I propose to take Questions Nos. 328 and 329 together.
Paragraph 59 of International Accounting Standard 39 (IAS 39) “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” explicitly precludes the recognition of losses expected as a result of future events, no matter how likely. Paragraph 59 falls within the part of IAS 39 that deals with “impairment and uncollectability of financial assets measured at amortised cost”, so that it applies to (among other things) loans that banks have advanced to customers.
Paragraph 59 of IAS 39 requires that there must be objective evidence of impairment as a result of a “loss event” (also known as a “trigger event”). The determination of whether a loss event (within the meaning of IAS 39) has or has not occurred involves a degree of subjective judgement, in the exercise of which prudence or conservatism may be appropriate. The exercise of prudence or conservatism in such circumstances does not imply the recognition of expected losses.
The IASB “Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements”, which was superseded by the “Conceptual Framework” in 2010, was not an International Accounting Standard or International Financial Reporting Standard and therefore endorsement or adoption by the EU under Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 (the “IAS Regulation”) did not arise.
The individual standards adopted under Regulation 1606/2002 set out the accounting requirements with which companies to which they are applicable must comply.