Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 9 May 2013

Written Answers Nos. 67-74

Tax Yield

Questions (67)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

67. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 176 of 30 April 2013, in which he said that the Revenue Commissioners could not estimate the amount that would be raised if CGT was applied to the sale of principal residences because it is not a current policy, the reason an estimate cannot be made by his Department in view of the wealth of knowledge that has been accumulated by his Department in relation to house transactions in preparation for the local property tax; his views on whether it is acceptable that his Department cannot make estimates of revenue that could be raised or saved as a result of a new policy; and if he considers this an impediment to formulating new policies at budget time. [21999/13]

View answer

Written answers

Capital Gains Tax is payable on any “chargeable gain” that arises on the sale of a chargeable asset, i.e. the difference between the sale price less the cost price (or market value in certain cases) and taking account of incidental costs associated with the purchase and the sale as well as any enhancement expenditure that may have been incurred. It would therefore be necessary to know each of these elements in relation to each property sold before it could be established whether a gain or a loss arises on each property. Where a loss is made on the sale of a chargeable asset, that loss is allowable against other chargeable gains made in the same year or, if not capable of being so used, is carried forward against losses in future years. Where a chargeable asset now being sold was acquired prior to 6 April 1974, the market value of the property at 6 April 1974 is substituted for its cost price. The market value at 6 April 1974 or the cost price, if purchased between 6 April 1974 and 31 December 2002, is indexed to take account of the effects of inflation, so that only the real gain in monetary terms is chargeable.

For example a property with a market value of (say) € 15,000 at 6 April 1974 would be indexed by an indexation factor of 6.112, so that the adjusted base cost/market value would be €91,680. Any consideration on sale in excess of this indexed base cost would be a chargeable gain (subject to any necessary adjustment for incidental costs associated with the sale as well as any enhancement expenditure that may have been incurred). On the other hand, a property purchased in 2005 for (say) €500,000, might only realize (say) €300,000 if sold today – giving rise to an allowable loss to the taxpayer of €200,000, which could be set against other chargeable gains, thereby potentially reducing the amount of CGT that would be raised.

As principal private residences have been exempt from capital gains tax since its introduction in 1975, none of the elements required to calculate a gain or a loss is not returned by taxpayers or otherwise collected by Revenue in a manner that would enable a chargeable gain or allowable loss to be calculated. Neither the introduction of local property tax nor the preparatory work that preceded it will be of assistance in estimating the yield from the removal of the CGT exemption for principal private residences.

Given the fall in the value of residential properties in recent years, it is likely that many residences, if sold, would not make a chargeable gain – and would in fact incur a loss, thereby reducing the CGT that would be raised in such cases.

It is necessary to balance the collection of statistical information for Exchequer purposes with the desire to minimise as far as possible the administrative burden placed on individual taxpayers and on the business community to provide such information in tax returns. In the circumstances, I have no plans to require taxpayers to provide the information necessary to estimate the possible yield from removing the exemption. Policies are formulated using the best available data having regard for the need for balance for the reason outlined.

Tax Yield

Questions (68)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

68. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 181 of 30 April 2013, regarding the lack of information of revenue that could be raised if CGT and CAT was applied to transfers between spouses, if he will consider establishing a database in which transfers of this type had to be recorded; and if he will then consider examining the policy of introducing a threshold for spousal transfers and applying either CGT or CAT to transfers. [22000/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am conscious of the need to balance the collection of statistical information for Exchequer purposes with the desire to minimise as far as possible the administrative burden placed on individual taxpayers and on the business community to provide such information in tax returns. At this stage I have no plans to establish a database along the lines suggested.

Tax Credits

Questions (69)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

69. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the current tax credit for rent relief; if it is being phased out and if so by when; and the cost of the tax relief in a full year at its current amount and at its previous value for €400 per annum. [22001/13]

View answer

Written answers

Section 473 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provides an allowance at the standard rate for a person who proves for a year of assessment that they have paid rent in respect of a certain type of private tenancy which is their main residence. The relief takes the form of a reduction in income tax chargeable on an individual’s income by an amount equal to the lowest of:

- the total of such payments multiplied by the standard rate of tax for that year;

- the “specified limit” (see below) multiplied by the standard rate of tax for that year;

- the amount that reduces the income tax of that person to nil.

The relief is being withdrawn on a phased basis with effect from 8 December 2010 and ending in 2017. No relief is due to individuals who commence renting on or after that date. The table below sets out the “specified limits” for the years 2010 to 2018.

Tax Year

Single Under 55

Single Over 55

Widowed/ Married

under 55

Widowed/ Married

over 55

2010

2,000

4,000

4,000

8,000

2011

1,600

3,200

3,200

6,400

2012

1,200

2,400

2,400

4,800

2013

1,000

2,000

2,000

4,000

2014

800

1,600

1,600

3,200

2015

600

1,200

1,200

2,400

2016

400

800

800

1,600

2017

200

400

400

800

2018

0

0

0

0

The most recent year for which detailed information is available regarding the rent relief scheme is the income tax year 2010, which presumably is the year to which the Deputy refers when he refers to “its previous value for €400 per annum”. The latter is the reduction in income tax chargeable which would apply in the case of a single person under 55 based on the “specified limit” of €2,000 multiplied by the standard rate of tax. In 2010, the cost to the Exchequer of the rent relief scheme is estimated at approximately €83 million. On this basis, assuming the cost base has remained constant in the years since 2010, the full year cost to the Exchequer in 2013 terms would be reduced by about 50% to a cost of the order of €40 million.

Property Taxation Exemptions

Questions (70)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

70. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm that landlords can write the local property tax off against rent for tax purposes; and the estimated cost of this to the Exchequer. [22002/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Inter-departmental group set up to consider the design of a property tax chaired by Dr Don Thornhill, (the “Thornhill Group”), recommended that the Local Property Tax (LPT) paid in respect of a rented property should be deductible for income tax or corporation tax purposes, in a similar manner to commercial rates. However, the Group recognised the considerable pressures on the public finances and the need to bridge the gap between expenditure and revenue. For this reason, the Group suggested that consideration be given to phasing in deductibility over a period of years. The Group also considered that it was a matter for Government, having regard to the prevailing budgetary situation, to decide on the time span for phasing-in deductibility and on what percentage of LPT to allow as a deduction from gross rents for tax purposes. There is no provision in the current legislation for such deductions. While it is the intention of the Government to introduce such a provision on a phased basis, neither the manner in which this will happen or the timing have yet been decided. It is not possible at this stage to estimate the potential cost to the Exchequer.

VAT Rates Exemptions

Questions (71)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

71. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the reason Betfair is not paying tax here; and the reason VAT is not being applied to the company. [22004/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that under the provisions of section 851A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, which was inserted into the tax code by the Finance Act 2011, they have a statutory obligation to treat all taxpayer information confidentially. Consequently, they are precluded from commenting on the tax affairs of the business in question.

Tax Exemptions

Questions (72)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

72. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide a list of the sporting bodies that currently have CGT exemptions. [22005/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that their website contains a list of sporting bodies, available at http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/it/leaflets/sport-bodies-alpha.pdf, that are exempt from income tax and corporation tax under section 235 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. Such bodies are also exempt from CGT by virtue of section 610A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provided the proceeds from any disposals made by such bodies are applied for the sole purpose of promoting athletic or amateur games or sports within the period of 5 years of the receipt of such proceeds. In certain circumstances, exemption from capital gains tax applies where the proceeds from disposals by sports bodies are applied for charitable purposes. The Revenue Commissioners may allow an extension of the period of 5 years if they are satisfied that an approved sports body is in the process of applying the proceeds of a disposal for sporting or charitable purposes, as the case may be.

Capital Allowances

Questions (73)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

73. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that could be raised for the Exchequer by reducing the energy efficiency capital allowances from 100% to 50%; and the conditions applicable to avail of this allowance. [22006/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under TCA, section 285A, accelerated capital allowances at a rate of 100% are available for certain energy-efficient equipment for use in a company’s trade. Accelerated capital allowances under Section 285A are only available to companies, not individuals. The equipment must be approved and listed by the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. The following conditions must be met:

- A person carrying on a trade must incur capital expenditure on the provision of machinery or plant for the purposes of that trade;

- The machinery or plant must belong to that person, not leased, let or hired;

- The machinery or plant must be in use at the end of the chargeable period for which the allowances are claimed;

- While the machinery or plant is used for the purposes of the trade, it must be wholly and exclusively so used.

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that on the basis of the estimated cost of claims relating to energy efficient capital allowances for accounting periods ending in 2011, the estimated gain to the Exchequer by reducing these capital allowances from 100% to 50% could be in the region of €0.7m.

However, this estimate assumes no behavioural changes on the part of taxpayers, and reductions in the amount a taxpayer can claim may have a significant behavioural impact and may not produce a corresponding increase in tax yield. In current economic conditions any estimate of additional yield must be treated with caution.

Tax Credits

Questions (74)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

74. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he has considered modernising the base year for R&D tax reliefs. [22008/13]

View answer

Written answers

As announced in Budget 2013, my Department is undertaking a review of the R&D Tax Credit in 2013. The purpose of this review is to ensure that the scheme remains best in class internationally, and represents value for money for the taxpayer. In February 2013 a request for submissions was published on the Department’s website inviting interested parties to make submissions on the terms of the review by the 12th April 2013. The terms of reference for this paper included the base year. All options identified in these submissions will be considered as part of the review, which will include the submission received from Sinn Féin and their proposal regarding the base year.

Top
Share