Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 8 Apr 2014

Written Answers Nos. 469-491

Data Protection

Questions (469)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

469. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the reason the Garda Síochána code of practice for data protection was not laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas in accordance with section 13(3) of the Data Protection Act 1988 which would enable the code to have force of law; if he will lay the existing code, or any future updated code, before the Houses to enhance and strengthen data protection practices within An Garda Síochána; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16828/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that the Garda Síochána Data Protection Code of Practice, which was approved by the Data Protection Commissioner under section 13 (2)(a) of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003, was launched in November 2007. The code was the result of intensive work by the Garda Commissioner and his staff working in close cooperation with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner.

The Data Protection Acts do not require the laying of the code before the Houses of the Oireachtas and clearly the Minister at the time did not do so. This does not diminish the application of the Data Protection legislation itself. The code clearly has a role in providing clarity and understanding of Data Protection to members of An Garda Síochána.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (470)

Luke 'Ming' Flanagan

Question:

470. Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will ensure that when a communication on wrongdoing is received in his Department the communication will be deemed to have come to his attention; if he will confirm that, while he is not expected to personally exercise the function of dealing with wrongdoing, he is responsible for ensuring that the function is exercised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17108/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will agree the term "wrongdoing" is a very broad term which covers an extensive range of activities from criminal matters, to civil matters, to an entire spectrum of other activities. Neither I nor my Department has a legal or constitutional responsibility for dealing with general allegations of "wrongdoing" in the broadest sense of that word nor should we be expected to do so. However, I can advise the Deputy that my Department does have well established mechanisms for dealing with correspondence which contains allegations of specific wrongdoing related to the general remit of this Department and for allegations of wrongdoing which fall within the remit of other bodies.

In relation to correspondence received alluding to criminal matters it is the normal procedure to direct the individual concerned to report the matter to An Garda Síochána, who are the investigative body for such matters. In circumstances where a person writes to the Department concerning the conduct of members of An Garda Síochána the correspondent is advised that they may wish to contact the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission, an independent body set up under the Garda Síochána Act 2005 to provide oversight of An Garda Síochána.

In relation to allegations relating to specific concerns of wrongdoing falling within the general remit of this Department I am advised that my officials always try to address the relevant allegations by directing the correspondence to the most appropriate Division and/or relevant body/agency for their attention. If the matter relates to a Department, body or agency outside the remit of this Department then efforts are invariably made to direct the correspondence as appropriate for attention and direct reply. With regard to other allegations of general "wrongdoing" relating to agencies that fall within my Department's remit, the individual concerned is advised to the best of the ability of my Department of the avenues open to them to lodge a complaint or seek redress in respect of the matter concerned.

On the issue raised by the Deputy of my assuming responsibility for ensuring that the function of dealing with wrongdoing in general is exercised by the responsible parties I am sure that the Deputy is aware that there are many bodies which have statutory, legal and constitutional obligations in this regard which I cannot assume for very good reasons of public policy, law and constitutional practice. I include in this category the role of An Garda Síochána in relation to the investigation of crime, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Courts Service as well as numerous other statutory bodies where legislation prescribes a specific governance role to Boards or other office holders or requires that the body concerned exercise an activity without interference from my Department.

Commemorative Events

Questions (471)

Finian McGrath

Question:

471. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Defence his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding the 1916 commemoration at Arbour Hill; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16126/14]

View answer

Written answers

The correspondence that the Deputy has enclosed raises a wide range of issues in relation to the annual 1916 Commemoration in Arbour Hill. A detailed response will issue to the Deputy and the correspondent as soon as possible.

Motor Tax Exemptions

Questions (472)

Seán Fleming

Question:

472. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Defence the number of motor vehicles in the possession of his Department or agencies of his Department that are not required to hold motor tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16025/14]

View answer

Written answers

There are currently 1,524 Defence Forces vehicles on the Defence Organisation asset register. In addition to the Defence Forces vehicles, my Department owns 445 civilian vehicles, 435 of which comprise the Civil Defence fleet including 4x4s, minibuses, ambulances and fire tenders and a further 10 vehicles which are operated by civilian employees at military installations. All State owned vehicles are exempt from the requirement to hold motor tax.

Departmental Transport

Questions (473)

Seán Fleming

Question:

473. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Defence the number of motor vehicles in the possession of his Department or agencies of his Department that do not hold an insurance policy; the manner in which insurance claims arising in respect of vehicles in the possession of his Department or its agencies are handled; the amount of insurance claims paid on behalf of his Department in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16041/14]

View answer

Written answers

There are currently 1524 Defence Forces Vehicles on the asset register. There are an additional 10 vehicles owned by the Department consisting of Jeeps, tractors and Gator Utility vehicles. Since November 2011 the State Claims Agency deals with all claims arising from accidents involving Defence Forces vehicles. Previously the Agency dealt with claims that occurred in Ireland only.

The following table outlines the number of claims finalised in the past 5 years and the subsequent cost to the State.

-

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Cases Finalised

90

107

232

45

63

Compensation/Settlements

€1,670,127.09

€743,995.88

€342,709.54

€247,319.39

€662,338.49

Legal Costs

€655,743.38

€343,440.50

€285,094.41

€181,137.95

€106,768.27

All Civil Defence vehicles are covered by commercial insurance and their claims are handled, in the normal manner, by their Insurance Company.

Defence Forces Retirement Scheme

Questions (474)

Michael Creed

Question:

474. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Defence if his Department has conducted a cost benefit analysis on the obligatory retirement age for privates and corporals in the Permanent Defence Force; the consultations if any he has had with PDFORRA on this matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16110/14]

View answer

Written answers

The unsatisfactory age and fitness profile of the Permanent Defence Force was an issue of serious concern during the 1990’s and was the subject of severe criticism by a series of external reports, mainly Price Waterhouse Consultants and the Efficiency Audit Group (EAG). One of the key areas identified for urgent action by the EAG was the development of a manpower policy with an emphasis on lowering the age profile of Permanent Defence Force personnel. The EAG’s report was accepted by Government in 1995. In an effort to alleviate the situation, the Government had already decided in 1993 to enlist personnel on a five year contract basis, following consultation with Permanent Defence Force Other Ranks Representative Association (PDFORRA). In 1997 agreement was reached with PDFORRA on a new manpower policy for the Defence Forces. This policy, applying to personnel enlisted after 1 January 1994, provided that service for Private Soldiers would initially be for five years with the option to be extended to a maximum of twelve years, subject to meeting standards of medical and physical fitness and conduct. Longer periods of service were envisaged for Non Commissioned Officers. In 2004 PDFORRA submitted a claim under the Conciliation and Arbitration Scheme for a further review of the terms of service applying to personnel enlisting in the Permanent Defence Force after 1 January, 1994. A set of criteria was agreed with PDFORRA to provide longer careers for those who enlisted post 1 January 1994 while continuing to address the Government’s objective of having an appropriate age profile to meet the challenges of a modern Defence Forces. The criteria require that any person re-engaging after 12 years service must be able to continue to operate at their current level both at home and overseas on an ongoing basis. Re-engagement is subject to the individual soldier meeting specified criteria in regard to physical fitness, medical category, successful completion of military courses of instruction, service overseas and conduct ratings.The maximum service period for these personnel is as follows:- - Enlisted Personnel, up to and including the rank of Corporal (and equivalent Naval Service rank), may not serve beyond 21 years service. - Enlisted Personnel, in the rank of Sergeant (and equivalent Naval Service rank), may be permitted to continue in service up to the age of fifty years.- Enlisted Personnel in all higher ranks may serve to the age of fifty-six.With the approach of 2015 the first effects of the agreement, whereby Privates and Corporals may not serve beyond 21 years, will be felt by Permanent Defence Force members in those ranks. A claim has been received from PDFORRA for a further review in relation to this matter. In accordance with normal procedures the Association’s claim is being dealt with under the Conciliation and Arbitration Scheme for members of the Permanent Defence Force. As discussions under the Scheme are confidential to the parties involved it would not be appropriate for me to comment on the matter at this time, including the specifics of cost benefit analysis, other than to emphasise that in dealing with this issue the manpower and operational needs of the Defence Forces must be the primary consideration.It is intended to finalise negotiations with the Representative Association within the next few weeks.

Costais Aistriúcháin

Questions (475)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

475. D'fhiafraigh Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív den Aire Cosanta cén méid airgid a caitheadh in 2013 ar aistriú doiciméad ó Bhéarla go Gaeilge nó ó Ghaeilge go Béarla, agus ó theangacha eile go Béarla agus ó Bhéarla go teangacha eile, faoi seach; cad ba chaiteachas iomlán riaracháin na Roinne sa bhliain 2013; agus an ndéanfaidh sé ráiteas ina thaobh. [16133/14]

View answer

Written answers

Chaith mo Roinn €8,873 in 2013 ar cháipéisí a aistriú ó Bhéarla go Gaeilge agus ó Ghaeilge go Béarla. Ni raibh aon chaiteachas ar cháipéisí a aistriú ó Bhéarla go teangacha eile agus ó theangacha eile go Béarla. An t-iomlán i ndeireadh na bliana don chaiteachas riaracháin don Roinn Cosanta i 2013 ab ea €21,529,335.

Parliamentary Questions Costs

Questions (476)

Joan Collins

Question:

476. Deputy Joan Collins asked the Minister for Defence the costs to his Department to process and respond to a priority, an oral and a written parliamentary question. [16588/14]

View answer

Written answers

The preparation of replies to Parliamentary Questions is an integral part of my Department’s business. It is not possible to separate out the cost of answering Parliamentary Questions from overall administration costs. Approximately 920 Parliamentary Questions were tabled for answer by my Department in 2013.

Defence Forces Parades

Questions (477)

Clare Daly

Question:

477. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Defence the reason on 3 September at Cathal Brugha Barracks before the first troops departed for Syria, he left the stand after the Ministerial inspection while the march past was taking place leaving troops to salute an empty stand, which caused hurt to some of the troops and their families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16680/14]

View answer

Written answers

On 03 September 2013, in Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin, I had the honour of reviewing personnel of the 43rd Infantry Group, who deployed to Syria later that month for service with the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF). There is a Defence Forces Ceremonial Order setting out the protocol associated with these reviews beginning with the marching on of the National Colour, where the Minister remains at the saluting Point. When that is completed the Minister is then invited to review the parade, following which he is escorted back to the saluting Point. The minister then addresses the assembly following which he is escorted to the waiting area while the parade prepares for the March Past. When the parade is ready for the March Past and the families and VIPs have been ushered to their viewing position, the Minister is then invited to take his position on the reviewing stand. On the afternoon in question, on my arrival on the parade ground, I was escorted to the Saluting Point by the Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces where we remained in position for the marching on of the National Colour. When the National Colour was in position, I was invited by the Officer Commanding, 43rd Infantry Group to review the Defence Forces personnel on parade. Following a review of the parade, I then addressed the assembly. When I completed my address, the Chief of Staff escorted me to the waiting area while the parade prepared for the March Past. When the parade was ready for the March Past and the families and VIPs had been ushered to their viewing position, I was invited to take my position on the reviewing stand where I remained until all personnel of the 43rd Infantry Group had marched past and the parade was dismissed. Later, I attended a reception in the Dining Hall at the barracks where I met members of the 43rd Infantry Group and their families.

Defence Forces Properties

Questions (478)

Jack Wall

Question:

478. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Defence if those living in an housing estate (details supplied) under his charge are subject to the property tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16694/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Finance (Local Property Tax) Act, 2012 (the Act) made provision for the introduction of the Local Property Tax (LPT). The tax became first payable in respect of all residential properties within the State in 2013. LPT is payable in accordance with Revenue Self –Assessment procedures. The liability date for the tax was 1 May 2013 in the initial year of assessment and in respect of any other year is 1 November in the preceding year. The person(s) liable for the tax are defined under Part 3 of the Act. On the liability date for 2013, the Department of Defence owned six properties in the housing estate referred to and has since paid the property tax due on those properties. For the 2014 year, the Department is liable for LPT in respect of five properties and the tax due on those properties has been paid by the Department.

The rest of the properties in the housing estate are not owned by the Department and therefore it is not responsible for any LPT return or associated tax payment which may be due by the private owners of these properties.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (479)

Luke 'Ming' Flanagan

Question:

479. Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan asked the Minister for Defence if he will ensure that when a communication on wrongdoing is received in his Department the communication will be deemed to have come to his attention; if he will confirm that, while he is not expected to personally exercise the function of dealing with wrongdoing, he is responsible for ensuring that the function is exercised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17101/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am satisfied that appropriate procedures are in place in my Department in relation to bringing relevant communications to my attention. I can confirm that, where correspondents are advised that their communications are being brought to my attention, such action takes place. I am also satisfied that there are statutory and administrative procedures in place in my Department to address any reports of allegations of wrongdoing.

Special Areas of Conservation Designation

Questions (480)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

480. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 566 of 4 February 2014, if he will compensate aquaculture operators in Kenmare Bay for having to survive under the restrictions of an SAC bay; if he will reinstate grant assistance which the rest of the industry outside SAC's receive, a measure which would cost the Exchequer very little and would help existing operators survive through the present bad weather or if he would prefer if there were no aquaculture operations in an SAC bay. [15973/14]

View answer

Written answers

As I stated in my response to Question No. 566 of 4 February 2014, my Department is constrained by European law from issuing or renewing aquaculture licences for sites located within Natura 2000 areas until such time as an ‘Appropriate Assessment’ has been conducted to assess the potential impact of the proposed aquaculture activities on the conservation objectives for the Natura 2000 site concerned. The licensing process must take full account of the outcome of that assessment in reaching a determination on any particular licence application. It is anticipated that the Appropriate Assessment for Kenmare Bay will be completed this year. The completion of the Appropriate Assessment will enable my Department to move immediately on the licensing aspects.The Seafood Development Programme 2007-2013 is the framework programme for EU co-funded aid to the seafood sector in Ireland and covers aid up to 2015. The Programme is based on Council Regulation 1198/2006 concerning the European Fisheries Fund (EFF). That Regulation specifies the measures that may attract EFF co-funding and provides the state aid basis for those measures. Member States select certain of the measures included in the Regulation for inclusion in their National Operational Programmes based on national priorities. This means that not all measures potentially eligible under the Regulation can be funded. Ireland’s Programme does not include measures for compensating aquaculture operators for any additional costs relating to operations in Natura 2000 areas. However, licensed sites in Kenmare Bay are not subject to any particular additional costs at this time, as they are operating in line with their existing licences pending any renewal of their licence. Ireland’s Programme does include measures to support the development and growth of aquaculture sites and grant aid of up to 40% of eligible costs is available to eligible sites. The EFF Regulation requires that the Commission and Member States ensure that assistance from the EFF is consistent with the policies, priorities and activities of the Union and that operations financed by the EFF comply with the provisions of the Treaties and the Acts adopted under the Treaties. This includes the Habitats and Birds Directives. To give practical effect to this legal obligation, the stakeholder Monitoring Committee approved selection criteria for the Commercial Aquaculture Development Scheme excluding sites located in Natura 2000 areas from aid under the Scheme until such time as an appropriate assessment has been completed and the site concerned has been licensed taking full account of the conclusions of the appropriate assessment. Once aquaculture operations in Kenmare Bay have been subject to appropriate assessment, sites licensed within the Bay may become eligible for grant aid under the Scheme.

Motor Tax Exemptions

Questions (481, 482)

Seán Fleming

Question:

481. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of motor vehicles in the possession of his Department or agencies of his Department that are not required to hold motor tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16021/14]

View answer

Seán Fleming

Question:

482. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of motor vehicles in the possession of his Department or agencies of his Department that do not hold an insurance policy; the manner in which insurance claims arising in respect of vehicles in the possession of his Department or its agencies are handled; the amount of insurance claims paid on behalf of his Department in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16037/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 481 and 482 together.

There is no requirement to pay for motor tax or insurance for Department vehicles, but all vehicles should display a tax disc and hold a letter on Department headed paper stating exemption from displaying an insurance disc under section 4.2 (a) of the Road Traffic Act 1961.

All vehicle Insurance claims made for or against this Department are handled by the State Claims Agency. I am unable to give any figures of the amount of claims paid in the past five years by the State Claims Agency.

In relation to the State Bodies/Agencies vehicle motor tax and insurance, this is an operational matter for the bodies themselves.

Grant Payments

Questions (483)

Michael McNamara

Question:

483. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the reason for the delay in paying the Burren life scheme which was due to be paid out in mid March following a visit from officials of his Department on 3 March 2014 to a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16078/14]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has commenced payments for actions undertaken by farmers participating in the 2013 Burren Farming for Conservation Programme (BFCP). The legal deadline, under the governing EU Regulations for making these payments is the end of June 2014. Since actions undertaken by the BFCP participants continued throughout the entire year 2013, it was not possible to carry out the required eligibility inspections, which must be carried out prior to payment, until 2014. The EU Regulations also provide that all of the eligibility inspections must be completed before payments can commence, this is now the case and payments have started to issue.

The payments for 2013 totalling €986,000, support high environmental value farming in the Burren, which is one of Ireland’s outstanding landscapes and is known worldwide. These payments will bring the allocation to participating famers by my Department over the four years of the Programme to over €3.8 million. Payments under this measure will remain in place in respect of the 2014 scheme-year.

Grant Payments

Questions (484)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

484. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding grassland sheep payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16081/14]

View answer

Written answers

In developing the shape of the new system of Direct Payments in Ireland, I have been very conscious of the needs of sheep farmers, in particular those who farm on hill and commonage land. In general sheep farmers hold low value entitlements under the current Single Payment Scheme and will benefit significantly from the model of convergence that is to be applied in Ireland where those with a low Initial Unit Value will see the value of their entitlements increase over the period of the scheme.

The Grassland Sheep Scheme is based on Article 68 of the current EU Regulation 73/2009 which governs direct payments in the form of the Single Payment Scheme. As of the 1 January 2015 that Regulation is superseded by EU Regulation 1307/2013 and consequently there is no longer any legal basis for the continuation of the Grassland Sheep Scheme in its present form.

When determining the Initial Unit Value of a farmer’s entitlements under the Basic Payment Scheme in 2015, Regulation 1307/2009 gives Member States the option to take into account any payment the farmer received in 2014 under Article 68 schemes such as the Grassland Sheep Scheme. This option is only available where the Member State is not applying voluntary coupled support to the sector concerned under the new CAP.

I have decided to apply this provision in Ireland as a means of safeguarding the value of the payments received under the Grassland Sheep Scheme for those farmers concerned. The Grassland Sheep Scheme is the only Article 68 scheme that is being incorporated into the calculation of entitlements under the new Basic Payment Scheme. If such incorporation does not take place the value of such payments would simply remain in the national fund and would be redistributed generally among all farmers who establish entitlements.

The incorporation of the Grassland Sheep Scheme payment into the calculation of a farmer’s Initial Unit Value in 2015 will obviously result in a higher entitlement value for the farmers concerned from the start of the Scheme rather than relying solely on the gradual process of convergence to increase the unit value over the five year period up to 2019.

Milk Quota Applications

Questions (485)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

485. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his Department is in receipt of an application for milk quota reserve in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Wexford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16105/14]

View answer

Written answers

Allocations of milk quota from the National Reserve are granted on the basis of recommendations made by an independent Milk Quota Appeals Tribunal. The Tribunal examines and makes recommendations on applications for additional quota, from individual producers, on the grounds of animal disease.

My Department has received an application from the named person and I understand the result of that application will issue in the next week.

Costais Aistriúcháin

Questions (486)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

486. D'fhiafraigh Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív den Aire Talmhaíochta, Bia agus Mara cén méid airgid a caitheadh in 2013 ar aistriú doiciméad ó Bhéarla go Gaeilge nó ó Ghaeilge go Béarla, agus ó theangacha eile go Béarla agus ó Bhéarla go teangacha eile, faoi seach; cad ba chaiteachas iomlán riaracháin na Roinne sa bhliain 2013; agus an ndéanfaidh sé ráiteas ina thaobh. [16129/14]

View answer

Written answers

I rith 2013 caitheadh €14,572.40 ar sheirbhísí aistriúcháin i mo Roinn. Bhain €13,904.84 den mhéid sin ar cháipéisí a aistriú ó Bhéarla go Gaeilge agus ó Ghaeilge go Béarla. €667.56 a caitheadh ar cháipéisí a aistriú go teangacha eile agus as teangacha eile.

Animal Breeding Regulations

Questions (487, 488)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

487. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he is satisfied that the current breed specific regulations under the Control of Dogs Act 1998 are not having an adverse impact on the welfare of the dogs of these breeds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16148/14]

View answer

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

488. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views that the current breed specific regulations under the Control of Dogs Act 1998 contravenes section 7 of the OIE, International Office of Epizootics, World Organisation for Animal Health, animal welfare standards, terrestrial animal code; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16149/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 487 and 488 together.

The Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013 provides for the welfare of animals. Section 11 requires that a person who has possession of an animal safeguards its welfare. It also requires that an animal’s owner ensures that their animal is kept in a manner that does not threaten the health or welfare of another animal.

The requirement to keep certain dogs in public places muzzled and on a leash are set out in S.I. No. 442/1998 - Control of Dogs Regulations, 1998, which was made under The Control Of Dogs Act, 1986 (No. 32 of 1986) and The Control of Dogs (Amendment) Act, 1992 (No. 13 of 1992). Accordingly, this is a matter for my colleague the Minister of Environment, Community & Local Government.

Rural Environment Protection Scheme Payments

Questions (489)

John O'Mahony

Question:

489. Deputy John O'Mahony asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive their rural environment protection scheme payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16198/14]

View answer

Written answers

The person named commenced REPS 4 in March 2009 and received payments for the first five years of their contract.

REPS 4 is a measure under the current 2007-13 Rural Development Programme and is subject to EU Regulations which require detailed administrative checks on all applications to be completed before any payments can issue. This process has now been completed for 2013 payments and the above named has now been authorised for payment. The 75% payment will issue shortly and the 25% payment shortly after that.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Applications

Questions (490)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

490. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when a 2013 disadvantaged area scheme payment will issue in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16215/14]

View answer

Written answers

Under 2013 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme, eligible applicants’ holdings were required to have satisfied minimum stocking density of 0.15 livestock units for a retention period of seven consecutive months, in addition to maintaining an annual average of 0.15 livestock units calculated over the twelve months of the scheme year. As the holding of the person named did not satisfy these minimum requirements, no payment is due to the person named under the 2013 Scheme.

Single Payment Scheme Payments

Questions (491)

Michelle Mulherin

Question:

491. Deputy Michelle Mulherin asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the position regarding a single farm payment for 2013 in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Mayo, when will it be expedited; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16278/14]

View answer

Written answers

The processing of the application of the person named under 2013 Single Payment Scheme was recently finalised. Payment under this scheme will issue as soon as possible to the nominated bank account of the person named.

Top
Share