Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 11 Feb 2014

Written Answers Nos. 521-538

Single Payment Scheme Eligibility

Questions (521, 522)

Brendan Smith

Question:

521. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the proposals, if any, he has to reverse his decision to incorporate the sheep grassland scheme payments into the single farm payment of sheep farmers where the benefits of the grassland scheme will be eroded under the single farm payment convergence and approximation mechanism to be implemented; if he will reverse his decision to abolish the sheep grassland scheme in order to preserve the income benefits to producers from that scheme and also the overall benefits to the sheep sector in terms of maintaining the national sheep flock; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6853/14]

View answer

Brendan Smith

Question:

522. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his attention has been drawn to the strong opposition among sheep farmers to his decision effectively to abolish the sheep grassland scheme in his recent announcement on the Common Agricultural Policy; if he will provide details of the analysis his decision was based on; if he will outline the mechanisms now in place to prevent a further fall in the national sheep flock; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6854/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 521 and 522 together.

The Grassland Sheep Scheme is based on Article 68 of the current EU Regulation 73/2009 which governs direct payments in the form of the Single Payment Scheme. As of the 1 January 2015, that Regulation is superseded by EU Regulation 1307/2013 and consequently there is no longer any legal basis for the continuation of the Grassland Sheep Scheme in its present form under the provisions of the new CAP Reform Regime.

Despite these difficulties, I have decided to take action to assist sheep producers. When determining the Initial Unit Value of a farmer’s entitlements under the Basic Payment Scheme in 2015, Regulation 1307/2009 gives Member States the option to take into account any payment the farmer received in 2014 under an Article 68 Scheme such as the Grassland Sheep Scheme. This option is only available where the Member State is not applying voluntary coupled support to the sector concerned under the new CAP.

I have decided to apply this provision as incorporating the Grassland Sheep Scheme payment into the calculation of a farmer’s Initial Unit Value in 2015 will obviously result in a higher entitlement value for the farmers concerned from the start of the Scheme. In addition, I have increased the total funding under the 2014 Grassland Scheme from €14 million to €15 million. As the 10% modulation deduction will no longer be applied under the 2014 Scheme, this will result in an increase of over €2 million in payments to sheep farmers under the 2014 Scheme. This additional €2 million will also be incorporated to the new entitlement value under the Basic Payment Scheme. In total, sheep farmers with an entitlement value close to the national average will benefit by approximately an additional €14,000 over the seven years of the Basic Payment Scheme.

Over the past two years sheep numbers have stabilised and while the breeding flock declined slightly in 2013, a return to growth is expected in 2014. I was pleased to note that for the third consecutive year Irish sheep throughput grew, reaching 2.61 million head, a rise of 7%. These developments led to sheepmeat production rising by around 3% to stand just over 55,000 tonnes. The total value of Irish sheepmeat exports is estimated to have increased by over 4% in 2013 to reach €220 million.

In conclusion as I made it clear at the National Sheep Conference, I am still open to suggestions regarding the provision of additional aid to the sheep sector.

Animal Welfare

Questions (523)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

523. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which animal welfare regulations continue to apply to non-thoroughbred sporting and non-sporting horses; the extent to which owner identification registration is currently managed or can be better managed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6858/14]

View answer

Written answers

My Department currently has statutory responsibility for the welfare and protection of farmed animals only i.e. animals normally bred or kept for the production of food or for use in or for the purpose of farming. The relevant legislation in this area is the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes Act, 1984 and the European Communities (Welfare of Farmed Animals) Regulations 2010, S.I. 311 of 2010. Veterinary inspectors of my Department enforce this legislation on farms.

The main statutes governing cruelty to all animals, including non-thoroughbred sporting and non-sporting horses, are the Protection of Animals Act 1911 and the Protection of Animals (Amendment) Act, 1965. Responsibility for enforcing this legislation rests with An Garda Síochána. However, the new Animal Health and Welfare Act consolidates a range of existing legislation in the area of animal welfare. Section 11 of the Act imposes a duty of care on persons in relation to all animals including horses. A person who has a horse(s) in his or her possession or under his or her control must take all necessary steps to ensure the animal is kept and treated in a manner that safeguards its health and welfare and a person who fails to comply with these provisions commits an offence.

With regard to horse welfare, it is important to note the advice of the Farm Animal Welfare Advisory Council (FAWAC) which recommends that, in situations where an owner can no longer adequately provide for an animal or where the equine can no longer fulfil the purpose for which it was bred, owners should be proactive in seeking to dispose of the animals before their welfare is compromised. Such action will help prevent the emergence of long-term and severe animal welfare problems.

The identification and registration of equidae is governed by EU Council Directives 90/426/EEC and 90/427/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2008, which have been transposed into national legislation via S.I. No. 357 of 2011 - European Communities (Equine) Regulations 2011 (as amended). The EU regulation does not provide for the notification of change of ownership. However, my Department is currently in the process of drafting legislation to provide for the compulsory notification of change of ownership under the Animal Health and Welfare Bill. I expect that this legislation will be published shortly.

Proposals to amend Regulation 504/2008 are currently under examination in Brussels. When adopted, the new regulation will significantly strengthen the existing provisions relating to the identification of horses, in particular, by the introduction of an equivocal link between the passport and the horse and notification of change of ownership where this is required by the national of the Member State. It will also give greater powers to the competent authorities in Member States to ensure the effective implementation of these provisions, including through the introduction of minimum criteria which must be met by bodies which issue passports for horses for production and breeding. The expected date of implementation of the new regulation is 1 January 2015.

Animal Welfare

Questions (524)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

524. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of reports of mistreatment of horses of which his Department has been made aware in each of the past three years to date; the extent to which breaches in animal welfare were identified; the action taken or proposed to address such issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6859/14]

View answer

Written answers

In the course of my first year as Minister, I asked my Department to set up a dedicated animal welfare helpline. This helpline has been in operation since early 2012 and the following calls have been received in relation to horses:

Year

Calls

Referred to Department Veterinary Inspectors for investigation*

2012

51

41

2013

68

61

2014 (to Feb 7th)

31

31

*Some calls were in relation to general horse issues and did not require veterinary investigation.

A number of calls are also received directly by District Veterinary Offices (DVOs). These are assessed at local level by a Department Veterinary Inspector and followed up as appropriate. Data on the number of calls received at DVO level is not held centrally. Actions taken in response to reports of mistreatment included the issuance of welfare notices, confiscation of horses and a number of prosecutions. This data is currently being collated, together with details of prosecutions, and will be forwarded to the Deputy as soon as possible.

The majority of these horses are removed under the Control of Horses Act by the relevant Local Authority. Unfortunately many of the animals in question are unidentified, making prosecution very difficult. The on-going work being undertaken by local authorities in conjunction with the Department via the Control of Horses Act, 1996 has reduced the numbers of abandoned horses throughout the country particularly in urban areas. Local authorities are humanely disposing of a considerable number of horses seized under the Control of Horses Act on an on-going basis where there is no possibility of re-homing or returning these horses to their owners.

As well as setting up the helpline, I have introduced a number of important legislative measures aimed at improving horse welfare. In May 2012 I introduced Regulations that make the registration of premises where horses are held obligatory. I also published a new updated Statutory Instrument on equine identification in March 2013. My Department has also established an equine central data base.

Furthermore, potentially cruel activities involving animals will be specifically prohibited under the new Animal Health and Welfare Act and involvement in such activities will be an offence. The Act will also require persons possessing animals to safeguard their welfare and provide them with adequate food, water and shelter. The Act also contains provisions for powers of intervention where an animal is deemed to be at risk of being welfare compromised and the level of penalties to be imposed has been increased.

Beef Industry

Questions (525)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

525. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which he and his Department continue to monitor variations in the prices paid to beef farmers here compared with those prevailing in the UK and other European countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6860/14]

View answer

Written answers

Market conditions in the beef and cattle sector are monitored on an on-going basis by my Department. Under Regulation 1249/2008, DG AGRI of the European Commission receives beef carcass prices from all Member States, including Ireland on a weekly basis. The European Commission chairs a Management Committee on Animal Products and the trends and variations in cattle prices are outlined on a monthly basis.

The information supplied at the management meeting includes details of prices paid in each EU Member State as well as information on the level of imports into and exports from the European Union, for all meat products (beef, pigs, poultry, and sheep) on an ongoing basis. Officials of my Department attend these management committee meetings. In addition, Bord Bia issues a weekly commentary on cattle prices and supply and demand trends in our main export markets including the United Kingdom.

While my Department has a role in monitoring and reporting on cattle prices I have no function in relation to commercial transactions between meat factories and their suppliers. Rather this is the responsibility of the industry – processors and farmers working together – to manage the type and volume of cattle brought to market so that the supply chain operates for the benefit of both parties.

Beef Industry

Questions (526)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

526. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which the control of beef prices here compares with the control system in the United States where the advantages appears to be with the producer rather than the processor; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6861/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware there are no official controls in the European Union for beef prices as this is a commercial matter between beef producers, beef processors and retailers. Neither I nor any agriculture minister in the European Union can interfere in a trade that is cyclical in nature and prone to short-term price fluctuations. Furthermore, successive reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy have involved a shift to more market-oriented policies that move away from price supports and towards direct payments to farmers.

I am aware of the current market situation with regard to beef prices and while prices for prime steers and heifers have remained relatively stable the young bull trade is challenging at present, as age and weight issues continue to affect demand. I have stated that it is the responsibility of the industry – in this instance, processors and farmers working together – to manage the type and volume of cattle being brought to market so that the supply chain operates for the benefit of both parties and does not undermine the viability of bull beef production systems for either winter finishers or suckler farmers. The current situation strongly underlines the need for the industry to improve communication on market trends and signals along the supply chain. I understand that producer and meat processor representatives have recently engaged in dialogue with a view to resolving the short-term oversupply of young bulls.

Beef Industry

Questions (527)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

527. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which producers of bull beef have suffered losses in the current year due to various issues such as market changes or other issues; the extent to which the causes have been fully investigated with a view to resolution; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6862/14]

View answer

Written answers

Market conditions in the cattle sector are monitored on an ongoing basis by my Department and I am aware of reports that some sellers are experiencing difficulties in trading and moving stock particularly those animals that do not qualify for the industry’s Quality Payment System. Prices for prime steers and heifers have remained relatively stable but the young bull trade is challenging at present as age and weight issues continue to affect demand.

Aggregate cattle supplies at Department-approved meat plants to the end of January 2014 are up almost 10% on the corresponding period in 2012 with strong increases recorded in the steer, heifer and cull cow categories. However, I note that the young bull kill has increased by 50% between week 1 and week 5 of 2014. Higher factory throughput is partly a result of cattle becoming fit for slaughter earlier than in previous years leading to a situation whereby factories are giving preference to certain types of stock that are better suited to the trade specifications demanded by their retail customers.

Delays in young bull slaughtering undoubtedly put pressure on producer profit margins but the cattle trade is cyclical in nature and short-term fluctuations in some cattle prices will not necessarily impact on the long-term strategy for the beef sector as set out in Food Harvest 2020.

Cattle prices are determined by the dynamics of supply and demand in the marketplace and I have no function in relation to commercial transactions between the meat factories and their suppliers. Rather, it is the responsibility of the industry – in this instance, processors and farmers working together – to manage the type and volume of cattle being brought to market such that the supply chain operates for the benefit of both parties and does not undermine the viability of bull beef production systems for either winter finishers or suckler farmers. The current situation underlines the need for the industry to improve communication on market trends and signals along the supply chain. I understand that producer and meat processor representatives have recently engaged in constructive discussions with a view to resolving the short-term oversupply of young bulls. An industry-led solution to clear the backlog of bull beef is essential to restoring confidence in the sector and will hopefully resolve the current difficulties for farmers.

I fully recognise the importance of maintaining confidence in a sector that has benefitted from historically high price levels in recent years. I recently announced the operational details of an investment package worth up to €40m to beef farmers in 2014. This package will include a €23m for Beef Genomics Scheme, €10m for the Beef Data Programme, €5m for the Beef Technology Adoption Programme and €2m in residual payments under the Suckler Cow Welfare Scheme.

The Genomic Scheme is a particularly important innovation that utilises cutting-edge science developed by the Teagasc research facility at Moorepark in collaboration with the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation . The use of genomics in dairy animals has helped transform cattle breeding in that sector as well as delivering tangible gains for efficient farmers. Introducing this technology for the suckler sector will help to improve the genetic quality of the national beef herd and to increase productivity and profitability at farm level.

The scheme will provide a payment of €40 per calf to participants in return for genotyping a selection of their animals specified by ICBF. Genomic selection involves taking an animal’s DNA sample and sending it to a laboratory to assess its performance traits. Farmers can use this information predicting the genetic merit of their stock to inform their breeding and selection decisions. Application forms for the scheme will issue to farmers over the coming weeks.

The Government’s investment is a strong vote of confidence in the suckler beef sector. It exemplifies the smart, green growth initiatives envisioned in the 2020 strategy and, coupled with additional support measures under the new Rural Development Programme, will underpin the development of a sustainable beef sector with long-term growth potential.

Food Labelling

Questions (528)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

528. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which he remains satisfied regarding the adequacy of food traceability with particular reference to the authenticity of labelling and the necessity to have a clear indication of the origin of the product through various processes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6864/14]

View answer

Written answers

Food production and labelling rules in the European Union operate in accordance with harmonised rules and member states controls are subject to audit and supervision by the EU Food and Veterinary Office of the EU. The Food Safety Authority of Ireland under the aegis the Minister for Health has overall responsibility for the enforcement of food safety and labelling requirements in Ireland. It carries out this remit through service contracts with my Department and other agencies including the Health Service Executive , Local Authority Veterinary Service and the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority.

Primary responsibility under EU law for the safety and traceability of food placed on the market lies with food business operators. The role of my Department is to verify compliance with these requirements. This is done by a combination of inspecting establishments and by auditing the food safety management systems which operators are required to have in place. These controls are applied at different stages in the food supply chain. Under current EU regulations, origin labelling is only mandatory for fresh beef and meat coming from third countries. However, new implementing rules on country of origin labelling for fresh, chilled and frozen sheep, goat, pig and poultry meat were adopted by the European Commission last December. These new rules will apply from 1 April 2015. My Department carries out labelling checks as part of the routine official checks at meat plants, where there is a permanent presence of Department veterinary or technical staff. Checks are conducted on a random, risk based frequency and cover labelling, traceability/origin, identification of cattle, labelling of carcases, meat, mince meat and meat products. Departmental officials also carry out work to ensure compliance with the application of health and hygiene regulations and traceability within the remit of my own Department. This work is subject to regular audit by both the FSAI and the FVO. EU law provides for the free movement of goods between Member States. On that basis, meat and meat products produced in an establishment which is approved under the relevant EU regulation can be moved freely within the EU. Food business operators in Ireland are responsible for carrying out checks to ensure that their ingredients come from approved plants. They must also have a system in place to identify the source of inputs and destination of outputs (referred to as "one step forward and one step back").

My Department also carries out checks at retail level under EU Marketing Standard Regulations. All imports of food products of animal origin into the EU are the subject of prior notification and my Department, in co-operation with the Customs Service, operate veterinary public health controls at EU approved Border Inspection Posts on all direct imports into Ireland coming from non EU (or third) countries. Such products may be imported only from countries and processing plants approved by the Food and Veterinary Office of the European Union, meeting the necessary health and hygiene standards.

An annual audit of imported products is carried out in each Department approved meat plant. The audit includes physical identity, labelling and documentary checks. This includes product originating both in E U Member States and third countries. In addition, labelling and documentary checks form part of the routine checks conducted by Department officials .

Exports Growth

Questions (529)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

529. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which new markets have become available for Irish dairy, beef and lamb; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6865/14]

View answer

Written answers

Since my appointment as Minister I have been very active in developing relationships in new and expanding international markets for dairy, beef and lamb, raising the profile of Ireland and increasing international confidence in Irish production and control systems. My aim is to provide a platform for long-term trading relationships into the future in these sectors, particularly in new and emerging markets and since taking office I have led trade missions to China, the US, Algeria and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries in the Middle East. In relation to the individual sectors, the latest position is as set out below.

Market analysis predicts that medium term prospects for global dairy markets are good, with growth in world population and wealth expected to stimulate strong levels of demand for dairy products. More than 85% of Irish dairy production is exported and Ireland has full market access to over eighty countries worldwide, with one third of the value of dairy exports going outside the EU. Nevertheless I am working with industry to raise the profile of the Irish dairy sector, and the Irish agrifood sector generally, in emerging markets in the Far East, North Africa, the Gulf States and elsewhere.

Ireland strongly supported the decision to abolish milk quotas with effect from 1 April 2015 on the basis that quotas were widely regarded by both the Irish dairy sector and market analysts as a brake on the potential of the sector to respond positively to market opportunities. I expect the abolition of quotas to facilitate an expansion in the sector and through the Food Harvest 2020 Report the industry has set itself an ambitious target for a 50% increase in milk production by 2020. For my part I have been working on a number of fronts to prepare the industry for the move to a quota free environment and equip it to respond to the market opportunities arising.

A key element of this market strategy is to optimise the already positive green image of Ireland in order to create a point of differentiation for Irish dairy products on international markets. In this context, I was delighted to launch the Sustainable Dairy Assurance Scheme last December. The scheme has the potential to boost the competitive advantage of Irish dairy products on the global market. Ireland’s strong sustainability positioning is fundamental to this. At processing level, Bord Bia’s Origin Green Programme is providing a vehicle for industry to commit itself to sustainability targets by reducing energy inputs, minimising overall carbon footprint and mitigating the impact on the environment. This proactive approach to environmental sustainability has a strong resonance with procurement strategists in the many multinational food companies who are interested in using Ireland as a source of high quality food ingredients and processed products.

Of course, the industry itself has a responsibility to focus its efforts on market and product development. Supported by Government, the Irish dairy sector has succeeded in positioning itself as a major international player and we have seen industry announcements in relation to the development of supply arrangements between Irish companies and multinational players in third countries as well as the development of value-added products which can maximise the value of our dairy output.

My Department engages on a daily basis with many countries, in collaboration with Bord Bia and Irish embassies’ personnel on market access issues. These initiatives have led to a number of notable successes in securing agreement to import from authorities in Japan, Singapore, Egypt and Iran which allow the import of Irish beef; with Singapore, South Africa, UAE, Canada and the Russian Federation-Customs Union for the import of Irish sheepmeat and with Australia and Serbia for the import of Irish pork. As recently as January, the Lebanon agreed to re-open its market to Irish beef, sheepmeat and cooked meats.

In November 2013, the US lifted its ban on the importation of beef from the European Union. This was one of my priorities the previous year when I visited the US, where I pushed the matter strongly with the US Department of Agriculture Secretary of State, Tom Vilsack and in meetings with Senators. My Department is working with the meat industry to advance the various technical requirements to ensure commencement of the trade at the earliest possible date.

In December 2013, a delegation from my Department visited China for discussions with authorities there on the lifting of the beef BSE ban which prohibits imports from any EU country. While there are a number of stages to go before Ireland secures access for beef to China, I am hopeful that these can be progressed in 2014.

Irish beef is now listed with more than 75 high-end retail chains across EU markets. This wide portfolio of customers has contributed significantly to higher returns for Irish beef in recent years and reflects the success of Bord Bia’s differentiation and premiumisation strategy which focuses on the key attributes of Irish beef: environmentally sustainable, grass-based production systems, full traceability, quality assurance at all stages and superior eating quality. Among Bord Bia’s key initiatives this year is the continued development, global promotion and marketing of its Origin Green initiative, designed to establish Ireland as a world leader in sustainably produced food and drink. Over 200 companies are currently working with Bord Bia to develop, and commit to, sustainability plans setting out clear targets in emissions, energy, waste, water, biodiversity and corporate social responsibility activities.

There is a strong demand for meat globally and my focus is to enable Irish exporters to take advantage of the opportunities that arise.

Beef Exports

Questions (530)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

530. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which the beef suckler herd remains adequate to meet the demands of future markets; if any particular needs have arisen in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6866/14]

View answer

Written answers

While suckler cow numbers have remained relatively stable since payments were decoupled from production in January 2005, my Department monitors the composition and strength of the national herd on an ongoing basis. The most recent results published by the CSO show a marginal increase in the numerical strength of the herd in 2013 relative to 2012 as high cattle prices encouraged beef producers to restock their herds.

Year

Beef Cow Herd

‘000 head

2011

1,123.3

2012

1,148.6

2013

1,150.3

Source: CSO June Livestock Survey

Government investment in the beef sector is aimed at improving the economic and environmental sustainability of the beef herd.

Recognising the importance of maintaining confidence in the sector, I recently announced the operational details of an investment package worth up to €40m to beef farmers in 2014. This package includes:

- €23m for the Beef Genomics Scheme;

- €10m for the Beef Data Programme;

- €5m for the Beef Technology Adoption Programme; &

- €2m in residual payments under the Suckler Cow Welfare Scheme.

The Genomics Scheme is a particularly important innovation that utilises cutting-edge science developed by the Teagasc research facility at Moorepark in collaboration with the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation (ICBF). The use of genomics in dairy animals has helped transform cattle breeding in that sector as well as delivering tangible gains for efficient farmers. Introducing this technology for the suckler sector will help to improve the genetic quality of the national beef herd and to increase productivity and profitability at farm level.

The scheme will provide a payment of €40 per calf to participants in return for genotyping a selection of their animals specified by ICBF. Genomic selection involves taking an animal’s DNA sample and sending it to a laboratory to assess its performance traits. Farmers can use this information predicting the genetic merit of their stock to inform their breeding and selection decisions. Application forms for the scheme will issue to farmers over the coming weeks.

The Government’s investment is a strong vote of confidence in the suckler beef sector. It exemplifies the smart, green growth initiatives envisioned in the 2020 strategy and, coupled with additional support measures under the new Rural Development Programme, will underpin the development of a sustainable beef sector with long-term growth potential.

It should be recognised too that an expanding dairy herd will have a positive impact on the supply of beef and emerging technologies such as sexed semen may also prove beneficial. Of course, the suckler herd will remain a critical seedbed for a quality Irish beef offering.

Fishing Industry Development

Questions (531)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

531. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which his Department continues to monitor the needs of the fishing industry with particular reference to traditional sea-fishing families dependent on the industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6867/14]

View answer

Written answers

I consider that the fishing industry itself is best placed to advise me on their needs. It is for this reason that the representative producer organisations in the industry, both fishermen and onshore processors, meet each month with my Department and the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority to make recommendations to me in relation to the quota to be allocated in the coming month for whitefish and some pelagic fisheries.

For non TAC and quota species, management measures applying only to Irish registered vessels fishing within our territorial waters are developed nationally. In the development of such national management measures, I always seek and fully consider any submissions from industry representatives.

New opportunities for the direct involvement of the fishing industry are also a central part of the new CFP Reform which, for the first time, introduces a regionalised approach to fisheries management. We have moved away from the old system of an EU decision making approach centralised in Brussels. The new policy puts fishermen at the core of developing conservation measures for fisheries in which they are involved and also makes specific references to taking account of the needs of our fishermen.

In a practical step in the implementation of this new regionalised approach, I have also hosted the first meeting of the North Western Waters Regional Group of Member States. It is through this group which will work in close association with stakeholders that decisions affecting Ireland's fishermen may be taken in the future and it is vital that we are at the heart of this new decision making process.

The recently established national Discards Implementation Group will ensure that the Irish fishing industry are fully prepared for, and engaged in, the implementation of the discards ban. It will empower fishermen by giving them a key role in the decision making for their fisheries. The work of this group will be central to ensuring that the practical issues around the introduction of a discards ban, as identified by the Irish fishing industry, will be developed into long term sustainable management tools that will safeguard the future of our coastal fishing communities.

From the outset of the Common Fisheries Policy revision process, Ireland’s overarching goal was to ensure a sustainable, profitable and self reliant industry that protects and enhances the social and economic fabric of rural coastal communities dependent on the seafood sector, while balancing these objectives with the need to ensure that fish stocks would be protected for future generations. I strongly believe that the new CFP will achieve that goal.

Fishing Industry Development

Questions (532)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

532. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which jobs continue to be created in the fishing industry with particular reference to the processing sector and added value of various fish and fish products; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6868/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by Bord Iascaigh Mhara that there are approximately 11,000 people employed in the seafood industry, of which almost 5,000 are employed in the catching sector and close to 3,000 in the processing sector. Employment growth in recent years has occurred mostly in the processing sector. Over the past three years, the seafood processing sector has performed strongly in creating jobs and generating exports. There has been good investment by the sector in developing facilities, growing sales and increasing the value added of seafood output. This effort has been supported under the Seafood Processing Business Investment Scheme for an approved investment programme of €35 million in that period. There were 354 jobs created in seafood processing associated with the ongoing investment in the sector. This investment is yielding dividends with Irish seafood exports growing by 20% in 2012, building on the 14% growth achieved in 2011. Last year was more challenging with estimates indicating a 5% fall in seafood revenues to €500 million.

Fishing Industry Development

Questions (533)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

533. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his vision for the future development of the fishing industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6869/14]

View answer

Written answers

From the outset of the Common Fisheries Policy revision process, Ireland’s overarching goal was to ensure a sustainable, profitable and self reliant industry that protects and enhances the social and economic fabric of rural coastal communities dependent on the seafood sector, while balancing these objectives with the need to ensure that fish stocks would be protected for future generations.

The new Common Fisheries Policy puts fishermen at the core in developing technical and conservation measures to protect juvenile fish and vulnerable fish species with a completely new regionalised decision making approach. This is a significant change as up to now fisheries decision making was centred in Brussels. The new CFP has moved away from the old system of EU wide development and application of the rules (a one size fits all approach). Instead, the new policy provides for the development of measures appropriate for each region by the Member States, in consultation with the stakeholders through the new Advisory Councils to devise and implement measures that work for the types of fisheries in the region. A first meeting of Member States from the North West region was hosted by Ireland in November.

A practical and phased discards policy is being introduced where in early years of implementation, TACs and quotas will be set to take account of current levels of discards, which should see quotas increase over time. This means that fishermen will have time to adjust and implement changes that will allow for the avoidance of non target species where there are particular problems with the relevant by-catch (such as that the stock is overfished and needs to be allowed to rebuild). In that context, I have established a national Discards Implementation Group to advise on the issues arising in the effective implementation of the new policy and to recommend practical solutions and arrangements that take into account the situation of the Irish industry.

Another key element of the new CFP is the setting of fishing levels on the basis of the MSY Principle (Maximum Sustainable Yield). This should lead to healthy fish stocks and to higher quotas for Irish fishermen and more sustainable fishing patterns.

Technical measures will also be introduced to avoid and minimise catches of juvenile fish and the reforms contain a commitment to continue and further strengthen conservation measures in the biologically sensitive area off the South and West coast of Ireland (new Irish box). The commitment to develop and strengthen biologically sensitive areas, with spawning grounds and high populations of juvenile fish will also protect the livelihoods of coastal communities by ensuring that fish are allowed to grow to maturity, are more plentiful and fished in a environmentally responsible manner.

Finally, and crucially from an Irish perspective, the Hague Preferences have been maintained and given increased reference in this agreement. The Hague Preferences have traditionally given Ireland an increased share of traditional whitefish stocks such as cod, haddock and whiting in the waters off our coast when stock levels are decreasing. It is important to bear in mind that other Member States receive reduced quota as a result of their allocation to Ireland and to the UK and there was no support from other Member States for a specific provision that would have made the application of Hague Preferences a mandatory provision of the CFP. In that context, having an increased reference to the Hague Preferences in the recitals of the new CFP Regulation is significant as it can be seen by other Member States as a clear signal of the intent of the Council and the Parliament.

My plans for the development of the overall seafood sector in the very short term are set out in the Seafood Development Programme 2007-2013, and the complementary Irish Seafood National Programme 2007-2013, which identify the investment priorities for the development of the sector up to 2015. The Seafood Development Programme includes the overwhelming majority of initiatives for the development of the sector. That Programme is co-funded by the European Union under the European Fisheries Fund. It was considerably updated in 2012, following an interim evaluation of its progress. The Programme identifies the development needs of the catching, processing and aquaculture sectors and the measures that will be implemented to address those needs. The complementary Irish Seafood National Programme is the framework programme for a small number of measures that are not included in the Seafood Development Programme or are not eligible for EU co-funding.

My Department is presently preparing a new Operational Programme for the seafood sector for the period 2014-2020 under the proposed EU Regulation for the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund. The EU co-legislators recently reached political agreement on this proposed EU Regulation and the Council and European Parliament will vote on the proposal in the coming months. I would hope to see the Regulation adopted by the Summer. My Department has already conducted a public consultation with stakeholders in 2013 on issues facing the sector and investment priorities for the new Programme. In the coming months, my Department will continue to work closely with stakeholders as the new plan for the sector is developed. I would anticipate that the plan will be completed before the end of this year.

Common Fisheries Policy Reform

Questions (534)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

534. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the degree to which conservation measures already adopted in the context of the Common Fisheries Policy or otherwise continue to improve fish stocks in traditional Irish fishing waters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6870/14]

View answer

Written answers

The new Common Fisheries Policy reform agreement, negotiated to completion under the Irish Presidency will mean real meaningful reform to how EU waters are fished in the future. The agreement is designed to ensure the long term sustainability of fishing in Ireland and throughout EU waters, utilising best scientific advice as a key determinant in setting annual fishing quotas in the future.

Setting fishing levels on the basis of the MSY Principle (Maximum Sustainable Yield) will lead to increased fish stocks and ultimately to higher quotas for Irish fishermen over time. It will end the practice of widespread overfishing and mean a more viable fishing industry for the longer term. Setting annual fishing quotas respecting best scientific advice will inevitably lead to increased fish stocks and more sustainable fishing patterns over time.

A practical and phased discards policy is being introduced where in early years of implementation, TACs and quotas will be set to take account of current levels of discards, should see quotas increase over time. This means that fishermen will have time to adjust and implement changes that will allow for the avoidance of non target species where there are particular problems with the relevant by-catch (such as that the stock is overfished and needs to be allowed to rebuild).

Technical measures are being introduced to avoid and minimise catches of juvenile fish and the reforms contain a commitment to continue and further strengthen conservation measures in the biologically sensitive area off the South and West coast of Ireland (new Irish box). The commitment to develop and strengthen biologically sensitive areas, with spawning grounds and high populations of juvenile fish will also protect the livelihoods of coastal communities by ensuring that fish are allowed to grow to maturity, are more plentiful and fished in a environmentally responsible manner.

The new policy puts fishermen at the core of developing technical and conservation measures to protect juvenile fish and vulnerable fish species with a completely new regionalised decision making approach. This is a big change as up to now decision making was fully centralised in Brussels. The new CFP has moved away from the old system of an EU wide development and application of the rules, a one size fits all approach. The policy provides for the development of measures appropriate for each region by the Member States working with the stakeholders through the new Advisory Councils to devise and implement measures that work for the types of fisheries in the region and involving fishermen in the decision making.

Food and Agriculture Organisation

Questions (535)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

535. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the extent to which he and his EU colleagues expect the EU food-producing sectors to contribute to world food production in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6871/14]

View answer

Written answers

Overall, the EU 27 is a mature food producing market with a reasonable balance between food production and consumption. As can be seen from the OECD- FAO food production forecasts for the period 2013-2022 table beneath, a significant increase in production is not anticipated over the next decade.

OECD FAO 2013-2022 Supply Balance Forecasts

% Volume Growth per annum

Wheat

Beef

Sheep

Pigmeat

Butter

Cheese

Skim Milk Powder

Whole Milk Powder

EU 27 Production

0.66%

0.20%

-1.48%

0.32%

0.66%

0.52%

0.89%

-0.05%

EU 27 Consumption

0.83%

0.37%

-1.17%

0.32%

0.56%

0.37%

0.29%

0.23%

However, these aggregate figures can mask variations within individual countries. Ireland is a case in point, where there are very definite plans to increase production and where strategies are in place to expand both the value and volume of exports and to access new markets. Food Harvest 2020 sets out a roadmap to achieve a 50% increase in milk production, a 78% increase in aquaculture production as well increasing the value of primary output in the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector by 33%; its value added component by 40% and the value of food and drink exports by 42%.

Progress on these targets is monitored and reviewed on an ongoing basis by the Food Harvest 2020 High Level Implementation Committee , which I chair. Strong industry support and buy-in for the Food Harvest vision has been achieved with a significant pipeline of industry investment in processing and innovation in train. At primary level, farmers have shown an increased focus on efficiency and sustainability and are gearing up for increased milk production once the quota system is removed next year. Progress to date augers well for the achievement of FH2020 targets as the sector has achieved growth in excess of 33% (primary production- CSO 2013 advance estimate), 20% (value-added- CSO 2011 data ) and 24% (exports-Bord Bia 2013 data) compared to the baseline period.

The FAO forecasts that world’s population will be over 9 billion in 2050, with up to 70% of the world’s population living in urban conglomerations with greatly increased income and calorie consumption levels. To feed this changed population, food production (net of biofuels) must increase by 60% to 70% over the next 40 years. As a food producing and exporting country, Ireland is positioning itself to meet this increasing global demand for food. On the supply side the sector is increasing its investment and production efficiency levels while opportunities for increased exports are arising from trade and investment missions combined with technical and diplomatic efforts to open new markets and trade areas.

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Payments

Questions (536)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

536. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers due rural environment protection scheme 4 and agri-environment options scheme 3 payments who have been paid to date; the number awaiting payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6878/14]

View answer

Written answers

Under the EU Regulations governing the REP Scheme, the Agri-Environment Options Scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue. This process has now been completed for 2013 REPS4 payments and 24,972 participants have been paid their 2013 REPS4 payment in full out of a total of 29,235 participants.

There are currently 5,981 active participants in the 2012 Agri Environment Options Scheme (AEOS 3). Again, the comprehensive administrative check, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue. These checks are well under way and I anticipate that payments for the AEOS 3 in respect of 2013 will commence in March.

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Payments

Questions (537)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

537. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the total number of farmers due agri-environment options scheme payments now; the number paid to date; the total allocation for AEOS payments in 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6879/14]

View answer

Written answers

AEOS I and II payments in respect of the 2013 Scheme year commenced in November 2013.

Under the EU Regulations governing all area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check of all applications, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue.

The table below outlines the number of participants currently active in AEOS I and II and the numbers who have passed the administrative checks and received payment in respect of the 2013 Scheme year.

-

Active Participants

Number of participants who have received 75% payment for 2013

Number of participants who have received 25% payment for 2013

Number of participants awaiting 75% payment for 2013

Number of participants awaiting 25% payment for 2013

AEOS 1

7,600

6,724

5,916

876

1684

AEOS 2

5,800

5,018

3,746

782

2054

In most instances where payments are outstanding there remains an outstanding query on the application. These queries are being resolved on an ongoing basis and officials in my Department have contacted the applicants concerned with the intention of resolving outstanding issues in order to allow payments to issue as soon as possible.

There are 5,981 active participants in the AEOS III Scheme and I expect that payments for this Scheme will commence in March 2014.

The total budget allocated for AEOS payments in 2014 is €61 million.

Commonage Division

Questions (538)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

538. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when he will set up a commonage working group; if he will appoint an independent chairman to this group; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6880/14]

View answer

Written answers

The management and farming of common lands, which are generally, but not exclusively all, hill and marginal lands form an extremely important part of rural Ireland. This is, particularly, the case along the West coast and these lands are important from a farming, environmental and leisure activities point of view. It is my intention to make an announcement on the management and farming of these lands with a view to ensuring the optimum use of this valuable resource within the next few weeks.

Top
Share