Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 6 May 2014

Written Answers Nos. 155-65

Insurance Industry

Questions (155, 159)

John Halligan

Question:

155. Deputy John Halligan asked the Minister for Finance if he is monitoring the situation regarding the collapse of Setanta Insurance which is affecting over 75,000 Irish citizens, some of whom have been left without cover or reimbursement for premiums paid and others who have been left uncovered during claim proceedings; if his Department has plans or authority to intervene in the situation in view of the fact that the European Commission is to investigate the closure and indeed the EU legislation which allowed it to sell insurance here; if he has sought clarification from the Financial Regulator here regarding this foreign regulation; if he will be sending a representative from his Department to represent Irish interests at the meeting of creditors being held in Malta next week; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20123/14]

View answer

Ciara Conway

Question:

159. Deputy Ciara Conway asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding policyholders at Setanta Insurance; the position of the State in respect of same; if those policyholders with active claims will be compensated via a State fund; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20156/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 155 and 159 together.

Under EU law which governs non-life insurance, an insurer is required to inform the regulator in its home Member State (its home regulator) that it intends to pursue business in another Member State. The home regulator must then provide the host regulator with a certificate attesting that the insurer covers the EU Solvency Capital Requirement, as well as the nature of the business which the insurer intends to undertake. The insurer may start to pursue business from the date that the certificate is communicated to the host regulator, in this case the Central Bank of Ireland.

Setanta Insurance Company Limited ("Setanta") is a Maltese incorporated company which was both authorised and prudentially supervised by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). While its financial position is not supervised by the Central Bank of Ireland as the Central Bank has no role in that regard, the firm is supervised by the Central Bank for conduct of business rules, i.e. consumer protection obligations. The Central Bank is in ongoing contact with the Malta Financial Services Authority in relation to Setanta Insurance Company Limited, the impact on policyholders and the provision for relevant and appropriate information, particularly in relation to claims.

Setanta was regulated at EU regulatory level in accordance with a directive known as Solvency I which currently places requirements on the amount of regulatory capital European insurance companies must hold against unforeseen events. I understand that Setanta met its EU regulatory obligations and under EU law is therefore entitled to trade across EU borders. Following negotiations that were completed at European level in November, 2013, a new regime known as Solvency II will commence on 1 January 2016, which will further strengthen the EU regulatory framework. The Solvency II EU Directive sets out new, stronger EU-wide requirements on capital adequacy and risk management for insurers with the key aim of increasing policyholder protection. The new regime will also ensure greater cooperation between supervisors.

My Department and the Central Bank will be reviewing the circumstances relating to Setanta and will be reporting to me on what lessons can be learnt and how the framework can be strengthened. The European Commission have indicated that it will review whether any issues raised relating to the regulatory framework require action. On 16 April, 2014, Setanta determined that the company was insolvent. This means that Setanta does not have sufficient funds to be able to honour its full obligations towards claimants, policyholders and other creditors. Setanta was formally placed into liquidation by the MFSA following a meeting of the creditors which took place on 30 April, 2014 where a liquidator, Mr Paul Mercieca, was appointed. The meeting was attended by a representative from the MFSA, who advised the Central Bank of Ireland on developments.

While the position on each policy is for the liquidator to decide in due course, policyholders will be given cancellation notification during which period cover will remain in force. While policies will remain valid until the required notice period has been served, it is important to be clear that the amounts due under any claims may not be fully recoverable in all circumstances. The Central Bank has written to over 230 brokers and firms who were offering policies from Setanta Insurance to consumers to require them to immediately contact any Setanta policyholder and inform them of the urgency to make alternative motor insurance arrangements.

Claims on personal insurance policies will be payable from the Insurance Compensation Fund (ICF). Claimants will be eligible for 65% of the amount due or €825,000, whichever is the lesser. Under Section 3.6 of the Insurance Amendment Act 1964 (as amended) first party claims by a body corporate or unincorporated body are not covered by the ICF.

The Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland ("MIBI") is a non-profit-making organisation which was established by Agreement between the Government and those companies underwriting motor insurance in Ireland. The principal role of MIBI is to compensate innocent victims of accidents caused by uninsured and unidentified vehicles. If, for legal reasons, MIBI is not in a position to accept a claim, these third party claims will be eligible to proceed for consideration by the High Court for compensation from the Insurance Compensation Fund (ICF). The ICF is subject to the limit of 65% of the amount due or €825,000, whichever is the less. The refund of premiums for commercial and personal insurance policies is not covered by the ICF or MIBI. A portion of the premium refunds may, however, be available upon completion of the Setanta liquidation. Until otherwise advised those policyholders which have been affected by the collapse should continue to contact to Setanta Insurance Services Limited at 0818 255 255 (if calling from outside Ireland +353 1 897 6300) or on support@setantainsurance.com.

Central Bank of Ireland

Questions (156, 157)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

156. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 77 of 17 April 2014, if the possible breach of the market abuse directive regulations, which has been referred to by a panel of assessors, includes the possible commission of a relevant offence under the Criminal Justice Act 2011; if he will confirm the total number of administrative sanctions procedure cases that the Central Bank of Ireland has conducted since 5 August 2011 which have resulted in a person employed by the Central Bank of Ireland having information which he or she knows or believes might be of material assistance in preventing the commission by any other person of a relevant offence under the Criminal Justice Act 2011 or securing the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any other person for a relevant offence under the Criminal Justice Act 2011; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20152/14]

View answer

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

157. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 77 of 17 April 2014, if the Central Bank of Ireland has conducted any internal review after the commencement of section 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2011 into all administrative sanctions procedure cases prior to that date to determine whether any person currently employed by the Central Bank of Ireland had information which he or she knows or believes might be of material assistance in preventing the commission by any other person of a relevant offence under the Criminal Justice Act 2011 or securing the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any other person for a relevant offence under the Criminal Justice Act 2011; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20153/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 156 and 157 together.

I am informed by the Central Bank that the possible breach of the Market Abuse Directive Regulations, 2005 has been referred to a panel of Assessors under Regulation 35 of the Market Abuse Regulations, to conduct an assessment as to whether or not a breach has occurred and, if so, what sanction, if any, the assessors consider appropriate. In the circumstances it would not be appropriate for me to comment publicly on the substance of a matter that is currently before the panel of Assessors.

Section 33AK of the Central Bank Act 1942, requires that the Central Bank report to the appropriate specified bodies, including An Garda Síochána, any information that leads the Central Bank to suspect that a criminal offence may have been committed by an entity supervised by the Central Bank. The Central Bank meets its obligations in this regard and regularly submits such reports to An Garda Síochána, including prior to the commencement of section 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2011. Accordingly the question of a review of cases prior to the commencement of the Criminal Justice Act 2011 does not arise.

Since 5 August 2011 there have been forty two Administrative Sanctions Procedure settlements with the Central Bank. In those cases where suspicions of a criminal offence also arose, the Central Bank reported the matter to the appropriate specified body, including An Garda Síochána, as required under s33AK of the 1942 Act.

Central Bank of Ireland Investigations

Questions (158)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

158. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance the total number of complaints employees of the Central Bank of Ireland have made to the Garda regarding information they have obtained during their course of employment where they suspect a crime may have been committed since 2010 to date; the number of those complaints which related to, or resulted in, subsequent prosecutions being pursued by the DPP; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20154/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am not privy to complaints made by employees of the Central Bank to the Garda Síochána. Furthermore I have no responsibility in any subsequent follow-up to any such complaints. In this regard, the DPP is entirely independent in carrying out her functions.

Question No. 159 answered with Question No. 155.

Property Tax Collection

Questions (160)

Brian Walsh

Question:

160. Deputy Brian Walsh asked the Minister for Finance if the Revenue Commissioners are erroneously seeking to collect household charge arrears in respect of a person and property (details supplied) in County Galway. [20161/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that with effect from 1 July 2013, Section 156 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) converted Household Charge (HHC) to LPT and made Revenue responsible for the collection of any arrears. Any outstanding HHC liability was increased to €200 and was included as part of the LPT liability for the property. Revenue received the Household Charge register from the Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and cross-referenced that register with the LPT register to identify a list of properties for which the Household Charge is still outstanding.

Revenue has indicated that the HHC arrears list is not fully accurate as the LGMA Register captured the name of the person who physically paid the charge rather than the property owner. In the specific circumstances of the individual mentioned by the Deputy, the person is the designated liable owner of the property in question, in accordance with the LPT1 Return for 2013, and consequently he is regarded as liable for any arrears of the HHC. There is no record of payment for HHC for this property. His contact address, for all Revenue matters, is the address of the property. He has submitted a query, with regard to the HHC arrears, through the online service and an email address has been provided. Contact will be made with the individual, by the LPT team, via the email address with a view to establishing his circumstances and updating his Revenue records, including the LPT Register records.

Revenue Documents Issuance

Questions (161)

John O'Mahony

Question:

161. Deputy John O'Mahony asked the Minister for Finance when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be issued with their stamp certificate to the original deed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20167/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the stamp certificate issued by post on the 12 December 2013 to the solicitor of the person in question. Should the person in question require further clarification he may contact Mr Michael O'Hanlon, Dublin Stamping District, Dublin Castle, Dublin 2, telephone 01 8589393.

Pension Levy

Questions (162)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

162. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if any pension levy or other charge will be imposed on private sector pension funds after 2015; if the 0.5% levy planned for 2015 will be kept at that level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20174/14]

View answer

Written answers

I announced in my Budget 2014 speech that the 0.6% Pension Fund Levy introduced to fund the Jobs Initiative in 2011 will be abolished from 31 December 2014. I introduced an additional levy at 0.15% which, as I also stated in the Budget speech, would apply within the existing legal framework to pension fund assets in 2014 and 2015. This was done to, among other things, continue to help fund the Jobs Initiative. I have no plans to make any further changes in this regard.

Property Tax Assessments

Questions (163)

Dan Neville

Question:

163. Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding a reassessment rate of property tax in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Limerick. [20181/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that as Local Property Tax (LPT) is a self-assessed tax it was a matter for the property owner to calculate the tax due based on his or her assessment of the market value of the property on 1 May 2013. In order to avoid incurring interest or penalty charges, individuals were required by 2 April 2014, to have filed an LPT 1 return in respect of their property, paid their 2013 liability and put payment arrangements in place in respect of their 2014 liability.

With regard to the circumstances of the individual referred to by the Deputy, I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that, contrary to the details supplied by the Deputy, no LPT return had been filed and no valuation submitted. A payment of €50 was, however, received in respect of the property with regard to LPT for 2013 and no payment arrangements were put in place in respect of 2014.

I can now confirm that an official from the LPT Branch has been in contact with the individual and as a result an LPT Return has been filed. I am further advised that monies already paid have discharged the 2013 liability in full, as the individual concerned valued the property in the band 1 category. The remaining balance will now be offset against the 2014 liability and the individual concerned has arranged to pay the 2014 balance by service provider.

Property Tax Collection

Questions (164)

Dan Neville

Question:

164. Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding alleged arrears of the household charge in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20228/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that with effect from 1 July 2013, Section 156 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) converted Household Charge (HHC) to LPT and made Revenue responsible for the collection of any arrears. Any outstanding HHC liability was increased to €200 and was included as part of the LPT liability for the property.

Revenue received the Household Charge register from the Local Government Management Agency (LGMA) and cross-referenced that register with the LPT register to identify a list of properties for which the Household Charge is still outstanding. Revenue clearly indicated that the HHC arrears list is not 100% accurate in all of its communications in regard to LPT/HHC, and stressed that in such circumstances the onus was on the property owners to make contact and provide the correct details.

In circumstances where a person believes that the amount is not due because either the HHC was paid to the LGMA, or the property was not liable to, or exempt from the HHC, a person can update their 'Household Charge Arrears Record' online at www.revenue.ie, using their Property ID and PIN or through the LPT Helpline at 1890 200 255. In the specific circumstances of the individual mentioned by the Deputy and following contact by a member of the LPT Branch with the person concerned, the LPT/HHC record has been updated to reflect the fact that the property in question was not liable to the HHC and therefore the liability has been removed from the record.

Revenue Commissioners Expenditure

Questions (165)

Seán Kenny

Question:

165. Deputy Seán Kenny asked the Minister for Finance his plans to increase the number of dogs in the Revenue Commissioners' dog unit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20233/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that that they currently have 14 detector dog teams, each consisting of a detector dog and its handler, at their disposal. These teams are deployed at strategic locations throughout the country and are used in the detection of drugs, tobacco and cash. While the teams operate primarily in their regions of assignment, they are also available for deployment elsewhere, as required. Revenue also ensures that the teams maintain a high visibility at the ports, airports, postal depots and freight forwarders' premises in which they routinely operate. In addition, the teams assist in operations carried out by An Garda Síochána, where requested to do so.

The experience of the Revenue Commissioners is that detector dogs play an important part in detecting illicit drugs and tobacco and the illegal movement of cash. The number of teams was increased significantly in recent years. Arrangements are currently in train for the replacement of one detector dog that was taken out of service last year, and for the acquisition of two further dogs. This will bring the number of detector dog teams to 17, and the Revenue Commissioners consider that that complement will provide the requisite support for their work in detecting and seizing illegal drugs and tobacco products and cash. The position will, however, be kept under review on an ongoing basis, in light of emerging circumstances and requirements.

Top
Share