Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 12 Feb 2013

Written Answers Nos. 125-147

Suckler Cow Quota

Questions (125)

John Browne

Question:

125. Deputy John Browne asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide the expenditure in 2011 and 2012 on the suckler cow welfare scheme; the estimated expenditure on suckler cow schemes in 2013 and 2014 based on the existing suckler cow welfare scheme and the new scheme he announced before Christmas; if he intends to maintain the expenditure on suckler cow schemes at the 2012 levels; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6960/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Suckler Welfare Scheme was a five-year Scheme for beef breed animals born during the period 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 in herds owned by eligible participants. This Scheme was fully funded by the Exchequer. In the context of Budget 2013, I announced that, given the existing Scheme had reached the end of its projected life and achieved its aim, I had secured funding for a new support programme for suckler beef farmers to participate in a Beef Data Programme. A total of €10 million has been allocated for this programme in 2013, which is financed from unspent Single Farm Payment Funds.

This programme will assist farmers in improving the genetic quality of Irish cattle and will maintain the data flow into ICBF in order to build further knowledge and more rapid progress in breeding and ultimately in profitability for farmers. In terms of support for the beef sector, I also announced that the Beef Technology Adoption Programme would be retained for 2013. This Programme, which provides for funding of €5m this year, will continue to provide farmers with better information to increase profitability on farms.

In excess of €150 million has been paid to participants in the Suckler Cow Welfare Scheme since its inception. Payments amounting to €30 million were made during 2011 and a further €27.4 million during 2012. I have also made funding of €10 million available in 2013 to continue to make payments for animals, born before 31 December 2012, that become eligible during 2013.

My Department believes that this provision will be sufficient to cover outstanding liabilities under the Scheme, given that payment has already been made, where possible, on animals born between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2011. As regards those animals born in 2012, it will be some time yet before the final picture emerges given the need to establish that the qualifying criteria have been complied with, particularly the weaning requirement.

In total, therefore, taking account of the other initiatives to which I have referred, a total of €25 million has been earmarked to support the beef sector in 2013. I believe that this represents a significant achievement in the current challenging budgetary situation and reflects the Government’s commitment to the sector. As regards 2014, it is too early to comment meaningfully in any specific terms, and I will review the matter in light of the budgetary situation and competing demands as preparation for the 2014 budgetary cycle commences.

Animal Welfare

Questions (126)

Michael P. Kitt

Question:

126. Deputy Michael P. Kitt asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of sport horses here; the controls in place to ensure animal and human health in relation to these horses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6968/13]

View answer

Written answers

The most recent estimate of the number of Sport Horses in Ireland is provided by a report commissioned by Horse Sport Ireland and conducted by UCD on the Economic contribution of the Sport Horse industry to the Irish economy. The report was published last autumn and estimated the total sport horse population in Ireland at 124,368. Of these, the Breeding sector comprised 73,349, the competition sector 10,354 and the leisure sector 35,882. These figures were compiled using a number of sources, such as Central Statistics Office data, the records of approved horse registration organisations and surveys of a wide range of parties in the industry itself.

With regard to animal health issues, the movement of equidae between Member States of the EU is subject to harmonised rules governing animal health. These rules require all equidae to be accompanied by a passport and a health document stating that the equidae has come from a holding which is not restricted due to notifiable diseases of equidae and are clinically healthy at the time of examination. The rules also provide that the equidae must undergo a veterinary inspection 48 hours prior to movement and their movement must be recorded on the TRACES system.

A Tripartite Agreement (TPA) between the United Kingdom, France and Ireland avails of a derogation provided for in Article 6 of Council Directive 2009/156/EC. This allows Member States to grant one another derogations from requirements for inspection and certification prior to movement and trade between them, provided they are satisfied that the relevant health status between the signatory countries is equivalent. Each country is required to notify the other members of the Tripartite of any confirmed cases of listed diseases that change the equivalence status. The original TPA related exclusively to horses registered in stud books or registered to any international association or organisation which manages horses for competition or racing. However, with the advent of compulsory identification of equidae and the requirement for all equidae to have passports, all equidae with passports (except those destined directly for slaughter) are permitted to move freely within the TPA areas.

With regard to human health, under EU and national regulation, only those horses that have been identified and registered with a passport issuing organisation may be considered for slaughter for human consumption. Horses treated with certain veterinary medicines such as phenylbutazone are permanently excluded from the human food chain in order to protect public health and the passport of the horse in question is endorsed by the prescribing veterinary practitioner to this effect at the time of the prescription being issued or the medicine being administered. An equine for slaughter for human consumption must be accompanied to the slaughterhouse by its passport compliant with current veterinary requirements - this requirement is an essential part of the food-chain information required by food law.

My Department introduced enhanced procedures for the slaughter of horses in abattoirs in October 2011 and communicated these and the checks required both to its staff and the business operators. These procedures provide that an official veterinarian must be present in a meat plant when slaughtering is taking place. All animals are subject to an ante-mortem inspection, which includes an identification check, by an official veterinarian prior to slaughter. Where forged or tampered passports accompanying horses to slaughter are detected, it is Department policy that such animals are destroyed and removed from the food chain.

Rural Development Programme Funding

Questions (127)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

127. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the EU allocation under different measures under the Rural Development Programme; the expenditure to date; the amount re-imbursed by the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6985/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Rural Development Programme 2007 - 2013 [RDP] a total of €2,494,540,590 EAFRD funding was allocated at programme level. This was subsequently allocated at axis level under the programme financial plan. Since the launch of the RDP expenditure under the programme up to the end 2012 amounted to €3.74bn. This represents close on 77.6% of the total value of the Programme which is €4.82bn and 83% of the EAFRD amount. Axes 1 and 2 of the Rural Development Programme are administered by my Department while Axes 3 and 4 are delivered by the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. Details of the expenditure per measure under the RDP up to the end of 2012 and the amount re-imbursed by the EU are set out in the table below. This table does not include funds already committed but not as yet claimed.

The programme, like all national spending, is subject to ongoing budgetary constraints but is configured to maximise all available EU funding. Ireland’s draw down rate under the Programme has been among the highest of EU Member States over the lifetime of the current Programme.

Spending under a number of measures may continue until the end of 2015 and this will provide considerable scope to allow all measures to spend up to their full allocation. Adjustments have already been made to the RDP financial plan and will continue to be made to the end of the Programme in order to achieve the fullest possible draw down of available funds.

 Support

Measure

Title

EAFRD Allocation per Axis

Total Expenditure

2007 – 2012

Of which EAFRD

-

-

-

Axis 1 Competitiveness

-

-

-

-

111

Vocational Training

7,133,733

4,040,626

112

Setting up Young Farmers

12,892,430

6,504,938

113

Early Retirement Scheme

212,653,617

112,687,662

121

Modernisation of Agricultural Holdings

78,194,859

45,671,306

-

Total Axis 1

237,515,376

310,874,639

168,904,532

Axis 2-  Environment and Land Management

-

-

-

-

212

Less Favoured Areas

1,288,821,995

708,852,098

213

Natura

84,365,076

47,134,930

214

Agri Environmental Payments

1,898,093,784

1,057,028,093

-

Total Axis 2

2,001,176,888

3,271,280,855

1,813,015,121

Axes 3 & 4 – Wider rural economy

-

-

-

-

321

Rural Broadband Scheme

13,413,000

0

0

413 & 421 & 431

LEADER

239,435,326

162,083,165

105,057,499

-

Total  Axes 3 & 4

252,848,326

162,083,165

105,057,499

511

Technical Assistance

3,000,000

1,441,575.23

720,789

-

GRAND TOTAL

2,494,540,590

3,745,680,238

2,087,697,941

Forestry Sector

Questions (128)

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

128. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if it is intended to fund the development of forestry from the next common agriculture policy programme; and if so, the effect this could have on agricultural payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6990/13]

View answer

Written answers

We have a long way to go before final decisions can be taken on the content of the next rural development programme, including whether to include an element for forestry development. Although we now know, since Friday last, the amount of EU funding that will be available to Ireland for rural development, the proposed EU framework of rules for rural development in the next programming period are still under discussion by EU Agriculture Ministers and by the European Parliament. Once these regulations have been agreed, there will follow an extensive analytical and consultative process to inform our decisions on the content of the Irish programme.

Departmental Schemes

Questions (129)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

129. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which all farm support payments due to the farming community are paid up to date; the number still outstanding and the reasons therefor; the extent to which he expects such payments to be made in full at an early date in order to assist farmers who may have budgetary problems arising from the reluctance in the part of lenders to facilitate their customers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6918/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am, of course, conscious of the financial pressures on many farm families and of the importance of grant and scheme payments to their incomes and cash-flow. Since my appointment I have given the highest priority to the processing and payment of all scheme payments and to the elimination of all unnecessary delays.

In a ten week period from late September to early December 2012, the amount paid by my Department by way of direct payments to farmers was in excess of €1.4 billion. By any measure, this is both a very significant sum in itself and a very commendable achievement in terms of delivery.

To date, over 123,000 farmers have been paid in excess of €1,210 million under the 2012 Single Payment Scheme. Payment commenced on 16th October 2012. The normal payment date is 1st December but the earlier payment date was approved by the EU following my making a case to the EU Commission.

With regard to the Disadvantaged Areas Scheme, while there is no regulatory start date for payments, the scheme being co-funded, the recognised earliest possible payment date is during the third week of September; I can confirm that payments began on schedule on 26 September. To date, payments worth in excess of €204 million have issued to some 93,000 applicants.

Under the Grassland Sheep Scheme payment cannot commence prior to 1 December. I can confirm that these payments commenced on 10 December last and, to date, payments worth some €18 million have issued to 28,152 applicants. The budget for the scheme is €18 million.

Payments under the Beef Technology Adoption Programme commenced on target in late December, with some €4.4 million already paid to in excess of 4,800 participants, while payments under the Dairy Efficiency Programme, worth in the region of €5.5 million, are on target to issue in the coming weeks, to some 5,500 participants. Payments worth up to €1 million are also on schedule to shortly issue to those successfully participating in the Burren Farming for Conservation Programme.

Area-based schemes under the Rural Development Programme, 2007-13, are subject to EU Regulations which require detailed administrative checks on all applications, including cross checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, to be completed before payments can issue. These rigorous procedures, together with on-farm inspections, apply to a number of scheme payments including the Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the Agri-environment Options Scheme (AEOS), and are necessary to ensure that applications meet the scheme conditions and cross-compliance requirements.

Payments under the agri-environment schemes, REPS and AEOS in 2012 exceeded the levels of payments achieved in 2011. Already in 2013 significant progress has been made issuing further payments and every effort is being made to resolve outstanding queries and to bring payments fully up-to-date.

Under REPS 4 all payments due in respect of the scheme years prior to 2012 have been made and a total of 26,145 of the 30,000 applicants have been already been paid their 2012 payment.

Under AEOS I all outstanding payments due in respect of both 2010 and 2011 have been finalised and of the 7,500 participants remaining in that scheme over 6,200 have received payment in respect of 2012.

Under AEOS II 5,070 of the 6,250 approved applicants have been paid in respect of 2011. 2012 represents the first full year payment for AEOS 2 applicants. The high level of queries and farmer delays in submitting valid claims has resulted in a lower than expected level of 2012 payments under AEOS 2. Nearly 2,100 have received payment at this stage and to deal with outstanding queries additional resources have been directed to this area with the intention of clearing the backlog as soon as possible. Requests and reminders have issued to farmers that have not submitted valid claim forms and where applicants have received correspondence in this regard they should respond as soon as possible.

Grant payments under Targeted Agricultural Modernisation Scheme (TAMS) are also subject to eligibility checks including on farm inspections in order to assess eligibility and payments are dependent on the completion of the project concerned.

Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Questions (130)

Michael Moynihan

Question:

130. Deputy Michael Moynihan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if the EU Commission has tabled any proposal under common agriculture policy reform that would allow each country the flexibility to set its own maximum single payment to a person; if no such proposal has been made if he intends to propose such a flexibility in view of the significant differences between farming in the different States of the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6972/13]

View answer

Written answers

The proposal tabled by the EU Commission provides for progressive reductions on payments in excess of €150,000 to any one farmer and sets a mandatory cap on individual payments of €300,000 or more. These reductions and caps are net of the greening payment and salary costs and would not have any practical implications for Ireland. The Commission proposal does not provide flexibility for Member States to set individual national limits. However, in agreeing the EU multiannual financial framework for the next EU budget last week, the European Council decided to make capping optional for Member States.

Of course, this does not automatically give Member States the option to fix ceilings on individual payments at a national level. This is an issue that EU Agriculture Ministers will have to consider over the course of the coming weeks in the light of the MFF agreement and the clarity provided concerning the overall budget for EU direct payments and national allocations.

For my own part, I have stated before in this house that I would have no difficulty with a cap on payments of approximately €100,000. However, and particularly in view of our role as Presidency, I recognise that we must find a common solution across the European Union which all Member States can accept and live with. I also need to ensure that the flexibility countries are given in relation to the capping issue suits Ireland.

I will be consulting with colleagues in the Council, Commission and European Parliament over the coming weeks with a view to arriving at a formula that is acceptable to the Commission and all Member States, including Ireland.

Aquaculture Development

Questions (131)

David Stanton

Question:

131. Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the progress that has been made by his Department in appropriate assessment of the impact of aquaculture activity on harbours and bays here necessary for compliance with various EU directives; when the assessment programme began and the impact this will have on aquaculture licence applications; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6939/13]

View answer

Written answers

The European Court of Justice declared in case C418/04 that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to comply with Article 6(3) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive) in respect of authorisation of aquaculture programmes, Ireland had failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive.

In the negotiations to address the judgment a process was agreed with the European Commission which would lead to full compliance by Ireland with the relevant EU Directives. This process includes the following steps:

- a detailed data collection in 91 Bays/Estuaries

- a detailed analysis of raw data collected

- setting of Conservation Objectives by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) in respect of each site

- carrying out Appropriate Assessments of each licence application/fishery plan against the detailed Conservation Objectives set, and

- determination of Licences/Fisheries on the basis of the Appropriate Assessment and other relevant factors.

The data collection programme is substantially complete. Analysis of the data, together with the setting of appropriate conservation objectives by the NPWS, will enable all new, renewal and review applications to be appropriately assessed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. This work represents a significant financial, administrative and scientific investment by the State in resolving this issue.

While the Appropriate Assessments are carried out on a bay by bay basis, each licence application within the bay must be assessed individually. Factors to be considered include location within the bay, species, scale etc. In addition to the Natura requirements, under the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive all licence applications must undergo an Environmental Impact pre-screening assessment. This requires significant input from the Department’s scientific and technical advisors. All applications, in compliance with the requirements of the Aarhus Directive, are advertised in order to facilitate public consultation, and submissions or observations received must be considered as part of the licence application determination process.

Conservation objectives had been set in relation to a significant number of bays and Appropriate Assessments have been carried in three bays (Castlemaine, Dundalk and Roaringwater). I expect to be in a position to make licensing determinations in relation to aquaculture applications in Castlemaine shortly.

My Department continues to make every effort to expedite the determination of aquaculture licence applications having regard to the need to comply with all relevant national and EU legislation.

EU Funding

Questions (132)

Niall Collins

Question:

132. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the financial implications for farmers here, including the re-distribution of payments, if the revised proposals on external convergence in the MFF are agreed, which would see all countries receiving a minimum payment of €196/ha, or 75% of the average by 2020. [6979/13]

View answer

Written answers

The financial implications for farmers arising from the MFF, in terms of the latter’s effect on farmers’ direct payments, derive primarily from the overall allocations made to individual Member States.

Under the terms of the MFF agreement reached last Friday by Heads of State and Government, the distribution of direct payments between Member States indeed included a provision that all Member States should receive a minimum average payment of €196 per hectare by 2020. This essentially involves an adjustment to the original Commission proposal on external convergence - which itself was suggested by Ireland - in order to accommodate new Member States. The impact has been a very marginal one on Ireland’s overall direct payments ceiling, which remains at over €1.2 billion per year for the period.

Departmental Properties

Questions (133)

Finian McGrath

Question:

133. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of rent reductions that have been negotiated between tenants in fishery harbour centres and his Department in each of the past two years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6921/13]

View answer

Written answers

My Department owns and operates, under Statute, six Fishery Harbour Centres at Killybegs, Ros an Mhíl, Dingle, Castletownbere, Dunmore East and Howth. Properties located in the Fishery Harbour Centres are, when appropriate, offered for tenancy under lease or licence agreements. An individual agreement, which is a formal legally binding document on both parties, is voluntarily signed at the outset by the tenant. My Department currently has in the region of 140 property agreements in place in the six Fishery Harbour Centres.

Property agreements are complex instruments and the specific terms of those agreements held with my Department vary. Of the total in place approximately 80 property agreements do not contain rent review clauses which require rent to be static or increased in the subsequent period. These include short-term licence agreements and pending lease agreements.

Any property agreements entered into subsequent to the application of Section 132 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 contain rent review clauses in which the rent payable following the review may be fixed at an amount which is less than, greater than or the same as the amount of rent payable immediately prior to the date on which the rent falls to be reviewed.

In the region of 60 lease agreements contain rent review clauses which require static or increased rent to be applied for the subsequent period. All 60 of the property agreements that contain such rent review clauses were signed prior to the application of Section 132 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act, 2009. These agreements generally require rent reviews to be conducted every five years.

The most recent round of rent reviews on these agreements related to the period up to mid 2008. A number of the rental valuations determined by the qualified valuer, appointed by the Department following a tender competition, were disputed by the tenants. The rent review dispute procedures set out in the tenants' leases were followed and in some cases the independent experts recommended a decrease in the revised valuation determined by the valuer acting on behalf of the Department.

I am acutely aware of the economic situation facing businesses and small enterprises and following the completion of rent reviews due for the period up to mid 2008 I decided in 2011 that no rent reviews would be carried out for years subsequent to 2008 and that zero rent increases would be applied across the board. I have recently decided to continue this approach in relation to rent reviews due in 2013 and a zero rent increase will be applied in all such cases.

Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Questions (134)

Barry Cowen

Question:

134. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if France or any other EU member state secures coupled payments in the common agriculture policy 2013 negotiations of 10% or more for vulnerable sectors, if he will insist on the same level of coupled support being available for Ireland to support suckler cow and sheep farmers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6963/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the CAP reform package, the EU Commission has proposed two separate ceilings for coupled payments in the future, linked to whether the Member already operates a fully decoupled payment regime at present or whether it still operates coupled support in certain sectors. The proposed ceilings are 5% in respect of Member States such as Ireland who are fully decoupled and 10% in respect of others.

I have long held the view that, as this is a discretionary measure, it seems quite inequitable to allow one Member State more discretion than another. Therefore, I believe that the same percentage limit should be applied in all Member States, rather than 5% for some and 10% for others.

However, as President of the European Council of Agriculture Ministers, my objective is to negotiate a Council position on the reform package by the end of March, with a view to securing an inter-institutional political agreement with the European Parliament and the Commission by the end of June. Bearing this in mind, I will be seeking a compromise solution that will satisfy the needs of all Member States.

Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Questions (135)

Martin Ferris

Question:

135. Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on the implications of the definition of active farmer under the reformed system of Common Agricultural Policy payments. [6913/13]

View answer

Written answers

The definition of an active farmer has not yet been finalised in the CAP reform negotiations.

The original Commission proposal defined active farmers by reference to their receipts from agricultural activity, confining them to those whose annual direct payments are greater than or equal to 5% of the total receipts obtained from all non-agricultural economic activities or, in the case of certain types of grazing land, to those who carry out a minimum level of agricultural activity as established by the Member State.

The EU Agriculture Council had extensive debates on the Commission proposal and proposed removal of the income criterion from the Commission’s original definition. The Council also added language to allow Member States the option to exclude certain enterprises such as operators of airports, railway companies, waterworks, real estate companies, sport and recreational grounds, hunting estates, fishing and aquaculture estates, camping sites, or other like non-agricultural businesses or activities.

The approach of the Agriculture Committee of the European Parliament is to leave the definition to the discretion of Member States but to base it on farming activity. The Committee also proposes optional exclusions for non-agricultural businesses or enterprises.

My own view is that the most sensible approach is to base the definition on farming activity and to allow Member States the flexibility to exclude the so-called “sofa-farmers” while ensuring that those farming low productivity marginal land remain eligible for payment.

The position of the Council is clear at this point. As Presidency, it will be my job to navigate a course through the diverging positions between the EU Commission, Member States and the European Parliament in order to settle on a compromise acceptable to all.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Applications

Questions (136)

Michael McGrath

Question:

136. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers in mountain areas who applied for the disadvantaged areas scheme in 2012; the number of these who have mountain holdings and own sheep; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6970/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Disadvantaged Areas Scheme, land is designated in three categories:

- Less Severely Handicapped Lowland and Coastal Areas with Specific Handicaps,

- Move Severely Handicapped Lowland and

- Mountain Type Grazing.

The rates of aid payable, which are designed to assist farmers to overcome the difficulties for farming in such disadvantaged areas, are graduated, in line with the level of disadvantage of the land designation. The rates payable under the 2012 Scheme are as follows:

Less Severely: €82.27 per forage hectare;

More Severely: €95.99 per forage hectare;

Mountain: €109.71 per forage hectare on the first ten hectares and €95.99 thereafter.

The detail sought by the Deputy is being extracted and collated at present and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy immediately it becomes available.

Horse Slaughtering Data

Questions (137)

Billy Kelleher

Question:

137. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of horses slaughtered for the food chain in licensed meat plants in each of the last five years; the numbers of meat plants that have been licensed for the slaughter of horses in each of these years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6966/13]

View answer

Written answers

The number of horses slaughtered in plants approved by my Department in each of the years since 2008 was as follows:

2008 – 2,002;

2009 – 3,220;

2010 – 7,296;

2011 – 12,575;

2012 – 11,402.

It is understood from the Food Safety Authority of Ireland that the following numbers of horses were slaughtered in local authority approved slaughter plants since 2008:

2008 – Nil;

2009 – 1,027;

2010 – 2,494;

2011 – 4,985;

2012 – 12,960.

The number of meat plants approved by my Department to slaughter horses was as follows:

2008 – 1

2009 – 2

2010 - 3

2011 - 3

2012 – 3

I understand from the Food Safety Authority of Ireland that the number of local authority approved horse slaughter plants was as follows:

2008 – Nil

2009 – 1

2010 – 2

2011 – 3

2012 – 3

The current position is that there are 2 local authority approved plants and one approved by my Department. The latter is not active at present.

My Department has introduced a range of measures to improve systems in this area.

The Department has liaised with passport issuing agencies in Ireland and has developed protocols to allow abattoir operators to check the details of passports with these agencies to seek to ensure that they are valid and that only those horses eligible for slaughter are slaughtered.

The Department is also developing a central database of horses which will involve migration of selected data from passport issuing agencies to the Department. The database will be populated by information provided from the databases maintained by the agencies, by the Department from records obtained at slaughter plants and knackeries and by local authorities in respect of records maintained at appropriate slaughter plants. The intention is that this database will be used at abattoirs to assist in verifying the authenticity of the passport for the equine presented and to record its date of slaughter.

Afforestation Programme

Questions (138)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

138. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of hectares planted in 2011 and 2012; the target for planting in each year; the steps he intends taking to increase private planting; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6992/13]

View answer

Written answers

Payment in respect of 6,653 hectares of new planting was made in 2011 under the afforestation schemes with an almost identical figure of 6,652 hectares planted in 2012. These figures were consistent with the annual funding provided in each year for the afforestation programme.

The outlook for planting in 2013 is positive with an increased interest in forestry among landowners as evidenced by the increased number of applications approved over the past year, much of which will feed into the planting programme for 2013. The provision of funding for the forestry programme in the 2013 Budget at more than €112.5 million will allow for approximately 7,000 hectares of new planting which should accommodate current demand. Provision was also made in the Budget for the continuation of the forestry support schemes, primarily the Forest Roads Scheme.

My Department undertakes significant promotional activities, with the assistance of Teagasc, to encourage increased farmer participation in forestry, highlighting the economic, social and environmental benefits of forestry. Teagasc is currently holding a series of one-to-one clinics throughout the country, offering free, independent advice to any landowner considering the possibility of planting. These promotional activities, together with the opportunities presented by the current timber prices and the developing wood energy sector, should all contribute to an increased interest in planting new forests.

Beef Industry Irregularities

Questions (139)

Dara Calleary

Question:

139. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will outline in detail controls his Department apply at factory level to ensure that processors comply with the correct beef carcase trim; and if he will further outline the implementation plan and procedures adopted by his Department in this regard. [6978/13]

View answer

Written answers

Officials of my Department carry out un-announced inspections at beef slaughtering plants to ensure that Carcase Dressing (Trim) is carried out in accordance with EU Regulations.

Unannounced inspections are carried out by authorised officers:

- According to an inspection schedule in an Annual Control Plan;

- As a result of infringements noted during a previous inspection visit;

- Where a complaint to the Department warrants an immediate inspection.

An inspection report form is furnished to factory management on completion of each inspection and, where appropriate, factory Management are required to address any deficiencies noted.

In 2012, 433 un-announced inspections were carried out during which almost 43,000 carcasses were inspected. It is planned to maintain this level of inspection in 2013. All inspecting officers are provided with ongoing training to ensure compliance with the Carcase Dressing (Trim) specification in accordance with the legislation.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Application Numbers

Questions (140)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

140. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers who applied under the disadvantaged areas payments scheme for 2012; the number who have received their payments; the number who have had their payments rejected; the number still under consideration broken down on a county-by-county basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6974/13]

View answer

Written answers

Payments under the 2012 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme commenced, on target, on 26 September and, to date, payments worth in excess of €203 million have issued to some 93,000 farmers. Payments continue to issue twice weekly, as individual cases are confirmed eligible.

Nationally, 127 applications were subject to 100% penalty, as each was received after the final date for receipt of applications. The governing EU regulations require that a 1% cumulative penalty be applied for each working day a given application is received late, with a 100% penalty to be applied where the application is received more than 25 days late. The 127 cases in question were not covered by Force Majeure/exceptional circumstance provisions.

Given the various qualifying criteria under the 2012 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme, particularly in relation to minimum stocking density (both the requirement to achieve a six month average of 0.15 livestock units per forage hectares and also to maintain an annual average of 0.15 livestock units per forage hectares calculated over the 12 months of the scheme year), the need for those with equines to have their holdings appropriately registered, etc, the position regarding certain applicants cannot be finally established for some weeks yet.

The details requested are set out in the table following. However, with appeals ongoing and payments being made twice weekly, the picture continues to evolve.

County

Number of applicants

Number paid

Value of payments

Carlow

759

704

€1,446,698.62

Cavan

4,857

4,562

€9,887,016.74

Clare

6,136

5,727

€13,802,845.32

Cork

7,122

6,624

€15,173,546.62

Donegal

8,473

7,374

€16,958,772.12

Dublin

134

114

€243,379.40

Galway

12,191

10,923

€23,630,726.76

Kerry

7,728

7,021

€17,309,060.60

Kildare

523

460

€818,163.22

Kilkenny

1,769

1,651

€3,464,670.85

Laois

1,726

1,595

€3,157,756.54

Leitrim

3,476

3,147

€7,100,069.72

Limerick

2,935

2,694

€5,330,644.68

Longford

2,391

2,251

€4,953,159.30

Louth

757

676

€1,127,269.23

Mayo

11,623

10,395

€22,108,132.41

Meath

1,352

1,253

€2,290,032.35

Monaghan

4,111

3,830

€7,605,739.34

Offaly

2,399

2,226

€4,448,714.36

Roscommon

5,749

5,345

€11,785,753.36

Sligo

4,065

3,640

€7,930,840.52

Tipperary

4,541

4,191

€8,945,668.13

Waterford

1,450

1,311

€2,692,138.96

Westmeath

2,653

2,468

€5,013,478.22

Wexford

1,435

1,270

€2,330,451.02

Wicklow

1,751

1,578

€3,845,906.86

TOTAL

102,106

93,030

€203,400,635.25

Forestry Sector

Questions (141)

Clare Daly

Question:

141. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine in relation to the Peter Bacon report, showing that it will actually cost the State money to sell the Coillte harvesting rights, if he will place the terms and conditions, that have been agreed to impose on any proposed sale agreements, into the public domain. [6910/13]

View answer

Written answers

Further to the Government decision that a concession for the harvesting rights to Coillte’s forests be put forward for sale, the National Treasury Management Agency, via its NewERA Unit, has been actively engaged with Coillte, the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and my Department to examine the financial and other implications of a potential transaction.

NewERA, the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and my Department received a copy of the report, “Assessment of the Consequences of the proposed Sale of Coillte’s Timber Harvesting Rights – 10 January 2013” by Peter Bacon and Associates, commissioned by IMPACT, at the end of last month, at a meeting with the Coillte unions. The report and its findings are currently being analysed as part of the ongoing consideration process.

The outcome of the overall analysis will be considered by the Government upon its conclusion; no decision has been taken as yet.

Forestry Sector

Questions (142)

Joe Higgins

Question:

142. Deputy Joe Higgins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine in view of the jobs per acre potential in forestry, the reason for the lack of investment in this sector in view of the stated commitment to job creation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6958/13]

View answer

Written answers

I fully recognise the potential of forestry and the contribution that it makes to both employment creation and maintenance, particularly in rural areas. Most recent figures show that almost 12,000 people are employed in the forestry and forest products sector in Ireland. In economic terms, it is valued at over €2 billion annually to the Irish economy.

During the period 2009 – 2012 my Department invested almost €0.5 billion in its afforestation programme and related measures. This has led to the establishment of close to 30,000 hectares of new forests during this reference period. This year a further €112 million has been set aside for forestry to plant up to 7,000 hectares and it is my intention is to continue to invest in this sector.

Departmental Properties

Questions (143)

John Halligan

Question:

143. Deputy John Halligan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of rent reductions that have been negotiated between tenants in fishery harbour centres and his Department in each of the past two years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6923/13]

View answer

Written answers

My Department owns and operates, under Statute, six Fishery Harbour Centres at Killybegs, Ros an Mhíl, Dingle, Castletownbere, Dunmore East and Howth. Properties located in the Fishery Harbour Centres are, when appropriate, offered for tenancy under lease or licence agreements. An individual agreement, which is a formal legally binding document on both parties, is voluntarily signed at the outset by the tenant. My Department currently has in the region of 140 property agreements in place in the six Fishery Harbour Centres.

Property agreements are complex instruments and the specific terms of those agreements held with my Department vary. Of the total in place approximately 80 property agreements do not contain rent review clauses which require rent to be static or increased in the subsequent period. These include short-term licence agreements and pending lease agreements.

Any property agreements entered into subsequent to the application of Section 132 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 contain rent review clauses in which the rent payable following the review may be fixed at an amount which is less than, greater than or the same as the amount of rent payable immediately prior to the date on which the rent falls to be reviewed.

In the region of 60 lease agreements contain rent review clauses which require static or increased rent to be applied for the subsequent period. All 60 of the property agreements that contain such rent review clauses were signed prior to the application of Section 132 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act, 2009. These agreements generally require rent reviews to be conducted every five years.

The most recent round of rent reviews on these agreements related to the period up to mid 2008. A number of the rental valuations determined by the qualified valuer, appointed by the Department following a tender competition, were disputed by the tenants. The rent review dispute procedures set out in the tenants’ leases were followed and in some cases the independent experts recommended a decrease in the revised valuation determined by the valuer acting on behalf of the Department.

I am acutely aware of the economic situation facing businesses and small enterprises and following the completion of rent reviews due for the period up to mid 2008 I decided in 2011 that no rent reviews would be carried out for years subsequent to 2008 and that zero rent increases would be applied across the board. I have recently decided to continue this approach in relation to rent reviews due in 2013 and a zero rent increase will be applied in all such cases.

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Applications

Questions (144)

Seamus Kirk

Question:

144. Deputy Seamus Kirk asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he intends increasing the number of places on the agri-environment option 3 scheme to cover all eligible applicants; when applicants will be notified as to whether they have been accepted into the scheme; when their contracts will commence and if farmers without land in designated areas will be accepted into the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6983/13]

View answer

Written answers

Despite the challenging budgetary constraints facing my Department, last year I secured an additional €20 million annually to fund a new agri-environment scheme and on foot of this I announced the re-opening of the Agri-Environment Options Scheme (AEOS). I decided on a maximum payment of €4,000 per annum for individual applicants to allow for up to 6,000 new participants to be accepted into the scheme. I have no plans allocate additional funding to AEOS 3 in order to extend the number of available places in the Scheme.

Approximately 9,500 applications were received in my Department’s offices at Johnstown Castle by close of business on Friday December 7, the closing date for submission of applications under AEOS 3.

The initial processing of the applications has been completed and acknowledgement letters will shortly issue to all applicants. Following that the detailed actions listed in each application will be recorded and all applications will be ranked and selected according to the predetermined selection criteria. This process is expected to take several weeks. At that stage letters will issue to all applicants informing them of the outcome of the selection process and of their commencement date, if appropriate.

Based on the initial processing of applications I expect that approximately 2,000 farmers without designated land will be admitted to the scheme.

Applicants should note that they should not undertake any actions listed in their application until approved for participation in the scheme as actions undertaken or expense incurred prior to formal approval will not be eligible for reimbursement.

Common Agricultural Policy Negotiations

Questions (145)

Timmy Dooley

Question:

145. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will outline the proposals that he has put forward on the issues of simplification of direct payment, inspections, notice, tolerances and penalties in the current common agriculture policy reform negotiations; if he will provide an update on the progress being made currently on securing a successful outcome in this area of the negotiations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6964/13]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland was one of a large number of Member States to sign up in 2011 to six key principles for simplification of the CAP, in the context of the CAP reform process. These principles are that:

- The CAP 2014-2020 must overall be simpler and cheaper for national authorities to administer, and have reduced administrative costs for recipients. Any increased cost or complexity to specific measures can only be justified where the benefits outweigh the costs,

- A risk-based approach should be applied to all controls on both administrations and recipients. This means that controls are reduced where the administration has demonstrated that they have a robust system of controls in place, or the recipient has a good track record. Equally, controls should - as is already the case - be increased where systemic problems have occurred,

- Member States should be given the discretion and flexibility in programming and to define the detailed control, monitoring and evaluation of schemes in a manner appropriate to their particular circumstances, providing they can demonstrate that the policy measures taken are effective,

- Greater proportionality should be applied to controls and penalties,

- Full transparency and clarity of all roles and responsibilities should be provided, and mechanisms put in place for providing the necessary clarity if there is any uncertainty about the interpretation of EU requirements,

- The use of technology should be maximise and incentivised.

Last year, we submitted a detailed paper to the Commission containing our proposals for simplification. The paper divided our concerns between policy and technical dimensions. The technical dimensions related to detailed article-by-article provisions of the draft CAP reform regulations. On policy, we stated our view that the formulation of policy in an overall sense should be informed by the need to keep things as simple as possible, and we highlighted some key concerns in this regard, namely:

- on direct payments, the fact that the proposals for a new payment model, the definition of ‘active farmer’ and a separate scheme for the ‘greening’ of direct payments would all add considerably to the administrative burden for Member States,

- on rural development, the fact that a complex framework to ensure coherence between spending from all EU funds, new ex-ante and macroeconomic conditionalities, and a new performance reserve would, similarly, add to Member States’ administrative burden,

- on financing and monitoring of the CAP, that there should be greater simplification of cross-compliance measures, the accreditation of payment agencies and the requirements for certifying bodies,

- that the general simplification of the regulatory framework, which is best exemplified in the single CMO proposals, should also result in practical benefits at farmer and administrative levels across all elements of the reform.

Many of our concerns have been taken on board in the subsequent negotiations, which, of course, are still ongoing.

Common Agricultural Policy Negotiations

Questions (146)

Robert Troy

Question:

146. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine in the event of a new reference year being decided as part of the common agriculture policy reform negotiations, if the lessor or the lessee will be entitled to the single payment entitlements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6965/13]

View answer

Written answers

The European Commission’s proposals for the reform of the CAP post-2013 included a proposal to use 2014 as a reference year for establishing entitlements to future direct payments. I am, of course, aware that this proposal, as currently formulated, could create a number of problems both in the land rental market up to 2014 and in the establishment of entitlements.

I would emphasise that this issue is by no means settled at this point. The Commission announced recently that it was proposing to delay the implementation of certain aspects of the reform until 2015, and this will also have to be factored into the discussion on this point.

On the specific question of whether the lessor or lessee will hold the entitlement, the entitlement would normally fall due to the lessor of the land in question, as it is he or she who has the capacity to declare the land, and, of course, there is the added condition that eligibility is conditional on having activated at least one entitlement in 2011. However, as the proposal currently stands, there is provision for the conclusion of contracts to transfer entitlements on leased land to one or more farmers. This will be a matter for the lessor and lessee to agree.

I would again advise farmers that they should not rush into investment or long-term leasing decisions on the basis of the current proposals. Detailed clarification and further negotiation remains to be done in this area. My objective at all times will be to ensure that the system of entitlements that is finally agreed will be in the best interests of productive and active farmers.

Suckler Welfare Scheme Payments

Questions (147)

Niall Collins

Question:

147. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his proposals to support the 60,000 suckler farmers under the common agricultural policy or through other schemes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6962/13]

View answer

Written answers

With particular regard to Suckler Farmers I have made funding of €10 million available in 2013 under the Suckler Welfare Scheme to continue to make aid payments on calves born in 2012, and earlier years when applicable. In excess of €150 million has been paid to participants in the Suckler Cow Welfare Scheme since its inception.

In addition, I have allocated €10 million in 2013, financed from unspent Single Farm Payment Funds for a new support programme for suckler beef farmers to participate in a new Beef Data Programme. This programme will assist farmers in improving the genetic quality of Irish cattle and will maintain the data flow into ICBF in order to build further knowledge and more rapid progress in breeding and ultimately in profitability for farmers. By way of further support to the beef sector, I announced that the Beef Technology Adoption Programme will be retained in 2013. This Programme is built on the lessons of the Dairy Efficiency Programme and provides a €5 million financial stimulus to encourage, through the medium of professionally facilitated discussion groups, and a task oriented approach, the adoption of a more focussed commercial approach to beef farming.

In total, therefore, I have made provision for the payment aid amounting to €25 million to the beef sector in 2013 which speaks for itself in terms of this Government’s commitment to the sector. It is evident, therefore, that, in the context of the existing regime, considerable support has and continues to be made available for the sector. With discussions ongoing at EU level on the shape of the future regime overall, it is too early to make specific comment in relation to any particular sector; however, I fully recognise its importance in the context of the ambitious targets set for the beef sector in coming years.

Top
Share