Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 26 Mar 2013

Written Answers Nos. 146 - 153

Food Labelling

Questions (146)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

146. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if unilaterally or in conjunction with his EU colleagues, it has been found possible to put in place accurate and authentic labelling to reflect traceability and authenticity in respect of all food products and or ingredients, thereby protecting the integrity of the meat and poultry sectors here and throughout Europe; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14673/13]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware the Minister for Health has overall responsibility for the general food labelling legislation and the new EU food information regulations that were adopted by the Council of Health Ministers in December 2011. However my Department plays an important role in the labelling of food together with the Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI).

In my capacity as Chairman of the EU Agricultural Council I have, together with my ministerial colleagues and the EU Commission, given a high priority to food labelling issues. Consumers should rightly expect not to be misled by inaccurate labelling and must have confidence in knowing what they are eating. Ireland will continue to give leadership in this area and will work with our EU partners to strengthen consumer assurance measures, including more accurate labelling requirements as set out in the Food Information for the Consumer (FIC) Regulation (1169/2011/EC).

This legislation extended explicit compulsory origin labelling requirements to meats other than beef, with the detailed rules to be adopted in implementing acts by 13 December 2013, following an impact assessment by the Commission.

General Food Labelling Rules

Food labelling used to inform consumers of the properties of pre-packaged food is governed by EU rules. The most important labelling rule is that the consumer should not be misled.

The FIC regulation also adopts rules on compulsory labelling where the origin or place of provenance of a food is given and where it is not the same as its primary ingredient. Insofar as meat as an ingredient is concerned, these rules are subject to the adoption of implementing acts, which must take account of an impact assessment to be carried out by the Commission. As a result of the recent incidents of horsemeat being discovered in beef burgers and other beef products the Commission have now agreed to bring forward their work on this aspect of the regulation to September this year. Beef Labelling Rules

In general, all fresh, frozen or minced beef marketed in the EU (with the exception of offal) is subject to a mandatory system of origin traceability and origin labelling. The purpose of these rules is to ensure that beef on sale can be traced back to the animal or group of animals from which it came.

There are two elements to the beef labelling regime which apply to all parts of the supply chain; the compulsory system, which requires food business operators to label their beef products (unless cooked or processed) with certain prescribed information up to and including the point of sale to the consumer; and the voluntary system, which covers any other labelling claim that processors or retailers wish to make concerning the origin, characteristics or production methods of the beef they are supplying. The claims made on product labels, marketing material or point of sale notices must be clear and cannot be misleading.

Formed meat

Also in the FIC regulation (Annex VI) in the case of meat products, meat preparations which may give the impression that they are made of a whole piece of meat, but actually consist of different pieces combined together by other ingredients, including food additives and food enzymes or by other means, shall bear the words “ formed meat” on the label.

Traceability

The identification and registration of cattle, sheep, pigs, poultry and equines are also governed by EU Regulations and these Regulations have been transposed into national law.

The Department’s Animal Identification and Movement (AIM) database is a generic system that records identification and movement data on cattle, sheep, goats and pigs. The AIM system was developed using Internet-based technology and the majority of interactions with the system are electronic transactions. Work is already advanced on the development of a central database for equines on the AIM system. The AIM system is integrated with the Department’s corporate systems to record customer data (CCS) and animal health data (AHCS). The AHCS database holds a record of persons registered as keepers of the different animal species, including equine animals.

The Department is introducing a range of measures to improve traceability systems in the equine sector and is liaising with passport issuing agencies in Ireland in this regard. Protocols to allow abattoir operators to cross check the details of passports with these agencies have been developed, aimed at ensuring that only those horses eligible for slaughter are slaughtered. The Department is also developing a central database of horses which will involve migration of selected data from passport issuing agencies. The database will be populated with information provided from the databases maintained by the agencies, by the Department from records obtained at slaughter plants and knackeries and by local authorities in respect of records maintained at appropriate slaughter plants. The intention is that this database will be used at abattoirs to assist in verifying the authenticity of the passport for the equine presented and to record its date of slaughter.

Pigmeat

Under the National Pig Identification and Tracing System (NPITS) all pig herds are centrally registered, all pigs being moved are identified (by means of tag or slap mark) and accompanied by movement documents, and all movements are recorded on a centrally managed database. Thus the movement of all pigs from farm to factory and to any destination in between is fully traceable.

Poultry

All poultry keepers are required to register with my Department. Poultry operators are subject to a wide range of EU and domestic legislation and are monitored by inspectors from my Department. Given the vertical nature of the poultry meat sector, most birds are reared under contract to processors. The processors supply the day-old birds in the first instance. The subsequent movement of broilers back to the processing facility is strictly controlled. Furthermore, there is an ongoing Department veterinary presence in poultry plants and this, together with inspections at farm level, underpins a strong domestic regime.

Question No. 147 answered with Question No. 131.

Fish Quotas

Questions (148)

Clare Daly

Question:

148. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will introduce the prohibition of pair trawling for herring, sprat and bass within a 12 mile radius of our coastline in order to protect marine mammals. [14671/13]

View answer

Written answers

Irish vessels are currently precluded from landing Sea Bass under the Bass (Conservation of Stocks) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 230 of 2006) and the Bass (Restriction on Sale) Regulations 2007 (S.I. No. 367 of 2007). The complete ban for the commercial fishing of sea bass applies to Irish fishing vessels in all areas.

In accordance with the provisions of EU Council Regulation 812/2004 (laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending regulation No 88/98), the second year of an independent dedicated observer programme of cetacean bycatch in Irish pelagic trawl fisheries was completed in 2012. This covered the 200 mile EEZ around Ireland. A total of 201 days at sea have been carried out as part of this programme across a range of pelagic trawl fisheries from August 2010 to March 2012 and no cetacean bycatch or significant bycatch event of other protected species has been observed as part of the programme. In addition to the independent observer programme, the Irish Sea Fisheries Board (BIM) and Marine Institute (MI) carry out onboard observer work as part of technical trials and surveys under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF). Figures combined from these programmes show that no cetacean bycatch was observed in 57 days at sea onboard Midwater otter trawl (OTM) vessels targeting small pelagic fish, 168 days at sea onboard Midwater pair trawlers targeting small pelagic fish nor 48 days onboard Midwater pair trawlers targeting large pelagic fish (albacore tuna) in 2011. Apart from 4 common dolphins observed as bycatch by an OTM research vessel targeting small pelagic fish in 2006, no cetacean bycatch incidences have occurred in 703 days of observations onboard Irish pelagic trawlers since 2005. Data compiled by Ireland and the UK since monitoring commenced in 2005 have demonstrated that cetacean bycatch incidents are very rare in pelagic trawling operations for small fish (mackerel, herring, horse mackerel etc.). The EU legislation specifically deals with cetaceans in fisheries and does not cover other mammals. Overall responsibility for marine mammals rests with the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.

Rural Environment Protection Schemes

Questions (149)

Micheál Martin

Question:

149. Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers currently in the rural environment protection scheme 4 and the agri environment schemes 1 and 2; the number that have received their 2012 payments; the reason for the delay in payment to farmers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14667/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the EU Regulations governing the scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check of all applications, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue.

Successive EU audits have made it absolutely clear that compliance with the Regulations must be strictly adhered to and that all administrative checks must be passed and eligibility conditions met before payment issues. As a result, my Department is obliged to ensure that individual payments will not issue until all aspects of a farmer’s application are in order, all outstanding documentation provided and all queries resolved.

The table below displays the number of active participants in both the Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) 4 and Agri-Environment Options Schemes (AEOS) 1 and 2 and the numbers in each scheme that have received payment for the 2012 scheme year.

-

Number of applicants in Scheme

Number of Applicants paid 2012 Payment

REPS 4

30,284

27,718

AEOS I

7,609

6,550

AEOS II

6,219

2,785

Outstanding 2012 payments under both REPS and AEOS are largely due to unresolved queries associated with applications and where necessary officials in my Department will have contacted the applicants concerned with the intention of issuing payment as soon as possible.

I am conscious of the importance of these payments to farmers’ incomes and my Department is making every effort to assist farmers in regularising their applications and claims for payment. Additional resources have been assigned to dealing with all outstanding queries and payments will continue to issue on an ongoing basis as outstanding issues are resolved.

Food Labelling

Questions (150)

Dara Calleary

Question:

150. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the proposed regulatory or legislative changes arising from the recent horse meat scandal; when it is proposed to make such changes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14736/13]

View answer

Written answers

The report on ‘Equine DNA and Mislabelling of Processed Beef Investigation’ which I released on 14th March 2013 sets out a range of actions being taken in relation to this issue at both national and EU level. These include a programme of DNA testing of beef products and testing of horse meat for the presence of phenylbutazone. Meat traders/agents will be required to register as food business operators. Controls relating to horse identification are being strengthened and my Department is taking responsibility for the supervision of all horse abattoirs.

The EU Commission is pursuing an action plan over the remainder of 2013 and into 2014 which includes specific actions and measures on the following basic elements: fighting food fraud, testing programmes, horse passports, official controls and origin labelling. It is important that controls in this area are strengthened on a pan European basis, not just at national level, and as stated in the report some of the measures envisaged will require legislative change at EU level.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Appeals

Questions (151)

Michael Moynihan

Question:

151. Deputy Michael Moynihan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers that were written to in relation to their 2012 disadvantaged payments under the stocking density rule; the number that have been refused a derogation, including after appeal, broken down between the three payment categories of less favoured areas, severely disadvantaged and mountain areas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14664/13]

View answer

Written answers

In total, my Department wrote to in excess of 10,000 beneficiaries under the 2011 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme whose holdings had not achieved the minimum stocking density of 0.3 livestock units per forage hectare, as required under the Terms and Conditions of the 2012 Scheme.

In response, my Department received 9,635 applications from farmers seeking derogation from this requirement. These applications have been fully processed and 7,086 applications were successful.

Those, whose applications were rejected, were informed of their entitlement to appeal their cases to the independently chaired DAS Appeals Committee. Appeals were received from 1,485 applicants, of which my Department was in a position to overturn the original decision on 548 cases, without the need to refer to the DAS Appeals Committee, on the basis of additional information which had not previously been submitted. Of the 937 appeals submitted to date to the Committee, decisions have been taken in respect of 836 cases, of which 276 were allowed, 462 disallowed and 98 requested to submit additional information. Processing remains ongoing.

Bearing in mind that a high proportion of those involved will have land in more than one of the categories referred to, it is not possible to provide the further breakdown requested.

Forestry Sector

Questions (152)

Sandra McLellan

Question:

152. Deputy Sandra McLellan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide assurances that the open access policy currently in operation on the Coillte estates will remain unchanged for the foreseeable future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8603/13]

View answer

Written answers

Further to the Government decision that a concession for the harvesting rights to Coillte’s forests be considered for sale, Coillte Board and management have engaged with NewERA, the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and this Department to examine the financial and other implications of developing the potential of Coillte’s forest assets. Substantial work has been undertaken to date on the identification of the forestry assets involved, the determination of their value and the consideration of a number of issues associated with the proposed sale of the harvesting rights. The open access policy to which the Deputy refers is one of the issues so identified which requires detailed consideration.

I am aware that Coillte, as part of its management of some 442,000 hectares of the national forest estate, plays a significant role in the provision of forest recreational activities continuing a long tradition of open access to state owned forests. It is the Government’s intention that appropriate provisions would be included in any sale of Coillte harvesting rights to allow for the maintenance of the company’s current open forest policy. The outcome of the overall analysis will be considered by the Government upon its conclusion and no decision has been taken as yet.

Rural Environment Protection Scheme Payments

Questions (153)

Robert Troy

Question:

153. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the numbers of farmers who have not being paid their REP scheme 4 payments for 2012; the reason for the delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14660/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the EU Regulations governing the scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check of all applications, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue.

Successive EU audits have made it absolutely clear that compliance with the Regulations must be strictly adhered to and that all administrative checks must be passed and eligibility conditions met before payment issues. As a result, my Department is obliged to ensure that individual payments will not issue until all aspects of a farmer’s application are in order, all outstanding documentation provided and all queries resolved.

There are currently a total of 30,284 participants in REPS4. To date 27,718 of these have been paid 100% of their 2012 REPS4 entitlement. A further 260 have been paid 75% of their REPS4 entitlement for 2012 and in these cases the balancing payment of 25% will be made shortly.

A total of 2,306 participants have yet to receive any payment under REPS 4 for 2012 to date.

Outstanding 2012 REPS 4 payments are largely due to unresolved queries associated with applications and where necessary officials in my Department will have contacted the applicants concerned with the intention of issuing payment as soon as possible.

Top
Share