Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Written Answers Nos. 171 to 179

Domiciliary Care Allowance Applications

Questions (171)

John O'Mahony

Question:

171. Deputy John O'Mahony asked the Minister for Social Protection when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive a decision on their application for domiciliary care allowance; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23146/13]

View answer

Written answers

An application for domiciliary care allowance (DCA) was received from the person concerned on 9 April 2013. This application has been forwarded to one of the Department’s Medical Assessors for their medical opinion. Upon receipt of this opinion, a decision will issue to the person concerned. It can take up to 8 weeks to process an application for DCA.

Social Welfare Appeals Reviews

Questions (172)

Clare Daly

Question:

172. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 317 of 30 April 2013, the length of time it took to review each of the 39 appeals conducted by the Chief Appeals Officer in the past year. [23175/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that the information in relation to the time taken for each of the 39 reviews is not available.

Processing times in relation to appeals are measured and reported by an ICT system in the Appeals Office. Reviews by the Chief Appeals Officer are not tracked on this system.

When a review is requested, the files in question are recalled from the Department and, following the review, all papers are returned to the Department.

Question Nos 173 and 174 withdrawn.

Social Welfare Appeals Status

Questions (175)

Sean Conlan

Question:

175. Deputy Seán Conlan asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) has been refused jobseeker's payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23255/13]

View answer

Written answers

The person concerned was refused jobseeker’s benefit by a Deciding Officer of the Department on the grounds that he was not available for full-time work and was not genuinely seeking full-time employment.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office has advised me that an appeal by the person concerned together with the relevant Departmental papers were received by that office on 03 May 2013 and that the case will be referred to an Appeals Officer who will make a summary decision on the appeal based on the documentary evidence presented or, if required, hold an oral hearing.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

Disability Allowance Appeals

Questions (176)

Sean Conlan

Question:

176. Deputy Seán Conlan asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason for the delay in a revised decision on disability allowance in respect of a person (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23256/13]

View answer

Written answers

The person’s claim is with the deciding officer for review and she will be notified shortly in writing of the outcome.

Question No. 177 withdrawn.

Departmental Expenditure

Questions (178)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

178. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will provide in tabular form a breakdown on a yearly basis of the legal and travel costs her Department has incurred as a result of litigation in the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, the General Court in Luxembourg and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg from the years 2005 to 2012; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23319/13]

View answer

Written answers

The extent to which my Department has been involved in litigation at the Courts of Justice of the European Union or the European Court of Human Rights is very limited. During the period in question my Department was represented at two cases; one in relation to a referral from the Irish Courts and one where Ireland was intervening in a case in which we had an interest in the decision of the Court. Travel expenses for these cases amounted to €911.37 in 2012 and €595.36 in 2011. Any legal costs associated with the cases were incurred by the Office of the Attorney General and/or the Chief State Solicitors Office.

Invalidity Pension Application Numbers

Questions (179)

Patrick Nulty

Question:

179. Deputy Patrick Nulty asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will publish in tabular form for the years 2008 - 2012 inclusive, the number of new applications for the invalidly pension that were received; the number of these applications that were refused and of these the number that were granted on appeal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23332/13]

View answer

Written answers

A breakdown of invalidity claims awarded and disallowed is not available from December 2010 - 2011. A dual payments system was in operation from December 2010 until all claims were migrated onto a new computer platform in May 2011.

INVALIDITY PENSION CLAIMS

Year

Received

Awarded

Disallowed

Total Decided

2008

7757

5431

2165

7596

2009

7475

4580

2933

7513

2010

8774

3445*

3411*

7614

2011

14621

2107#

4697#

12829

2012

11510

6352

11423

17775

*Breakdown for period January 2010 - November 2010 inclusive.

#Breakdown for period June 2011 - December 2011 inclusive.

Invalidity Pension Appeals - 2008 - 2012

Year

Appeals Allowed

Appeals Partly Allowed

Revised Deciding Officer Decision(*)

Total with Favourable Outcome

2008

233

1

78

312

2009

243

1

82

326

2010

341

6

185

532

2011

408

6

345

759

2012

1,031

4

474

1,509

(*) Where a person has received a decision to disallow a payment, it is open to them to ask for a review by a deciding officer. These figures reflect those cases where a disallowed claim was revised on review by a deciding officer prior to determination by an Appeals Officer. Generally these cases arise where a person submits additional information, not already considered, in support of their claim following a decision to disallow.

Top
Share