One expression of interest received

National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission

One vacancy from

18 January 2013

The vacancy has not yet been advertised

-

National Development Finance Agency Board

Three vacancies

01 January 2013

Expressions of interest were sought for these vacancies

Five expressions of interest have been received

State Claims Agency Policy Committee

One vacancy from

01 January 2013

Position held by representative from Department of Health, which has been the practice since the committee was established

Fuel Rebate Scheme

Questions (64)

Ciara Conway

Question:

64. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider an excise rebate on diesel for passenger transport companies; if he will confirm that this may be required under EU law in view of the fact that it is proposed to introduce an excise rebate in diesel; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4871/13]

View answer

Written answers

The proposal to introduce an auto-diesel excise duty relief for licensed road hauliers that I announced in the Budget is confined to licensed and tax compliant hauliers. However, I have received a number of submissions from, and on behalf of, private coach operators seeking to have this relief extended to them. I will consider these proposals and the level of the rebate in the context of the Finance Bill. It is worth noting that one of key arguments for introducing a rebate for the haulage industry is the fact that a large quantity of fuel purchased by this industry is purchased abroad thus generating no tax revenue for the State. A rebate should encourage hauliers to start purchasing their fuel in Ireland thus offsetting some of the costs involved. Such an argument does not exist for the most part for the coach industry.

The fuel rebate scheme proposed is governed by the terms of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 which limits its application to auto diesel used in defined categories of road vehicles. I will be informing the European Commission of the rebate measure once it is introduced.

Tax Collection

Questions (65)

Finian McGrath

Question:

65. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of public servants earning €100,000 per year or more; the number of private sector workers earning €100,00 or more; and the total tax take for this range of persons. [4879/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the latest relevant sector-based information available on income earners in the tax system is derived from income tax returns filed for the income tax year 2010 and represents about 95 per cent of all returns expected at the time the data was compiled for analytical purposes. The data relating to the public sector includes individuals in receipt of various forms of income from public sources that would not normally be regarded as constituting employment within the public service, e.g. those receiving fees, those on State Boards etc. On the basis of the available tax-based data it is not possible to identify and exclude income from public sources to groups that would not normally be regarded as employed within the public service or to distinguish the earnings of employees associated with typical work patterns.

On this basis, the total numbers of public sector income earners and private sector income earners, including self-employed earners, who had earnings in excess of €100,000 in the tax year 2010, are 12,500 and 86,900 respectively. Their liability to income tax was approximately €410 million and €4,075 million respectively. A married couple which has elected or has been deemed to have elected for joint assessment is counted as one tax unit.

Tax Yield

Questions (66)

Arthur Spring

Question:

66. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance the level of taxation that has been generated by the sale of tobacco products each year since 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4880/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the yield from Tobacco Products Tax and estimated VAT on tobacco products for the years 2008 to 2012 is as follows:

-

Tobacco

Products

Tax

VAT

€m

€m

2008

1,170

327

2009

1,216

314

2010

1,159

335

2011

1,126

302

2012

1,113

310

It should be noted that the 2012 figure for Tobacco Products Tax is provisional at this time and is subject to change. Please note that the Value Added Tax receipts are estimated, as the VAT returns do not require the yield from a particular sector or sub-sector of trade to be identified.

Pension Provisions

Questions (67)

Ciara Conway

Question:

67. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider reducing the pension levy on occupational and pension fund assets imposed on an organisation (details supplied) in view of the fact that the fund trustees have decided to recover the cost of the levy from pensioners themselves by 0.6%; if there are any exceptions to the pension levy; to whom those might apply; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4917/13]

View answer

Written answers

The pension fund levy applies at a rate of 0.6% per annum to the market value, on the valuation date, of assets under management in pension funds and pension plans approved under Irish tax legislation. The levy will operate for a period of 4 years only (2011 to 2014) and the legislative provisions giving effect to the levy (section 4 of Finance (No 2) Act 2011) were specifically drafted to reflect this. I confirmed in my Budget 2013 Speech that the levy will not be renewed after 2014.

The moneys raised from the pension fund levy are being used to pay for the Government’s Jobs Initiative introduced in May 2011. The measures introduced as part of the Jobs Initiative include a new 9% VAT rate on certain activities, the halving of the lower rate of PRSI and small amounts of additional current and capital expenditure. The implementation of a jobs and growth strategy is a key priority of the Government. The measures announced in the Jobs Initiative are aimed at assisting in employment generation – providing opportunities for those who are out of work, to restore public morale and confidence in the economy and encourage spending by consumers.

The chargeable persons for the levy are the trustees or other persons (including insurance companies) with responsibility for the management of the assets of the pension schemes or plans. The payment of the levy is treated as a necessary expense of a pension scheme and the trustees or insurer, as appropriate, are entitled, where they decide to do so, to adjust current or prospective benefits payable under a scheme to take account of the levy. It is up to the trustees to decide whether and how the levy should be passed on and who should be impacted and to what extent, given the particular circumstances of the pension schemes for which they are responsible. I cannot intervene in this process in respect of the pension fund referred to in the details supplied with the question or other pension funds. However, the legislation also includes safeguards aimed at ensuring that benefits payable, either currently or prospectively to any member, are adjusted in such a way that the reduction in value of those benefits shall not exceed 0.6% of the market value of the assets accounting for the scheme’s liabilities to that member.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that there are two exceptions to the requirement to pay the levy provided for in the governing legislation (section 125B of the Stamp Duties Consolidation Act 1999). The first exception provides that the levy will not apply to the assets of occupational pension schemes in respect of employees whose employment is or was wholly exercised outside the State. In other words the levy does not apply to the extent that a pension scheme is intended to provide retirement benefits outside the State. The second exception provides that the levy will not apply where the trustees of a scheme have passed a resolution to wind-up the scheme and where the business in respect of which the scheme was established is insolvent.

I am conscious of the concerns of pension scheme members about the impact of a levy in circumstances where the pensions sector, in common with other sectors in our economy and society, is finding the current economic and financial environment very challenging. However, much of the value of pension funds is attributable to the rolled up value of generous tax reliefs that pension savings have historically been granted and continue to receive. The purpose of the levy is to improve the economic environment by providing the means to encourage job creation in areas of our economy most likely to deliver that employment quickly.

Property Taxation Application

Questions (68)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

68. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance if he will make provision to allow local authorities to classify the way estates are part of the forthcoming local property tax and if he will allow the classifications to be approved by the elected members on the recommendation of the city or county manager; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4923/13]

View answer

Written answers

I understand that the Deputy is asking about the process by which residential estates are classified as ‘unfinished estates’ for the purpose of exemption from the Local Property Tax. The Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 sets out in detail how the tax is to be administered and provides how a residential property is to be valued for LPT purposes. The Act also provides for a number of specific exemptions from the charge.

An exemption will apply to unfinished housing estates as prescribed by the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government. In determining whether an unfinished housing estate should be prescribed, the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government must satisfy himself or herself that the development in question is incomplete to a substantial extent. Examples of the criteria that the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government should take into account in such a determination include the state of completion of roads, footpaths, lighting facilities, water and sewerage facilities within the development as well as compliance with the terms of any planning permission applicable to the development and the extent to which roads, open spaces, car parks, sewers, water mains, drains or other public facilities in the development have been taken in charge by the local authority concerned. These criteria are set out in section 10 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012.

Properties will not be regarded as relevant residential properties for the purposes of the local property tax, and will not be subject to the local property tax so long as they remain on the prescribed list of unfinished housing estates. There are no plans to devolve responsibility for compilation of the prescribed list from the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to local authorities. However, elected members may make recommendations on the matter at any time to city or county managers or directly to the Minister.

Redundancy Payments

Questions (69)

Dan Neville

Question:

69. Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding redundancy payment in respect of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4934/13]

View answer

Written answers

The person in question is a civil servant, and as the Deputy will be aware in the context of the Civil Service Code of Standards and Behaviour, canvassing on behalf of civil servants is not appropriate. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that retirement benefits are being processed in accordance with the terms of the Superannuation Scheme for Civil Servants.

Top
Share