Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 18 Jul 2013

Written Answers Nos. 247 to 260

Education and Training Provision

Questions (247)

Tom Fleming

Question:

247. Deputy Tom Fleming asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will set up a tourism training division in conjunction with SOLAS to address the demand in the tourism and hospitality sectors (details supplied). [36759/13]

View answer

Written answers

Under the National Tourism Development Authority Act, 2003 the training and education of workers in the tourism and hospitality industry fall under the remit of Fáilte Ireland. Fáilte Ireland have responsibility under the Act for encouraging, promoting and supporting the recruitment, training, and education and development, of persons for the purposes of employment in connection with the tourism industry in the State. My Department has a broader concern that training and education offerings are aligned with the needs of industry and job seekers. In this context, officials of my Department met representatives of the hospitality industry and my Department will continue to examine the availability of genuine job opportunities in this area and review training offerings in that light. However, in the light of Fáilte Ireland's responsibility in this area, there are no plans to establish dedicated arrangements in respect of this sector. It should be noted that FÁS has recently developed a small number of foundation level courses in catering and hospitality through its Local Training Initiatives, Community Training Centres and Specialist Training Providers. These awards/modules are offered in response to specific local requests where there is a recognised employment opportunity.

Educational Disadvantage

Questions (248)

Niall Collins

Question:

248. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he has any advice to offer to the boards of management of DEIS band primary schools in Tallaght, Dublin 24 on funding (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36761/13]

View answer

Written answers

A key focus of the Government's education policy is to prioritise investment in favour of those most at risk and to optimise access, participation and outcomes at every level of the system for disadvantaged groups. Therefore it is my intention that the additional resources available to DEIS schools are utilised to optimum benefit to achieve identified outcomes for the most at risk pupils. As part of the DEIS programme a total of €69.1m is being provided to 665 primary schools supporting 100,595 pupils and some 930 additional teacher posts. This funding provides for Reduced Class Sizes; Home School Community Liaison Service; Support Teacher Project; DEIS and Book Grants to individual schools. DEIS Schools are also targeted for supports provided under the Department of Social Protection Schools Meals Programmes (€34m) and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs School Completion Programme (€26.4m). My Department continues to work to ensure that DEIS funding is used effectively. For example, it has recently provided guidelines on the appropriate use of DEIS grant funding in primary and post primary schools, emphasising a number of recommended activities such as at least 10% of DEIS grant to be allocated to Home School Community Liaison activities.

Some of the additional DEIS grant may also be used to meet ancillary costs such as heating, lighting and other miscellaneous charges related to extended openings of school buildings remaining open to cater for clubs and after school activities. The 22 DEIS schools in Tallaght will receive €0.715 million in DEIS grants in 2013/14 school year. Schools have been given the autonomy to work within the guidelines for the appropriate use of DEIS funding and to decide how best to utilise DEIS resources, including the DEIS grant to achieve maximum benefits to the most at risk pupils in line with their DEIS Action Plans and addressing educational disadvantage. These guidelines, which issued in October 2012, now place emphasis on outcomes rather than being too prescriptive in relation to recommended activities and interventions. Information on the full range of supports provided to DEIS schools is available on the Social Inclusion section of my Departments website at following link http://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Services/DEIS-Delivering-Equality-of-Opportunity-in-Schools-/DEIS-Supporting-Information/Supports-to-DEIS-Schools.html.

Question No. 249 answered with Question No. 208.

Education Grants

Questions (250)

Martin Heydon

Question:

250. Deputy Martin Heydon asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will review the provisions whereby the grant aid of postgraduate study is limited to four years, even in the case where no grant has previously been awarded, and if this criteria can be reviewed for 2013-2014 in view of the emphasis on high quality training and the smart economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36770/13]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to inform the Deputy that given the level of demand on the student grant budget from first time students and students that are progressing with their studies to a higher level, there are no plans at present to change the arrangements in place for postgraduate students.

Appointments to State Boards

Questions (251)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

251. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Skills the present gender balance of the total members of State boards under the aegis of his Department; if the ratio has changed significantly over the course of the present Government's term; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36788/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Programme for Government includes a commitment to ensure that all State Boards have at least 40% of each gender. The breakdown by gender for State Boards under the aegis of my Department for the years 2010 to 2012 is attached in tabular form. I am pleased to note the progress made in that period towards achieving an optimal gender balance, with the percentage of female membership on the boards of aegis bodies increasing from 42% to 47%. The most recent data, for July 2013, confirms the gender balance on the aegis boards as 47% female and 53% male.

Name of Board

-

-

2011

-

-

-

2010

-

-

-

-

Men

%

Women

%

Total

Men

%

Women

%

Total

The Teaching Council

20

54%

17

46%

37

20

54%

17

46%

37

Higher Education Authority (HEA)

8

42%

11

58%

19

4

40%

6

60%

10

Irish Research Council for the

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Humanities and Social Sciences (IRCHSS)

8

67%

4

33%

12

8

67%

4

33%

12

Irish Research Council for Science

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Engineering & Technology (IRCSET)

10

71%

4

29%

14

0

0%

0

0%

0

Residential Institutions Redress Board

4

36%

7

64%

11

5

7

12

Residential Institutions Review Committee

5

83%

1

17%

6

4

80%

1

20%

5

Education Finance Board

7

78%

2

22%

9

7

78%

2

22%

9

Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse

3

43%

4

57%

7

3

43%

4

57%

7

An Comhairle um Oideachas Gaeltachta

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

& Gaelscolaiochta (COGG)

8

38%

13

62%

21

8

38%

13

62%

21

National Council for Curriculum &

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Assessment (NCCA)

13

52%

12

48%

25

14

56%

11

44%

25

National Centre for Guidance in Education

6

55%

5

45%

11

6

55%

5

45%

11

State Examinations Commission

3

60%

2

40%

5

3

60%

2

40%

5

Skillnets Ltd

11

85%

2

15%

13

11

85%

2

15%

13

An Foras Aiseanna Saothair (FAS)

8

73%

3

27%

11

8

73%

3

27%

11

FETAC

7

58%

5

42%

12

9

60%

6

40%

15

HETAC

6

50%

6

50%

12

9

60%

6

40%

15

National Qualifications Authority of Ireland

8

67%

4

33%

12

12

86%

2

14%

14

National Council for Special Education

7

54%

6

46%

13

6

50%

6

50%

12

Grangegorman Development Agency

9

60%

6

40%

15

9

60%

6

40%

15

Leargas

1

25%

3

75%

4

4

44%

5

56%

9

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Totals

152

57%

117

43%

269

150

58%

108

42%

258

Name of Board 2012

-

Men

%

Women

%

Total

The Teaching Council

19

51%

18

49%

37

Higher Education Authority (HEA)

11

58%

8

42%

19

Irish Research Council*

6

50%

6

50%

12

Residential Institutions Redress Board

4

36%

7

64%

11

Residential Institutions Review Committee

5

83%

1

17%

6

Education Finance Board

4

50%

4

50%

8

Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse

2

33%

4

67%

6

An Comhairle um Oideachas Gaeltachta

-

-

-

-

-

& Gaelscolaiochta (COGG)

8

38%

13

62%

21

National Council for Curriculum &

-

-

-

-

-

Assessment (NCCA)

9

36%

16

64%

25

National Centre for Guidance in Education

6

50%

6

50%

12

State Examinations Commission

4

80%

1

20%

5

Skillnets Ltd

11

85%

2

15%

13

An Foras Aiseanna Saothair (FAS)

8

73%

3

27%

11

Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI)**

4

40%

6

60%

10

National Council for Special Education

7

54%

6

46%

13

Grangegorman Development Agency

2

100%

0

0%

2

Leargas

6

67%

3

33%

9

-

-

-

-

-

-

Totals

116

53%

104

47%

220

* The Rearch Council replaces the IRCHSS and the IRCSET

**The QQI replaces HETAC, FETAC and NQAI

Official Travel

Questions (252)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

252. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the parameters of the deal with an airline and travel agent (details supplied) that allowed his Department officials, and public representatives, to avail of set airline fees and other perks between Ireland and Europe as part of the Irish Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the first six months of 2013; his views on whether significant savings were made on travel as a result of this agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35990/13]

View answer

Written answers

Air travel for Government Departments and Offices is purchased under a contract for Travel Management Services awarded by the National Procurement Service to Carlson Wagonlit Travel (Ireland) Ltd. (CWT) following an open tender process. The service to be provided under this contract includes sourcing the most competitive rates for foreign travel for civil servants and members of the Oireachtas travelling abroad on official business.

Ahead of Ireland’s 2013 EU Presidency, Ryanair contacted the Government with a fixed-fare offer for travel on the Dublin-Brussels South Charleroi route (Brussels South Charleroi Airport is located approximately 45 km from Brussels). Following discussion between Ryanair, CWT and the National Procurement Service, agreement was reached on a fixed one-way fare of €49.99 for travel between Dublin and Brussels South Charleroi for the duration of Ireland’s EU Presidency. The fare included government taxes and charges, but did not include fees for baggage or for extras such as reserved seating or priority boarding. This fare was subject to a 2% credit card fee. It could be booked either online or by telephone, with a €6 administration fee per person per sector for bookings made by telephone. The agreement also allowed for one change to be made to a booked ticket to an alternative flight of the passenger’s choice on the same route. Ryanair also committed to providing an Assistance Desk at both of the airports concerned for any assistance required by travellers availing of this fare. The agreement applied only to the Dublin - Brussels South Charleroi route. This special fare was available to all officials and Oireachtas members travelling to Brussels on official business during Ireland’s EU Presidency. Other options available to travellers to Brussels are the Aer Lingus service between Dublin and Brussels Airport and the standard fares available from Ryanair. In planning journeys, travellers would take account of the suitability of flight times, having regard to the timing and duration of the relevant meetings in Brussels. A further factor to be considered by Departments/Offices in choosing flights is the ground transport links from the particular airport regarding access and cost. For those officials whose work/meetings schedule allowed them to use this route, the Ryanair offer provided value for money. As a result of Ryanair's offers, significant reductions were achieved in the average cost of flights to Brussels when compared with the same period in 2012.

Commercial Rates Valuation Process

Questions (253)

Ciara Conway

Question:

253. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will list by urban rateable area, broken down by business type and in tabular form, the number of appeals to rate valuations received to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36061/13]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, the Valuation Office has been conducting a revaluation of all commercial and industrial properties in the Waterford rating authority areas (Waterford City Council, Waterford County Council and Dungarvan Town Council) and in the Dublin City rating authority as part of its ongoing programme to revalue all such properties in the State. This has resulted in the issue of Proposed Valuation Certificates to the ratepayers in relation to their property. However this process is not yet complete in Waterford as a small batch of outstanding Certificates will issue shortly. Ratepayers may make representations to the Valuation Manager if they consider that the proposed valuation or any details contained in the Proposed Certificate are incorrect. The representation stage is currently under way and will not be complete for some time. Following the processing of the representations to the Valuation Manager, the Final Certificates of Valuation will be published on 31st December, 2013, when each ratepayer in Waterford and Dublin City will have a statutory right to make an appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if dissatisfied with the outcome of their representations. The Valuation Tribunal is an independent body set up to settle disputed valuations between the Commissioner of Valuation and the ratepayers of local authorities. Therefore, it will be early 2014, before the appeal stage is reached in respect of the Waterford and Dublin City rating authorities, accordingly it is not possible to provide the detailed statistical information which the Deputy is seeking at this stage. Under the Valuation Act, 2001, there is also a right of internal appeal to the Commissioner of Valuation. However, legislative proposals are currently before the Houses of the Oireachtas which would result in this appeal being removed. This is one of a number of legislative proposals set out in the Bill. However, it will be a matter for the Oireachtas to determine how such proposals proceed or otherwise.

For the Deputy’s information, three revaluations of commercial property have been carried out to-date in the rating authority areas of South Dublin, Fingal and Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown and the number of appeals received from ratepayers in each of those rating authority areas is indicated in the following table. As already mentioned, similar information for Waterford and Dublin City will not be available until early 2014.

Rating Authority Area

Number of Appeals to the Commissioner of Valuation

Number of Appeals to the Valuation Tribunal

South Dublin County Council

725 (11.5%) *

227(3.6%) *

Fingal County Council

819(14.4%)

100(1.75%)

Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council

1,148(22.2%)

302(5.84%)

*% of Revaluations by the Commissioner of Valuation.

Commercial Rates Valuation Process

Questions (254)

Ciara Conway

Question:

254. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he has given further consideration to placing a moratorium on the rates valuation process in Waterford until after the amalgamation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36062/13]

View answer

Written answers

I would refer the Deputy to my reply to PQ 31103/13 of 26th June, 2013 in relation to the background to the Revaluation process currently underway in Waterford. The application of a moratorium to a revaluation because of local authority amalgamation considerations is not provided for under the Valuation Act, 2001, as the application of such an option would not affect the valuation process. Section 21 of the Act provides that a valuation list must be published within three years of the making of a valuation order.

The Government’s Action Programme for Effective Local Government, Putting People First, indicates that in the context of reorganisation of local governance structures, the proposed new municipal districts will provide an opportunity to achieve a more coherent approach to rates and charges on a county-wide basis, having regard to funding requirements and the need to support employment and business competitiveness. The Action Programme proposes rates harmonisation to cater for differences between Annual Rates on Valuation (ARVs) of towns and counties. The approach of the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to rates harmonisation will seek to ensure, that harmonisation does not lead to significant net loss of revenue in individual counties with consequential implications for services, and that any change in rates does not impact negatively on businesses and employment. It is important that local government reform drives down costs to business in order to protect existing jobs and sustain our economic competitiveness.

Commercial Rates Valuation Process

Questions (255)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

255. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform with respect to determination of commercial rates by the Valuation Office, if he will outline details of the rolling programme of valuation undertaken by the office; when each area of the country is assessed and in what order; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36131/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Valuation Office is currently undertaking a systematic programme of revaluing, for rates purposes, all industrial and commercial properties in the State. The immediate objective of the national revaluation programme is to ensure that the first revaluation of all rating authority areas is conducted as soon as possible. Revaluation is conducted across all relevant properties in one or more rating authority areas at the same time. However, implementation of the national programme cannot occur across the entire country simultaneously and the programme must, accordingly, be operated on a phased basis. Following the first revaluation, subsequent revaluations of each rating authority area will then be carried out on a cyclical basis no sooner than five years and no later than ten years after the first revaluation (Section 25 of the Valuation Act 2001).

Section 9(10) of the Valuation Act 2001 provides that the Commissioner of Valuation is independent in the performance of his functions. Section 19(1) of the said Act empowers the Commissioner to make a Valuation Order specifying a rating authority area over which a revaluation is to be conducted, after consultation with the Minister for the Environment and Local Government and the rating authority concerned. Steady progress is being made on the National Revaluation Programme. Between 2007 and 2010 the three Rating Authority areas of South Dublin, Fingal and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown were revalued comprising c.17,700 commercial properties which represents approximately 22% of the national rateable valuation base. Additionally, there are currently six revaluation projects in progress which include the Rating Authority areas of Dublin City, Waterford City and County and Dungarvan Town together with Limerick City and County comprising c. 38,000 commercial properties or 32.6% of the valuation base. Furthermore, the statutory consultation process, required before a valuation order can be made is under way with a further five rating authorities, Galway City Council, Kilkenny County Council, Kilkenny Borough Council, Carlow County Council and Carlow Town Council. Decisions in relation to a further set of rating authorities for revaluation are currently under consideration by the Valuation Office.

The current position as regards projects in train or pending is set out in the following table:

Rating Authority

Area

Date Valuation Order Signed

Publication Date for the New Valuation List.

Number* of Items

% of Valuation Base [Pre - Revaluation]

Dublin City

5/05/2011

31/12/2013

25117

26.62

Waterford City

12/12/2011

31/12/2013

2548

1.44

Waterford County

12/12/2011

31/12/2013

1387

0.39

Dungarvan Town

12/12/2011

31/12/2013

621

0.24

Limerick City

29/03/2012

31/12/2014

4085

1.94

Limerick County

29/03/2012

31/12/2014

4505

1.98

Galway City

Valuation Order pending

3702

2.30

-

Kilkenny County

Valuation Order pending

1974

0.92

-

Kilkenny Borough

Valuation Order pending

993

0.48

-

Carlow County

Valuation Order pending

982

0.38

-

Carlow Town

Valuation Order pending

906

0.40

-

Totals

-

46820

37.09

-

*2009 baseline data.

National Monuments

Questions (256)

Sandra McLellan

Question:

256. Deputy Sandra McLellan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his plans to incorporate Kilmainham courthouse into the Kilmainham jail experience; and if he will provide a timeline for the incorporation of the courthouse. [36406/13]

View answer

Written answers

Kilmainham Gaol is a National Monument site in the care of the Office of Public Works (OPW) and, with 310,910 visitors in 2012, is one of the most popular and heavily-visited tourist sites in Ireland. The OPW's role at Kilmainham is to maintain the physical fabric of the site and present it to the public through a dedicated Guide Service, explaining its 217 year history and its role in some of the key events in the formation of the State. The site opens to the public on a fulltime basis 362 days per year, attracting significant numbers of visitors and sustaining a strong income profile. As well as its tourist and heritage attractiveness to visitors, it is also the preferred chosen venue for frequent formal events and functions of social, cultural, artistic, civic and diplomatic significance. However, its capacity to deal with an ever-increasing demand is severely limited currently by a number of key factors, most notably the physical limitations of the building, which was obviously constructed with a different purpose in mind and which is not ideally configured to sustain an exponentially increasing volume of visitors. It is expected that this challenge will be further emphasised with an expected increase in visitor numbers in the period ahead, particularly in the context of the interest generated by the various commemoration events over the next few years. At current levels, the existing Gaol building is at absolute capacity and cannot sustain further large scale increases in visitor traffic without significant risk to the fabric of the Monument and to the comfort and safety of visitors. The OPW have been working on a suitable proposal to enhance the visitor experience at the Gaol. Discussions have taken place with a range of bodies with a view to advance a project in tandem with the 1916 centenary celebrations.

State Properties

Questions (257)

Ciara Conway

Question:

257. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will provide an update on the transfer of Mount Congreve into public ownership; when the gardens will be open to the public; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36065/13]

View answer

Written answers

The house and gardens at Mount Congreve are currently under the care of the Mount Congreve Trust. The Mount Congreve Trust consists of three Trustees including the Commissioners of Public Works. The remaining two Trustees represent the Congreve Foundation and were appointed by Mr. Congreve. The Trust period for the gardens commenced upon the death of Mr Congreve in May 2011 and will expire in May 2032. The Mansion House will remain in the hands of the Trust until 2059. Only upon the expiration of these Trust periods will the properties revert to the ownership of the State. The Commissioners of Public Works, in their role as Trustee, have been in discussions with the other Trustees as to the future management of the Trust properties. While these discussions are ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further.

State Properties

Questions (258)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

258. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the State usage that has been allocated for the former Whitehall Garda Station, Dublin; what the property will be used for and by whom; the length of time that a lease to another State body lasts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36066/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Whitehall former Garda Station has been allocated to the Department of Justice and Equality. The property is to be used by the Office of the State Pathologist and the Dublin City Coroner. It is anticipated that the Department of Justice and Equality will be accommodated in this property for the foreseeable future.

State Properties

Questions (259)

Andrew Doyle

Question:

259. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the purpose for which 91-93 Merrion Square, Dublin, will be used; by whom, when it is ready for use next year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36068/13]

View answer

Written answers

This State owned property at 91-93 Merrion Square is currently being refurbished and will be used, as part of the OPW rationalisation policy to vacate rented property, to accommodate another government office during 2014. There are a number of departments/offices under consideration for this property.

Information and Communications Technology Issues

Questions (260)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

260. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he is preparing his Department to adapt to and make maximum use of next generation technologies, in information and communications, in order to better enhance the interaction of his Department with the citizen and the internal functioning of his Department; if he intends to conduct a risk analysis in respect of same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36109/13]

View answer

Written answers

My Department provides information and communications technologies (ICT) on a shared services basis to my Department and to the Department of Finance. We continue to update the use of technology in accordance with an agreed plan for both Departments and development of new ICT strategies for my Department and for the Department of Finance have been initiated. Suitable risk assessments will be undertaken as part of these strategies. The newly appointed Government CIO is providing advice and information in relation to the development of information systems for my Department and for the Department of Finance.

Top
Share