Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 28 Jan 2014

Written Answers Nos. 202 - 225

Investor Compensation Company Limited

Questions (202)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

202. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding investigations into the directors of Custom House Capital; the likelihood of investors in CHC receiving any return or compensation for their investments; if he will provide details as to the Destiny Property 118 Fund and whether it made any investments; if it invested in the purchase of a building in Glasgow; who now owns this building; the role the Central Bank has at present in denying the release of information to those who invested with CHC; the reason the appointed receivers are not allowed to release information to claimants in this matter; the status of the investor compensation company; and the reason investors who made appropriate claims have not heard from them to date. [3937/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will be aware that the Central Bank maintains a page on its website where it provides up to date information on Custom House Capital ("CHC"). This can be accessed at https://www.centralbank.ie/press-area/press-releases/Pages/UpdateonCustomHouseCapital.aspx.

The Deputy will also be aware that the  Investor Compensation Company Limited (ICCL), established under the 1998 Investor Compensation Act, also maintains a page on its website with relevant updates for investors in CHC who may be eligible to claim compensation from the investor compensation fund. This can be accessed at  http://www.investorcompensation.ie/current_cases_004.php. This page is reviewed and updated on a weekly basis and all claimants have been advised that they should consult the ICCL's website for relevant updates.  

In relation to the compensation which investors in Custom House Capital may receive, I would like the Deputy to note the following:

- As of 23rd January, 2014, the ICCL had received certified statements from the Administrator in respect of 428 claims and has paid compensation to those claimants amounting to €6,624,280.  All compensation payments were made by the ICCL within 2 weeks of having received the relevant certified statement.

- The ICCL has received 1,969 claims from former clients of CHC.  All claimants received an acknowledgement from the ICCL following receipt of their claim.  All claimants would subsequently have received a confirmation that their claim had been passed to the Administrator, Kieran Wallace, who would verify and certify their claim in due course.  The legislation provides that it is the Administrator, not the ICCL, who checks the validity of each claim and determines the level of compensatable loss to be paid.  I understand the Administrator had indicated that this will be a protracted process given the complexity of the reconciliation process.

In relation to the release of information regarding the case and the respective roles of the Central Bank and the Liquidator, I would like the Deputy to note the following:

- Upon presentation of the Final Inspectors Report to the High Court Justice Hogan ordered that CHC be wound up immediately.  Copies of the Final Report have been provided to the Minister for Justice and Equality, to the Director of Public Prosecutions, to the Director of Corporate Enforcement, to the Revenue Commissioners and to the Garda Commissioner.  At the time the High Court outlined that the only solution in the CHC case was an immediate court sanctioned liquidation where the Liquidator would take steps to conserve the assets of the company and to ensure that payments out were made to creditors in a manner authorised by law.  The High Court reviewed the position of Mr Kieran Wallace for this role and confirmed his appointment as Liquidator with immediate effect.

- The Central Bank s investigation into Custom House Capital Ltd (in Liquidation) and persons concerned in its management has been on-going since the publication of the Final Report to the High Court by Court Appointed Inspectors dated 19 October 2011.  Following consultation with An Garda Síochána, the Central Bank's investigation has been deferred pending completion of investigations by An Garda Síochána.

- As identified in the Final Inspectors Report, there was large scale misuse of client holdings and systematic deception by CHC that caused uncertainty surrounding the legitimate ownership of all client holdings.  As a result, this is not a routine liquidation and, in the interests of all clients, the legitimate ownership of holdings must be established before any payment or return of holdings can be made to any client.  The situation is further complicated by the fact that in many cases these holdings form part of various pension arrangements (e.g. ARFs, PRSAs) which are subject to additional legislation.  Directions imposed on CHC by the Central Bank are in place to ensure that misleading information is not issued to clients about individual client holdings pending completion of reconciliation work by the Official Liquidator.

- As also set out in the Final Report of the High Court Inspectors, the sub-management arrangements entered into between CHC and Horwath Bastow Charleton Wealth Management Ltd. sought to protect against a diminution in the value of remaining client holdings and provide a mechanism for (a) maximising a recovery of funds for clients and (b) providing transparency and ensuring fairness in the return of assets to clients.  The Liquidator remains responsible for all reconciliation work carried out in respect of CHC related client holdings.

- In light of the above I cannot comment on details pertaining to any particular fund held by CHC, whether relating to any investments made by the fund, assets held by the fund, etc.

- The process of establishing legitimate ownership of all investments involves a significant and lengthy reconciliation of client holdings that takes time to fully complete.  As mentioned above, Mr. Kieran Wallace of KPMG was appointed Official Liquidator by and is accountable to the Court for the conduct and completion of the liquidation of CHC.

Appointments to State Boards

Questions (203)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

203. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details as to the tenure of a person (details supplied) as a director of the Central Bank of Ireland. [3938/14]

View answer

Written answers

The individual concerned was appointed by the then Minister for Finance to the Board of the Central Bank, where he served a five year term from 12 February 1998 to 11 February 2003.

Carer's Allowance Eligibility

Questions (204)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

204. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance if steps will be taken to ensure that the single person child carer tax credit is not used as leverage in discussions between separated couples; if he will examine secondary carers becoming automatically eligible when the credit is not in use; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4035/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, the One-Parent Family Tax Credit (OPFTC) has been replaced with a new Single Person Child Carer Tax Credit from 1 January 2014. However, the credit will be more targeted, in that it will in the first instance, only be available to the principal carer of the child.

Given the difficult fiscal environment, it is essential to review all tax reliefs, credits and incentives in order to ensure that they are properly targeted and if necessary re-focused in order that they can achieve the socio-economic objectives that are set for them.  A system that allows multiple claims in respect of the same child or children is unsustainable. 

As regards the potential of this change to interfere with the level of maintenance payments, if such reasoning were to be applied, then any general tax increase, as a result of an adjustment in tax credits, rates or bands could lead to similar situations. Ultimately, maintenance payments are a matter for parents and if necessary, the courts to decide. It is not possible, and indeed would not be appropriate, for the tax code to take account of every possible variable.

Notwithstanding this, as a result on an amendment I brought at Committee stage of the Finance Bill, a primary carer who is entitled to the credit and who does not wish to avail of it can choose to surrender it.  A secondary carer may then make a claim for the credit, provided that the qualifying child resides with him or her for not less than 100 days in the tax year. However, where a primary carer is married, in a civil partnership or cohabiting they would not be entitled to the new credit (or indeed the former one). In such circumstances the primary carer cannot relinquish the credit to a secondary carer. In addition, a secondary carer who is married, in a civil partnership or cohabiting, would not be entitled to the new credit (or indeed the former one) regardless of the marital status of the primary carer.

Given the above and the requirement for the Revenue Commissioners to maintain confidentiality in relation to the personal information of taxpayers, it would not be possible to automatically assess entitlement and transfer of the new credit to a secondary carer.

Mortgage Arrears Proposals

Questions (205)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

205. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance regarding his comments in Dáil Éireann on 16 January 2014, that he has conveyed to the six main banks that letters threatening repossession should count as a sustainable solution under MARTs, the way the information was conveyed; and if he will publish his correspondence with the banks on the issue. [4045/14]

View answer

Written answers

The strong view of the Government is that, in respect of co-operating borrowers under the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process, repossession of a person's primary home should only be considered as a last resort and that every effort should be made to agree a sustainable arrangement as an alternative to repossession. I can assure the Deputy that both my Department and I have expressed this view to the lenders and are keeping in regular contact with them on this important issue. 

The Central Bank's Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA) places an onus on the banks, in respect of a co-operating borrower, to explore all the options for an alternative repayment arrangement offered by the lender to address a mortgage difficulty before any legal action is considered.  Furthermore, as the Deputy is aware, under the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Targets (MART) process, the Central Bank is requiring the main lenders to work through their mortgages in arrears of more than 90 days and, where possible, to propose and conclude sustainable restructures with their borrowers in arrears. 

On the basis of their audit of the bank's mortgage arrears targets, the Central Bank has indicated that all six mortgage lenders covered by the MART process have reported that they met the 20% proposed sustainable solutions target for the second quarter of 2013 and also the 30% target for the third quarter in 2013.  The subsequent targets set by the Central Bank will be the subject of further audit work to ensure consistency with the sustainability principle in respect of solutions being offered by the lenders. 

It is important that any bank proceeding to legal recourse with co-operating borrowers, in circumstances where an alternative sustainable arrangement is feasible and can be agreed, is not acting in a manner consistent with the MART process, or with the CCMA.

Of course, the CCMA and MART can only achieve positive results in circumstances where the borrower cooperates with the lender and engages with the process.  Where this does not happen, the lender may have no other option but to go down the legal route to deal with an arrears case.  However, if that course of action leads the borrower to commence a constructive engagement, this can lead to a more favourable conclusion for the respective parties.

Regretfully, however, it must also be accepted that due to the individual circumstances, not all mortgages can be made sustainable and that in these limited circumstances, it will be in the best interests of both parties to resolve the situation in a fair manner.

Freedom of Information Requests

Questions (206)

Jim Daly

Question:

206. Deputy Jim Daly asked the Minister for Finance his views regarding the recent reports regarding missing files at his Department relating to decisions taken prior to the bank guarantee; the steps being taken to locate these files; if he is considering measures to ensure there is no repeat occurrence of this practice in his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4055/14]

View answer

Written answers

I assume the Deputy is referring to the two missing letters which were part of an FOI request to this Department.  Both letters post date the bank guarantee.

My Department answered a freedom of information request received from a Deputy in December 2013 in which the Deputy sought a review of a decision in respect of an FOI received in 2009 which covered all correspondence between Minister Brian Lenihan and Chairpersons/Chief Executive Officers in those banks under the Government Guarantee Scheme for the period 1 August 2008 to 11 March 2009 as per FOI 066/2009 with a renewed assessment of whether each record could be released under FOI rules.

The Department answered the request on 5 December, 2013. In its response, the Department indicated that it could not consider whether to redact or release two of the documents as it could not locate the original copies of the documents. It did however provide the redacted copies of the correspondence along with an extract from one of the letters from the Ministerial representation system. 

I understand that the documents in question relate to correspondence between third parties with the Minister for Finance copied into the correspondence and are not directly related to the guarantee.

My Department is continuing its efforts to locate the original documents received in the department, and is also investigating whether copies are available from the original correspondents.

Property Tax Assessments

Questions (207)

John Browne

Question:

207. Deputy John Browne asked the Minister for Finance the reason private landlords are not allowed tax deductibility of local property tax and are treated differently to commercial landlords in relation to tax deductibility of rates particularly as he has given a firm commitment to accept the recommendation from the expert group that local property tax should be an allowable expense for private rental income; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4068/14]

View answer

Written answers

Commercial rates, which are deductible for tax purposes against rental income, are levied by local authorities on property used for commercial purposes; as commercial rates are not payable in respect of residential property, which is instead liable to Local Property Tax (LPT), there is no distinction in the liability of landlords to LPT.

The inter-departmental group, chaired by Dr Don Thornhill, set up to consider the design of a property tax (the Thornhill Group) recommended that the Local Property Tax paid in respect of a rented property should be deductible for income tax or corporation tax purposes, in a similar manner to commercial rates.

The Thornhill Group recognised the considerable pressures on the public finances and the need to bridge the gap between expenditure and revenue, and, for this reason, suggested that consideration be given to phasing in deductibility over a period of years.  The group also considered that it was for Government, having regard to the prevailing budgetary situation, to decide on the time span for phasing-in deductibility and on what percentage of LPT to allow as a deduction from gross rents for tax purposes.

The Government accepted the recommendation of the Thornhill Group in principle, but has not considered the manner or the timing in which this will happen.

Property Tax Data

Questions (208)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

208. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm figures relating to the payment of the local property tax (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4083/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that preliminary Local Property Tax (LPT) data on payment options chosen by property owners was published by them on 7 November 2013 and is available at: http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/lpt/lpt-stats-initial-2014.pdf. These preliminary figures were based on the 2014 Payment Instruction that had been filed by property owners up to 7 November. 

The Commissioners have confirmed that while the percentage distribution across the various payment options is still broadly in line with these preliminary figures, there has been a reduction in the percentage of property owners who chose to pay by Single Debit Authority and an increase in the number who chose to pay by one of the Approved Payment Service Providers.

The Commissioners have also confirmed that by the end of December 2013 the amount of LPT collected for 2014 was €76m. Significant volumes of payments are being made throughout January, and substantial volumes correspondence remain to be processed. In this context, I am further advised that more up-to-date figures for 2014 will be published shortly.

Tax Compliance

Questions (209)

Clare Daly

Question:

209. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 143 of 15 January 2014, if he will confirm that the identified companies are now predominantly insolvent property development or building firms and that this will impact on the outcome for the Exchequer; if the tax scheme in question involved the use of charitable trust structures; and if so, will he elaborate on same. [4142/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the identified companies operate across a variety of business sectors such as retail, hospitality and property development. The beneficiaries under the scheme were the company shareholders and hence the tax assessments under appeal relate to the shareholders as distinct from the companies. Any tax liabilities that arise will be pursued by the Revenue Commissioners against those individuals. The solvency or otherwise of a participating company is thus not a feature in relation to any potential tax liabilities. The tax scheme did not involve the use of charitable trust structures.

VAT Rate Application

Questions (210)

Olivia Mitchell

Question:

210. Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the inconsistency that exists between the VAT Consolidation Act 2010 and the Revenue Commissioners' leaflet on VAT for veterinary services, which is of great concern to the professional dog groomers industry; if he will review the inconsistency and allow professional dog groomers to charge the 13.5% VAT rate which is available to veterinary practices that provide dog grooming services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4145/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the supply of dog grooming services is liable to VAT at the standard rate, currently 23 per cent.  Paragraph 21(3) of Schedule 3 to the Value-Added Tax Consolidated Act 2010 provides that the supply of services by a veterinary surgeon in the course of their profession is liable at the reduced rate of VAT, currently 13.5%.  Where a veterinary surgeon carries out a dog grooming service as part of a veterinary procedure, such as treating an illness or disease, the dog grooming is considered part of the veterinary procedure and the entire procedure is liable to VAT at the reduced rate.  However, where a veterinary surgeon provides a dog grooming services as a supply that is distinct from a veterinary procedure the service is liable to VAT at the standard rate, currently 23%. 

I am further advised by the Revenue Commissioners that there is no inconsistency between the VAT Consolidation Act 2010 and a Revenue leaflet on VAT for veterinary services.  The Revenue leaflet deals with veterinary professionals, including veterinary surgeons, who provide services of a kind normally provided by veterinary surgeons.  The leaflet lists dehorning of cattle and shodding of horses as examples of supplies made by veterinary professionals.  The leaflet points out that a veterinary professional who is also engaged in other business activities is liable for VAT on all his or her activities.  Dog grooming is considered as one such other business activity. In addition, the VAT rates database on the Revenue website lists dog grooming as a service that is liable for VAT at the standard rate.

The VAT rating of goods and services is subject to the requirements of EU VAT law with which Irish VAT law must comply.  While the EU VAT Directive provides for the possibility of applying a reduced of VAT to the supply of certain goods and services, the supply of dog grooming services is not one that could have a reduced rate applied to it.

NAMA Operations

Questions (211)

Michael McGrath

Question:

211. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the reason the National Asset Management Agency is re-tendering the contract to manage loans received as a result of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation liquidation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4164/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware the appointment of service providers is a commercial decision for the Board of NAMA, I have no role in this process.

I refer the Deputy to NAMA's public statement on this matter which sets out the decision by the NAMA Board.  It is available on its website at http://www.nama.ie/news/nama-announces-new-tender-servicing-ibrc-commercial-loans-may-acquired-special-liquidators/.

European Financial Stability Facility

Questions (212)

Michael McGrath

Question:

212. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance when the revised maturity date for Ireland’s EFSM loans will be decided; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4165/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Eurogroup meeting of Euro-area Finance Ministers decided on 21 January 2013 to examine the extension of maturities on Portugal's and Ireland's European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) loans.

At the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (Ecofin) on 22 January 2013 the Finance Ministers representing the 27 EU member states  agreed to examine the maturities of the loans drawn down under the EFSM programme.

The April 2013 Ecofin and Eurogroup meetings in Dublin agreed in principle to extend the maximum average maturity of both Ireland's and Portugal's EFSF and EFSM loans by seven years, subject to certain conditions (both countries continued successful programme implementation being confirmed by the Troika together with the 9th review of the Irish adjustment programme and the 7th review of the Portuguese programme).

These conditions having been met, the extensions were confirmed at the June Ecofin and Eurogroup meetings.

The Amendment to the EFSM Loan Facility Agreement entered into force on 3 September 2013 and was laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas on 4 September 2013. 

While the revised maturity dates of Ireland's EFSF loans have been agreed and the details set out, the revised maturity dates of Ireland's  EFSM loan will only be determined as they approach their original maturity dates. As the EFSM operates in the debt markets to borrow on behalf of others, specific refinancing activity may be subject to overall funding plans and market conditions. It is possible therefore that individual EFSM loan tranches will be extended more than once in order to achieve the objective of increasing the original weighted-average maturity to 19.5 years although it is not expected that Ireland will have to repay any of its EFSM loans before 2027.

The following below, supplied by the NTMA, shows the current maturity dates for each of the tranches of EFSM funding drawn down to date. The loan maturity extensions are not reflected in the table.

 European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) loan tranches to Ireland as at 28/01/14

Nominal Loan Amount (€ bn.)

Date of Drawdown

Maturity Date

5.00

12 January 2011

4 December 2015

3.40

24 March 2011

4 April 2018

3.00

31 May 2011

4 June 2021

2.00

29 September 2011

4 September 2026

0.50

6 October 2011

4 October 2018

1.50

16 January 2012

4 April 2042

3.00

5 March 2012

4 April 2032

2.30

3 July 2012

4 April 2028

1.00

30 October 2012

4 November 2027

The nominal EFSM loan amount outstanding as of 28 January 2014 is €21.7 billion. The final tranche of €0.8 billion from the EFSM is expected to be drawn down in March 2014.

EU-IMF Programme of Support

Questions (213)

Michael McGrath

Question:

213. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the amounts currently borrowed from the International Monetary Fund under the EU-IMF programme; the current rate of interest payable on these borrowings; the maturity date of the loans; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4166/14]

View answer

Written answers

As of end-December 2013, the nominal liability of loans from the IMF under the EU/IMF Programme stood at €22.5 billion. The details of the individual IMF loan amounts as provided by the NTMA are set out in table format below. The table also provides information on the IMF loan maturities. As of end-December 2013 the overall blended euro equivalent interest rate on Ireland's IMF loan is estimated by the NTMA to be 4.16%.

Since 18 January 2014 a further 'time based surcharge' of 100 basis points has been applied by the IMF to the amount of Ireland's loan in excess of three times its IMF quota, currently about €4.25 billion. This is a standard change of lending in accordance with the rules of the IMF's Extended Fund Facility and is applied if a country's credit remains above 300 percent of quota after three years.

Liabilities outstanding at end December 2013 under the EU/IMF Financial Assistance Programme

Lender

Nominal Loan Amount¹

Date  of Draw Down

Maturity Date

Term from Date of Drawdown

International Monetary Fund

Amortising:

4.5 -10 yrs

SDR 5.01 billion

18-Jan-11

18 Jul 2015 - 18 Jan 2021

SDR 1.41 billion

18-May-11

18 Nov 2015 - 18 May 2021

SDR 1.32 billion

07-Sep-11

07 Mar 2016 - 07 Sep 2021

SDR 3.31 billion

16-Dec-11

16 Jun 2016 - 16 Dec 2021

SDR 2.79 billion

29-Feb-12

31 Aug 2016 - 28 Feb 2022

SDR 1.19 billion

15-Jun-12

15 Dec 2016 - 15 Jun 2022

SDR 0.76 billion

28-Sep-12

28 Mar 2017 - 28 Sep 2022

SDR 0.76 billion

20-Dec-12

20 Jun 2017 - 20 Dec 2022

SDR 0.83 billion

27-Mar-13

27 Sep 2017 - 27 Mar 2023

SDR 0.83 billion

27-Jun-13

27 Dec 2017 - 27 Jun 2023

SDR 0.68 billion

27-Sep-13

27 Mar 2018 - 27 Sep 2023

SDR 0.58 billion

18-Dec-13

18 Jun 2018 - 18 Dec 2023

IMF SDR Total

SDR 19.47 billion

 

 

IMF EUR Equivalent Total

€22.53 billion

 

 

7.3 yrs weighted average life

 

EU-IMF Programme of Support

Questions (214)

Michael McGrath

Question:

214. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if Ireland is permitted to repay its loans early under the EU-IMF programme; the rules that apply to early repayment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4167/14]

View answer

Written answers

It would be possible for Ireland to make early repayment of the EU/IMF funding. However, each source of funding forms an integrated part of our EU/IMF programme funding (totalling €67.5 billion), and as such cannot be separated out from the funding received from our other programme partners. The question of early repayment of any one lender cannot therefore be treated in isolation from other lenders and market expectations for when programme loans are due to be repaid.

The early repayment of, for example, IMF funds would trigger automatic mandatory proportional early repayments to the EFSF, EFSM, United Kingdom, Kingdom of Sweden and Kingdom of Denmark. This would apply in respect of each of the programme funding partners.

Credit Guarantee Scheme Implementation

Questions (215)

Michael McGrath

Question:

215. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will set out, in tabular form, the fees that have been received by the Exchequer from each institution, on an annual basis, since 2008 in respect of the credit institutions financial support scheme and the eligible liabilities guarantee; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4168/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, the ELG Scheme closed for new liabilities at midnight on the 28th March 2013. Eligible liabilities covered under the Scheme which were incurred up to midnight on the 28th March 2013 continue to be covered up to their maturity date which could be up to 5 years maximum from the date the liability was incurred. This means that covered liabilities will wind down over the period from midnight on the 28th March 2013 until the 28th March 2018 at the latest.

Fees paid by the covered institutions in respect of the ELG Scheme guarantee are paid quarterly in arrears and therefore there is a time lag before the fees are paid into the Exchequer (i.e. fees received as cash in Q1 of 2013 are in respect of fees accrued for Q4 of 2012).

The total fees received to date from the covered banks in respect of both the CIFS and ELG Schemes amount in total to €4.2bn which does not include interest accrued.  This amount comprises €758.4m in respect of CIFS and €3,461.9m in respect of the ELG Scheme.

 CIFS Scheme fees paid to date by Covered Institutions

€millions

IL&P

BoI

AIB

Anglo

EBS

INBS

Postbank

Total

2008

-

32.3

-

37.9

-

-

0.004

  70.20

2009

35.4

138.1

174.7

94.8

9.7

23.8

0.020

476.52

2010

14.8

68.3

58.3

54.9

5.9

8.8

0.015

211.01

2011

-

-

-

0.7

-

-

-

     .70

Total

50.2

238.7

233.0

188.3

15.6

32.6

0.039

758.43

 

ELG fees paid to date by Participating Institutions

€millions

IL&P

BoI

AIB

IBRC

EBS

Total

2010

95.9

275.5

299.3

149.9

34.2

854.8

2011

172.9

448.7

464.9

85.5

62.6

1234.6

2012

165.2

375.4

332.0

23.9

54.7

951.2

2013

105.4

142.3

126.8

  0.0

46.8

421.3

Total

539.4

1241.9

1223.0

259.3

198.3

3461.9

State Banking Sector

Questions (216)

Michael McGrath

Question:

216. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will set out, in tabular form and by institution, the proceeds from the disposal of investments in the State-supported banks in each year since 2010; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4169/14]

View answer

Written answers

I can confirm to the Deputy that, since the State first invested in the banks, the following disposals have been made:

Date of disposal

Bank

Transaction

Total proceeds - including accrued interest/dividend

April 2010

Bank of Ireland

Cancellation of preference share warrants

€491m

December 2010

Allied Irish Banks

Cancellation of preference share warrants

€53m*

August 2011

Bank of Ireland

Sale of equity shares

€0.24bn

October 2011

Bank of Ireland

Sale of equity shares

€0.81bn

2012 - no disposals

January 2013

Bank of Ireland

Sale of convertible contingent capital note (CoCo)

€1.06bn

July 2013

permanent tsb

Sale of Irish Life

€1.34bn

December 2013

Bank of Ireland

Sale/redemption of preference shares

€2.05bn

 * These proceeds were netted off in calculating the State's recapitalisation investment.

VAT Exemptions

Questions (217)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

217. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding VAT; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4174/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the transport of passengers and their accompanying baggage is exempt from VAT in Ireland under paragraph 14(3) of Schedule 1 to the VAT Consolidation Act 2010.  In this respect, services provided by the coach and bus sector are exempt from VAT.  This means that a person who provides a bus or coach service does not register for VAT and does not charge VAT on the supply of their services.  This also includes the hiring of a bus or coach with a driver.  Persons who are exempt from VAT cannot recover VAT on goods and services, such as fuel, tyres and mechanic charges, used for the purposes of the person's coach and bus service.

VAT law in Ireland and the UK must comply with the EU VAT Directive.  As passenger transport was exempt in Ireland on 1 January 1978, it is possible under the VAT Directive to continue to apply that exemption.  As passenger transport services were charged at the zero rate in the UK on 1 January 1991, the UK are entitled to continue to apply a zero rate to passenger transport services. It is not possible under EU law for Ireland to apply a zero rate to such services as we did not apply a zero rate to them in 1991.

However, I would point out that UK passenger transport operators who establish their businesses in Ireland are subject to the same VAT rules as Irish operators. They are exempt from VAT and not zero-rated, and as such not entitled to deductibility in respect of VAT incurred on items such as fuel.  In addition, UK passenger transport operators who are not established in the State are not entitled to any refund of VAT incurred in this State for the purposes of carrying out passenger transport activities, whether that service takes place wholly or partially in the State or whether it takes place wholly outside the State.   

EU VAT law also provides that the VAT rate applying to petrol and diesel must be the standard rate, which in Ireland is 23%.  It is not possible to apply a lower VAT rate to such supplies.

With regard to the VAT incurred on the purchase of a touring coach, I would point out that while persons who are VAT exempt cannot recover any VAT incurred on goods and services incurred in relation to their business, there is special provision within the VAT code to allow a refund of VAT incurred on the purchase of touring coaches.  Under VAT Refund Order S.I. 266 of 2012 coach operators who are exempt from VAT may, subject to the conditions in the Order, be entitled to a refund of the VAT paid on the purchase of touring coaches that are no more than 2 years old and are within specified dimensions.

With regard to your question on duty rebates, any rebate on mineral oil tax under our national law must conform to the EU Energy Tax Directive. Ireland, in common with a number of other Member States, had derogations under this Directive which allowed for specific tax reliefs or rate reductions for fuel used for particular purposes, including school transport services.  The European Commission, which is the deciding authority, ruled against an extension of these derogations and the Member States affected, including Ireland, were obliged to withdraw these tax reliefs. Ireland accordingly withdrew the relief that covered bus services, including school buses, with effect from 1 November 2008.

The Energy Tax Directive obliges all Member States to exempt jet fuel used by airlines and fuel used by shipping in Community waters from duty, but does not allow for a similar exemption to be applied to fuel used by road transport operators. The Directive does, however, allow Ireland and other Member States to give a rebate on diesel used by road transport operators and I introduced the Diesel Rebate Scheme last year on that basis. That scheme enables qualifying transport operators to claim a repayment of part of the mineral oil tax paid on auto-diesel purchased in the State for use in qualifying vehicles in the course of business.  There is no equivalent scheme in Northern Ireland.  The amount of the repayment will vary in accordance with the average price at which auto-diesel is available for purchase in the State during a repayment period, subject to a maximum of 7.5 cent per litre.  The rebate rate applicable for the current repayment period is 6.2 cent per litre.  In addition to the diesel rebate scheme, it should also be borne in mind that the rate of mineral oil tax on auto-diesel in Ireland is considerably lower than in Northern Ireland; €479.02 per 1,000 litres compared with €695.93 in Northern Ireland at the current exchange rate.

Fuel laundering has been a problem for many years but, with changes in the sulphur content of marked fuel in 2011, it became more viable and criminal gangs intensified their laundering and distribution activities dramatically.  Revenue is very aware of the threat that fuel laundering poses to consumers, legitimate business and to the Exchequer and, in response, has made action against fuel laundering one of its priorities. To that end Revenue is implementing a comprehensive strategy to tackle the problem through enhanced supply chain controls, the acquisition of a more effective fuel marker for joint use in the UK and Ireland and continued robust enforcement action. There are severe penalties available to the courts on conviction for a fuel laundering offence. The Courts can impose of fine of up to €126,970 and/or a custodial sentence of up to five years, on a person convicted of an indictable offence relating to fuel laundering. In addition, where the value of the fuel involved in the offence is more that €250,000, a fine of three times the value of the products may be imposed.

Revenue maintains very close working relationships with fuel sector representative bodies to improve the integrity of the distribution system and to challenge those suppliers involved in supplying rogue elements with marked fuel for laundering. The legitimate trade can contribute to closing down the illicit trade by providing information on traders supplying fuel to launderers, outlets that are selling laundered diesel and on persons knowingly using green diesel in road vehicles.  Revenue chairs the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group (HEMG) and has established regional sub-groups of the HEMG to facilitate the reporting of information by traders through their representative associations.  A person who suspects or has evidence that laundered diesel is being sold in their area should report this through their representative associations to Revenue.  Any such reports are treated as confidential and are fully investigated by Revenue.

Living City Initiative

Questions (218)

Derek Nolan

Question:

218. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Minister for Finance when he expects to be in a position to extend the living city initiative; if it will include all Georgian buildings, located in Dublin city, that are used as principal private residences; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4175/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will be aware that I announced in my Budget Statement that the Living City Initiative, which was enacted in the Finance Act 2013, would be extended to now include the cities of Dublin, Cork, Galway and Kilkenny as well the original target cities of Limerick and Waterford. The inclusion of these four cities within the Initiative followed the results of a thorough independent ex ante cost benefit analysis.

The Initiative will target certain areas of these six cities, particularly those areas which are most in need of regeneration. Those designated areas will be decided upon following consultations with the relevant local authorities and other Government agencies. These consultations have just commenced. It is not yet possible to estimate the number of properties which might be eligible in any of the cities but I have made it clear that I do not see this as a wide-spread Initiative, as it is targeted at those areas which are most in need of attention.

The submission to the European Commission seeking State Aid approval will be issued shortly.

NAMA Social Housing Provision

Questions (219)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

219. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 219 of 21 January 2014, if he will provide a breakdown of the 132 properties acquired by NARPS for lease to approved housing bodies; the names of the approved housing bodies; the location and number of properties leased to each approved housing body; and of the total 596 properties delivered for social housing, a breakdown of the local authority administrative areas in which these properties were delivered. [4180/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that the information sought by the Deputy is available on the NAMA website at http://www.nama.ie/about-our-work/social-housing/.

Departmental Bodies

Questions (220)

Michael McGrath

Question:

220. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if, in respect of his Department's audit committee, he will provide details of its current membership; the date of appointment of each member; the fees paid to each member; if members of the committee are required to hold certain professional qualifications; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4217/14]

View answer

Written answers

Mr Aidan Horan (Chairperson, Non-Executive Member). Mr Horan is a Director of the Institute of Public Administration (IPA) and is a qualified accountant.   As Mr Horan is a serving public servant, Mr Horan's employer (the IPA) was paid €2,062.17 in fees in respect of Mr Horan's work on the Committee for 2013. Mr Horan was appointed on the 1st January 2012.

Mr Bryan O'Sullivan (Non-Executive Member). Mr O'Sullivan is retired, and was an Internal Auditor in the Bank of Scotland (Ireland).  Mr O'Sullivan's fees for 2013 amount to €1,146.87. Mr O'Sullivan was appointed on the 1st February 2009.

Mr Martin Shanagher (Non-Executive Member). Mr Shanagher is an Assistant Secretary in the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI).  As a serving Civil Servant, Mr Shanagher does not receive any fee in respect of his work on the Committee.  Mr Shanagher was appointed on the 1st January 2011.  His term of office ends with the meeting of 29 January 2014.

Mr Paul Ryan (Executive Member). Mr Ryan is Director in the Department of Finance.  As a serving Civil Servant, Mr Ryan does not receive any fee in respect of his work on the Committee. Mr Ryan was appointed on the 07 October 2013.

Ms Niamh Campbell (Executive Member).  Ms Campbell is a Principal Officer in the Department of Finance. As a serving Civil Servant, Ms Campbell does not receive any fee in respect of her work on the Committee.  Ms Campbell was appointed on the 27th October 2011.

Members of the Committee are selected on the basis of either their knowledge  of or experience in an auditing, accounting or business-related and/or public sector function. 

In accordance with its Charter, the Audit Committee is required to have at least one member of the Audit Committee with recent and relevant financial experience. The Audit Committee annually reviews its training needs to identify any gaps in knowledge or expertise needed to fulfill its functions.

Financial Services Regulation

Questions (221)

Michael McGrath

Question:

221. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he has full confidence in the manner in which the Central Bank of Ireland is performing its regulatory functions at the present time; if he is proposing any changes in the area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4226/14]

View answer

Written answers

A whole series of reforms have been introduced since the financial crisis to underpin a more effective and efficient financial regulatory regime.  The Central Bank Reform Act 2010 gave effect to significant structural changes in the operation of financial regulation in Ireland. The Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 further strengthened the ability of the Central Bank to impose and supervise compliance with regulatory requirements and to undertake timely prudential interventions.

At EU level, the Irish Presidency was to the fore in prioritising a number of dossiers geared towards enhancing the international regulatory environment which ensures that our regulatory framework is benchmarked against other EU and international jurisdictions.

These legislative reforms have been supplemented by a significant increase in regulatory activity by the Central Bank. The Bank's new risk-based regulatory framework (PRISM) represents a challenging and proportionate risk-based system of supervision for all financial institutions operating in Ireland. This new approach is supported by a significant growth in staff numbers leading to the establishment of new directorates and divisions. The Bank is committed to continuing to review internal governance arrangements to ensure that it has the appropriate internal structure, resources and organisational capability to achieve its strategic goals.

In 2012, the Bank published its three-year Strategic Plan for the period 2013-2015 which sets out a strategy of assertive risk-based supervision, underpinned by a credible threat of enforcement, in order to deliver on its key strategic priorities over the coming years. The Bank intends that reform of its regulatory and supervisory framework will be deepened over the term of the plan to minimise future risks to financial stability and enhance consumer protection, while continuing to promote a better functioning financial sector. I am satisfied that the reforms introduced in recent years have brought our regulatory system into line with international best practice.  A number of further changes are being introduced as part of the wider EU reform agenda --which was advanced significantly under the Irish EU Presidency -- and it will be necessary to review the need for future changes on an ongoing basis to take account of emerging best practice in regulation and to keep pace with developments in the modern financial services sector.

Carbon Tax Implementation

Questions (222)

Willie Penrose

Question:

222. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider reviewing the imposition of the carbon tax, which sees a significant increase in charges for solid fuel resulting in the addition of €1.20 per 40 kgs of solid fuel and 26 cent per bale of briquettes, all of which will impact severely upon those on low incomes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4299/14]

View answer

Written answers

The application of the carbon tax to solid fuels remained subject to a Ministerial commencement order since 2010. This approach was primarily adopted to delay the application of the carbon tax to solid fuel in the residential sector to allow for the development of a robust mechanism to counter the large scale sourcing of coal from Northern Ireland where lower sulphur standards apply.  Such a mechanism is in place since June 2011.

The application of the carbon tax to solid fuels was further postponed in 2012 given the overall tax increases in Budget 2012 including in the standard rate of VAT.

The introduction of Carbon Tax was about sending a price signal that there is a cost associated with the consumption of fossil fuels to the detriment of the environment.  It should also be noted that solid fuels have the highest carbon content of all fossil fuels. As a result they are considered the dirtiest fuels and given the environmental impact it is important that they are taxed. 

As I was aware of the potential impact on lower income households, I chose not to introduce the carbon tax on solid fuels until after the 2012/2103 winter period and I opted to introduce the tax in two phases i.e. €10 per tonne of CO2 from 1st May 2013 and a further €10 per tonne of CO2 from 1st May 2014 thus bringing the carbon tax on solid fuels in line with that on all other fossil fuels i.e. at €20 per tonne of CO2.  The net effect of the €10 carbon tax from 1 May 2014 will be, as the Deputy has stated, approximately €1.20 on a 40kg bag of coal and 26 cents on a bale of briquettes.

While tax increases are unpopular, where Member States are under fiscal pressure, it makes sense to increase taxes in areas where some benefits can arise, in this instance a carbon tax promotes energy efficiency, reduces emissions and reduces our dependence on imported fossil fuels.

Accordingly I do not intend to defer the further increase of €10 per tonne of CO2 emissions from 1 May 2014.

Tax Credits

Questions (223)

Willie Penrose

Question:

223. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Finance if he will take steps to have the tax free allowance of a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath transferred to the person's spouse in order to avail of same, in compliance with their expressed desire that same would be done in their current financial circumstances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4301/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the Tax Credits of the person (details supplied) in County Westmeath have been transferred to their spouse as requested.

IBRC Liquidation

Questions (224)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

224. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if there are any persons still being paid as directors of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited. [4312/14]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised by the Special Liquidators that there are no persons still being paid as directors of IBRC Limited (in Special Liquidation).

IBRC Liquidation

Questions (225)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

225. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if the former board of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation was dismissed as part of the special liquidation of that organisation in February 2013; and if so, the date on which the members of the board of IBRC were dismissed. [4313/14]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised that, as with all liquidations, on the appointment of a Liquidator the powers and duties of directors cease and the liquidators assume the authority and powers of the board. The directors do however remain listed as directors of the company. The same analysis applies to the appointment of the Special Liquidators to Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited on 7 February 2013 such that the powers and duties of the directors ceased and the Special Liquidators assumed the authority and powers of the board. So, for the avoidance of doubt, the directors were not dismissed as directors and they remain as directors of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited.  For those directors who were also employees of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited, their employment was terminated on the signing of the Special Liquidation Order on 7th February 2013.

Top
Share