Skip to main content
Normal View

Defence Forces Properties

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 6 February 2014

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Questions (14, 17, 24)

Clare Daly

Question:

14. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Defence if he will initiate a cross-departmental meeting with representatives from his Department and the Departments of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht; Environment, Community and Local Government,;Public Expenditure and Reform; and Heath, in order to evaluate how the history and heritage that exists in the Curragh Camp can be preserved; and if he will conduct a cost-benefit analysis of utilising the substantial amount of property that exists in the area. [5579/14]

View answer

Mick Wallace

Question:

17. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Defence if he will consider a report by an independent party costing a renovation programme for the remaining 101 family dwellings at the Curragh Camp; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5575/14]

View answer

Clare Daly

Question:

24. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Defence if he will consider the costs of renovating to acceptable standards the units of family accommodation that remain in the Curragh Camp. [5581/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 14, 17 and 24 together.

My Department is engaged on an ongoing building programme designed to modernise and enhance the training, operational and accommodation facilities available to members of the Defence Forces. The Department and the Defence Forces, similar to all other Government Departments, must take into account the current difficult economic environment we are now operating in. The budgetary situation and the operational requirements of the Defence Forces are the primary factors in determining the individual projects which can be completed, including those within the Curragh Camp. The Department does not have the funds to develop assets for other than to meet core, essential, military requirements. As part of the process for the allocation of funding for individual capital projects an assessment of requirements, which includes a cost benefit analysis, is undertaken.

In relation to the Curragh Camp it is understood from the military authorities that of the married quarters properties in question, 47 properties are unoccupied due to their condition, 56 properties are currently occupied, 26 by existing military personnel and a further 30 are occupied by non-military personnel. It should be noted that currently nearly 50% of the 103 properties concerned are uninhabitable and many others are in need of substantial refurbishment.

As I have said earlier I have asked that a technical assessment of the pool of properties, be undertaken so as to inform a decision on whether it is economically viable to restore and use any of the properties in a cost effective manner. Any development of property from the public purse at this key location which encompasses the Defence Forces Training Centre must in the first instance be considered for use for military purposes.

Further, any such initiative must support and complement the current policy positions of withdrawing from the provision of Married Quarters and resolving the issue of overholding. I must repeat as I have said earlier, I cannot support the illegal occupation of military property by those who have no entitlement. It is important to remember that the Department does not have a role in the provision of housing accommodation for civilians, including ex-members of the Defence Forces. Regarding meetings with other Departments and agencies on this matter, I can assure the Deputies concerned that any engagement with other parties necessary to inform and resolve this issue will be undertaken.

Question No. 15 answered with Question No. 13.
Top
Share