Skip to main content
Normal View

Special Educational Needs Services Provision

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 15 May 2013

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Questions (145, 146, 147)

Clare Daly

Question:

145. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Education and Skills further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 428 and 429 in which he stated that tuition was further approved for the child to which the Deputy has referred until the date that the new class physically opened on the basis that he was unable to access placement during this period, if he will provide a copy of the documentation sent to the parent that recorded this approval of the home tuition at that time. [23322/13]

View answer

Clare Daly

Question:

146. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Education and Skills further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 428 and 429 if he will clarify his answer in which he stated that the National Council for Special Education identified placements for the children referred to by him in June 2011 in view of meeting (details supplied); if he will provide a copy of the actual documentation that records when these apparent placements were communicated to the parents from June 2011 or subsequently after that date. [23323/13]

View answer

Clare Daly

Question:

147. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Education and Skills further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 428 and 429 if he will clarify his answer where he stated that his approval was provided notwithstanding that the child had not been enrolled by then and remains not enrolled in the school despite the identification of the placement by confirming that this school had in place on or before 17 October 2011, that is, the date on which the home tuition ceased, a school policy covering the ASD unit in line with the requirements of the 1998 Education Act and that a copy of this policy had been sent to the parent on or before 17 October 2011 as had been requested by the parent. [23324/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 145 to 147, inclusive, together.

Copies of the documentation requested by the Deputy can be released to her once she has obtained and provided to the relevant section in my Department the appropriate consent from the parent in question. As outlined to the Deputy previously the NCSE identified placements in June 2011 for the children to whom she referred in her April parliamentary question on the issue. Home tuition was approved for these children for a 4 week period from the start of the 2011/2012 school year as the placements previously identified by NCSE had been assigned to other children and were no longer available.

The meeting referred to by the Deputy took place in July 2011 at which point parents in attendance were advised of a number of placements available. Some placements identified earlier to parents were at this point no longer available. Following this meeting a number of additional placements were identified by the NCSE. One of these placements was in a special classes for autism approved by NCSE. While this placement was identified in September 2011, it did not open until December 2011 as the school needed additional time to prepare itself. In the light of this, Home Tuition was further approved for the child to whom the Deputy has referred until the date that the new class physically opened on the basis that he was unable to access placement during this period. This approval was provided notwithstanding that the child had not been enrolled by then and could not have attended on 14th of October because of this fact. Enrolment of the child in the school was a matter for the parents of the child and the school's Board of Management. The availability of the school's documented policies to the parent is a matter for the school and the parents.

Top
Share