I propose to take Questions Nos. 592, 593 and 612 together.
As Minister of State Hayes stated to the House during the topical debate on this matter last week, it would be inappropriate for me or my Department to interfere in the operations of a receivership in the manner suggested by the Deputy. The role of a receiver appointed to companies in distress is set down in law.
I understand from various public statements that, while significant amounts may be owed to marts, the marts have signalled their commitment to continue to pay Irish livestock suppliers on a weekly basis. I am confident that the banks will deal sympathetically with individual farmers and marts who are owed money by the company concerned.
The Deputy will be aware that my Department attaches considerable importance to the live export trade and, over the years, has done all in its power to facilitate this trade. The reality is that the live export trade provides alternative market outlets for certain categories of livestock, particularly weanlings, thereby serving a market demand and providing increased competition in the market place for cattle. I am always keen that Irish meat and livestock producers can access as many global markets as possible and, to that end, my Department will continue to seek to ensure market access from Irish produce, including live exports.
