Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 26 Jun 2013

Written Answers Nos. 62-69

Conflict Resolution

Questions (62)

Dessie Ellis

Question:

62. Deputy Dessie Ellis asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his attention has been drawn to Highway 60, a road which stretches between Israel and the West Bank in Palestine, that the Israeli Government has recently revived plans to continue building this road, that the new plans may lead to the confiscation of land from Palestinian farmers in Beit Ommar and that it may lead to the demolition of houses in Beit Ommar and effectively cut the town in two; and if he will raise the issue with the Israeli authorities. [30768/13]

View answer

Written answers

There are innumerable cases where the rights and lands of Palestinian villagers are infringed or expropriated to serve the interests of settlements planted on the hills around them. The access of Palestinian villages to major arterial routes such as Highway 60 is increasingly blocked in order to reserve the route for settler traffic, leaving the villages with long, circuitous and irrational routes for all their communications with the outside world.

We are not in a position to raise every such case that arises; and, where these are the subject of court cases, we have in any event no means to intervene. But we have used our knowledge of cases such as this one to maintain a sharp focus on the continual and relentless damage and injustice inflicted on the Palestinian community by the Israeli authorities’ settlement programme. We have raised this issue directly with the Israeli authorities, and in discussions at EU and UN level, and have underlined that these actions are incompatible with a genuine search for a peace agreement. Ireland also funds Palestinian and Israeli NGOs who are active in challenging these orders and decisions through the legal and planning systems.

Question No. 63 answered with Question No. 23.
Question No. 64 answered with Question No. 6.

Israeli Imports

Questions (65)

Brendan Smith

Question:

65. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the proposed labelling measures for goods from Israeli settlements that are currently being discussed at the EU level will take the form of voluntary guidelines or will be mandatory by law; if they will extend to all goods imported from Israeli settlements beyond just fresh agricultural produce; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30912/13]

View answer

Written answers

It is important to be aware that EU regulations already prohibit misleading labelling of goods, which might lead a consumer to make a different choice than he or she would make if in full possession of the facts. This includes settlement goods. The essential element of voluntary national guidelines already issued by some Member States, and of the EU level guidelines now being considered, is to make clear to importers, wholesalers and retailers that the Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestinian Territory are not located in Israel, and that it would therefore be misleading if goods produced there were labelled, as they reportedly are in some cases, as being “Made in Israel”. These are thus guidelines to the correct implementation of already existing EU law. As such they will apply to all goods produced by settlements. In all administrations, labelling of goods is a complex matter, involving numerous different Ministries, policy areas and objectives. At EU level, the EAS is now working through these complex issues with the European Commission to produce draft EU guidelines. This may take some time – the UK guidelines in this area were the result of a two year period of consultation. Since this work is ongoing, I cannot predict the details of what will eventually emerge.

Mandatory place of origin labelling applies to some types of goods in the EU. For other products, such labelling is not required at all, and where it appears this is a choice of the producer, importer or retailer. Many goods which do not have to carry place of origin labelling nonetheless do so.

No Member State has suggested that the outcome at EU or national level will be to require all goods produced by settlements to be origin labelled. This would be to introduce a mandatory origin labelling regime for settlement goods alone, which would be disproportionate for such a tiny proportion of goods marketed in the EU. The intention is that origin labelling, where it appears on a mandatory or voluntary basis, must be accurate.

EU Budget Issues

Questions (66)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

66. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the expected outcome of discussions at EU Parliament level in respect of the EU budget; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31119/13]

View answer

Written answers

On 8 February the European Council reached agreement on the EU Budget Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014-2020, the MFF. Under the Lisbon Treaty, the consent of the European Parliament is required before the MFF can be adopted by Council. As Presidency, we have had the responsibility for negotiating the text of the MFF Regulation and the Inter-Institutional Agreement between the Council, the Commission and the Parliament. This task has been a challenging one, and the outcome remains critical to our capacity across the EU to begin to address the key challenges of creating jobs and growth. It is also an urgent task. Since February we have been engaged in intensive consultations. Informal discussions with the Parliament began soon after the February European Council, leading to several rounds of formal Trilogues between Presidency, Parliament and Commission. These negotiations were advanced at political level through detailed consultations on 13 May, 28 May, 4 June, 11 June and finally on 18-19 June. I led the Presidency negotiating team and MEP Alain Lamassoure has the lead for the Parliament’s team. In each case, the negotiators kept their respective institutions appraised of progress. From an early stage in discussions, it was clear that for the European Parliament, four main issues were critical in securing their consent: Flexibility, a Mid-term Review, Own Resources and Unity of the Budget.

Throughout the iterative process we worked through our respective positions on each of those core concerns. We made substantial progress.

On 19 June Mr Lamassoure and I concluded negotiations and agreed a core package, comprising the MFF Regulation and Inter-Institutional Agreement (IIA). We both agreed that we would recommend that package to our respective institutions. We are now in the process of discussing the elements of the package both in the Council, and in the European Parliament.

I remain hopeful that the package will offer the basis for the final outcome on this important file. I am also optimistic that this process will conclude under the Irish Presidency.

An additional but important aspect of concluding the MFF, relates to the Amending Budget for 2013. The linkage between the MFF and the 2013 Draft Amending Budget 2 (DAB 2) was established by the Parliament, and was recognised in the MFF negotiations as a political reality. The issue, which is one of significant sensitivity, was addressed at a summit meeting of the Presidents of the Parliament, Commission and the rotating Presidency on 6 May.

At the 14 May ECOFIN Council, it was agreed that of the requested €11.2bn, the Council would approve a first tranche of €7.3bn, subject to agreement on the MFF. This issue will have to be addressed before final adoption of the MFF, and I am confident that we can find a workable arrangement.

Both Council and Parliament are now considering the outcome of the MFF negotiations. That outcome provides extensive flexibility in payment appropriations for the first time, as well as improved arrangements for the special flexibility instruments and a provision for the limited carryover of commitment appropriations. In addition, there will be a meaningful mid-term review, provisions on the unity of the budget, and a detailed roadmap for future work on reform of Own Resources.

All of this together represents a significant step forward. The agreement of the Parliament and Council would allow us now to move ahead, and to rapidly deliver the spending and programmes that our citizens need and expect: it is about real money for real people and real jobs at a time when they have never been more needed in Europe, particularly by the very many affected by the crisis of youth unemployment.

The MFF deal will put in place a robust €960 billion budget for investment that will enable the European economy to grow, to create jobs and to begin to address youth employment. It is a matter of some urgency across Europe that this major investment is implemented without delay.

Ireland will benefit in particular from a strong and well-funded CAP, and from increased funding for competitiveness and jobs, including from the special allocation of €6 billion for youth unemployment which we have supported being frontloaded starting in 2014. We will also benefit from a number of specific and tailored resource instruments, including a special allocation of €100 million for rural development, and a special allocation of €100m for the Border, Midland and Western region. I am especially satisfied to have been instrumental in ensuring a special allocation of €150m for the PEACE programme.

I now look forward to moving beyond the detailed negotiations, and to addressing the major political challenge we share as politicians, whether in Council or Parliament: to ensure that we use every euro of EU resources to address the impact of the crisis and the blight of unemployment across our European family. We have no time to lose.

Humanitarian Aid

Questions (67)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

67. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the extent to which the international community continues to monitor events in Syria with particular reference to the degree to which any intervention on humanitarian grounds might be considered in the context of the provision of safe havens or corridors within which refugees might be accommodated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31120/13]

View answer

Written answers

The humanitarian crisis in Syria and neighbouring countries is distressing. The number of fatalities as a result of the widespread and indiscriminate violence is in excess of 90,000 and there are now almost 7 million people in need of emergency humanitarian assistance inside Syria, many of whom are children. Fear and uncertainty have forced more than 1.6 million Syrians to flee to neighbouring countries, with more than 4 million more displaced from their homes within Syria’s borders. Ireland’s total support in response to this humanitarian crisis is now almost €10 million after the Government recently announced a further assistance package of €1.65 million. This makes Ireland one of the most generous contributors in the world to the humanitarian response on a per capita basis. Ireland’s total support includes the pledge of €4.7 million made at the Kuwait Pledging Conference for Syria in January, which was met in full. Ireland’s humanitarian assistance is being provided through trusted UN agencies, NGO partners and the Red Cross to deliver life saving support, including with water, food, shelter and vital medicines, to the most vulnerable and in greatest need as a result of this disaster.

Humanitarian access remains a serious concern. Excessive controls on aid agencies working in the country, restrictions imposed by the Assad regime, the fragmentation of the armed opposition and the intensity of military confrontations make it very difficult to access populations in need of humanitarian assistance. We must work together to improve access for humanitarian agencies. Where it is proving too difficult to reach those most in need simply through cross-line activities, we must consider alternative forms of aid delivery, including the cross border delivery of assistance.

Earlier this month, Under-Secretary-General and Emergency Relief Coordinator Valerie Amos and United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay issued a joint statement in relation to the civilians trapped and wounded in the town of Al-Qusayr. In their statement they underlined that all parties must immediately halt all actions that might result in civilian loss of life and damage, and to permit civilians to move to safer areas. Humanitarian agencies must be allowed to evacuate the wounded and provide life-saving treatment and supplies.

At the G8 Summit last week, it was again emphasised that all humanitarian action takes place in a manner consistent with humanitarian principles and international law. Those suffering the consequences of hunger and conflict throughout the world benefit from our respect for the core principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence. As Emergency Relief Coordinator Valerie Amos has also underlined, we must caution against calls for military interventions in support of humanitarian actions which may place vulnerable people and aid workers at further risk.

In relation to calls which have been made for the establishment of a no-fly zone over Syria, this would obviously necessitate broad international agreement and could only be authorised through a UN Security Council Resolution specifically mandating such a step. Regrettably, the Security Council has not been able to agree any Resolution on Syria since the conflict erupted in March 2011 and it appears most unlikely that the political will exists within the Council at present to reach agreement on such a proposal.

I very much welcome US and Russian efforts to convene a peace conference in Geneva in the coming weeks. If the suffering arising from this conflict is to be alleviated then clearly, more must be more done to reduce the violence and persuade all sides in Syria to commit to peace talks and the promotion of a democratic transition. The diplomatic efforts to convene the Geneva II conference will hopefully be considerably advanced by last week’s agreement by the G8 in Enniskillen on the urgent need for a political solution.

Overseas Development Aid Issues

Questions (68)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

68. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of locations worldwide currently in receipt of Irish aid; the extent to which the relevant aid agencies remain satisfied regarding the security of their personnel and the efficacy and efficiency of distribution in the various locations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31121/13]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland’s aid programme, Irish Aid, which is managed by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, is strongly focused on the fight to end extreme poverty and hunger, especially in the countries of sub-Saharan Africa. In 2012, the Government provided a total of €639 million for Official Development Assistance. Ireland’s assistance is directed to development programmes and emergency humanitarian assistance in over eighty of the world’s least developed countries. As Minister of State with responsibility for Ireland’s aid programme, I am aware that Irish-based aid agencies and their partners operate in some of the most sensitive and insecure locations in the world. The Government strongly supports and promotes the efforts taken by many of these organisations to develop solid security management plans and to employ dedicated security professionals to help train staff and ensure that they are adequately protected during the course of their work.

I am very conscious of the need to ensure that Ireland's assistance continues to be delivered in the most efficient and effective manner and that it makes a real difference in the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable. The OECD Development Assistance Committee has highlighted Ireland as a highly effective donor and noted the high quality of our aid programme. I am committed to ensuring that we maintain these high standards.

To ensure that Irish Aid support is effectively delivered across all our locations, we work in partnership with national governments, local communities, NGOs, and other key multilateral partners such as the United Nations and European Union. All agencies that are in receipt of our funding are subject to appraisal and regular internal and external monitoring to ensure that Irish aid is used in an effective and efficient manner and that it reaches the intended beneficiaries.

Foreign Conflicts

Questions (69)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

69. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the extent to which the international community continues to monitor the situation in Somalia, deemed to be one of the most dangerous countries in the world; the extent, if any, to which the issues pertaining there can be addressed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31122/13]

View answer

Written answers

The situation in Somalia continues to be a serious concern for the European Union and the broader international community. A major international Conference on Somalia was convened in London on 7 May and was attended by representatives of more than 50 countries and international organisations. Ireland was represented by the Minister of State for Trade and Development, Mr. Joe Costello T.D. The Conference discussed a wide range of issues relating to ongoing efforts to consolidate lasting peace and stability in Somalia after twenty years of destructive conflict, underdevelopment, and lawlessness. A further international conference on Somalia will be organised by the European Union, in Brussels later this year. The EU is implementing a comprehensive Strategy for the Horn of Africa which was adopted in 2011 and which covers the entire region, including Somalia. It addresses all dimensions of the crisis including conflict, underdevelopment, and issues related to governance and human rights.

The continuing fragility in Somalia was tragically underlined by the attack on the UN Compound in Mogadishu last week by the Al Shabaab terrorist group, which claimed 15 lives.

The EU’s support in the area of security includes our funding for the African Union peacekeeping mission, and direct engagement through a number of Common Security and Defence Policy Missions including the EU Training Mission, EUTM Somalia, which is building the capacity of the Somali National Security Forces to enable them to take over responsibility for security and law and order.

Ireland is providing the Commander and a significant contingent of personnel for EUTM Somalia. Ireland has contributed more than €41 million to efforts to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Somalia and the region, and we are committed to continuing to provide support and help in this area. We have also indicated, in the context of our new Policy on International Development, ‘One World, One Future’, which has a strengthened focus on fragile states, that Ireland will examine other opportunities for assisting Somalia’s recovery in the period ahead.

Top
Share