Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 27 Feb 2014

Written Answers Nos. 44-55

Refugee Appeals Tribunal Decisions

Questions (44)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

44. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his views on the refugee appeals tribunal; if his attention has been drawn to the particulars of a judicial review regarding a decision of the refugee appeals tribunal (details supplied) which identified many extreme errors and part-attributed the decision to a personal dislike by a tribunal member of the applicant concerned; if his attention has been drawn to previous judicial reviews in similar cases which also expressed very grave concerns regarding the fairness of decisions undertaken by the tribunal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9464/14]

View answer

Written answers

The case mentioned by the Deputy was the subject of an ex-tempore judgement of the High Court in January 2013 with the written judgement delivered in January 2014. As the Deputy will be aware the Refugee Appeals Tribunal is a statutory independent body established under the Refugee Act, 1996 to decide appeals against negative recommendations in respect of applications for refugee status issued by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) and to make recommendations to the Minister for Justice and Equality in relation to whether or not refugee status should be granted. As the appeal in this case has been remitted for re-hearing by the Tribunal, the Tribunal has yet to make its recommendation in the case to me. In the circumstances, clearly any comment by me would be inappropriate.

The management of the Tribunal is the responsibility of the Chairperson who under the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) is required “to ensure that the business of the Tribunal is managed efficiently and that the business assigned to each division is disposed of as expeditiously as may be consistent with fairness and natural justice ”. The Deputy may be aware that in August, 2013 a new Chairperson of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal was appointed following a selection process run in conjunction with the Public Appointments Service. Since taking up his position, I understand that the Chairperson has begun a major review of Tribunal practices, procedures and guidelines. In September, 2013 the Assigning Policy of the Tribunal was published, which details how cases are assigned amongst the various members of the Tribunal. The new Chairperson has also established a Tribunal Users Group which comprises of the Chairperson and representatives nominated by the Law Society and the Bar Council. I am informed that the group will meet on a regular basis to discuss matters of interest and/or concern to users of the Tribunal. I am advised that the Group has considered draft procedural guidelines which will set out the practice and procedure relating to how appeals are dealt with by the Tribunal. Other guidelines are also in preparation, including a comprehensive guideline for dealing with child applicants.

Following on from the appointment of new Tribunal members and the expansion of the Tribunal's remit to the area of subsidiary protection under the European Union (Subsidiary Protection) Regulations 2013, which I signed into law in November 2013, a comprehensive training programme has been undertaken by the Tribunal, to ensure that the new members are fully equipped to discharge their duties to the highest professional standards.

I am informed that as part of this training programme, the Tribunal has been working closely with the UNHCR in developing a new decision template designed to enhance the robustness of the process and to assist Members in their difficult task. This process has been greatly enhanced by the participation, via the UNHCR, of an internationally recognised former Canadian refugee law judge who has been central to the training provided. The Chairperson in his recently published strategy statement for 2014 - 2017 commits the Tribunal “to consider and decide refugee, subsidiary protection and Dublin Regulation appeals to the highest professional standards.” He has also committed to an ambitious reform programme to achieve the Tribunal’s strategic goals and to undertaking a review of Tribunal policy on public access to Tribunal documents, including the Tribunal’s database of previous decisions. I am confident that the changes which I have outlined will have a major impact on the performance and perception of the Tribunal as they are integrated into its ethos and practices in the coming year.

Question No. 45 answered with Question No. 42.

Diplomatic Representation

Questions (46, 51)

Clare Daly

Question:

46. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide an update on the contact he has had with the Egyptian authorities regarding the release of an Irish citizen (details supplied) as a matter of urgency. [10068/14]

View answer

Seán Crowe

Question:

51. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the assistance his Department is providing to a person (details supplied) detained in Egypt; if his Department is working towards ensuring this person is released; and if he has personally raised the issue with the Egyptian authorities. [10198/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 46 and 51 together.

As the Deputy is aware this Irish citizen has been detained for over six months. I have raised my concerns at his continued detention without trial with the Egyptian Foreign Minister, Nabil Fahmy, on 11 November and 23 December 2013. The Embassy of Ireland in Cairo has been actively liaising with the Egyptian authorities in relation to the case and contacts have included numerous meetings. Our Ambassador and her colleagues in Egypt have met with senior officials from the Foreign Ministry, Ministry of Justice, and the office of the Prosecutor General.

Consular officials in Dublin met with family representatives on 17 August, 19 September, 24 October and 16 December 2013, and 16 January 2014. Consular visits were made to the individual named on 24 August, 8 September, 15 September, 10 October, 24 October, 30 October, 10 November, 21 November, 3 December and 18 December 2013 and 8 January, 26 January and 13 February 2014. The EU Special Representative for Human Rights, Mr. Stavros Lambrinidis raised this individual’s case with both the Egyptian Foreign Minister, Nabil Fahmy, and the Prosecutor General, Hisham Barakat, during his visit to Cairo this month. However, as the Deputy is aware, the individual named is still before the judicial system in Egypt and we are precluded from getting involved in the judicial process. On all recent visits this individual was found to be in good health and in reasonably good spirits despite the ordeal of being detained so long. He appears to be being well treated in the low-security prison in which he is being held. Regular family visits have also been permitted. The Embassy and the Consular Assistance Section will continue to give all appropriate consular assistance.

EU Membership

Questions (47)

Robert Dowds

Question:

47. Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if in the interests of prudence, his Department has prepared or is preparing a report on the consequences for Ireland in the event that the United Kingdom votes to leave the European Union in the next five years; and if no such report has or is being prepared, his views on having such a report prepared in the near future. [10073/14]

View answer

Written answers

The developments in the United Kingdom in relation to engagement with the European Union are followed in detail in my Department and in the Department of the Taoiseach as well as other Government Departments concerned. The debate in the UK has moved quickly, but its outcome remains uncertain. There are a large number of variables which could affect whether a referendum on EU membership will take place in the UK, and indeed on what basis any such referendum might take place. Ahead of Westminster elections which are expected in the first half of 2015, the benefit of preparing reports, by their nature static, is open to question.

I have been clear in voicing our view that Europe is a shared asset from which Ireland and the UK, and the relationship between us, have benefited significantly. Ireland has a unique relationship with the UK and thus has a deep interest in the outcome of this debate about the UK’s future in Europe. We value the contribution the UK has made to the EU during the four decades we have been members together and hope that this will continue.

Our Embassy in London actively monitors the ongoing debate with regard to the United Kingdom’s EU membership. I will continue to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the potential consequences for Ireland of future developments.

Departmental Reports

Questions (48)

Robert Dowds

Question:

48. Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if in the interests of prudence, his Department has prepared or is preparing a report on the consequences for Ireland in the event that Scotland votes to become an independent country in September 2014; and if no such report has or is being prepared, his views on having such a report prepared in the near future. [10074/14]

View answer

Written answers

The people of Scotland will vote in a referendum on 18 September 2014 on the question: ‘Should Scotland be an independent country?’ Ireland is entirely neutral in the debate, on the basis that the question is one for the people of Scotland to decide. That being said, the issues arising in the Scottish debate are of major importance, and have potentially significant direct and indirect implications for Ireland. Our silence therefore should not be mistaken for indifference. Our Embassy in London and Consulate General in Edinburgh, in communication with the relevant stakeholders across the whole of Government, are monitoring the debate very closely and assessing the issues arising on an ongoing basis.

Foreign Conflicts

Questions (49)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

49. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide an update on Ireland's position in response to recent protests in Bosnia which are considered to be non-ethnic and a protest against corruption among the political elite; the way Ireland will push for Europe to put pressure on Bosnia's political elite to combat corruption and address the citizens' call for eradication of poverty and dysfunctionality of the state recently referred to by Lord Paddy Ashdown in news articles; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10118/14]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland remains strongly supportive of Bosnia and Herzegovina and of its efforts to become a member of the European Union. Through the enlargement process, the EU has set out the reforms that are needed in Bosnia and Herzegovina. We have underlined that these measures are not just necessary for the country to advance towards EU membership, but that they are also in the interests of the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The necessary actions include political, constitutional and economic reforms, as well as a sustained effort to tackle organised crime and corruption. The EU has consistently called on the political leaders of Bosnia and Herzegovina to work together to undertake the necessary reforms, in the interests of their citizens. I would support and reiterate that call. Minister Donohoe, when he visited Sarajevo in January, delivered this message clearly.

The EU will continue to support Bosnia and Herzegovina as it embarks on reforms. For instance, Commissioner Fule, in a recent visit to Sarajevo, confirmed that the EU will expand its Structured Dialogue with Bosnia and Herzegovina on Justice to include the fight against corruption. The Commission has also launched a new initiative to focus on better economic governance in the Western Balkans. Bosnia and Herzegovina should be among the first countries to benefit from this approach. Finally, the EU will also work more closely with Bosnia and Herzegovina on fully utilising the funding already allocated from the European Union through the Instrument for Pre-Accession. I would, however, reiterate the point that I expressed to the Deputy in reply to her Parliamentary Question last week: the solutions to the issues affecting the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina must come from within the country itself. The EU cannot impose remedies from outside.

Naturalisation Applications

Questions (50)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

50. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the issue of the authenticity of an identification document submitted with an application for naturalisation and subsequently with an application for a passport has been clarified in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10143/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Passports Act, 2008 requires that before issuing a passport to a person, the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade shall be satisfied as to the identity of each applicant and that the person is an Irish citizen. The issue of a passport is the culmination of an important and legally binding process. The checks and balances within the passport process embrace the standard principles that are provided for in the Act and help to ensure that the identity of the applicant is known and that the person in question is an Irish citizen. This serves to maintain the worldwide good reputation and integrity of the Irish passport, which, in turn, ensures the safe travel and well-being of Irish citizens as they travel abroad. Moreover, it helps to combat passport and identity fraud.

The Department received an application from the person in question on 11 June 2013. Questions have arisen concerning the authenticity of an identity document submitted with the passport application which have been referred to the appropriate authorities. The Department wrote to the applicant on 9 September 2013 to inform him of the situation and to advise him that his application at that time was being refused. If the applicant has further documentary proof in respect of his identity and entitlement to citizenship that he wishes to submit in support of any such application that position will be reviewed.

Question No. 51 answered with Question No. 46.

Tax Collection

Questions (52)

Luke 'Ming' Flanagan

Question:

52. Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance the reason there is a three week delay in processing VRT applications; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that these delays cause serious problems for vehicle dealers and customers alike and that this delay lengthens the transaction period by up to three weeks, effectively making it impossible for vehicle importers-dealers to hand over the vehicle for a further three weeks after agreeing a sale; his views that there has to be a more efficient way of doing this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10185/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that following a procurement process carried out during 2008, in accordance with the public sector procurement rules, Applus Car Testing Limited (who also have responsibility for the operation of the National Car Testing Service (NCTS)) were appointed and authorised to carry out specified registration functions in relation to the operation of VRT and have been performing those functions in the State since 1 September 2010.

In the early months of the operation of the new system Revenue and the NCTS faced some challenges in relation to the delays in getting appointments.  These challenges were addressed in a number of ways.  The NCTS put procedures in place to provide additional capacity in their centres, including extending the opening times in some centres and adding a number of other centres to deal with VRT.  In recognition that there was a unique requirement for authorised motor dealers Revenue provided electronic facilities for the registration of used vehicles that have been subjected to a pre-registration examination.  The pre-registration examination is restricted to motor dealers and allows a motor dealer to have vehicles pre-inspected, entered onto the Revenue computer system and then registered on-line as sales are made.  An appointment for pre-inspection can be made in person at an NCTS Centre, through the centralised booking service using a national local rate number, through the Applus web-based booking system or by fax or post.  I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that approximately 50% of all used vehicles registered by motor dealers in 2013 used this system and the lead time for bookings is less than 5 days.

I am further informed by the Revenue Commissioners that there was an untypical delay in a number of NCTS Centres in the west and northwest over the past 2 weeks.  Revenue discussed this matter with NCTS operations management who had already taken steps to resolve the delay by training and deploying additional resources and increasing capacity (for example, one of the Centres has increased its capacity from 2 days per week to 4/5 days).  I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the Centres in question are normally two of the better service providers in the network and that this delay was highly unusual. Overall, the average lead time for appointments at NCTS Centres is 6.3 days (though it should be noted there can be little or no waiting time where bookings that are made directly at the NCTS Centres and a place is available through cancellation).

The Deputy may be aware that there has been a surge in vehicle registrations since the beginning of the year that is reflected in both new and used car sales.  This has obviously led to a spike in demand at NCTS Centres.  Revenue is acutely aware that this demand puts pressure on motor dealers and is actively working with NCTS management to ensure that this demand is met.  Revenue is confident that the measures that have been put in place will ensure the continuing provision of an efficient and effective service.

IBRC Mortgage Loan Book

Questions (53)

Stephen Donnelly

Question:

53. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance if the measures currently being worked on by his Department to protect mortgagors whose loans are sold to unregulated institutions as part of the winding up of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation will be extended to all mortgagors whose loans are with unregulated institutions (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9981/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, my officials and officials in the Central Bank are in communication in relation to the application of the CCMA to entities that are not regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. I also welcome the voluntary agreement reached between the Special Liquidators of IBRC and the unregulated bidders for the IBRC mortgage book in relation to the application of the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA).  This is an important and timely development and will ensure that mortgage holders in arrears will be serviced in line with the CCMA and the customers will continue to be protected by the code. The  application of the code by unregulated entities is a positive development and is in the best interests of both borrower and lenders. However, as I have previously stated, if it becomes evident that the voluntary application of the code is not delivering the requisite protections for mortgage holders in arrears, I will bring forward the required legislation.

The firm to which the Deputy refers is registered as an insurance intermediary under the European Communities (Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005 (as amended) since 10 August 2005.  The following is a link to the relevant Central Bank register: http://registers.centralbank.ie/Home.aspx. The Central Bank has informed me that firms that are already authorised or registered with the Central Bank for other regulated activities do not require a separate authorisation to provide retail credit. The Consumer Protection Codes, including the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears apply to the regulated activities undertaken by regulated entities and the Central Bank supervises lenders compliance with those provisions and financial services legislation generally.

Tax Code

Questions (54)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

54. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Finance if he will take into account the extenuating circumstances and consider reviewing the criteria for tax relief or if that proves impossible to consider refunding the VAT in respect of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 10. [9983/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that a person may claim income tax relief at the 20% income tax rate on the cost of gluten-free foods manufactured specifically for coeliacs.  A letter from a doctor is required, which states that the individual, in respect of whom the expense was incurred, has the condition. However, as is the case with all claims to tax relief, relief is dependent on the claimant having a liability to income tax against which to offset it.

With regard to VAT, I would point out there is no VAT charged on the majority of basic food products, including the equivalent basic foods for coeliacs.  Basic foodstuffs such as bread, butter, tea, sugar, meat, milk, vegetables and cornflakes are not liable to VAT.

Bank Charges

Questions (55)

Simon Harris

Question:

55. Deputy Simon Harris asked the Minister for Finance if he will respond to a query (details supplied) regarding variable mortgages and the frustration of some variable mortgage holders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9986/14]

View answer

Written answers

Firstly, I must confirm to the Deputy that the lending institutions in Ireland, including those in which the State has a significant shareholding, are independent commercial entities. It is not appropriate for me, as Minister for Finance, to comment on or become involved in the detailed mortgage position of mortgage holders.

In relation to the details provided by the Deputy, the Central Bank of Ireland has responsibility for the regulation and supervision of financial institutions in terms of consumer protection and prudential requirements and for ensuring ongoing compliance with applicable statutory obligations. However, the Central Bank has no statutory role in the setting of interest rates by regulated financial institutions, apart from the interest rate cap imposed on the credit union sector in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Union Act, 1997.

The mortgage interest rates that financial institutions operating in Ireland charge to customers are determined as a result of a commercial decision by the institutions concerned.  This interest rate is determined taking into account a broad range of factors, including European Central Bank base rates, deposit rates, market funding costs, the competitive environment and an institution's overall funding.

Top
Share