Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 21 Feb 2013

Written Answers Nos. 31-35

Economic Competitiveness

Questions (31, 121, 122)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

31. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the extent to which he is satisfied regarding the competitiveness of the industrial sector in this jurisdiction as compared with others within the European Union and the Eurozone specifically; the extent to which he has identified any particular factors impeding competitiveness, job retention and expansion; his plans to address any such issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9217/13]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

121. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the extent to which the competitiveness of the Irish economy remains competitive in the context of comparison with other EU member states including those within the eurozone and without; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9440/13]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

122. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the extent to which he and or his Department have identified any issues impeding competitiveness in the economy; the extent to which such elements have been addressed to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9441/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 31, 121 and 122 together.

Under the 2012 Action Plan for Jobs, I requested Forfás to undertake research into a number of factors impacting on Ireland’s international competitiveness, to benchmark these factors and to develop proposals to systematically reduce excessive key business costs or delays.

Forfás’s research indicates that in the period between January 2000 and April 2008, Ireland suffered a 22.5% loss in competitiveness. However, in the period from April 2008 to July 2012, Irish cost competitiveness improved by 19% as measured by the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices. Prices have now fallen back to levels last seen in 2002. Over half of this improvement is attributable to favourable exchange rate movements.

The Forfás research benchmarks Ireland’s performance against a number of our key trading partners, as well as the OECD and Euro area averages. Some of the key messages emerging from the benchmarking exercise are that:

- Labour costs in Ireland have fallen marginally since 2008. While wage growth has started to resume of late, it is at a lower rate than elsewhere in the Euro area, meaning that our labour cost competitiveness continues to improve.

- Construction and rental costs have fallen significantly since the collapse of the property bubble. Rental costs for office space declined by 45% in the period 2007-2011. Other property costs such as stamp duty and local authority rates have also been reduced in recent years.

- In 2011, the cost of most business services in Ireland had fallen to, or below, 2006 levels, with the exception of the Legal, Accounting, PR and Business Management categories where prices remain marginally above 2006 levels.

Areas where Ireland is less competitive internationally include transport, electricity costs, water costs for industrial users, waste disposal costs and broadband.

The Forfás report concludes that while Ireland has regained some cost competitiveness, further progress is required if Ireland is to return to strong economic and employment growth. I propose to bring Forfás’s research paper to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Recovery and Jobs shortly for further consideration.

The Action Plan for Jobs includes a series of measures for delivery across Government to reduce business costs and improve competitiveness. The vast majority of the actions for delivery in 2012 were implemented and we will continue to build on this progress in the 2013 Action Plan which will be launched in the coming days.

Question No. 32 answered with Question No. 25.
Question No. 33 answered with Question No. 13.

Upward Only Rent Reviews

Questions (34)

Mary Lou McDonald

Question:

34. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation in view of the damage done to the economy and small business in particular by the continued operation of upward only rent clauses, and if he will direct agencies under his Department to remove such clauses from within leases to which the agency is the lessor. [9053/13]

View answer

Written answers

IDA Ireland, Shannon Development and Forfás are the only agencies under the aegis of my Department that have upward only rent clauses in place.

I am informed by IDA Ireland that, as of February 2013, IDA Ireland currently has 50 occupied property leases across its IDA and Private Finance Building Portfolio. 37 of the leases were granted prior to 28 February 2010, at which time all IDA Ireland Building Leases would have contained upward only rent reviews which was the norm. There have been no recent rental increases on the 37 leases granted prior to 28 February 2010. However, where a business is in difficulty, the IDA will on a case by case basis respond and facilitate requests from companies.

From 28 February 2010, IDA Ireland’s leases are linked to market rent and there are currently 13 leases that were granted after 28 February 2010. These leases do not contain upward only rent review clauses.

Shannon Development have informed me that it has 42 leases which contain upward only rent clauses. Consideration of reductions in rent are dealt with on a case by case basis, regardless of whether or not the lease includes an upwards only rent review clause. The number of long term leases executed by Shannon Development since 28 February 2010 is six, and there are no upward only rent review clauses subsequent to this date.

However, in view of the planned merger of Shannon Development with Shannon Airport into a new company at the airport, it is not considered appropriate to make any changes to the lease terms at this time.

I am informed that Forfás is the head lessee on the leases for three properties. The head leases do not allow for rent reductions at review (rent can only be equal or greater than that paid in proceeding period). The result of the rent reviews on these properties is ultimately passed on to all Forfás tenants. If Forfás did not pass on rent increases following review then it would have to pick up the shortfall which would have to be funded by the Exchequer.

The latest rent reviews for two of these properties took place in 2009 which were settled with Nil increases agreed. The rent review on the third was due in 2011, the landlord did not instigate a review, but Forfás had indicated that it would not accept an increase.

Question No. 35 answered with Question No. 8.
Top
Share