Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 4 Jul 2013

Written Answers Nos. 133-137

Infrastructure and Capital Investment Programme

Questions (133)

Kevin Humphreys

Question:

133. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if his attention has been drawn to the value for money assessment by the National Development Finance Agency on the proposed waste to energy incinerator project in Poolbeg conducted in 2005; his views on whether it is acceptable to use data that is eight years old when the economic circumstances of the country have changed considerably in the meantime when considering whether to continue with a project; if he will indicate if his Department has a policy in place for reassessing capital investments and public private partnerships that were proposed during different economic times in view of our changed circumstances, and what that policy is; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32779/13]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has the same role in relation to PPP projects as it does in relation to capital investment projects generally. It sets the overall capital investment framework and the basic principles to be observed for the appraisal, assessment, procurement and evaluation of projects. It does not have a direct role in delivering individual projects (either PPP or traditional Exchequer capital projects). This is primarily the responsibility of the Sponsoring Department/Agency. All spending Departments must comply with the new Public Spending Code which draws together all of the standard guidance for assessing, reviewing and appraising public expenditure programmes – current as well as capital – in the public service. The Code highlights the need to revise appraisals if there are time lapses, changes in circumstances or significant additional costs involved in projects. In particular, Cost Benefit Analyses (CBAs) for capital projects should be reviewed at key stages to make sure the project is still justified. The Code also states, in relation to CBAs, that a final reassessment of demand and costs should be undertaken if there is a significant time lag between the appraisal and commissioning of the project.

Additionally, a full suite of guidance material has been published to facilitate the PPP process. This guidance dovetails with the Public Spending Code but also includes specific technical tools to evaluate PPP proposals and tenders. The key aspects of the guidance relate to the assessment of projects for procurement as PPP, the compilation of the public sector benchmark and ensuring value for money through the PPP process. There are a number of specific tests throughout the procurement and tender negotiation processes to ensure that best value is derived for the State. Details of the timing and content of these value for money tests are set out in the various PPP guidance issued by my Department which are available at www.ppp.gov.ie.

In accordance with the guidance issued by my Department, the National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) has the role of providing an opinion to the Sponsoring Agency in relation to the value for money testing on a PPP project. I am informed that the NDFA issued a value for money letter on 21 June 2007 when the Poolbeg incinerator project was at contract close with conditions precedent outstanding. NDFA later wrote to Dublin City Council in March 2012 to clarify that the previously issued NDFA value for money opinion of June 2007 was no longer valid as this opinion was based on the original contractual arrangements which had since changed. The NDFA has been requested by Dublin City Council to provide an opinion on an updated value for money test and this will be undertaken once the Public Sector Benchmark and all of the supporting documentation is completed, finalised and submitted to the NDFA for consideration.

International Bodies Membership

Questions (134)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

134. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will outline each international organisation, international agency or international body of which Ireland is a member and for which his Department or a State body or agency under the aegis of his Department is responsible or co-responsible; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32815/13]

View answer

Written answers

In response to the Deputy’s question the following is a list of each international organisation, international agency or international body that Ireland is a member of that my Department or agencies under my remit is responsible or co-responsible for:

Department / Office

Name

Department of Public

Expenditure and Reform

European Institute of Public

Administration (EIPA) based in Maastricht

Additional information received from the Department on 29/7/2013.
The Office of Public Works is responsible for the care and maintenance of National Monuments sites in State care and, in that regard, a number of international obligations arise:
UN. Ireland is responsible for the management and operation of two World Heritage Sites at Skellig Michael, Co. Kerry and Brú na Bóinne / Newgrange, Co. Meath and is therefore responsible under International Agreements to UNESCO in this regard.
ICCROM (International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property). As the organisation responsible for conservation of a significant portion of the Heritage portfolio, OPW participates in this UN funded organisation.

Bullying in the Workplace

Questions (135)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

135. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if the provisions in the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act, and associated legislative instruments, relating to risk analyses are robust enough to protect employees from cyber bullying; if the changes in the legislation are required to reflect developments in the area of access to social media and information technology in the workplace; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32616/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 every employer has a duty, to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safety, health and welfare of their employees and to manage and conduct work activities in such a way so as to prevent, as far as is reasonably practicable, any improper conduct or behaviour likely to put the safety, health or welfare of their employees at work at risk. The provisions in this Act do not specifically identify all possible workplace hazards as to do so would be impractical. However, the Act requires employers, where they know of, or can reasonably be expected to know of, a workplace hazard that is impacting on the safety, health or welfare of an employee or group of employees, to act reasonably in terms of assessing the risk, and putting in place control measures.

Under section 19 of the Act an employer is required to carry out and maintain a written risk assessment to identify all potential hazards that may occur in a workplace under their control. Under section 20 the employer is required to ensure that all identified potential hazards and all protective and preventative measures taken are recorded in their safety statement. This statement also identifies the duties of employees in respect to the safety, health and welfare of all persons within the workplace.

Similarly, the 2005 Act also places obligations on employees in relation to their duties not to engage in improper conduct or behaviour likely to endanger their own safety, health and welfare at work or that of any other person.

Under the 2005 Act, the Health and Safety Authority (HSA) has published a Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work, and this is aimed at preventing and dealing with all bullying where it happens in Irish workplaces.

The Code of Practice defines bullying as repeated inappropriate behaviour, direct or indirect, whether verbal, physical or otherwise, conducted by one or more persons against another or others, at the place of work and/or in the course of employment, which could reasonably be regarded as undermining the individual’s right to dignity at work.

The Code also reflects the legal requirement that employers carry out a risk assessment, and where bullying is identified as a hazard, they ensure that it is included in the safety statement. The Code gives guidance on how to identify and assess if bullying is a hazard at work as well as on how to prepare a Bullying Prevention Policy.

The purpose of an effective policy is not simply to prevent improper conduct and behaviour but also to encourage best practice and a safe and harmonious workplace where such behaviour is unlikely to occur. Employers should therefore adopt, implement and monitor a comprehensive, effective and accessible policy on bullying, at work. This would include cyber-bullying.

The Code of Practice also states that the scope of an employer’s Bullying Prevention Policy should state that the protection of the policy should extend beyond the place of work to off-site work activities and to work-related social events.

The Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 and Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work state the clear requirements for all employers to have a stated, clear and enforceable policy and procedures which they consistently apply, regarding the access to, use of, and penalties for mis-use of, company property including computers and the software systems used whilst employees are working or in the course of employment. All employees should be made aware of these requirements, and sign off on the duties which they must uphold.

The role of the HSA under the Code is to monitor if employers and employees are meeting their obligations and duty of care under the 2005 Act. The Code of Practice is available for free download at www.hsa.ie.

I am satisfied that the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 in addition to the Health and Safety Authority’s Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work provide a robust regime to protect employees from bullying, including cyber bullying, in the workplace. Consequently I have no plans for legislative change in this area at present.

Enterprise Ireland Funding

Questions (136)

Dominic Hannigan

Question:

136. Deputy Dominic Hannigan asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will outline specific grants that are available to businesses wishing to expand; if there are particular sections within Enterprise Ireland that a business could contact; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32629/13]

View answer

Written answers

Enterprise Ireland offers a range of financial and non-financial supports to assist clients through all stages of the business development cycle. The nature and level of support offered to Enterprise Ireland’s clients depends on the individual company’s development needs and is assessed in consultation with their Enterprise Ireland development adviser. Funding decisions are broadly determined by the following criteria:

- Need for financial support for the project;

- Potential employment and sales growth;

- Previous funding provided to the company;

- Regional location of the company.

The main Enterprise Ireland grant offers that are available to client companies, that are seeking to expand, include the following:

- Going Global Grant, which is a grant for market research costs to assist companies that have successfully established businesses in Ireland who wish to explore opportunities to internationalise as a route to growth;

- Internationalisation Grant, which is a grant to support the costs of researching and exploring new international business opportunities;

- Job Expansion Fund, which provides funding towards the recruitment of new employees;

- Tailored Company Expansion Packages, which provides support for companies who are planning to undertake an ambitious expansion that will create employment and grow sales in international markets. The nature of the package will be determined through discussions with Enterprise Ireland.

Businesses can contact Enterprise Ireland through its national, regional and international office network. Contact details for all Enterprise Ireland offices are set out on Enterprise Ireland’s website, which can be contacted at http://www.enterprise-ireland.com/en/

Intellectual Property Protocol

Questions (137)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

137. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will outline the details of the International Treaty on Intellectual Property that was signed on 28 June 2013 in Marrakesh, Morocco, under the Irish Presidency of the Council of the EU; if the treaty requires ratification here through primary legislation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32658/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Treaty entitled the “Marrakesh Treaty to facilitate access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled” was adopted on 28 June 2013 at Marrakesh. The objective of the Treaty is to improve access for the blind, visually impaired, and print disabled to published works in formats such as braille, large print text and audio books.

It provides also for the exchange of accessible format works across borders by organizations that serve people who are blind, visually impaired, and print disabled. When the Treaty comes into effect, it will harmonize limitations and exceptions that apply in the contracting states so that these organizations can operate across borders. This sharing of works in accessible formats should increase the overall number of works available to persons in need of the works in accessible formats. For instance, instead of five countries producing accessible versions of the same work, it would be possible for the five countries to instead produce an accessible version of a different work, which could then be shared with each of the other countries.

The treaty is also designed to provide assurances to authors and publishers that the system will not expose their published works to misuse or distribution to anyone other than the intended beneficiaries. It therefore reiterates the requirement that the cross-border sharing of works created, based on limitations and exceptions, must be limited to certain special cases which do not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonable prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.

The Treaty will be open for signature at the headquarters of WIPO by any eligible party for one year after its adoption. It will enter into force after it has been ratified by twenty WIPO contracting States. Ratification of the Treaty will require contracting parties to adopt national law provisions that permit the reproduction, distribution and making available of published works in accessible formats through limitations and exceptions to the rights of copyright Rightholders.

The text of the Treaty can be found at the following link: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/diplconf/en/vip_dc/vip_dc_8.pdf

Ireland signed the Final Act of the Treaty on 28 June 2013 in Marrakesh but not the Treaty itself in line with normal protocol which requires Government approval of international Treaties to allow for signature. Thereafter, and prior to any decision to seek Government approval to ratify the Treaty, a detailed examination of the final text adopted and of the relevant Irish law, will be undertaken. It is the case that as it stands Ireland already has an exception in its national copyright law that allows for the adaptation of books into formats that are easier to use for visually impaired persons. These formats include braille and audio files adapted for the visually impaired.

Top
Share