Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 9 Jul 2015

Written Answers Nos. 112-121

State Banking Sector

Questions (112, 113)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

112. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he has given further consideration to the retention of Allied Irish Banks in the ownership of the people, given the commentary that at least one stable pillar bank should be owned directly or co-operatively by the people and given the appalling failure and collapse of the private banking sector from 2008-09; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28082/15]

View answer

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

113. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he will present Dáil Éireann with a detailed cost-benefit analysis on the future outcomes for Allied Irish Banks before any decision is made to sell this major asset of the people, and given the matters now being investigated by the commission of investigation into the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28083/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 112 and 113 together.

AIB is well on the road to recovery and officials in my department are working with AIB on reconfiguring its capital structure and setting out a path for the bank to begin to return capital to the State. Given the scale of the State's investment, amounting to some €20.8 billion, and the different financial instruments this money is invested in, there are a range of options available to recoup value from the bank and it is critical that we get these decisions right. As a result Goldman Sachs International and William Fry are assisting the Department with this work by providing financial and legal advice respectively.

Reconfiguring the bank's capital structure, which is no longer fit-for-purpose given the new regulatory regime, is just the start of the process, but it is an essential first step on the road to recovering value for the taxpayer. Discussions commenced recently with the SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism) and the Central Bank, AIB's regulators, regarding AIB's capital structure and this process is expected to take a number of months.

No decision has been made by the Government to sell any of our investments in AIB. However, Government policy is that we will not remain a holder of our banking investments in the long term. Given our high debt to GDP ratio, we do not have the luxury of holding all of these investments indefinitely and I envisage receipts from the gradual sale of these investments helping to play their part in reducing the State's overall debt burden in the coming years.

All options remain on the table and while I have said previously that an Initial Public Offering or IPO on the stock market looks like the most likely exit route for the State, it is too early to specify what steps will be taken or to put a timeline on decisions.

Tax Forms

Questions (114)

Jack Wall

Question:

114. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide the P21 forms for the years 2011 to 2014 in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; if the person is due a tax rebate; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28107/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that P21 Forms (PAYE Balancing Statements) were previously issued to the person concerned for 2011 and 2012.  Arrangements have been made by Revenue to send a copy of those Forms to the person concerned.

Revenue has written to the person concerned setting out the information required in order to review his tax affairs for 2013 and 2014 and subsequently issue a P21 Form for each year. Those forms will show whether the person is due any tax rebate for those years.

Eurozone Issues

Questions (115, 116, 117, 118)

Paul Murphy

Question:

115. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Finance to set down his views on the result of the referendum in Greece; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28137/15]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

116. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on discussions held with his European Union counterparts on the result of the referendum in Greece. [28138/15]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

117. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Finance to set out his views on negotiations with the Greek Government following the "No" vote in the referendum in Greece. [28139/15]

View answer

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

118. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Finance to outline his views on the "No" vote in the Greek referendum held on 5 July 2015; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28157/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 115 to 118, inclusive, together.

The Government has noted the result of the referendum in Greece. The position of the Irish Government is that we will continue to engage in an effort to reach a successful outcome.

Following the referendum, Finance Ministers of the euro area Member States (the Eurogroup) met in Brussels to take stock of developments, and to try to find a way forward.  Heads of State or Government of the euro area Member States (the Euro Summit) subsequently met.

The Greek government submitted a new request for financial assistance from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) yesterday, which will be assessed by the Institutions in order to assess and analyse Greece's financing needs and the debt sustainability. Following the assessment the Eurogroup will be able to take a decision on whether formal negotiations can start.

Tax Code

Questions (119)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

119. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on the communications his Department has had with the Revenue Commissioners regarding 5,300 Standard Life shareholders who have been negatively impacted by a postal delay; if he will consider granting them an exemption from the tax liability they are due to incur as a result of this delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28162/15]

View answer

Written answers

The UK company Standard Life plc, offered its shareholders the option of having return of value payments due to them treated as income or capital, with treatment as income being the default position in the absence of shareholders choosing an option within a specified time which has now elapsed.

The Revenue Commissioners have informed me that, from an Irish tax perspective, the position is that if the Standard Life return of value payment is received as income by an Irish resident taxpayer it will be taxed under Income Tax rules. If it is received as capital it will be taxed under the Capital Gains Tax rules.

In last year's Finance Act, I included provisions allowing for a measure of tax relief to the many thousands of Irish shareholders with a small shareholding in Vodafone plc who inadvertently found themselves subject to an unintended liability to income tax, PRSI and USC rather than a nil capital gains tax liability arising from a return of value payment from that company. I did this because the shareholding of very many of those individuals arose originally from their investment in Eircom plc and, as a result of which investment, they continue to carry capital losses. I considered, given the particular background in that case, that to leave those shareholders with income tax and other liabilities on foot of a decision they inadvertently made or didn't make at all would have been inequitable. This particular background is not a feature of the Standard Life return of value case.

The fact that notifications of the options made by some individuals in the Vodafone case last year were delayed in the post beyond the deadline date in that case or were otherwise not dealt with by the company as shareholders would have wished were not factors in my decision to provide the relief, the reason for which I have outlined above.

I am not in a position to say who or what is responsible for the problem that has arisen for the Irish shareholders in Standard Life plc. While I can understand the frustration of the shareholders, I do not think it an unreasonable point to make that the State should not be required to intervene by way of changing tax legislation on each occasion that a difficulty arises resulting from the administrative arrangements put in place by commercial public limited companies for dealing with their shareholders.

All that said, I will give careful consideration to the views and concerns expressed by the Deputy, as well as those of others that have been expressed to me in this matter, in the course of my preparations for the forthcoming Finance Bill.

NAMA Receivers

Questions (120)

Michael McGrath

Question:

120. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance to set out the number of receivers appointed by the National Asset Management Agency for the first six months of 2015; the number appointed in 2013 and in 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28163/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised by the National Asset Management Agency that in 2013 it made 101 appointments and selected 40 separate firms to execute these appointments; in 2014 it made 71 appointments and selected 33 separate firms to execute these appointments and to date in 2015 it has made 16 appointments and selected 9 separate firms for these appointments.

NAMA Receivers

Questions (121)

Michael McGrath

Question:

121. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form for 2013 and 2014 and for the first half of 2015 the names of the receivers appointed by the National Asset Management Agency, the number of receiverships they were engaged on; the total fees received by each named receiver in each year and in the six-month period of 2015; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28164/15]

View answer

Written answers

I have been provided by the National Asset Management Agency with data, set out in the following table, on the names of receivers appointed by the National Asset Management Agency, the number of receiverships they were engaged on and the fees agreed for each named receiver in each of the years in respect of these appointments for 2013 and 2014 and the six month period of 2015.

-

2013

2014

2015 to Date

Receiver Firm

# of Receiverships

Fees Agreed €

# of Receiverships

Fees Agreed €

# of Receiverships

Fees Agreed €

Alder King LLP

 

 

 

 

1

8,502

Allsop LLP

1

  -  

2

93,117

 

 

Baker Tilly Ryan Glennon

5

454,619

4

107,125

1

6,465

Bannon Commercial

1

108,165

1

3,900

 

 

BDO

4

53,304

4

166,792

1

24,900

BDO LLP

1

28,014

1

21,633

 

 

BTW Shiels

1

  -  

 

 

 

 

CBRE UK

2

22,383

 

 

 

 

Chantrey Vellacott

3

94,297

1

39,450

 

 

Colliers International

2

13,100

 

 

 

 

Crowe Horwath

5

65,333

6

176,611

 

 

Deloitte

 

 

1

35,500

2

11,000

Deloitte LLP

 

 

1

70,611

 

 

Dr Peter Minuth

1

  -  

 

 

 

 

Duff & Phelps LLP

1

359,671

1

40,540

 

 

Eddisons

1

  -  

 

 

 

 

Ernst & Young

1

  -  

1

2,019

 

 

Ferris & Associates

 

 

2

39,380

 

 

Friel Stafford

2

21,933

1

4,000

 

 

FRP Advisory

1

20,000

3

84,616

 

 

Ganly Waters

1

9,600

 

 

 

 

Grant Thornton

7

908,831

2

35,500

3

29,700

Grant Thornton UK

 

 

1

29,763

 

 

GVA Donal O'Buachalla

2

3,857

4

62,777

 

 

GVA Grimley 

1

  -  

1

67,751

 

 

Hooke & MacDonald

3

30,565

1

2,145

 

 

Hughes Blake

1

183,082

1

32,083

1

10,000

HWBC Allsop

 

 

3

10,040

 

 

Kavanagh Fennell

2

12,500

4

62,395

 

 

Keenan Corporate Finance

1

8,220

 

 

 

 

KPMG

13

223,968

2

20,768

 

 

KPMG UK

1

30,500

 

 

 

 

Lambert Smith Hampton

1

  -  

 

 

 

 

Lisney

1

8,392

 

 

 

 

Lisney Ireland

3

13,600

 

 

 

 

Mason Owen Lyons

 

 

1

7,400

 

 

Mazars

6

132,650

4

318,552

2

84,450

McKeogh Gallagher Ryan

3

174,067

2

107,170

 

 

McPeake Auctioneers

1

3,700

 

 

 

 

McStay Luby

 

 

1

56,500

 

 

Moore Stephens Nathans

 

 

 

 

2

42,515

O'Dwyer Property Management

1

26,521

4

11,025

 

 

PKF O'Conner Leddy Homes

 

 

1

7,000

 

 

PWC

7

170,148

 

 

 

 

Duff & Phelps Ireland

7

261,975

5

62,117

 

 

RSM McClure Watters

2

115,527

1

  -  

 

 

Russell Brennan Keane

1

45,353

3

19,683

3

91,368

Savills Commercial Ireland

1

14,333

 

 

 

 

Smith & Williamson

2

49,000

 

 

 

 

WK Nowlan & Associates

1

1,030

1

6,896

 

 

Totals

101

3,668,238

71

1,804,859

16

308,900

Top
Share