Skip to main content
Normal View

Building Regulations Application

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 17 April 2013

Wednesday, 17 April 2013

Questions (162, 163, 164)

Barry Cowen

Question:

162. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Communications; Energy and Natural Resources the number of applications for a Building Prohibition Order received from the ESB under section 19 of the Electricity Supply (Amendment)(No. 2) Act 1934 in the past 30 years in tabular form; the decision made in each application; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17815/13]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

163. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Communications; Energy and Natural Resources the compensation that is available to a person when he grants a Building Prohibition Order prohibiting or otherwise restricting the erection of buildings or structures on their land; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17816/13]

View answer

Barry Cowen

Question:

164. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Communications; Energy and Natural Resources if concerns have been raised that the provisions of section 19 of the Electricity Supply (Amendment)(No. 2) Act 1934 may be unconstitutional; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17817/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 162 to 164, inclusive, together.

As far as I am aware, there have been no applications for a Building Prohibition Order under section 19 of the Electricity Supply (Amendment)(No. 2) Act 1934 in the relevant period.

My understanding is that there is no legislative provision which provides for the payment of compensation on the issuance of a Building Prohibition Order under Section 19 of the Electricity Supply (Amendment)(No. 2) Act 1934.

I am not aware of any concerns having been raised on the constitutionality or otherwise of Section 19 of the relevant Act.

Top
Share