Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 27 Feb 2019

Written Answers Nos. 1-27

Middle East Issues

Questions (10, 16, 22, 23)

Seán Crowe

Question:

10. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the refusal by the Israeli Government to extend the mandate of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH); if his attention has been drawn to the work of TIPH in monitoring the breaches of a protocol (details supplied); if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that the work of the TIPH is enshrined in the Oslo II accords in 1995; and if the decision by the Israeli Government to refuse to extend the mandate of the TIPH will be condemned. [9634/19]

View answer

Gino Kenny

Question:

16. Deputy Gino Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the steps he will take to have the Temporary International Presence in Hebron reinstated as a matter of urgency (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8900/19]

View answer

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

22. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will report on the recent expulsion of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron from the region and the withdrawal of observers from the Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel; his plans to ensure that TIPH is reinstated; if he will report on his efforts to organise a meeting of representatives of Israel and Palestine here to advance a peace process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8813/19]

View answer

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

23. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if a commitment will be made for the return of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron, West Bank in view of the deteriorating situation in the region and stated support for the Oslo Accords; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9689/19]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 10, 16, 22 and 23 together.

I was deeply disappointed by Israel’s announcement that the mandate for the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH) would not be renewed. The TIPH, a civilian observer mission which was established in 1997 as part of United Nations Security Council Resolution 904 and the Oslo II accords, has played an important role in mitigating tension and conflict in Hebron.

Observers have been sent from five contributing countries: Norway, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. The area of responsibility of the mission covers both the H1 and H2 areas of Hebron, the Palestinian and the Israeli-controlled areas.

This conflict prevention mechanism has continued to meet a vital need, and has promoted a feeling of security to the Palestinians of Hebron. No adequate reason has been given for the decision to end its mandate, which would seem to be a unilateral breach by Israel of the Oslo Accords.

The withdrawal of the international presence is likely to accentuate tensions on the ground in an already fragile situation in Hebron. Ireland regrets this decision and I call on Israel to reverse it. Ireland stands with the EU in stressing that Israel must fulfil its obligations under international law, as an occupying power, to protect the Palestinian people in the occupied Palestinian territory. This decision will instead reduce those protections, leaving Palestinians more vulnerable to persistent attacks by settlers.

Subsequent to this announcement, the observers from a separate, non-governmental, protection mission that had been active in Hebron, the ecumenical accompaniment programme in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI) has reportedly decided to halt its work in the H2 area of Hebron. This decision has been made following a number of serious incidents of harassment by Israeli settlers against its volunteers. EAPPI has been in existence since 2002, and has provided a feeling of protection, by means of their presence in vulnerable communities in the West Bank, particularly for communities at risk of forcible transfer, farmers at heightened risk of settler violence and to students and teachers in areas of the West Bank where safe access to school is not guaranteed.

The withdrawal of the TIPH has now led the EAPPI to conclude that it too must withdraw its volunteers from the H2 area of Hebron. Many Irish volunteers have participated in the EAPPI programme over the years, and my Department has met with them from time to time, and values their work.

Both the TIPH and the EAPPI in Hebron have been engaged in protecting children going to school from attacks by settlers, something which will have immediate resonance with Irish people. These children too are now under increased risk.

Ireland will continue to take a firm stance on matters relating to the Palestinian people and the Middle East Peace Process. At Israel’s Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council last year, Ireland raised the continued expansion of settlements, the establishment of which violates the rights of the occupied population, through seizure of their land, discriminatory treatment, house demolitions, revocation of residency, and differentiated application of planning laws. Ireland urged that Israel abide by its international legal obligations, including under the Fourth Geneva Convention, on the treatment of a civilian population under military occupation.

I reiterated our concerns about these policies in my speech to the UN General Assembly in September 2018. The Israeli authorities are well aware of our views, and we will certainly convey our specific concerns about the case of Hebron.

Northern Ireland

Questions (11)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

11. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he is assessing the impact of Irish unity and planning accordingly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7341/19]

View answer

Written answers

The principle of consent and the possibility of change in the constitutional status of Northern Ireland are fundamental elements of the Good Friday Agreement, endorsed by the people of this island North and South.

The full implementation of the Good Friday Agreement and subsequent agreements is a priority for my Department and indeed the Government as a whole. The approach of the Government in relation to Irish unity is of course guided by Article 3 of the Constitution, as amended by the people in 1998.

The Agreement states clearly that “it is for the people of the island of Ireland alone, by agreement between the two parts respectively and without external impediment, to exercise their right to self-determination on the basis of consent, freely and concurrently given, North and South, to bring about a united Ireland, if that is their wish, accepting that this right must be achieved and exercised with and subject to the agreement and consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland”.

Furthermore, under the Agreement, the two Governments “recognise the legitimacy of whatever choice is freely exercised by a majority of the people of Northern Ireland with regard to its status, whether they prefer to continue to support the Union with Britain or a sovereign united Ireland”. And should such a choice be made in the future, it will be a binding obligation on both Governments to introduce and support in their respective Parliaments legislation to give effect to that wish.

The holding of a referendum in this jurisdiction is connected with the calling of a border poll, under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, in Northern Ireland. Under the Good Friday Agreement, the Secretary of State shall exercise this power "if at any time it appears likely ... that a majority of those voting would express a wish that Northern Ireland should cease to be part of the United Kingdom and form part of a united Ireland."

At present, the Government does not believe it likely that such a border poll in the near future would result in a decision on the part of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland in favour of constitutional change. In these circumstances, it is the Government’s clear view that such a poll would only increase uncertainty and division at an already difficult and sensitive time.

In the absence of the prospect of a referendum in the near future, the Government has no immediate plans for specific preparations on this issue. My immediate priorities are to secure the functioning of the devolved power-sharing institutions and the North South Ministerial Council, which are at the heart of the Good Friday Agreement, and to ensure the protection of the Agreement in all its parts and the gains and benefits of the Peace Process, through the ongoing Article 50 negotiation between the European Union and the UK, which are at a critical point.

In the event of a future referendum within the consent provisions of the Good Friday Agreement, the Government would make all necessary preparations in accordance with the terms of the Constitution and the principles and procedures of the Agreement.

There are of course aspects of this constitutional issue which relate to my Department’s ongoing work. In the context of Brexit, the Government has made clear its determination to ensure respect for all aspects of the Good Friday Agreement, including those provisions relating to a possible change in the constitutional status of Northern Ireland, regardless of the UK’s status within the EU. As a result of intensive political and diplomatic engagement by the Government, we have secured the solidarity and support of all our EU partners on ensuring the protection of the Agreement in all its parts and of the gains and benefits of the Peace Process, through the process of the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union.

On 29 April 2017, the European Council adopted Guidelines for the EU-UK negotiations which included a strong acknowledgment of the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland and the importance of preserving the achievements, benefits, and commitments of the Good Friday Agreement. These Guidelines remain the basis of the Union’s approach to the negotiations with the UK, including on the Ireland-specific issues. Also on 29 April 2017 the European Council agreed a statement acknowledging that the Good Friday Agreement provides for an agreed mechanism whereby a united Ireland may be brought about and that, in accordance with international law, the entire territory of such a united Ireland would thus be part of the European Union.

The Government has nonetheless been very clear that we do not see the UK exit from the European Union as a pretext or an opportunity for the holding of a border poll in Northern Ireland, under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement.

Sustainable Development Goals

Questions (12)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

12. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on extending the memorandum of understanding between the HSE and Irish Aid operating in relation to Sub-Saharan African countries to Nepal as a low income Asian country with poor health indicators; and his further views on the need for extending this collaboration. [9690/19]

View answer

Written answers

Through Ireland's International Development Cooperation programme, recognised as one of the best in the world, my Department prioritises and invests in addressing global health challenges and in strengthening health systems. We work through global health initiatives as well as through our bilateral programmes.

My Department has worked closely with the Health Service Executive (HSE) since 2010 guided by a Memorandum of Understanding. This partnership is based on shared values, and is intended to facilitate the transfer of Irish expertise and technical knowledge. Actions are triggered in response to requests from Ireland's development cooperation partners, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, but also in Nepal. The partnership is a demonstration of collaborative work across different branches of the civil and public service which allows Ireland to address important global and national health challenges.

As part of the collaboration with the HSE, my Department provides funding to the ESTHER Programme. This programme works to promote institutional health partnerships through knowledge generation, sharing best practice, collaboration, and advocacy. Nepal is a beneficiary of this programme and the HSE has already established institutional partnerships there.

My Department will continue to work closely with the HSE in advancing our shared international health objectives, guided by the Sustainable Development Goals and Ireland's forthcoming new policy for International Development.

The current Memorandum of Understanding governing the partnership between my Department and the HSE will be reviewed in the coming year. This will provide an opportunity to take stock of almost 10 years of close collaboration and to agree the future focus and extent of this collaboration.

Ministerial Meetings

Questions (13)

Michael Moynihan

Question:

13. Deputy Michael Moynihan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the EU Ambassadors he has met recently. [8462/19]

View answer

Written answers

I and my officials regularly meet Ambassadors from EU Member States as well as those from other States accredited to Ireland. Some recent occasions include -

At a meeting of EU Heads of Mission, hosted by the Ambassador of Bulgaria, on June 19th 2018.

When EU Ambassadors attended my State of the Union address hosted by the Institute for International and European Affairs on 30 January 2019.

At a Reception I hosted on Tuesday 8 January 2019 on the theme Global Ireland 100: Celebrating 100 years of Taking Our Place Among the Nations of the World.

It is also often the case that I meet Ambassadors when other Foreign Ministers visit Ireland.

Brexit Negotiations

Questions (14)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

14. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the indications there are that the UK is likely to soften its demand in relation to the backstop; if, in the absence of same means can be found by which the customs union and single market on the island of Ireland can prevail; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9697/19]

View answer

Written answers

As co-guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement, Ireland and the UK have solemn and binding obligations to ensure peace and stability in Northern Ireland, and that there is no return of a hard border on the island of Ireland.

The Withdrawal Agreement, including the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland, which contains the provisions for the “backstop,” was negotiated on the basis of the EU and UK’s shared understanding of this need to address the unique circumstances on the island of Ireland. This translates the UK’s political commitment to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland into a legal guarantee.

As set out in their joint statement of 20 February, Prime Minister May and President Juncker discussed how the temporary nature of the backstop can once again be underlined, with both sides reconfirming their committed to avoiding a hard border and respecting the integrity of the EU's Single Market on one hand, and of the UK's on the other. They also discussed the possibility of changes or additions being made to the Political Declaration that are consistent with the EU and the UK government's positions, and agreed that this work will be taken forward by the respective teams.

In the event of no deal, the United Kingdom will have obligations under the World Trade Organisation and we will have obligations to protect our Single Market and customs union, of which we will continue to be a full part. As such, if the UK leaves without an agreement in place, the EU and Ireland on one side, and the UK on the other, will all have to work intensively together to ensure that we deliver on our shared goal of avoiding the return of a hard border on the island of Ireland.

Regardless of the outcome of Brexit, Ireland's place within the Single Market and the Customs Union is secure, and we will continue to fully enjoy the benefits that this membership offers.

State Visits

Questions (15)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

15. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will report on the co-ordination of the various State visits that members of the Government are making on St. Patrick’s Day; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9738/19]

View answer

Written answers

St Patrick’s Day is a unique opportunity, unmatched by any other country, to promote Ireland to an international audience and to renew our bonds with the global Irish family. Ministerial visits over the St Patrick’s Day period advance Ireland’s political and economic interests, and deepen relationships with important partners and Irish communities overseas.

The Taoiseach, Tánaiste, Ministers, Attorney General, Ceann Comhairle and Cathaoirleach will visit 58 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Americas, and the Asia Pacific region over the 2019 St Patrick’s Day period, and will promote Ireland as a great place to live, visit, study, work and do business.

In the context of Brexit, this year’s St Patrick’s Day programme will also serve as a platform to underline Ireland’s commitment to and membership of the European Union. Ministers will visit all 27 EU capitals over the St Patrick’s Day period.

The 2019 programme also reflects Ireland’s expanding diplomatic and state agency presence around the world, as part of the Global Ireland initiative. Ministers will visit Wellington, Vancouver, Bogota and Santiago, where Ireland has recently opened new diplomatic missions. Mumbai and Los Angeles will also receive a Ministerial visit over the St Patrick’s Day period, in advance of the opening of new Irish Consulates there later this year.

St Patrick’s Day visits will also provide an opportunity to advance Ireland’s campaign for a seat on the Security Council of the United Nations in 2020 – 2021.

The Embassy network is currently working closely with all other members of Team Ireland in Ireland and abroad to finalise Ministerial programmes. Each Minister and Department is responsible for their own costs and all costs will be carefully controlled.

Question No. 16 answered with Question No. 10.

Foreign Conflicts

Questions (17, 46)

Catherine Connolly

Question:

17. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on reports asserting that US special forces and mercenaries engaged by the UAE have conducted targeted killings of religious and political leaders in Yemen; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9736/19]

View answer

Niall Collins

Question:

46. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the status of the situation in Yemen and the efforts to address the acute risk of famine in the country; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9704/19]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 17 and 46 together.

I welcome this opportunity to provide an update on the situation in Yemen.

The Yemen conflict is a very complex situation, and the challenge of resolution should not be underestimated. What began as a conflict between the internationally-recognised Government and the Houthi de facto authorities has developed to involve outside actors including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Iran. The presence of other non-state fighting and terrorist groups further complicates the crisis. Both at UN level, and in EU discussions on the issue, Ireland has stressed that military action cannot be a solution.

Ireland fully supports the work of the United Nations in attempting to bring the conflict to a political resolution. Implementation of the agreements reached in Stockholm in December 2018 remains crucial. The international community is maintaining pressure on the parties to engage with the UN Special Envoy, the Redeployment Coordination Committee, and the United Nations Mission to Support the Hodeidah Agreement (UNMHA).

Lawlessness and weak governance are problems throughout Yemen. In relation to the allegations referred to by Deputy Connolly, I understand that there have been media reports alleging that mercenaries engaged by the United Arab Emirates have targeted members of the Al Islah movement in Yemen. I have no independent source of information to allow me to comment on the accuracy of these reports. I am glad to have this opportunity to urge all parties to the conflict to ensure that the principles of international law and international humanitarian law are respected.

The Group of Eminent Experts (GEE) on Yemen, which Ireland played a key role in establishing at the Human Rights Council in September 2017, is continuing to investigate all alleged violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by all warring parties in Yemen. I look forward to their report later this year, which will be a valuable contribution to accountability for violations committed.

In relation to the humanitarian situation, after nearly four years of war, the Yemeni economy has all but collapsed, and with Government salaries going unpaid, millions are food insecure and have difficulties in accessing basic healthcare services. Both humanitarian and commercial access are often restricted, further exacerbating the situation. The UN reports that almost 80% of the population is in need of humanitarian assistance.

Ireland is contributing towards the humanitarian effort and has provided almost €17.5 million in assistance to Yemen since 2015. Minister of State for the Diaspora and International Development Ciarán Cannon attended a High-Level Pledging Event in Geneva just yesterday, where he pledged, on behalf of the Government, that Ireland will provide a further €5 million to the UN Yemen Humanitarian Fund this year.

Ireland also contributes to global funds that allocate funding to the Yemen Crisis, including the UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) which disbursed $50 million in 2018 to bolster the humanitarian response in Yemen.

Significant EU funds are also channelled towards humanitarian support in Yemen. Since 2015, the EU has contributed a total of €438 million to Yemen towards humanitarian, development, stabilisation and resilience support.

Ireland will continue to monitor the situation in Yemen, contribute what we can to the humanitarian response and continue to call on all parties to the conflict to engage with the UN-led process, with a view to resolving this alarming humanitarian crisis.

Middle East Issues

Questions (18)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

18. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he raised the issue of the Israeli Government withholding taxes that it collects on behalf of the Palestinian Authority from the authority with his counterparts across Europe; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9741/19]

View answer

Written answers

Last week the Government of Israel decided unilaterally to withhold the equivalent of 123 million Euro in Palestinian tax revenue transfers. This decision is a result of legislation adopted by the Knesset last year that instructs the Government to withhold money equivalent to what the PA pays to Palestinians convicted by Israeli courts of involvement in terrorism or other security-related offenses, and to their families.

I also understand that the Palestinian leadership has in response decided to reject all clearance revenue in protest at the funding cut, which no doubt will have repercussions for the Palestinian people who depend on the PA to deliver basic services such as healthcare and access to education.

I am acutely concerned about the worsening financial situation of the PA. Thankfully the impact of its budget shortfall last year was somewhat mitigated by donor aid. This economic insecurity is expected to increase this year, and as we have seen in 2018, the same scale of financial aid by large donors is by no means guaranteed. The financial stability of the PA is inextricably linked to the security of both the Palestinians and the Israelis. I believe that the EU is right to urge the Palestinian Authority to review how it operates its system of payments. However, as I have said before in this House and elsewhere, unilateral moves, such as withholding a huge proportion of the revenue collected on the Palestinian Authority's behalf, seriously undermine the chances for a just and lasting peace.

I reiterate the EU’s call for Israel to honour its obligations under the Oslo Accords, with due regard to the Paris Economic Protocol, which administers the economic and financial relations between Israel and the PA.

These are very serious developments that put at risk the financial stability of the Palestinian Authority and ultimately the security of both Israelis and Palestinians alike.

EU Heads of Mission, including the Irish representative, met with senior figures from the Palestinian Authority to discuss this decision. There was unanimous agreement between EU partners, that this move is the latest flagrant violation of past agreements signed between the two parties.

I can assure the Deputy that these concerns about the repercussions of this move on the peace process will be raised with Israeli interlocutors.

Emigrant Support Services

Questions (19)

Fiona O'Loughlin

Question:

19. Deputy Fiona O'Loughlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the action he is taking to encourage returning Irish emigrants. [9681/19]

View answer

Written answers

This Government is committed to making it as easy as possible for Irish emigrants to return to live and work in Ireland. Reducing barriers to returning emigrants has important implications for national competitiveness; in a growing Irish economy facilitating the return of skills will be of importance in sustaining economic growth.

In my capacity as Minister of State for the Diaspora, I chair the Inter-Departmental Committee on the Irish Abroad which works to ensure that Government works in a joined up way to realise the objectives of Ireland’s Diaspora Policy, including addressing issues affecting the Irish abroad and those seeking to return.

On foot of the work by the Inter-Departmental Committee on the Irish Abroad, the Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade commissioned an independent economic report on difficulties experienced by Irish people returning home. Following a competitive tendering process, this report was completed by economic consultants Indecon in February 2018, considered by Government, and was published on the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade website.

Since the publication of the Indecon Economic Report on Addressing Challenges Faced by Returning Irish Emigrants, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has undertaken a number of steps, in conjunction with other Government Departments and State Agencies, to address the thirty recommendations made in the report. Most recently, I wrote to relevant Ministers in December 2018 seeking a further update on progress on their individual areas of responsibility.

Currently, nineteen of the total thirty recommendations have been, or are in the process of being addressed. Departments are aware of further action to be taken in respect of 6 recommendations. The remaining recommendations are being partially implemented, or are being considered as part of a wider issue rather than in the context of the recommendation alone.

All responses made in respect of these recommendations will inform a further Memorandum to Government on the progress made since the publication of the Indecon Report.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has already implemented several of the Indecon Report’s recommendations in relation to information provision. An enhanced ‘Returning to Ireland’ section containing more information and advice for returning emigrants has been developed for our dedicated diaspora website, the Global Irish Hub. Officials are working closely with the Citizen’s Information Board to ensure that returning emigrants have the best information and advice possible to assist them in making the return back to Ireland.

In addition, following on from a successful pilot programme in 2018, I recently launched the second year of the Back for Business programme - a mentoring programme designed to assist returning emigrants to set up business in Ireland. The programme works to assist returning emigrant entrepreneurs by addressing the challenges that all early stage entrepreneurs face, with a particular focus on the additional barriers and challenges faced by those who have been out of the country for some time. The programme is based on a model of mentor support, and will run from February to July 2019.

Question No. 20 answered with Question No. 9.

International Agreements

Questions (21, 25, 30)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

21. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade when Ireland will ratify the Political Dialogue and Co-operation Agreement on the EU and Cuba. [9691/19]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

25. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade when Ireland will ratify the Political Dialogue and Co-operation Agreement between the EU and Cuba; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9437/19]

View answer

Seán Crowe

Question:

30. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade when the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Co-operation Agreement will be ratified (details supplied). [9637/19]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 21, 25 and 30 together.

The Government fully supports the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA), which was signed by each EU Member State and the Cuban Minister for Foreign Affairs in the margins of the Foreign Affairs Council in December 2016. This is the first bilateral agreement between the EU and Cuba. Its signature marked a further positive step forward in relations between Cuba and the EU, which have improved considerably in recent years.

The agreement is robust and comprehensive, consisting of three main pillars, namely Political Dialogue, Cooperation and Sectoral Policy Dialogue, and Trade and Trade Cooperation. The core aim of the PDCA is to open channels of dialogue and cooperation between the EU and Cuba in order to assist the modernisation of the Cuban economy and society, strengthen human rights and democracy, and work together to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

In July 2017, the European Parliament voted to endorse the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement. While most of the Agreement has been provisionally applied since November 2017, its full application will require ratification by the EU once Member States have completed their own internal legal procedures. A number of remaining Member States, including Ireland, have yet to complete their internal procedures. The process, involving my Department and the Oireachtas, has been initiated and we are committed to completing it at the earliest possible opportunity.

The entry into force of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement and improvements in the EU-Cuba relationship will in turn have helpful consequences for the Ireland-Cuba relationship. Ireland has a positive relationship with Cuba and this year marks the 20th anniversary of diplomatic relations between our two countries.

The visit of President Higgins to the island in 2017 was a high point in our relations and facilitated the strengthening of ties between our two countries. This visit also highlighted the interesting shared history between the two countries, with Irish emigrants having contributed to the economic, cultural and political evolution of Cuba over the years, and Cuban leaders having been influenced by the leaders of the Irish revolutionary and independence movements.

This high-level engagement continued with the visit of Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba, Ana Teresita González, to Dublin for political consultations in October 2018, and with Minister of State for Disability Issues, Finian McGrath T.D., scheduled to visit Cuba over the St Patrick's Day period next month.

My assessment is that the PDCA provides a solid framework and welcome opportunity to strengthen both EU-Cuba and Ireland-Cuba relations. I look forward to continued positive developments in the period ahead, including the announcement of completion by Ireland of the internal legal procedures necessary for EU ratification.

Questions Nos. 22 and 23 answered with Question No. 10.

Human Rights

Questions (24)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

24. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views with regard to some supporters of Israel attempting to equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli treatment of Palestinians; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9737/19]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland strongly condemns all manifestations of racism, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including anti-Semitism. Ireland is strongly committed to the promotion and protection of tolerance, non-discrimination, freedom of expression, freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief. Through our multilateral engagement, Ireland consistently raises the issues of racism and intolerance and advocates for inclusive societies at the UN’s Human Rights Council, (HRC), through the Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism and at the European Union.

Ireland is a signatory of the Stockholm Declaration of the International Forum on the Holocaust and Ireland joined the Holocaust Remembrance Alliance in 2011. As a signatory to the Stockholm Declaration, Ireland has made a commitment to fight against the evils of anti-Semitism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, racism, xenophobia and other expressions of hatred. I also attended and participated in the National Holocaust Memorial Day in Dublin on 27th January this year, during which I read aloud an excerpt from the Stockholm Declaration.

There is, thankfully, no significant political party in Ireland hostile to immigrants, or to minorities such as the Jewish community. But on this, we must remain vigilant. Earlier this year, an Irish synagogue was defaced with swastika graffiti – something which I utterly condemn, and which must encourage us all to renew our commitment to rooting out anti-Semitism.

Successive Irish Governments, as well as public representatives, NGOs and individuals, have voiced strong criticisms of Israel’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territory. I have done so myself. The same is true in many other countries. It is to be expected that any country which is engaged in a military occupation of another people will be subject to a particularly high level of scrutiny. These criticisms are based not on anti-Semitism or hostility, but on our values of respect for justice, human rights and the rule of law. There are of course very many people in Israel who share critical views on the conduct of the occupation of the Palestinian territory.

Criticism of Israeli policy is not in and of itself anti-Semitic, and to conflate these things is unjust, counter-productive, and potentially very damaging. Conflating just and valid criticism of Israeli actions, with anti-Semitic attitudes, risks unfairly stigmatising people who are motivated by a desire for justice for the Palestinians, and blunting the reflex of horror we should all have at real manifestations of anti-Semitism. Conversely, I also believe that it is wrong when criticism of Israeli government actions conflates the Jewish people – globally or in Ireland – with the government of Israel.

I believe that in criticising Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people – something which I will continue to do as long as that occupation lasts – it is essential to base our criticism on values we hold consistently and globally, including respect for human rights and for international law.

Question No. 25 answered with Question No. 21.
Questions Nos. 26 and 27 answered with Question No. 6.
Top
Share