Skip to main content
Normal View

Direct Provision System

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 9 June 2020

Tuesday, 9 June 2020

Questions (237)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

237. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of persons in direct provision centres at present by country of origin; the number in direct provision on 1 January 2019 and 1 January 2020, respectively; the steps being taken to reduce this number by a speedier assessment process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10220/20]

View answer

Written answers

I can inform the Deputy that there were 6,115 persons residing in Direct Provision accommodation as of 1 January 2019. The corresponding figure at 1 January 2020, was 7,683 persons. In 2019, the total figure for grants of status or permission to remain was 1,284. Between January and April of this year that total figure was 301 grants.

The table below shows the number of persons residing in accommodation as of 31 May 2020, by nationality. At that date, there were people from a total of 110 different nationalities residing in our accommodation. The figures include both international protection applicants and people who are no longer in the process, having already been granted an international protection status (refugee status or subsidiary protection) or a permission to remain in the State. Currently, we continue to accommodate almost 1,000 such people. We are assisting these residents to transition to permanent mainstream accommodation, working closely with the City and County Managers Association, the Local Authorities and organisations like DePaul Ireland, the Peter McVerry Trust and the Jesuit Refugee Service. People with status or permission to remain in the State have the same entitlement to housing supports and State services as everyone else.

No breakdown is provided for nationalities with less than 10 people due to the increased risk of their identification, which is prohibited under Section 26 of the International Protection Act 2015.

Nationality

Total

Afghanistan

178

Albania

558

Algeria

199

Angola

30

Bahrain

11

Bangladesh

189

Benin

11

Bolivia

35

Botswana

41

Brazil

20

Burundi

12

Cameroon

79

China (including Hong Kong)

12

Congo, The Democratic Republic of

310

Cote D’Ivoire

12

Egypt

29

El Salvador

22

Eritrea

15

Ethiopia

25

Georgia

655

Ghana

89

Guatemala

19

India

69

Iran (Islam Republic of)

37

Iraq

84

Israel

10

Jordan

14

Kenya

34

Kosovo/UNSCR 1244

34

Kuwait

15

Lesotho

11

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

21

Malawi

228

Malaysia

16

Mauritius

36

Morocco

50

Nepal

13

Nigeria

987

Pakistan

509

Palestinian Territory, Occupied

56

Russian Federation

28

Sierra Leone

64

Somalia

199

South Africa

610

Sri Lanka

15

Sudan

49

Swaziland

29

Syrian Arab Republic

85

Tanzania, United Republic of

11

Togo

25

Uganda

46

Ukraine

26

Venezuela

17

Yemen

10

Zambia

13

Zimbabwe

1034

Others (54 countries)

159

Total

7,195

The procedures to be followed in the assessment of applications for international protection are set out in law under the provisions of the International Protection Act 2015. As such, there are certain steps that the International Protection Office (IPO) is required by law to follow in assessing every application. The IPO is constantly exploring all options that will lead to a more timely processing of such applications.

The IPO currently has an existing caseload of approximately 5,700 cases (at end April 2020) having received almost 4,800 applications in 2019. Applications have been increasing year on year since the IPO’s creation at the end of 2016, with applications up 30% approximately at the end of 2019 on the total received in 2018. However, it is acknowledged that the impacts of COVID-19 on travel to Ireland since March 2020 will somewhat distort that upward trend.

Efforts to improve processing times have been impacted upon by the current COVID-19 pandemic which has reduced the output of cases considerably. The IPO’s main focus going forward is to get its processing system functioning as effectively and efficiently as possible, while adhering to all measures in place to combat the spread of COVID-19.

It is recognised that no single solution will achieve faster processing times but rather a targeted suite of measures, including additional staffing resources. Options that are being explored include greater automation of the process including ICT improvements, revision of key documentation and the use of remote interviewing.

Historically, the majority of international protection interviews were conducted at the IPO in Dublin with applicants travelling from their accommodation to Dublin for interview. Early in 2019, the IPO commenced a pilot to conduct protection interviews in suitable locations. These locations were closer to applicant's accommodation and removed the challenge for applicants of having to travel sometimes considerable distances for interview. This pilot was successful and in November 2019 the IPO moved to the next stage - interviews by video conference (VC). The first VC interviews took place in the south and, in early 2020, were also successfully trialled in the north west. The successful trials suggest that interview by VC may be suitable for many, though not all applicants. The success of these trials will also factor into the IPO planning for the resumption of protection interviews in the context of COVID-19 restrictions.

Top
Share