Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 11 Jun 2013

Written Answers Nos. 345-360

Sale of State Assets

Questions (345)

Seán Fleming

Question:

345. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in relation to public bodies that are selling assets that they no longer require, if there is any requirement to ensure that these assets are not going into the black economy; if there is a requirement on State bodies to obtain a tax clearance certificate from the person who purchases these assets to ensure that assets formerly owned by the State are not going into the black economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27577/13]

View answer

Written answers

Above certain thresholds, public bodies generally require tax clearance certificates from persons or bodies to whom grants, subsidies, or other types of payments are being made or from contractors in situations where the public bodies are buying, hiring, or leasing goods or generally expending public monies. The aim, in the first instance, is to protect the interests of taxpayers by ensuring tax compliance on the part of those persons or bodies in receipt of public funds. On the other hand, when public bodies dispose of assets (or grant access to property or infrastructure for commercial arrangements) with a view to raising funds, it is incumbent on them to seek to optimise the return achieved. By way of illustration, the Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies issued by my Department provides that, for anticipated values at or above €150,000, the method of disposal should be by auction or competitive tendering process, and that the method used should be both transparent and likely to achieve a fair-market related price. As the expenditure of public monies does not arise in such situations, it is not clear what role, if any, there may be for requiring tax clearance certification as a condition of sale.

State Property

Questions (346)

Seán Fleming

Question:

346. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will provide a list of all buildings in the State's property portfolio which are or could be considered to be residences for the purposes of the local property tax; the market value attributed to same by the Office of Public Works; the local property charge payable in 2013 in respect of each of these properties; the date on which this was paid or will be paid; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27580/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Office of Public Works has engaged with the Revenue Commissioners and concluded an exercise to identify all those state owned properties, which may be liable for the property tax within their portfolio. A list identifying the residential properties within the property portfolio of the Commissioners for Public Works will be sent to Deputy Fleming under separate cover.

The Commissioners are not in a position to respond to the Deputy’s request for the market valuation of these properties as the valuations would, in some instances, be considered as commercially sensitive. This situation arises as the Commissioners will be disposing of a number of state properties to the market. Payment of the local property charge will be completed by the 1st of July, the date specified by the Revenue Commissioners

Departmental Staff Recruitment

Questions (347)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

347. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 53 of 30 May 2013, the discussions that officials in his Department have had with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to date on the need to fill the said positions; his plans to sanction the competition later this year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27582/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has discussed the possibility of holding a competition for third secretary posts with my Department. The issues surrounding recruitment of Third Secretaries, Administrative Officers and Executive Officers later this year are currently under consideration in my Department.

Legal Matters

Questions (348)

Michael McGrath

Question:

348. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his views on the recent decision of the High Court (details supplied) between a number of applicants and the Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland regarding procurement policy; the implications of this judgment; the way the Office of Public Works intends to respond; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27625/13]

View answer

Written answers

On 29 May 2013, the High Court gave judgment on certain preliminary issues in the case to which the Deputy refers. No final High Court Order has been made. The matter was back in court on 11 June 2013 for further consideration and, on foot of a request by the applicants, was adjourned until 25 June 2013. Until a final High Court Order is delivered, no decision on procurement policy can be made.

State Property

Questions (349)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

349. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the properties the Office of Public Works intends to put up for sale in County Galway in the coming year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27647/13]

View answer

Written answers

The OPW is presently examining expressions of interest from State Bodies for the use of vacant properties including former Garda stations in County Galway. Following this examination, the OPW will be finalising a list of properties which will be placed on the market. It is not possible at this time to provide information on specific properties in County Galway.

Public Sector Staff Remuneration

Questions (350, 351)

Clare Daly

Question:

350. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the percentage of public servants who earn more than €60,000 per annum; if the pension related deduction paid by these public sector workers at a rate of 10.5% of income above €60,000 is a temporary deduction, and if so, the length of time it will it be in place; and if the deduction is made from gross or net pay. [27691/13]

View answer

Clare Daly

Question:

351. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the proportion of pension related deductions paid by staff in the public sector earning less than €60,000 per annum. [27692/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 350 and 351 together.

The closest data currently available within the Department to that sought by the Deputy indicates that the percentage of employee numbers on a whole time equivalent basis (based on a whole time equivalent figure of 292,000) on a salary range of €60,000 or more, is 18%. I do not have a breakdown of the Pension Related Deduction (PRD) collected across income bands. For the Deputy's information, the PRD realises in the order of €1 billion per annum (including contributions from Local Authority employees and other non-Departmental employees on whom the deduction is levied). The PRD is applied to gross pay. The PRD was introduced on 1 March 2009 by the then Government as one of a range of measures to help address the economic crisis, and in particular, the serious imbalance in the public finances. While the deduction can undoubtedly be a significant imposition on many public servants, it is this Government's view that it is a necessary and proportionate measure given the exceptionally serious position of the public finances. As the Deputy will be aware the impact of the PRD measure was lessened with effect from 1 May 2009 by way of adjustments to the bands and rates, including an increased rate, from 10% to 10.5%, on the earnings band above €60,000. Those adjustments were particularly beneficial for lower paid public servants, in so far as they provided that the first €15,000 of annual earnings be made fully exempt from the deduction. I should also state that, as provided for in section 11 of the recently enacted Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2013, an adjustment in PRD will take place on 1 January 2014, when the 5% deduction rate applied to the band of annual income between €15,000 and €20,000 will decrease from 5% to 2.5%. The Deputy may wish to note that under the financial emergency legislation, the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform must review the PRD and other emergency measures annually and report to the Oireachtas on such review.

Flood Prevention Measures

Questions (352)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

352. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the position regarding measures to prevent flooding from the River Wad in Donnycarney (details supplied) in Dublin 5; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27730/13]

View answer

Written answers

Dublin City Council, which is the Contracting Authority for the River Wad flood relief scheme, has recently submitted a formal application for funding to the Office of Public Works, along with a detailed Cost Benefit Analysis report for the project. This report is currently being considered by the OPW. If the economic justification of the scheme is acceptable, and provided the Council is able to obtain all necessary consents from property owners and other stakeholders, the OPW hopes to be in a position to approve the scheme in principle in the coming weeks and to consider the most effective method for constructing the works, subject to the continued availability of funding.

Tourism Promotion

Questions (353)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

353. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if the Office of Public Works will list the top ten OPW managed tourist sites in Dublin; the pricing structure for each site; and the number of visitors to each site per annnum. [28026/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Office of Public Works (OPW) administers a range of visitor sites in Dublin. A number of these sites, that are free of charge, do not have a guided service. As a consequence, visitor numbers are not recorded at these sites. An example of such a site is St. Stephen's Green. The following tables list those OPW visitor sites where visitor numbers are recorded and the admission and guided tour charges, if applicable. It should be noted that some of the sites listed have restricted opening dates and times.

Office of Public Works – Guided Visitor Sites in Dublin

Site Name

Admission/Guided Tour Charges

Visitor Numbers in 2011

Visitor Numbers in 2012

National Botanic Gardens

Free Admission – Guided Tour €2 per person 

501,000

544,685

Farmleigh

Free

315,464

375,064

Kilmainham Gaol

See Table  Following

300,042

310,910

Dublin Castle

See Table  Following

141,849

157,253

Phoenix Park Visitors Centre

Free

121,487

147,539

St. Audoen's Church

Free

25,927

26,548

Rathfarnham Castle

Free

9,506

23,832

Pearse Museum – St. Enda's Park

Free

16,528

16,462

Áras an Uachtaráin

Free

6,010

9,000

Casino Marino

See Table  Following

12,047

7,444

Admission Charges. N/A = Not applicable

Site Name

Adult

Senior/Group

Child/Student

Family

Kilmainham Gaol

€6.00

€4.00

€2.00

€14.00

Dublin Castle

€4.50

€3.50

€2.00/€3.50

N/A

Casino Marino

€3.00

€2.00

€1.00

€8.00

State Bodies Mergers

Questions (354)

Eamonn Maloney

Question:

354. Deputy Eamonn Maloney asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if the proposed merger of the National Consumer Agency and the Competition Authority is going ahead; the timetable for such a merger; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27243/13]

View answer

Written answers

Work on drafting the legislation to merge the National Consumer Agency and the Competition Authority is on-going and the Bill is included in the A list in the Government's current Legislative Programme. Following publication of the Bill and its subsequent consideration by the Oireachtas, I intend to establish the new agency as soon as possible after the commencement of the legislation.

Consumer Protection

Questions (355)

Eamonn Maloney

Question:

355. Deputy Eamonn Maloney asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if, in view of the perceived lack of diligence by leading retailers to display their prices and terms and conditions correctly and the perceived lack of enforcement of the regulations underpinning consumer law, more meaningful legislation is required to protect consumer rights in the retail sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27245/13]

View answer

Written answers

Consumer protection law obliges traders offering a product for sale to indicate the selling price and the unit price of that product and to ensure that the indication of the selling price and of the unit price is clearly visible. Complaints in relation to products being offered for sale where the price or unit price is not clearly visible should be brought to the attention of the National Consumer Agency who has responsibility for enforcing consumer law. Similarly in instances where a wrong indication of price is concerned, traders who provide false information in relation to the price of a product may be engaging in a misleading commercial practice and may, therefore, be committing an offence under consumer law. Again instances of such practices should be referred to the National Consumer Agency in order that they can be investigated.

As regards the provision of information in relation to the terms and conditions that may apply to a particular product, consumer protection law also prohibits traders from engaging in misleading commercial practices, including practices which involve the concealment or omission of material information that the average consumer would need to make an informed transactional decision and which could cause the average consumer to make a transactional decision he would not otherwise make. Accordingly, persons who may be concerned that traders may be engaged in selling products by means of false representation through the omission or concealment of material information, such as relevant information concerning the terms and conditions relating to such products, may wish to bring their concerns to the attention of the National Consumer Agency so that they may be investigated.

As regards enforcement activity, the National Consumer Agency maintains and publishes a Consumer Protection List of enforcement actions taken against traders who do not comply with the requirements of consumer protection law, including those requirements in relation to the above mentioned provisions of the law. I am advised that in so far as enforcement in relation to pricing is concerned, the Agency in the course of 2012 visited some 349 traders, across a range of sectors, and covering all counties. As a result of these visits, the Agency in 2012 issued 111 pricing enforcement actions to traders, comprising 71 Fixed Payment Notices (fines of €300 in each case) for breaches of the requirement to display prices, and 40 Compliance Notices for charging higher prices than those displayed. Details of the Agency's enforcement actions are published in its Consumer Protection Lists and I understand that the next Consumer Protection List, covering the period May to December 2012, will be published shortly.

I very much support the Agency's proactive approach, as evidenced by its enforcement activities, to ensure that consumers are provided with accurate information regarding products and services and are not exposed to unfair or misleading commercial practices. It is important that those who would seek to mislead consumers through the provision of false information are subject to the rigours of consumer protection law and I welcome the Agency's determination to ensure that the law is enforced in such situations.

Appointments to State Boards

Questions (356)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

356. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the number of vacancies on State boards under the aegis of his Department; the number of board members that are currently out on sick leave; if he will provide a breakdown of the figures for the above two categories on a board by board basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27307/13]

View answer

Written answers

As Members of Boards of the Agencies under my Department's remit are not, in their capacity as Board members, employees and do not have a contract of employment, they are not required to report their sick leave in that capacity.

State Boards

Vacancies

Forfás

Forfas has no vacancies on the Forfas Board.

IDA

IDA Ireland currently has one vacancy on its Board.

Enterprise Ireland

EI currently has 1 vacancy.

National Standards Authority of Ireland

A Chairperson and a Board member have been selected to be reappointed to the NSAI. NSAI have 3 remaining vacancies. One of which is a Departmental nominee.

Science Foundation Ireland

At present there are no vacancies on the SFI Board though three vacancies shall arise in late July 2013 and these are now advertised on the Public Appointments Service website at www.publicjobs.ie.

Shannon Development

Shannon Development has 1 Board vacancy.

Health and Safety Authority

The HSA has no vacancies at present.

Irish Auditing and Accountancy Supervisory Authority

IAASA currently have no vacancies.

Personal Injuries Assessment Board

PIAB currently has no vacancies.

Competition  Authority

The Competition Authority has no vacancies.

Intertrade Ireland

There is 1 vacancy since 21st May 2013.

National Consumer Agency

The NCA has 2 Vacancies since 1st May 2013.

IDA Supports

Questions (357)

Paudie Coffey

Question:

357. Deputy Paudie Coffey asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the total amount of Industrial Development Agency funding that was granted to a company (details supplied) in County Waterford for each of the years that it was located in the specified business park; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26663/13]

View answer

Written answers

The company received one grant approval from IDA Ireland and was paid a total of €830,000. This was paid over four years as follows, 2006 - €510,000; 2007 - €40,000; 2008 - €230,000; and 2009 - €50,000. The company currently employs 55 people at its hedge fund services centre in Waterford City. It established operations in Ireland in 1965 and now has its European headquarters in Dublin, where it employs approximately 2,300 people at its offices in the IFSC. Unfortunately the company recently announced its plans to close its Waterford office in November 2013 with the loss of those 55 jobs. The company took the decision due to a combination of challenges in the marketplace for its Hedge Fund business. IDA Ireland has, however, been working with company management on the possibility of other business opportunities for the Waterford-based employees. These efforts are on-going.

Companies Law Issues

Questions (358, 359, 360, 361)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

358. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will detail the impact of the Companies Bill 2012 on companies that are currently Irish registered non-resident companies. [26887/13]

View answer

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

359. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will detail the impact of the Companies Bill 2012 with regard to the number and residency requirements of directors in Irish registered non-residential companies. [26888/13]

View answer

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

360. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will detail the impact of the Companies Bill 2012 with regard to the requirement to carry out activity in the State on Irish registered non-residential companies. [26889/13]

View answer

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

361. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will outline the residency requirements for companies under the proposed Companies Bill 2012. [26890/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 358 to 361, inclusive, together.

As set out in my reply to the Deputy on 30 May 2013, measures were taken in response to concerns in the 1990s regarding Irish Registered Non-resident companies. These measures are contained at sections 42 to 51, inclusive, of the Companies (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1999 as amended. As a precondition of incorporation, every application for registration is required to demonstrate that the proposed company intends to carry on an activity in the State. Every company registered in the State was required to maintain an Irish resident director or a bond to the value of €25,394.76. The Irish resident director requirement was subsequently changed under the Companies (Amendment) Act 2009 to a requirement for a director resident in the European Economic Area. The requirement for either a bond or an EEA resident director does not apply if the company obtains from the Registrar of Companies a certificate that the company has a real and continuous link with one or more economic activities in the State. The company concerned must provide proof of such a link. A statement from the Revenue Commissioners that it has reasonable grounds to believe that the company has such a link is deemed proof of a link under the Act. The number of directorships which could be held by one person was limited to 25 (subject to certain exemptions). The 1999 Act contained enhanced strike-off provisions and enhanced notification to the CRO where directors have resigned.

With regard to residency requirements, all companies incorporated in the State are regarded as resident in the State for tax purposes, unless they fall under specific exemptions in tax law. Policy responsibility for tax issues rests with my colleague the Minister for Finance. I have no direct function for such matters. In relation to residency requirements for directors, specific residency rules are prescribed by section 44 of the Companies (Amendment) (No.2) Act, 1999 as amended. These residency rules largely mirror the residency provisions of section 819 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. A person is considered resident if he or she has been present for an aggregate of at least 183 days or more in any 12 month period. The Act also provides that he or she can be resident for an aggregate of 280 days over two 12 month periods, subject to certain qualifications. The Companies Bill 2012 contains similar provisions to sections 42 to 51, inclusive, of the Companies (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1999 as amended.

Top
Share