Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 11 Jun 2014

Written Answers Nos. 73-94

Inland Fisheries

Questions (73)

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

73. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht further to Parliamentary Question No. 127 of 8 May 2014, which states that responsibility for protecting the freshwater pearl mussel is a matter for the National Parks and Wildlife Service, if he is satisfied that all of the actions taken by Inland Fisheries Ireland and-or its predecessor organisations in their management of rivers for fish conservation or angling promotion purposes of the past 15 years have been consistent with the need to conserve the freshwater pearl mussel; if he is satisfied that no actions have been taken by IFI or its predecessor organisations in the past 15 years which have been damaging to the conservation status of the freshwater pearl mussel; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24813/14]

View answer

Written answers

The freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) is a large, long-lived, bivalve mollusc found in clean, fast-flowing rivers. It is a highly threatened animal, categorised as Critically Endangered within Ireland and across Europe. There are many factors involved as to why it is so endangered. The freshwater pearl mussel is listed in Annex II of the EU Habitats Directive and requires the designation of Special Areas of Conservation for its protection. The freshwater pearl mussel has an unusual life-cycle, in that the larval stage must attach to fish gills for a period of around 10 months. In Irish rivers, young Atlantic salmon are the usual hosts.

Because of this dependency, the habitats of the freshwater pearl mussel and juvenile salmonids frequently overlap. All of these species are associated with good and high water quality. While the freshwater pearl mussel requires the highest standards of water quality, works by Inland Fisheries Ireland to improve water quality for salmonids are very much to the benefit of the species.

In-stream interventions for fish conservation or angling purposes, such as rock-armouring, weir construction or the introduction of artificial spawning habitats, have the potential to negatively impact on the freshwater pearl mussel, where those structures are in, or upstream of, beds of mussels. To avoid such negative impacts, close cooperation evolved between my Department and the Central and Regional Fishery Boards, both among the organisations’ scientific staff and also at local management level. However, our understanding of the complex interactions that impact on water quality are evolving and active engagement continues between my Department and Inland Fisheries Ireland, for example in the soon to be completed freshwater pearl mussel InterReg project in Donegal.

In general, the future survival of the freshwater pearl mussel in Ireland requires close cooperation with many public authorities and other stakeholders to ensure that water quality within our rivers can support healthy populations. My Department is working with these stakeholders to achieve these aims.

Commemorative Events

Questions (74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 80)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

74. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht his commemorative plans to mark the centenary of the passage into law of the Home Rule Act on 18 September 1914; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24845/14]

View answer

Paudie Coffey

Question:

75. Deputy Paudie Coffey asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the commemorative activities he will undertake in September 2014 to mark the centenary of the passage into law of the Home Rule Act on 18 September 1914. [24849/14]

View answer

James Bannon

Question:

76. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the commemorative activities he will undertake in September 2014 to mark the centenary of the passage into law of the Home Rule Act on 18 September 1914. [24865/14]

View answer

Joe Carey

Question:

77. Deputy Joe Carey asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the commemorative activities he will undertake in September 2014 to mark the centenary of the passage into law of the Home Rule Act on 18 September 1914; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24866/14]

View answer

Billy Timmins

Question:

78. Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the commemorative events he will hold in September 2014 to mark the centenary of the signing of the Home Rule Act into law on the 14 September 1914; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24873/14]

View answer

Regina Doherty

Question:

80. Deputy Regina Doherty asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the commemorative activities he will undertake in September 2014 to mark the centenary of the passage into law of the Home Rule Act on 18 September 1914; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24880/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 74 to 78, inclusive, and 80 together.

The passing of the Home Rule Act was a milestone in the history of Ireland and the crowning achievement of the Irish Parliamentary Party. As Minister with responsibility for co-ordinating the Decade of Centenaries, I have been following the historical timeline closely, marking key stages in the progress of the 3rd Home Rule Bill through the parliament at Westminster. To mark the centenary of the introduction of the Bill, an exhibition was prepared that was hosted at Westminster in London, at the Houses of the Oireachtas and the National Library of Ireland in Dublin, and at Stormont in Belfast. This exhibition set the 3rd Home Rule Bill in its historical context and provided an insight into the political forces that drove, and restricted, the progress of the Bill. As the Bill was introduced in April 1912, I arranged, on its centenary in April 2012, the 'Redmond Memorial Lectures' in Waterford delivered by Frank Callinan SC and Dermot Meleady (see www.decadeofcentenaries.com for further information).

My Department also supported the production of a supplement to the Irish Times "Home Rule and Ulster's Resistance" that was distributed free of charge to schools. The provision of information, resources and primary source material has been a cornerstone of my strategy to commemorate important events and I am pleased to note that this week the RTÉ/Century Ireland project, supported by my Department, is publishing details of John Redmond's moves to forge close links between the Irish Parliamentary Party and the Irish Volunteers in June 1914.

I have attended a number of events in Westminster highlighting the historical importance and the enduring significance of the Home Rule campaign and legislation. In January 2013, in partnership with NIO Minister Penning and Lord Bew, we arranged for a special presentation to mark the centenary of the second passing of the Bill.

Indeed, I am pleased to say that on 1 July next, I will be attending again at Westminster for a commemorative event arranged by the Speaker of the Commons, John Bercow, MP. With contributions from John Bruton, Baroness Shirley Williams, Lord Paul Bew and Professor Michael Laffan, the event will attended by over 100 invited guests from parliament, media and academic life. I hope to arrange that the proceedings will subsequently be available online.

While I am keen to ensure that the life and work of John Redmond is given appropriate recognition in the Decade of Centenaries, the role of other distinguished members of the Irish Parliamentary party should also be reflected. Initiatives rooted in the areas and communities from which they were elected would be particularly welcome. The specific arrangements for the anniversary of the legislation on 18 September and the address by John Redmond at Woodenbridge on 20 September 2014 remain under consideration and will include publication of historical resource material.

As indicated in the recent announcement of capital expenditure on commemorative projects, I consider it appropriate that provision is being made to restore the burial vault of John Redmond.

Special Areas of Conservation Designation

Questions (79)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

79. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the scientific evidence available to prove afforestation affects the breeding grounds of the hen harrier; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24879/14]

View answer

Written answers

The 1979 EU Birds Directive requires that each Member State of the European Union classify suitable areas as Special Protection Areas (SPAs) for the protection of endangered species of bird, including the Hen Harrier. Under Article 6 of the Habitats Directive, which applies to SPAs, Ireland is obliged to prevent the deterioration of these SPAs as suitable areas for the species and only to consent to projects, including afforestation, where there is clear scientific evidence that such projects will not lead to an adverse impact on the integrity of the SPA. It is now well established that afforestation interacts with the ecology of Hen Harriers. During the early growth stages, these areas are selected by breeding Hen Harriers for nesting and foraging. Depending on the location and scale, afforestation can lead to an increase in breeding populations. However, as plantations mature, their value as a feeding and nesting resource is significantly diminished. Therefore, if particular areas are dominated by plantations of a similar age, then the overall availability of suitable breeding habitat for the Hen Harrier declines as a result of the maturing trees. The availability of suitable habitat is a fundamental requirement for the conservation of breeding birds in the wild. The results of the latest national survey recorded a significant decline in the numbers of breeding Hen Harriers in those SPAs that were designated for the conservation of this species.

A report based on a recent Irish scientific study observed that the breeding productivity rate of Hen Harriers in their study sites was low and that a negative relationship existed between second rotation pre-thicket forests and Hen Harrier breeding success. The potential impact of such a negative association is of concern, due to the fact that a large proportion of Hen Harrier nests in Ireland are situated in second rotation pre-thicket forestry.

The following published scientific reports and papers have informed this understanding:

- Irwin, S., Wilson, W., O'Donoghue, B., O'Mahony, B., Kelly, T., O'Halloran, J. (2012) Optimum scenarios for Hen Harrier Conservation in Ireland; Final Report 2012. Prepared for the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine by the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork;

- O’Donoghue, B.G. (2010) The Ecology and Conservation of Hen Harriers (Circus cyaneus) in Ireland. PhD Thesis. University College Cork;

- O'Flynn, W. J. (1983) Population changes of the Hen Harrier in Ireland. Irish Birds, 2: 337–342;

- Ruddock, M., Dunlop, B. J., O’ Toole, L., Mee, A. and Nagle, T. (2012) Republic of Ireland National Hen Harrier survey 2010. Irish Wildlife Manual, No. 59. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland;

- Wilson, M.W., Irwin, S., Norriss, D.W., Newton, S.F., Collins, K., Kelly, T.C. & O’Halloran, J. (2009) The importance of pre thicket conifer plantations for nesting Hen;

Harriers Circus cyaneus in Ireland. Ibis 151: 332 343.

- Wilson, M. W., Gittings, T., Pithon, J., Kelly, T. C., Irwin, S. and O’Halloran, J. (2012) Bird diversity of afforestation habitats in Ireland: current trends and likely impacts. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 112B;

- Wilson, M. W., O’Donoghue, B., O’Mahony, B., Cullen, C., O’Donoghue, T., Oliver, G., Ryan, B., Troake, P., Irwin, S., Kelly, T. C., Rotella, J. J. and O’Halloran, J. (2012) Mismatches between breeding success and habitat preferences in Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus breeding in forested landscapes. Ibis, 154: 578–589.

Question No. 80 answered with Question No. 74.

Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme

Questions (81)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

81. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the total number of traditional turf cutters with whom agreement has been reached arising from special areas of conservation or natural heritage areas throughout the country and in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24953/14]

View answer

Written answers

A total of 2,959 applications for compensation under the cessation of turf cutting compensation scheme, applicable to raised bog special areas of conservation, have been received and acknowledged by my Department. Of these, 820 applicants have expressed an interest in relocation to non-designated bogs. A total of 4,596 payments and 503 deliveries of turf have been made in respect of these applications. In addition, 1,266 legal agreements have been returned to my Department and 1,104 once-off incentive payments of €500 have been made to date to applicants in respect of these legal agreements. Progress in relocating turf cutters is being achieved in a number of cases.

Arrangements for the relocation of turf cutters to non-designated bogs have been made as regards a group from Clara Bog special area of conservation in County Offaly and a group from Carrownagappul Bog and Curraghlehanagh Bog special areas of conservation in County Galway. The group from Clara Bog commenced turf cutting at the relocation site in Killeranny, County Offaly, in June 2012, where 25 qualifying turf cutters have now been accommodated. 23 qualifying turf cutters from the group from Carrownagappul Bog and Curraghlehanagh Bog have been accommodated at the Islands Bog and Killasolan Bog, County Galway from the 2014 turf cutting season.

Progress has been made with a view to the relocation of 9 qualifying turf cutters from Ballynafagh Bog special area of conservation in County Kildare to Timahoe North, County Kildare, which is in the ownership of Bord na Móna. The site has been available for turf cutting during this season. However, turf cutters have not agreed with my Department to cut turf there.

Progress has also been made with a view to the relocation of qualifying turf cutters from Moyclare Bog special area of conservation in County Offaly to Lemanaghan Bog, County Offaly, which is in the ownership of Bord na Móna, from the 2015 turf cutting season.

My Department has provided 7 turf cutters from Monivea Bog special area of conservation with the possibility of relocating to a number of sites which have been assessed as suitable for relocation:

- Killaclogher Bog, Abbert Demense, County Galway which could accommodate 11 turf cutters;

- Clogh, Cloonkeen Bog, Attymon, County Galway, which could accommodate 14 turf cutters; and

- Gortnalone South, Cloonkeen Bog, Attymon, County Galway which could accommodate 10 turf cutters.

Due to the number of turf plots available, my Department is also endeavouring to determine whether other turf cutters may be interested in relocating to one of these sites.

Lattins Bog, also known as Mouds North Bog, in County Kildare, has been identified as a potential relocation site for turf cutters from Mouds Bog special area of conservation. Bord na Móna has undertaken a full suitability assessment for the site and my Department has provided a copy of the assessment report to the Secretary of the Committee of the Kildare Turf Cutters Association. This report illustrates that 19 turf cutters could be accommodated on the site. Bord na Móna, in consultation with my Department, is investigating the potential for the accommodation of additional turf cutters on the site.

Relocation sites have also been assessed as suitable for turf cutters from Ardgraigue Bog, Moanveanlagh Bog and Redwood Bog special areas of conservation. Due to the small number of turf cutters from these bogs who have expressed an interest in relocation and to the number of plots available, my Department is endeavouring to ascertain whether other turf cutters may be interested in relocation to these sites.

I am advised that of the remaining 43 raised bog special areas of conservation, potential relocation sites have been identified for a further 28 bogs and work is on-going on identifying and investigating sites. Relocation is unlikely to be required, or is likely to be small-scale, for another 15 raised bog special areas of conservation due, for example, to the small number that had been cutting turf on these sites during the relevant five year qualification period.

The Review of Raised Bog Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs), which is available to download from my Department’s website at http://www.ahg.gov.ie/en/Publications, provides details on future arrangements regarding turf cutting on each of the 75 raised bog natural heritage areas.

Carbury Bog NHA in County Kildare is one of the NHAs which are to be conserved. In the case of this bog, the review envisages the cessation of turf cutting on the site by 1 January 2017 to preserve its conservation value. Turf cutting may continue on the bog until that date, on plots that have been cut in the five year period prior to the Government decision of 14 January 2014 on the NHA review.

To ensure that cutting does not intensify over the next 3 years, owners of plots or of turbary rights who have cut over the past 5 years must obtain a permit to cut from my Department. Contractors are also obliged to obtain permits.

The NHA review also envisages the complete or partial de-designation of 46 existing NHAs where turf cutting may continue into the future. In these de-designation cases, it will not be necessary for individuals to seek consent to cut turf. Hodgestown Bog NHA in County Kildare is one of these de-designation cases.

Any turf cutter required to cease turf cutting on an NHA is being offered compensatory measures similar to those available to turf cutters from raised bog special areas of conservation. Such compensation will be available to qualifying persons with effect from 2014.

My Department has issued in the region of 250 compensation forms in relation to NHA sites and 50 completed forms have been received. My Department has also received 129 permit applications in relation to NHA sites, resulting in 90 permits to cut turf until the end of 2016 being issued. 5 permits to cut turf have also been issued to contractors.

Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme

Questions (82)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

82. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the total compensation paid to traditional to date to traditional turf cutters being discommoded or displaced arising from special areas of conservation or natural heritage areas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24954/14]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has operated a number of compensation schemes applicable to those who have been cutting turf on raised bog special areas of conservation and natural heritage areas for domestic use. In 1999 a voluntary bog purchase scheme was established under which individuals with a legal interest in designated raised bog sites could apply to sell their interest in these areas to my Department at set rates. This scheme was revised and increased rates introduced in 2004. Since May 2010, this scheme is closed to new applicants.

Also in May 2010, the then Government announced the establishment of an interim compensation scheme applicable to the 31 raised bog special areas of conservation nominated for designation between 1997 and 1999. This scheme offered a compensation payment of €1,000 in respect of 2010 to those who ceased cutting turf in these designated sites.

In April 2011, the present Government put in place a compensation scheme for those affected by the cessation of turf cutting on raised bog special areas of conservation. This scheme provides for a payment of €1,500 per year, index linked, for 15 years or, where feasible, relocation of turf cutters to non-designated bogs where they can continue to cut turf. Those wishing to relocate can avail of the financial payment, or the delivery of 15 tonnes of cut turf per annum, while relocation sites are identified and prepared. An additional once-off payment of €500 for qualifying turf cutters is provided where legal agreements are signed with me, as Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.

The Review of Raised Bog Natural Heritage Areas, which is available to download from my Department’s website at http://www.ahg.gov.ie/en/Publications, envisages the cessation of turf cutting on 36 natural heritage areas by 1 January 2017 to preserve their conservation value. Any turf cutter required to cease turf cutting on a natural heritage area is being offered compensatory measures similar to those available to turf cutters from raised bog special areas of conservation. Such compensation will be available to qualifying applicants with effect from 2014.

Details of the total expenditure to date on these schemes are set out in the following table:

Compensation Scheme

Total Expenditure

Voluntary Bog Purchase Scheme

€28,179,816

Interim Turf Compensation Scheme

€171,000

Cessation of Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme

€8,360,987

Heritage Sites

Questions (83, 87, 88)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

83. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the number and location of heritage sites, buildings or historical locations brought to his attention and deemed to be at risk over the past three years; the action taken or pending in any such cases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24955/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

87. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which national monuments or historical sites worthy of preservation and or deemed at risk have been brought to his attention in the past three years; the extent of the action taken; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24959/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

88. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which national monuments or historical sites in County Kildare worthy of preservation and or deemed at risk have been brought to his attention in the past three years; the extent of the action taken; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24960/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 83, 87 and 88 together.

Comprehensive statistics are not available in respect of the number and location of endangered heritage sites or buildings throughout the country or specifically for County Kildare. As set out previously in my reply to the Deputy's Question No. 149 of 17 April 2014, my Department has a number of measures at its disposal to address the issue of endangered heritage sites or buildings throughout the country.

All known archaeological monuments, of which there are in excess of 130,000, are entitled to protection under the National Monuments Acts 1930-2004. Those Acts allow me, as Minister, to make a preservation order where I consider a national monument to be at risk. Protection may be extended to previously unrecorded monuments by entering them in the Register of Historic Monuments or the Record of Monuments and Places. Prosecutions in respect of damage to recorded monuments are initiated, where warranted.

Under section 53 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended, I may, as Minister, make recommendations to a planning authority concerning the inclusion in its Record of Protected Structures any structures which I consider would merit such inclusion and the attendant planning restrictions which would apply to protect the structures’ special architectural, historical, archaeological, artistic, cultural, scientific, social or technical interest.

Special Areas of Conservation Designation

Questions (84)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

84. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the total acreage of lands protected under special areas of conservation or natural heritage areas currently; the extent to which any new areas are pending; the degree to which SACs or NHAs have been extended over the past 15 years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24956/14]

View answer

Written answers

Some 707,000 hectares of the SAC network is regarded as terrestrial, or above the High Water Mark, with some 57,000 hectares of the NHA network in the same category. This includes inland water bodies. In addition, some 1,200 hectares, also defined as terrestrial, are within both an SAC and NHA. The designation process of Ireland’s SACs, of which there are 429, began in 1997 and will be completed in the near future. Over that period, to comply with the requirements of the Habitats Directive and in response to a European Court of Justice finding against Ireland, additional sites were proposed for designation and the boundaries of certain sites were increased.

Two further raised bog SACs will be proposed for designation later this year, as outlined in the draft National Raised Bog SAC Management Plan which was published for consultation earlier this year. There are currently 155 NHAs. The Review of the Raised Bog Natural Heritage Area Network, also published earlier this year, proposes the complete or partial de-designation of 46 existing raised bog NHAs and the designation of an additional 25 new sites. I expect to be in a position to progress these designations later this year.

Arts Funding

Questions (85, 86, 89)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

85. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which the various forms of the arts continue to be supported and encouraged notwithstanding the economic downturn; if particular or specific areas have been earmarked for attention; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24957/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

86. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the total number and location of recipients of grant aid in support of the arts in the course of the past three years to date both directly through his Department or through the aegis of subordinate bodies; the extent to which all such funding has been drawn down; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24958/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

89. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which interest continues to be shown in this country for film location purposes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24961/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 85, 86 and 89 together.

I refer the Deputy to my previous extensive responses to him on these matters. As the Deputy will recall, responsibility for the promotion of the arts at all levels throughout the country is primarily devolved to the Arts Council, which is the principal agency through which State funding is channelled to the arts. Under the Arts Act 2003, the Arts Council is a statutorily independent body, funded by my Department and independent in its day-to-day operations, and I have no role to play in relation to its funding decisions, such as those relating to local festivals, musical and dramatic productions.

In Budgets 2013 and 2014, significant changes to the film and television production tax and incentive regime were announced to encourage the location in the State of mobile audiovisual production. I would refer the Deputy to the website of the Irish Film Board at http://www.irishfilmboard.ie/ on which details of film locations are regularly updated. Relevant details in relation to funding decisions by my Department are also available on its website at www.ahg.gov.ie.

Questions Nos. 87 and 88 answered with Question No. 83.
Question No. 89 answered with Question No. 85.

Waterways Ireland Remit

Questions (90)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

90. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the extent to which he has monitored the situation in respect of canal dwellers and the ongoing dialogue between Waterways Ireland and canal dwellers and users with particular reference to the need to meet the reasonable requirements of recreational users and canal dwellers; if he has succeeded in assuaging the concerns raised by local interests in County Kildare and elsewhere throughout the country who are concerned that notwithstanding their contribution to the restoration to the Royal Canal in particular, they may find themselves at a disadvantage in the context of access, mooring and recreational use in respect of the canal system; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24962/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, Waterways Ireland undertook a public consultation process in relation to the proposed by-laws for the Royal Canal, Grand Canal and Barrow Navigation earlier this year. I am informed by Waterways Ireland that the main stakeholders, including the Inland Waterway Association of Ireland, the Heritage Boat Association, the Royal Canal Amenity Group and the Irish Boat Rental Association, were contacted individually and invited to meet with the Chief Executive and the senior management team of Waterways Ireland prior to submitting their views. I am also advised that all current permit holders on the three waterways, including traditional canal users and canal dwellers, received individual written notice and were given the opportunity to make their views and requirements known. I understand that over 2,000 submissions were made in the course of the public consultation process. Waterways Ireland has now concluded their analysis of the public consultation, a summary of the consultation process and of the submissions received is available on the Waterways Ireland website and work is continuing on finalising the proposed by-laws. To that end, Waterways Ireland will prepare a report setting out its proposed approach, including any revisions it may wish to make to its original proposals the report will be submitted to my Department and will then be referred to me, with recommendations for consideration and final decision.

I am satisfied with the extensive consultation that Waterways Ireland undertook and that the proposed by-laws, when finalised, will enhance the ability of Waterways Ireland to manage these waterways for the benefit of all their users. The proposed bye-laws will introduce a new framework to regulate the use of moorings that will provide all visitors, including tourists and recreational users to the canals, the opportunity to use public moorings at key locations close to amenities, visitor attractions and places of interest.

As I indicated during a debate in Seanad Éireann on Wednesday 26 February 2014, I will afford interested Deputies and Senators an opportunity to discuss the matters with me, prior to making a final decision on the proposed new by-laws.

Inland Fisheries

Questions (91)

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

91. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if he is satisfied with the utility and the environmental soundness of Inland Fisheries Ireland continuing the practice of stocking non-native hatchery reared fish from their facility in Cong into the River Erriff; the scientific purpose or research the IFI is relying on to justify this practice; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24814/14]

View answer

Written answers

I refer to the reply to Question No. 437 of 13 May which addressed the issues the Deputy is raising. I am advised that Inland Fisheries Ireland have undertaken a number of scientific releases of ranched salmon at the River Erriff research station (National Index Sea Trout Catchment) as part of ongoing and important research into the effects of sea lice from marine salmon farms on salmon smolt survival.

Results from previous experimental releases have been published in reputable peer reviewed international journals and provide advice to management of the potential impact of sea lice on increased marine mortality of wild salmon.

I understand that similar studies are undertaken at Burrishoole where research using ranched salmon also supports the Marine Institute’s coded wire tag programme which provides an estimate of salmon survival at sea.

IFI have full trapping facilities at the River Erriff research station to remove all returning ranched salmon to prevent their upstream migration.

Social Media Regulation

Questions (92)

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

92. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 438 and 439 of 13 May 2014, if his reply, which raises very serious questions for the use of social media by all State bodies, is supported by legal opinion. [24815/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised that in accordance with the manner in which social media works, Inland Fisheries Ireland or indeed any public body is not in a position to edit or control the content of external Facebook pages and cannot take responsibility for the content of private social media pages. The Deputy’s concern regarding “the use of social media by all State bodies” has a far wider context than IFI. Comments and images posted by individuals on their own social media sites and linked to the site of any public body do not necessarily represent the views of that Public Body.

IFI, in common with other Public Bodies, issues a standard disclaimer to the effect that “external, non-IFI links on this site do not constitute official endorsement on behalf of the IFI”’

I am also advised that IFI are in the process of reviewing a number of operational policies, including its policy on social media, and, if appropriate, legal input may be sought, as part of this review.

Inland Fisheries

Questions (93, 94)

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

93. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if he is satisfied that best practice is being followed by Inland Fisheries Ireland in its policy of allowing the exploitation of endangered and protected stock of wild salmon by means of catch and release angling. [24816/14]

View answer

Pádraig MacLochlainn

Question:

94. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if it is the practice of Inland Fisheries Ireland to carry out assessments of factors leading to the mortality of wild salmon which have been subjected to catch and release angling; and if studies have been carried out on delayed mortality following catch and release angling, will they be published. [24817/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 93 and 94 together.

I am advised by Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) that the independent Standing Scientific Committee on Salmon has emphasised the value of having reliable information to provide a population estimate to support the conservation management of wild salmon on an individual river basis. This independent Committee includes Scientists from IFI, the Marine Institute, BIM, ESB, the Loughs Agency and the Agri-Food and Bioscienes Institute (AFBI) Northern Ireland.

Consequently, since 2007, and in order to provide a population index, on rivers where no harvest fishery (recreational or commercial) is permitted, it has been recommended that catch and release angling may be permitted on catchments achieving in excess of 65% of the rivers Conservation Limit.

I am advised that research has shown that very low levels of mortality are associated with catch and release angling when practised correctly and using single barbless hooks as required by law. Ireland’s wild salmon management regime is now viewed by NASCO (North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation) parties and others as exemplary in an international context and satisfies the reporting requirements of the EU’s Habitats Directive.

Inland Fisheries Ireland has conducted research on mortality associated with Catch and Release angling for salmon in three Irish rivers over a two year period; this research has been submitted for publication and is currently in the peer review process.

Results of this research show high survival of salmon after Catch and Release when conducted using proper guidelines practised correctly and demonstrates that opening rivers to C&R angling provides a valuable tool to provide information on salmon stock status while not significantly impacting on salmon survival.

Top
Share