Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 10 Dec 2013

Written Answers Nos. 241-256

Joint Labour Committees Agreements

Questions (241)

Dara Calleary

Question:

241. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the provisions being made in the proposed joint labour committees legislation in relation to wage structures for symbol operated stores, shops and supermarkets, for such stores that operate under an umbrella marketing plan yet remain independently owned; his views on whether small store owners operating in such circumstances should not have JLC restrictions imposed upon them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52882/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act 2012 provides that reviews of each Joint Labour Committee (JLC) be carried out by the Labour Court, as soon as practicable after the commencement of the Act, and at least once every 5 years thereafter. The review assisted the Labour Court’s deliberations as to whether any JLC should be abolished, maintained in its current form, amalgamated with another JLC or its establishment order amended and the Labour Court is required to make recommendations to the Minister to this effect. On 1 October last, I published the Report of the Labour Court’s Review of the 10 existing JLCs.

In relation to the Retail Grocery JLC, the recommendation from the review was to confine the scope of the retained JLC to those establishments which are defined as multiples and symbol operators within the sector. The review recommended that independent grocery shops, garage shops that do not have symbol shops attached, shops that are fish shops or butchers or cake and bread shops or vegetable shops should not be comprehended by the Retail Grocery JLC in future.

It is important to remember that the JLC Establishment Orders envisaged will provide only a framework within which employers and employee representatives can come together voluntarily and negotiate terms and conditions of workers in their respective sector. For vulnerable workers, the advantage of JLCs is that they see fair terms and conditions such as wage rates, sick pay etc. agreed and given effect by ERO, while for some employers, the advantage of the JLC system, based as it is on the principle of self-governance, means that they can agree and set minimum pay and conditions, agree on work practices which are custom-made to their industry – a flexibility which cannot be achieved by primary legislation. Where both parties to a JLC see commonality of purpose and outcome then an agreement may emerge.

The net effect of changing the scope in the ways recommended is intended to reduce the overall size of the JLC to more closely match the majority share of the competitive grocery market; to extend the scope to cover all of the relevant employees that fall within the remit of the JLC and to make it more flexible and simpler to follow and to enforce. While some shops that are currently covered by the JLC would be excluded, these were not considered by the review to be a significant proportion of the main competitive market of the sector as a whole.

The Office of the Parliamentary Counsel has been requested to prepare new orders to give effect to the Labour Court recommendations. In addition, I am considering legal advice received from the Attorney General and I hope to deal with this issue and other establishment orders shortly.

Capital Programme Expenditure

Questions (242)

Kevin Humphreys

Question:

242. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation of the €23 million in capital funding recorded as not spent under the expenditure profile at end November in the most recent analysis of gross Voted expenditure Exchequer figures, the reason for the underspend; if he will provide a breakdown of the capital projects or outlays that have not commenced as yet, as per the profile; if any of the €107.2 million in total capital carryover in Government moneys for 2012 relates to his Department; the amount of same; if it has been spent; on what it has been spent; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52953/13]

View answer

Written answers

The €23million in capital expenditure referred to in the Deputy’s question represents the difference between the capital expenditure from my Department’s Vote as reported in the End November Expenditure Return published by the Minister for Finance and the amount of capital expenditure originally profiled for that period at the beginning of the year. In this regard, as part of assisting the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform’s oversight of exchequer expenditure, Government Departments, including my own Department, are required to prepare a monthly profile of expected expenditure, including capital expenditure, from their Votes at the beginning of each year. It is the case that as the financial year progresses there can be a number of reasons why monthly expenditure may deviate from the initial monthly profile, resulting in capital underspends or overspends at the end of a particular month.

Capital expenditure from my Department’s Vote is essentially expended by the enterprise development agencies such as IDA Ireland, Enterprise Ireland and Science Foundation as well as the County Enterprise Boards. Typically this funding is by way of grant provision to private industry and to the higher education institutions. The drawdown of exchequer financial support by companies or other bodies, such as the higher education institutions, is demand-led and funding is provided on the basis of matured liabilities. It will be appreciated, therefore, that such funding provision can only take place if the entity in question has progressed a given project in line with the agreement entered into with the State. In addition, there can also be factors such as timing issues relating to the finalisation of legal agreements or the securing of matching private funding by the successful grant applicant to ensure eligibility to drawdown the grant. Given these factors, it is important to point out that the €23 million referred to by the Deputy represents just 4.7% of the overall Departmental capital budget for 2013.

Insofar as 2012 situation is concerned, the total Government capital carryover of €107.2 million referred to by the Deputy included an amount of €25 million in capital carryover in respect of my Department’s Vote. I would point out that as part of the conditions associated with any annual capital carryover provision, a Ministerial order approved and signed by the Minister of Public Expenditure and Reform, requires that carryover money must be expended in the early part of the following financial year to support on-going activity. Such carryover provision must be exhausted prior to expending any of the capital funding provision approved in the Vote allocation as published on Budget Day.

As regards the Deputy’s request for a breakdown of capital projects in this area, it is the case that as there can be several thousand live grant awards and initiatives being supported across the enterprise agencies at any particular point in time, it would not be feasible to provide the Deputy with specific details regarding the status of projects per profiled expenditure. The capital expenditure programme overseen by my Department is undoubtedly a key element in supporting Ireland’s jobs, enterprise and research activities. The total capital allocation of €479.5m for 2013, which includes the aforementioned €25m in carryover from 2012, represents a very significant and vital stimulus in the on-going and increasingly successful challenge of promoting enterprise and creating jobs for our citizens.

Job Creation Data

Questions (243)

Jonathan O'Brien

Question:

243. Deputy Jonathan O'Brien asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the number of jobs created and the number of jobs lost for each year since 2007 in the manufacturing and in the financial services sector; the way these figures are determined; and if the recent figures are in line with the targets set by the Government for these sectors. [53033/13]

View answer

Written answers

The total number of jobs lost and gained for the Manufacturing and Financial Services Sectors, for the period 2007-2012, is set out in the tables below. Both sets of figures are compiled by Forfás as part of that agency’s business information monitoring and are updated, if necessary, in Forfás’ Annual Employment Survey. The figures show an overall gain of approximately 3,000 in manufacturing jobs in 2012 over 2011, and a slight gain in financial services jobs in the same period.

As you are aware, Forfás published a Strategy for the Manufacturing Sector earlier this year – Making it in Ireland: Manufacturing to 2020 - which includes a target to create an additional 20,000 jobs in the sector by 2016. With regard to the Financial Services Sector, the Strategy for the International Financial Services Industry in Ireland, published by the Department of the Taoiseach in 2011, calculated that there were 33,000 people employed directly in Ireland in international financial services (i.e. excluding banking and related financial services activity in the domestic sector) at that time. The Strategy sets an objective to increase employment in this sector by 10,000 by 2016 and a range of measures are proposed. Implementation of that Strategy is being driven by the IFSC Clearing House Group, which operates under the aegis of the Department of the Taoiseach. In addition, the Action Plan for Jobs includes a series of actions across a wide number of sectors including manufacturing and services. By implementing the 2013 Action Plans for Jobs and the new 2014 Action Plan for Jobs , to be developed in the New Year, the Government is confident that further growth in employment in both sectors will be achieved.

Manufacturing

-

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Job Gains

12,800

10,299

6,919

8,151

11,359

10,704

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Job Losses

-15,108

-20,194

-28,525

-14,108

-11,004

-7,987

Financial Services

-

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Job Gains

3,360

2,298

1,027

1,643

2,398

2,505

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Job Losses

-565

-1,247

-1,973

-1,677

-1,245

-1,855

Job Losses

Questions (244)

Seán Crowe

Question:

244. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation following the disappointing news that Pfizer Ireland has announced 150 job losses in Newbridge, County Kildare, the measures being taken to reskill and-or retrain the staff who have been let go, many of whom have been with the company for many years; and if a training package and grants, such as that received by the TalkTalk workers in Waterford, will be made available to Pfizer staff in Newbridge. [53062/13]

View answer

Written answers

Pfizer recently undertook a review of its worldwide manufacturing capabilities to improve its overall operational effectiveness. The Global Pharmaceutical industry is experiencing a number of challenges due to patent expiry and over-capacity in manufacturing and Pfizer is no exception. Greater efficiencies and competitiveness are continually being sought across all Pfizer’s sites in order to compete in the changing landscape. It is regrettable that this process has resulted in 150 job losses in Newbridge. The relevant State agencies will work closely to ensure the best possible outcome for the affected staff.

In relation to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, or EGF, the Managing Authority for that Fund is part of the Department of Education and Skills. That Authority monitors collective redundancies in order to assess whether the strict requirements and criteria can be met to make sustainable applications for EU co-financing of approved programmes of guidance, training, education and enterprise supports through the Fund. Ireland has made seven successful EGF applications to date since 2009, assisting over 9,760 redundant workers affected by the adverse impacts of globalisation. Applications are normally made where, inter alia, at least 500 workers are made redundant within prescribed reference periods.

In this context, my Department have been in touch with the EGF Managing Authority, who, in turn, have been in contact with IDA Ireland and contacts are being made with the Pfizer company seeking to ascertain in the first instance whether the conditions may exist whereby a sustainable application for EGF co-financing assistance can be progressed in due course, including potentially on a broader sector wide or exceptional circumstances basis, under the terms of the new EGF Regulation coming into force from 2014.

I am informed that the total EU funding available annually under the new funding EGF round 2014 – 2020 has been reduced by 70% and care must be taken to ensure that only those applications with the most favourable prospects of success in support of redundant workers are submitted by Member States.

Charities Regulation

Questions (245)

Billy Timmins

Question:

245. Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the amount of funding that his Department gives to Irish charities; the name of each organisation that receives funding; the amount of funding each organisation receives; the number that are open and transparent regarding salaries; and the steps he is taking to deal with non-disclosures. [53553/13]

View answer

Written answers

My Department provides funding to two entities who are registered with charitable status as approved by the Revenue Commissioners. The first such body is the Consumers’ Association of Ireland. Funding is provided to the Association to support suitable projects to enhance its capacity to address the needs of consumers. Funding in the amount of €48,484.90 was provided to the Association in 2012. An application for funding in 2013 is currently being considered. The salary costs incurred by the Association are included in its Annual Reports.

The second body is Microfinance Ireland Ltd. Microfinance Ireland, which is a subsidiary of Social Finance Foundation, was established in 2012 pursuant to the Microenterprise Loan Fund Act 2012 and is also a limited company with registered charitable status. The stated purpose of Microfinance Ireland Ltd is to manage the Microenterprise Loan Fund by making loans to microenterprises in accordance with the requirements of the 2012 Act. My Department with the consent of the Departments of Finance and Public Sector and Reform provided a grant of €10 million to Microfinance Ireland in 2010. The salary costs incurred by Microfinance Ireland are published in the company’s annual report.

Civil Registration Legislation

Questions (246)

Jim Daly

Question:

246. Deputy Jim Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection the decision made on a marriage licence application in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52914/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Registrar General is the person with statutory responsibility for the administration of civil registration in the State. Where, as in this case, a person has been divorced in another jurisdiction these divorces are required to be recognised under the law of the State before any of the parties to the divorces may marry in the State. I have made enquiries of the Registrar General and I understand that in the case in question the General Register Office has informed the person as to the evidence required in respect of previous divorces. The evidence furnished to date is insufficient to enable the GRO to definitively determine the matter. The person concerned has been informed of this and further evidence is awaited.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (247, 248)

Olivia Mitchell

Question:

247. Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Social Protection in view of the restrictions on access to benefits and housing to be introduced in the UK, if similar measures will now be required here on 1 January when citizens of both Romania and Bulgaria will have completely free mobility throughout the EU; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [53177/13]

View answer

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

248. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Social Protection if she has considered recent suggestions from the British Prime Minister in relation to the issue of welfare tourism, specifically that it is the intention of the UK Government not to pay benefits to persons immigrating to the UK for the first three months and that, on approval for benefits, they would be paid for a maximum of six months; her plans to introduce similar measures here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52477/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 247 and 248 together.

Free movement of workers and other citizens of the Union is a fundamental right granted by the EU Treaties and one which can bring benefits, economic and otherwise, to the individual and to the EU as a whole. Accordingly, it is something to be facilitated and encouraged. However, we must also ensure that the right of free movement is used for the right motives and is not abused through unjustified claiming of benefits. Restrictions on Bulgarian and Romanian citizens accessing the Irish labour-market were lifted with effect from 1 January 2012 and so citizens of those countries are already entitled to live and work in Ireland. Restrictions on these citizens will be lifted in the UK and other countries from 1 January 2014.

The UK recently announced a series of measures in relation to the welfare entitlements of EU migrants. These include a ban on EU migrants receiving out-of-work benefits for the first three months of residence and restrictions on the claiming of jobseeker's allowance for more than six months, unless a person can prove that they have made serious efforts to secure employment and that they have a genuine prospect of securing work. In relation to the former, under the EU Residence Directive, member states already have the right to refuse support under their social assistance systems to certain migrants for the first three months of residence.

Access to social assistance payments in Ireland is subject to the habitual residence condition. Accordingly, those receiving such payments are deemed to have established their centre of interest in Ireland and to have significant contacts with the country. As well as satisfying habitual residence conditions a person claiming jobseeker’s allowance must, inter alia, be available for and genuinely seeking full-time employment. Any person who does not satisfy these conditions will not receive a jobseeker’s allowance payment.

I am satisfied that the provisions of the Irish welfare system, and EU regulations in this area, are being used to the fullest extent possible to deter unjustifiable claiming of benefits in this country. I am not proposing any changes in practises here at present but I will continue to monitor developments here and in the UK and other countries, with a view to establishing potential implications and learning for this jurisdiction.

Social Welfare Fraud Investigations

Questions (249)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

249. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 112 of 21 November, in relation to social welfare fraud detection at airports, if she will extend the detection to the other airports in the State and the passenger ferry terminals; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52479/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Social Welfare Act 2012 made provision for social welfare inspectors to undertake power of enquiry at ports and airports. In line with the powers that are provided for in the legislation, social welfare inspectors have the authority to attend and make enquiry at any port or airport. These powers are designed to deal specifically with incidences of welfare tourism or non-residency.

My Department reviews and adjusts the approach to control activity and fraud investigations in the light of operational experience and evidence; this includes its activity in ports and airports. In this regard, increased activity at ports and airports is being considered.

Invalidity Pension Appeals

Questions (250)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

250. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if an appeal for invalidity pension will be reviewed in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52480/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that an Appeals Officer, having fully considered all the evidence has disallowed the appeal of the person concerned. Following receipt of additional Medical Evidence including that supplied by the Deputy, the case was reviewed by the Appeals Officer who advised that a revision of his decision was not warranted.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

Child Care Services Funding

Questions (251)

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

251. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Social Protection if she plans to cut funding to child care centres currently funded under the community services programme. [52483/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Community Services Programme operates under the aegis of my Department and provides grants in the form of a financial contribution to the costs of employment management and operative staff in supporting the delivery of services of benefit to communities where gaps in services exist or to ensure that existing community and public investment is utilised. A very broad range of services, including the provision of community childcare is supported under the programme. Contracts are generally offered on a three year cycle and reviewed within this cycle to confirm eligibility, value for money, compliance with programme rules and continued relevance of the service.

I propose to provide some €45.1 million of this programme in 2014 which is equivalent to the same funds provided in 2013. The level of funds offered to a contractor may vary over time to reflect the outcome of the regular review process. Where funds become available, there are allocated to other contracts where services are expanding or to fund new proposals. The Deputy may wish to note that a number of contracts will transfer from the programme to another State agency in 2014 which will see a reduction in the total allocation to the programme under this Department. There have been no cuts in the funds available to the remaining contracts.

Farm Assist Scheme Appeals

Questions (252)

John O'Mahony

Question:

252. Deputy John O'Mahony asked the Minister for Social Protection when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive a decision on their farm assist appeal; the reason for the delay; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52575/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Social Welfare Appeals Office has advised me that an appeal by the person concerned was registered on 3 September 2013. The appeal was referred to an Appeals Officer on 25 November 2013, who will make a summary decision on the appeal based on the documentary evidence presented or, if required, hold an oral hearing. The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions in relation to social welfare entitlements.

Jobseeker's Allowance Eligibility

Questions (253)

Noel Harrington

Question:

253. Deputy Noel Harrington asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will review the case of an person (details supplied) for jobseeker's allowance whose allowance has been reduced by over 50% because their uninhabitable home is being assessed as income; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52601/13]

View answer

Written answers

Social welfare legislation provides that the yearly value of "property owned but not personally used or enjoyed" is assessable for means testing purposes. Such property includes houses and premises owned by a claimant which may or may not be put to commercial use. However, it does not include property such as the home or, for example, a premises used by the claimant in carrying out a business. Where a claimant considers that a decision on his or her claim is based on a market value of a property which is too high, he or she may appeal that decision to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.

The person concerned has been assessed with means, derived from the capital value of a property and self-employment. The Deputy's parliamentary question is being treated as a request for a review of the means of the person concerned and the papers are being referred to the Social Welfare Inspector for investigation. When the investigation is complete a decision will be given by a deciding officer and the person concerned will be advised of the outcome as soon as possible.

Social Welfare Benefits Data

Questions (254)

John Lyons

Question:

254. Deputy John Lyons asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of casual and part-time employees in receipt of social welfare payments such as jobseeker's allowance, jobseeker's benefit and family income supplement; if these figures can be grouped by economic sector according to Nace Rev. 2 codes; if the figures can be grouped according to occupation type, by UK SOC, if possible; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52615/13]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy in relation to the number of casual and part-time employees in receipt of jobseeker's allowance or jobseeker's benefit is not available. I am however informed that at the end of November there were 81,489 casual employees on the live register and a breakdown of this number grouped by the economic sector of their employer activity according to Nace Rev. 2 industrial sector codes and grouped by their occupation according to the UK Standard Occupational Classification, or UKSOC, where possible is detailed in the following tables. Occupation is recorded at the start of each jobseeker’s claim, i.e., relates to previous occupation, while industrial sector is for current casual employment.

With regard to recipients of the family income supplement scheme it is not possible to differentiate between persons who are in full, casual or part-time employment.

Casual Jobseekers on the Live Register at end November 2013

By employer activity

-

Sector of Employer activity*

Persons

A Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing

1,809

B Mining and Quarrying

272

C Manufacturing

5,891

D Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

25

E Water supply; Sewerage, waste management and remediation activities

398

F Construction

7,324

G Wholesale and Retail Trade; Repair of Motor Vehicles and motorcycles

16,663

H Transportation and storage

3,260

I Accommodation and food service activities

13,397

J Information and communication activities

989

K Financial and insurance activities

1,008

L Real Estate activities

983

M Professional, Scientific and Technical activities

2,800

N Administrative and support service activities

7,279

O Public Administration And Defence; Compulsory Social Security

2,293

P Education

2,692

Q Human Health And Social Work activities

5,012

R Arts, entertainment and recreation

2,191

S Other Service activities

4,160

T Activities of Households as employers and U Activities of Extra-territorial Organisations And Bodies

485

Unclassified or unknown

2,558

All casuals at end-November 2013

81,489

* using NACE Rev.2 classification of employer economic activity

-

Casual Jobseekers on the Live Register at end November 2013

-

By occupation group

Major Occupation Groups*

Persons

Managers and Administrators

1,982

Professional Occupations

4,954

Associate Professional And Technical Occupations

1,906

Clerical And Secretarial Occupations

8,006

Craft and Related Occupations

16,376

Personal And Protective Service Occupations

15,313

Sales And Customer Service Occupations

12,025

Plant And Machine Operatives

13,018

Other Occupations

6,546

Unknown or no stated occupation or those who never worked

1,363

All casuals at end-November 2013

81,489

* using the UK Standard Occupational Classification, 1990 classification

-

Work Placement Programmes

Questions (255, 264, 273, 274)

Jonathan O'Brien

Question:

255. Deputy Jonathan O'Brien asked the Minister for Social Protection the schools and educational institutions in which JobBridge interns have been taken on and in which they are currently employed since its inception; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52617/13]

View answer

Sandra McLellan

Question:

264. Deputy Sandra McLellan asked the Minister for Social Protection with regard to JobBridge, if the employer is obliged to offer the intern a position after the six or nine months; if the employer does not offer the intern a position, if they are allowed to advertise the same job seeking another intern for the same position; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52764/13]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

273. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of participants on JobBridge who are receiving the lower jobseeker's allowance rates of €100 and €144, respectively. [52936/13]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

274. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of staff assigned to administer and monitor the JobBridge scheme; if these same staff have responsibilities relating to other schemes also; if so, the extent of same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52937/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 255, 264, 273 and 274 together.

The JobBridge scheme was launched on 1 July 2011. As at end November 2013, a total of 486 schools, including both primary and secondary, had participated in the scheme.

Host organisations participate in the scheme on a voluntary basis and receive no payment or other benefit from the State in respect of their participation in the scheme. I believe that in these circumstances the organisations concerned have a legitimate expectation that their participation on the scheme will remain confidential, and accordingly do not propose as a matter of course, to publish names of any host organisations. JobBridge is a voluntary scheme. Host organisations are not obliged to offer an intern employment at the end of their internship. However, a six-month cooling-off period applies where the host organisation cannot advertise for another intern for the same area of activity. This is to prevent potential displacement.

As at end of November, 2013, there were over 6,500 jobseekers participating on the scheme. Of which, there were 393 participants on the €100 jobseekers rate and 739 participants on the €144 jobseekers rate. An additional €50 weekly top-up payment is made to all participants.

JobBridge is administered and monitored by the Department’s regional offices comprising over 2000 staff. These are supported by a central JobBridge team comprising 6 staff and the National Contact Centre comprising 18 staff. It is worth highlighting that over 4,000 on-site monitoring visits have been conducted by Departmental officers to ensure on-going compliance with scheme criteria.

Employment Support Services

Questions (256)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

256. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 107 of 20 November 2013, the specific programmes or targeted measures which are being or will be put in place to support citizens, particularly younger citizens, who are in part-time employment in one field but who have academic experience or training in another field of expertise and therefore could be said to be underemployed. [52623/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Government’s primary employment strategy is to increase full-time employment opportunities, including for young people, by creating the environment for a strong economic recovery by promoting competitiveness and productivity through the Action Plan for Jobs. Economic recovery will underpin jobs growth and thus increase employment. Increasing full-time employment opportunities will benefit both the unemployed and those who are currently under-employed. In terms of measures such as access to training and education, internships and other labour market interactions, government policy is to prioritise these opportunities for people who are full-time unemployed.

However, young people who are currently underemployed and seeking alternative employment can avail of the public employment services at their local Intreo office where a range of job-search facilities are available and where vacancies from the JobsIreland website are advertised.

Top
Share