Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 15 Dec 2020

Written Answers Nos. 101-122

Covid-19 Pandemic Supports

Questions (101)

Aindrias Moynihan

Question:

101. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the measures being considered or undertaken to address mental health issues experienced by school leavers and third level students due to difficulties they are experiencing during the ongoing Covid-19 restrictions; the way in which students are being identified who are at risk of increased mental health issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42353/20]

View answer

Written answers

The support and wellbeing of our students is a priority for my Department, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increased stress and pressure resulting from it.

I recently launched a new National Framework to address the issues of student mental health and suicide prevention. This Framework is Ireland’s first ever national approach to address student mental health and suicide prevention. The Framework was developed in collaboration with students, mental health and suicide prevention specialists, academics, researchers and institutional staff. The Framework delivers on a commitment to develop national guidelines for the higher education institutions (HEIs) in relation to suicide risk and critical incident response, thereby helping to address any gaps which might exist in the prevention of suicide in higher education. The Framework additionally recognises the many challenges students face and sets out ways in which institutions can support and respond through working proactively to maximise mental health and wellbeing.

Earlier this year, I secured a comprehensive package of financial support in the amount of €168m for the Higher Education and Further Education and Training sector to mitigate against the direct financial impact of COVID-19 on our higher education institutions (HEIs) and students in 2020. This package includes additional funding of €3m to underpin wellbeing and mental health and student services in our HEIs, and is in addition to the €2m that was allocated in Budget 2020. This overall funding of €5m comes at a time of great urgency in relation to student supports, and will enable institutions to enhance their student facing services, such as by employing additional student Counsellors, Assistant Psychologists etc. and implementation of the National Student Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Framework. Many institutions are already in process of increasing their counselling service capacity. This increased capacity/resourcing will allow for development of further active outreach to students.

The increased capacity/resourcing of counselling will allow for development of active outreach to students and deliver more support and training to campus staff to identify, support and refer students in difficulty. This whole of campus approach to student support is a central principle in the National Framework for Student Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. While specific services such as counselling provide the specialist response to mental health difficulties, all staff should be aware of how to engage and respond supportively to a student in distress, and how to make effective referrals to the services, and we will be working towards achieving that in line with the framework.

In October, I also announced the new keyword partnership with 50808. This is a Free 24/7 anonymous text support service. Students text their institution keyword to 50808 to begin a text conversation e.g. Text DKIT to 50808 for Dundalk IT students. The 50808 volunteers will also signpost student texters to their campus and local community supports, based on their location, in instances that where further support is required.

Question No. 102 answered with Question No. 70.

Ministerial Meetings

Questions (103)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

103. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the contact he has had with his counterpart in Northern Ireland on all-island education; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43156/20]

View answer

Written answers

In October 2020, I held a productive meeting with Minister Diane Dodds, Minister for the Economy. Our discssion, held virtually, touched on areas of common interest, including ongoing co-operation between our higher education institutions and the possibilities for collaboration in areas including research and innovation.

It would be my intention to meet again with Minister Dodds in the new year as schedules permit.

Further and Higher Education

Questions (104)

Catherine Connolly

Question:

104. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 661 of 24 November 2020, the status of the higher education staffing agreement; when the principles will be agreed; the engagement there has been with workers and higher education institutions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43313/20]

View answer

Written answers

Officials from my Department are engaging in discussions with the HEA and DPER in relation to the development of a new set of principles to inform a revised Higher Education Staffing Agreement. This will form the basis of an update to the current Employment Control Framework which is implemented since 2011.

My officials are engaged with the Higher Education Authority and officials from Public Expenditure and Reform in relation to the development of a new set of principles to inform a revisedframework discussion paper, which will be finalised in consultation with the key stakeholders.

Technological Universities

Questions (105)

Jennifer Murnane O'Connor

Question:

105. Deputy Jennifer Murnane O'Connor asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if he has had contact with Carlow College, St. Patrick’s, Carlow with regard to bringing about the full integration of Carlow College, St. Patrick’s, into the higher education framework and system in the south-east region; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41537/20]

View answer

Written answers

As stated in the Programme for Government 2020 the progression of a technological university to serve the people of the South East is the Government’s top priority in higher education and regional development terms. Any peripheral proposals must be viewed in that context, particularly if there is any risk of delay or impeding the delivery of the TU agenda in the South East.

At their request, I met with the principals of Carlow College in September 2020 in relation to the college’s proposals regarding their future position in the higher education landscape and my officials have continued to engage on this matter since.

I suggested to the college principals that they consider commissioning a detailed independent governance and financial review to enable more informed consideration of all relevant issues. Again this was on the understanding that the college’s strategic direction and sustainability remain matters for its own governing body. In order to be of assistance Department officials will return any observations on the review’s draft terms of reference in due course to facilitate the college in commissioning their review.

Student Universal Support Ireland

Questions (106)

Gary Gannon

Question:

106. Deputy Gary Gannon asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the total amount of repayments due to grant overpayments over 2020-2021 academic year sought by SUSI; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42787/20]

View answer

Written answers

The complex nature of the student grant scheme means that there is a risk that some students receive grant payments for which they are not eligible, including for reasons beyond the direct control of SUSI.

To mitigate the risk of overpayments, SUSI implements procedural and system-based controls within its application assessment and grant payment operations. A highly developed quality assurance programme is implemented within the assessment process and a focussed programme of independent post-assessment reviews are also performed across targeted risk areas.

The critical objective for SUSI is to identify and rectify errors on a timely basis before a grant is awarded and thus before any overpayment can arise. Issues identified from quality and post-assessment reviews are fed back into the assessment process through feedback and training on a current basis.

Where overpayments do arise, SUSI has a formal Overpayments Policy and implements a structured process of debt management to seek their recovery. This process includes portfolio analysis/reporting of the overall debt profile and structured interaction with students as debtors. To date, for the 2020/21 academic year, the total overpayments stand at €25,542.76.

If an individual applicant considers that she/he has been unjustly refused a student grant, or that the rate of grant awarded is not the correct one, she/he may appeal, in the first instance, to SUSI. Applicants may also appeal against decisions made by SUSI in relation to overpayments.

Where an individual applicant has had an appeal turned down in writing by an appeals officer in SUSI and remains of the view that the scheme has not been interpreted correctly in his/her case, an appeal may be submitted to the independent Student Grants Appeals Board within the required timeframe. Such appeals can be made by the appellant on line via www.studentgrantappeals.ie

Education Policy

Questions (107)

Jennifer Carroll MacNeill

Question:

107. Deputy Jennifer Carroll MacNeill asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his plans to extend third level and apprenticeship opportunities for persons with intellectual disabilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43151/20]

View answer

Written answers

Fostering Inclusion is one of the three core pillars around which the Further Education and Training Strategy (FET) 2020-2024 is built. The FET sector is committed to increasing levels of inclusion through the provision of high quality, more accessible and flexible education and training programmes and supports suited to the identified needs of individuals, including those with a disability. FET programmes are available to all learners, including those with a disability, who meet the eligibility criteria and the guidelines provided for each FET programme. Specialist Training Provision (STP) is also available for learners with more complex support needs, and this provision addresses the identified training needs of people with disabilities who are experiencing exclusion and labour market disadvantage in the form of vocational training programmes.

SOLAS, the national Further Education and Training authority is currently overseeing an independent evaluation of SPT. The purpose of the evaluation is to examine the quality, effectiveness, on-going relevance and overall value of vocational training that is currently delivered by specialist training providers, and to propose any recommendations for future practice.

Community Education assists learners with a disability to participate in FET provision by adapting course content, resources and teaching methodologies to suit their abilities. FET providers are required to offer reasonable accommodation to learners with disabilities, the nature of these accommodations varies depending on the identified needs of individual learners. FET provision is available across the country in every county. Most of these programmes are either free of charge or heavily subsidized.

Details of FET courses are available at www.fetchcourses.ie, or through the Adult Education Guidance Service in the learner’s local ETB. This service is free of charge and open to anyone over the age of 18, and they will be able to advise of all education and training options, as well as additional supports that are available to learners, including for learners with a disability.

In relation to apprentices, information is sought at the point of registration on any additional supports that may be needed due to disability including those with an intellectual disability. Education and training providers offer learning and other supports to apprentices during their training and many employers also provide accommodations in the workplace to apprentices with disabilities. In accordance with the Programme for Government, a new Action Plan for Apprenticeship is in development to cover the period 2021-2025 with a target of 10,000 apprenticeship registrations per annum by 2025. The plan will also set out how the apprentice population more closely reflect the general population and offer targeted supports for under-represented groups, including those with disabilities. Stakeholder submissions and a review of the current position of the Pathways findings and recommendations will be used to inform the new action plan which is due to be finalised by year end.

I am also aware of particular initiatives to give people with intellectual disabilities an opportunity to engage with higher education institutions. These have tended to be smaller in scale than the system-level provision delivered in the further education and training (FET) sector, but I am interested in seeing what we can do to build on these existing initiatives. This will include developing a better understanding of what works best within the different models, how we can support different providers in working together and learning from each other, across both the further and higher education system, and examining what is scalable from institutional-level approaches. There are other important policy and access questions, for example is it better from an access perspective for provision to be provided locally in a further education and training setting or in higher education settings where access may be problematic for some students living further away from the institutions? In this context, I will be looking over the coming year to see what more can be done in this area and I have asked my officials to bring forward proposals to me in this regard.

State Examinations

Questions (108)

Richard Bruton

Question:

108. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if his attention has been drawn to the recent OECD report on the reform of the leaving certificate which highlighted the lack of engagement of higher and further education institutions and of the enterprise sector in the development of reforms; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43170/20]

View answer

Written answers

I understand, based on the information available to me, that the recommendations of the OECD report in question were presented to the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) last year, and actions have been taken since then to engage further and higher education providers, and the enterprise sector, in the reform process.

The Senior Cycle Review process (2017-2020) is led by the NCCA and comprised three phases. It offered many opportunities for education stakeholders to reflect on enduring and evolving elements of senior cycle education in Ireland.

The initial phase involved international research into upper secondary education in other jurisdictions. The second phase involved engagement with schools across the country, where students, parents, teachers, school leaders and other stakeholders shared their views on the senior cycle experience and the future of this stage of education. Phase three took the themes that emerged from phase two to a wider public audience. This public consultation phase included regional focus groups, online surveys and bilateral discussions with groups and organisations.

During the review, NCCA invited the OECD to conduct an assessment of the Senior Cycle Review process. This happened during the second phase of the review (2018-19) when the OECD team visited Ireland and met with various stakeholders, including teachers, principals, and students, to hear their views on the process of review. The findings of the OECD assessment were presented at the NCCA Senior Cycle Consultation Conference in October 2019 and the OECD report, Education in Ireland: an OECD Assessment of Senior Cycle Review, was presented to NCCA Council in November 2019.

The policy assessment presented in the OECD report took stock of the NCCA senior cycle review process, provided feedback on progress made and offered recommendations that informed the design of the third phase of the review, a wide public consultation that took place in 2019. On foot of specific OECD recommendations the NCCA held a series of bilateral consultations with representatives of further and higher education and with industry representatives, including IBEC. The NCCA has also established a Standing Groups with both the HEA and SOLAS to ensure continued structured engagement with these key stakeholders.

I am satisfied that steps have been taken to remedy the lack of engagement highlighted in the OECD report in question, and will ensure that higher education and further providers continue to be consulted as the Leaving Certificate reform process continues.

Covid-19 Pandemic Supports

Questions (109, 409, 410)

Denis Naughten

Question:

109. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if a mechanism will be introduced for fourth year student nurses not in receipt of SUSI to receive the €250 refund in view of the fact that they will not be on campus in 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43176/20]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

409. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if students living here and attending university in Northern Ireland who are not in receipt of the SUSI grant are eligible to receive the €250 once off grant; if so, the way in which a student (details supplied) can apply for the grant; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42858/20]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

410. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if postgraduate students are eligible to receive the €250 once off payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42859/20]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 109, 409 and 410 together.

In recognition of the challenges facing full time third level students the Government has approved once off funding of €50m to provide additional financial assistance in this academic year.

The funding was provided in Budget 2021, in recognition of the exceptional situation they have experienced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Financial assistance will be provided to all EU full-time undergraduate and postgraduate students attending publicly funded Higher Education Institutions.

The scheme will ensure students;

- Who avail of the SUSI grant, including students abroad, will receive €250 top-up in their grant;

- Students who do not avail of the grant but attend publicly funded Higher Education Institutions in the state can reduce by €250 any outstanding student contribution fee payments or receive a €250 credit note for their institution;

- In a small number of cases, alternative arrangements will be made for the payment of the monies to students at the discretion of institutions.

The latter two options are designed to ensure students who are not in receipt of SUSI benefit from the measure. It is also the intention that these address circumstances where students are in final year, have paid their contribution fee and may not be on campus, as in the case of final year student nurses on clinical placement..

Irish/EU/EEA students partaking in courses in other countries who are in receipt of SUSI support are eligible for the payment if they are attending approved SUSI courses in approved higher education institutions within the EU. However other EU fulltime students outside of the SUSI system must be registered in a publicly funded higher education provider in the State to avail of this allocation.

In terms of other Irish nationals studying abroad, the provision of supports to Irish citizens based on nationality alone with the exclusion of other EU nationals would be contrary to EU law. It is therefore not possible to provide supports based on Irish citizenship alone. Instead the measure applies to all of these qualifying for SUSI grants, wherever they are studying and those of EU nationality at publicly funded higher education institutions in the State. Additionally a key administrative feature of the fund is that it is being implemented with the assistance of publicly funded institutions in the State under the remit of my Department.

SUSI and institutions will be communicating directly with students on arrangements in the coming weeks.

Additionally Budget 2021 provides further funding to enhance SUSI grant supports for post-grads and increase support for the PATH access initiative.

This builds on the additional supports announced in July including a doubling of the Student Assistance Fund, and a €15 million technology fund for devices for students in further and higher education.

Covid-19 Pandemic Supports

Questions (110)

Paul McAuliffe

Question:

110. Deputy Paul McAuliffe asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the Covid-19 related supports available to third-level and further education colleges for 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43220/20]

View answer

Written answers

Since the onset of Covid-19 in March, my Department, the Higher Education Authority (HEA) and SOLAS have collaborated with key stakeholders from the sector to identify, quantify and develop options to mitigate the financial impacts of Covid 19 on the sector, including costs associated with the safe commencement of the 2020/21 academic year in line with Public Health advice. As announced in July, the Government has provided additional and re-prioritised funding in the amount of €168m to enable providers to facilitate the safe return of students to further and higher education in 2020, in the context of public health advice. This funding includes provision for PPE and equipment, online learning costs, student supports and research costs and is specific to 2020.

Through Budget 2021, as detailed in the 2021 Expenditure Report, funding will be provided to meet demographic and other pressures across the sectors, including Covid-19 impacts, and to provide for additional upskilling and reskilling opportunities, as well as increased capacity and places in the higher education sector. The funding in this Vote as noted in the Expenditure Report includes the National Training Fund.

In this regard €167million is allocated towards Covid-19 related policy responses. Funding in respect of core budgetary programmes, demographics and the central pay agreement provision are provided for separately.

The 2021 report notes that from an expenditure perspective there are two distinct policy goals that will need to be addressed in budgetary decisions over the medium term: providing for the core budgetary programmes; and funding Covid-19 related policy responses.

While full details on the allocation of resources across spending areas will be set out, as usual, in the Revised Estimates Volume (REV) I have highlighted below key measures to me met from the increased 2021 allocations referenced by the Deputy:

- Continuation of July Stimulus and 2021 Skills Package to reskill and upskill people affected by the pandemic;

- Research investment to support researchers, build capacity, support Covid research, and strengthen north-south research links;

- Funding will be provided to sustain additional places in higher education following exceptional increased demand arising from the Calculated Grade model on this years Leaving Certificate;

- Ensure students impacted by Covid have access to necessary supports through SUSI to facilitate active participation in education;

- Increased SUSI grant supports for post-graduate students;

- Additional support for the PATH access initiative to increase participation in Higher Education from the most economically disadvantaged students.

The Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science will engage with the HEA and the sector, to inform discussion with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform in relation to the allocation of funding in 2021 to ensure that the sector can continue to operate safely in the Covid-19 environment.

Further Education and Training Programmes

Questions (111)

Colm Burke

Question:

111. Deputy Colm Burke asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the courses available to older persons to improve their digital skills by county; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43218/20]

View answer

Written answers

Fostering Inclusion is one of the three core pillars around which the Further Education and Training (FET) Strategy 2020-2024 is built. The FET sector is committed to increasing levels of inclusion through the provision of high quality, accessible and flexible education and training programmes and supports suited to the identified needs of individuals, with the aim of enabling every citizen to participate fully in society. Digital literacy is key in facilitating the full inclusion of all members of our society.

There are a range of programmes available within FET for all persons, including older persons, who wish to develop their digital literacy. These programmes are integrated into adult literacy and numeracy provision and are designed to meet the specific digital literacy needs of learners. As a result, they are generally organised on a one-to-one or small group basis. Older persons who wish to develop their digital literacy are encouraged to make contact with their local Education and Training Board (ETB) to discuss what courses may be available to them to meet their particular digital literacy needs. FET provides over 120,000 community education and adult literacy, numeracy and digital literacy training places and provision is available across counties, towns and communities.

Examples of FET basic digital skills courses, which are open all learners including older persons, include courses on internet skills, basic computers, self-directed digital learning, computer literacy, and preparation for ECDL. There are also number of courses, such as ‘Get Connected’, ‘Silver Surfers’ and ‘How to use a tablet’ which are designed to specifically help people feel more comfortable about using digital technologies in everyday life.

Details of digital skills provision and statistics in relation to older people/learner enrolments in FET for 2018-2019 can be found at

Courses .

Covid-19 Pandemic Supports

Questions (112)

Ciaran Cannon

Question:

112. Deputy Ciarán Cannon asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the breakdown of the 16,700 laptops made available to students; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43305/20]

View answer

Written answers

As part of a package of COVID-19 supports for the higher and further education sectors, my Department allocated €15 million to higher and further education providers for a once-off COVID-19 grant to support disadvantaged students in accessing ICT devices.

Devices procured using the grant are being distributed by Higher Education Institutions and Education and Training Boards to disadvantaged students via appropriate lending schemes. Almost 16,700 laptops have been procured and shipped as part of a bulk order organised by HEAnet. In addition, over 4,800 devices were procured directly by providers under this funding.

I am including in the table attached, for the Deputy's information, a breakdown of the number of devices procured by the HEIs and ETBs under the HEAnet bulk order and directly.

Bulk Orders

Third Level Staff

Questions (113)

Holly Cairns

Question:

113. Deputy Holly Cairns asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if his attention has been drawn to 11,200 lecturers working on a temporary or casual basis in recent years across Irish universities and institutes of technology. [43301/20]

View answer

Written answers

In May 2016 the then Minister welcomed the report of the Chairperson of the Expert Group on Fixed-Term and Part-Time Employment in Lecturing in Third Level Education in Ireland. The recommendations contained in the report will assist in addressing concerns raised about precarious employment by Union representatives. The Department issued directions to the sector on the 4th July 2016 to implement the recommendations contained in the report in accordance with the terms of the Lansdowne Road Agreement and our understanding is that the Institutions took steps to do so.

The Cush Report is specific to concerns raised about part-time and fixed-term employment in lecturing and its recommendations are not applicable to non-lecturing grades. It is importantto acknowledge that there can be objective conditions for the employment of an individual on a fixed term basis such as for example, for the completion of a specific task or project or for the temporary replacement of an academic seconded to a leadership role for the period. Nevertheless the recommendations of the Cush Report to avoid unnecessary use of extended temporary contracts areclear. In line with the Universities Act, 1997, third-level institutions have autonomy in relation to human resource policies, subject to compliance with Government policy in respect of employment numbers and pay policy. Employers in the higher education sector are also required to operate in accordance with the provisions of national industrial relations agreements.

In the event that a union has concerns regarding work and contract conditions among staff in any third level institution, that union can seek to have the matter addressed using the dispute resolution procedures provided for in the Haddington Road Agreement, and any individuals who have issues of dispute have a variety of dispute resolution options open to them.

Apprenticeship Programmes

Questions (114)

Richard Bruton

Question:

114. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the progress which has been made to date in getting Departments to commit to recruiting a cohort of apprentices each year. [43171/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Programme for Government has committed to taking the lead on boosting the availability and uptake of apprenticeships, by providing government apprenticeship schemes. Apprenticeship is an employer led offering. As such, and given the employment status of apprentices, apprentices will need to be included within public sector employment ceilings where these exist. Apprenticeships should therefore be focused on areas of identified skills needs within the sector.

Craft apprenticeships are well established within the public sector with in the region of 200 craft apprentices in employment across the sector. In addition to craft apprentices, 40 ICT and 10 Accounting Technician apprentices were recruited in 2019 and employed across 10 Departments and agencies.

Feedback from individuals involved in the ICT apprenticeship programme has emphasised the need to have relevant supports and procedures in place for apprentices at the commencement of their programme. The availability of mentor staff is critical to the success of the programme for individual apprentices, particularly in the challenging post COVID-19 environment.

The Action Plan for Apprenticeship for the coming 5 year period is under development. In addition to the Programme for Government commitment, the role of the public sector in apprenticeship recruitment was raised by a number of stakeholders during the consultation process and proposals in this area are informing the new action plan.

Third Level Admissions

Questions (115)

Alan Farrell

Question:

115. Deputy Alan Farrell asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his plans to reform the CAO form to include further education; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43173/20]

View answer

Written answers

The CAO is a company set up by the Higher Education Institutions in order to process applications for undergraduate, and some postgraduate, courses on their behalf. The HEIs are autonomous and determine their own criteria in relation to admissions. They HEIs make decisions on admissions and instruct the CAO to make offers to successful candidates.

I am conscious that CAO system is very well known and can often dominate the national discourse in relation to the options available for students completing the Leaving Certificate. There are a host of routes into further and higher education, for school leavers and older adults returning to or continuing their education. I would like there to be clear and equal visibility of all of the options for all learners and potential learners in a single user-friendly location.

It is my intention that an important part of the work of my new Department will be to expand and streamline life-long and life-wide pathways between and within further and higher education and training. This will involve a comprehensive review of the current further and higher education pathways.

Third Level Education

Questions (116)

Pauline Tully

Question:

116. Deputy Pauline Tully asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his plans to provide work placements for students studying physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech and language therapy as many in these professions have been redeployed to Covid-19 testing; if these placements will be delayed; if the qualification date for these students will be delayed; the supports that will be put in place for these students if their placement and qualification date are delayed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42418/20]

View answer

Written answers

Provision of clinical placements for healthcare students is a matter for the Department of Health and the HSE, and my Department is not in a position to provide information on whether such placements may be delayed.

Since the onset of the Covid-19 outbreak, significant work has been undertaken by a stakeholder group chaired by the Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) and including the representative bodies of education providers to address issues relating to the maintenance of the quality and standards of teaching and learning, assessment and qualifications. This group has focused on the implementation of alternative arrangements, where appropriate and necessary, to meet both these standards and, where applicable, the educational accreditation criteria established by Professional Recognition Bodies (PRBs).

In the case of physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech and language therapy the awards standards established by QQI reflect the accreditation criteria that have been set out by CORU, Ireland's multi-profession Health and Social Care Regulator and consequently the relevant PRB for these professions. Members of the stakeholder group as well as QQI and CORU engaged regularly to ensure that necessary arrangements were put in place to maintain standards of education and training in this area so that students can progress e.g. from third year into fourth year or, where relevant, graduate with the relevant professional competencies that have been set out by CORU and which are reflected in QQI’s award standards.

Higher Education Institutions

Questions (117)

Eoghan Murphy

Question:

117. Deputy Eoghan Murphy asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if he has or will issue regulations regarding the way in which publicly-funded higher education bodies may or may not use their land for commercial or other activities. [41270/20]

View answer

Written answers

Legislative provisions are in place with regard to the acquisition and disposal of lands owned by publically funded higher education institutions.

Section 5 (1)(i) Regional Technical Colleges Act 1992, as amended by Section 6(a)(iii) Institutes of Technology Act 2006, requires the approval of the Higher Education Authority for the acquisition of land by an institute of technology. Similar provisions pertain to the Technology University sector as per Section 8 of the Technological Universities Act 2018 which requires the approval of the Minister for Further an Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science as well as the approval of the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform to acquire, hold and dispose of land, an interest in land or any other property. While, there is no equivalent provision within the Universities Act, where Exchequer funding is requested for acquisitions, there is an evaluation process in place which is undertaken by the Higher Education Authority with the final decision regarding land acquisition approval remaining with this Department.

The Deputy may wish to note that within the governing legislative framework, higher education institutions have the autonomy to take decisions with regard to the development of their landholdings, including for use for commercial or other activities undertaken to help underpin their overall financial position and sustainability. However, as with any expenditure by higher education institutions that is supported with public funding, the expenditure must be consistent with the provisions of the Public Spending Code in terms of value-for-money requirements.

Technological Universities

Questions (118)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

118. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the way in which the new Munster Technological University can best work with stakeholders in the region to produce greater employment opportunities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43311/20]

View answer

Written answers

The establishment of technological universities (TUs) is an important part of the Government’s higher education and regional development policy as underscored in the Programme for Government 2020.

The new Munster Technological University (MTU) will be established on 1 January 2021 and become the second technological university in the State.

Last year, the Department of Education and Skills established a high-level working group entitled the TU research network (TURN). This group, which included the presidents of TU Dublin and of those Institutes of Technology involved in TU development, the Higher Education Authority, the Technological Higher Education Association, and the Department, produced a seminal report in October 2019. This report sets out in detail the blueprint for successful TU development in this country. It describes the rationale, benefits and key requirements of this new type of higher education institution in Ireland. The report is entitled "Connectedness and Collaboration through Connectivity".

TUs are closely connected with their regions, stakeholders, students and staff. They are collaborative partners with enterprise, research communities, local and national government, and other education providers at home and abroad. Their connectivity is reflective of the modern, globalised, digitally connected world in which students, staff and stakeholders live, work and study.

The TURN report makes a series of 12 recommendations for outcomes that will provide a solid foundation for the development and progression of TUs, centring on the thematic areas of investment in integrated multi-campus digital infrastructure, research capacity-building, and realignment of the policy framework and funding for TUs. The focus is now on the implementation of these recommendations, including the development of academic career structures, by the sectoral stakeholders.

Arising directly from the TURN report, budget 2020 introduced a new TU transformation fund of €90 million going out to 2023. This represents a trebling of annual funding and will see TU-oriented funding increase to over €120 million by 2023. The fund will assist in key investment areas including digital infrastructure, research capacity building, change management, systems integration, governance and project management structures and information sharing to establish TUs and assist them to deliver key strategic social and economic development objectives and to respond to specific diverse regional and sectoral impacts such as Brexit. On 7 October I announced that the Higher Education Authority, which is overseeing and administering the Fund subject to Department policy requirements, was making a total of €34.3 million in funding allocations. The funds will be disbursed in 2 tranches in Quarter 4 this year and Quarter 1 next year. MTU was allocated €8.25 million under this call.

Although they will pursue their own individual missions, the common threads that will run through all TUs are identified in the TURN 2019 report –– higher education access, provision of high quality research-led teaching and learning excellence across all levels of the National Framework of Qualifications, skills and employment retention and creation, collaboration with other education institutions in further and higher education, regionally, nationally and internationally and the creation of a welcoming and supportive personal developmental environment which will allow all learners and students to fulfil their individual and societal potential.

The Department continues to work with TUs, TU development consortia and with relevant Government Departments and agencies on the implementation of relevant TURN report recommendations.

The Department is encouraging ownership by the sector of the TU development process such as can facilitate this new type of higher education institution to assist the delivery of relevant national and regional strategic priorities are set out, for example, in Project Ireland 2040, the National Development Plan, Future Jobs Ireland, Innovation and Horizon 2020.

As such, it remains a matter for MTU under its first incoming president and governing body to decide on the most appropriate way in its own particular circumstances in which it can assist in the delivery of skills and employment retention and creation regionally in consultation and collaboration with its internal and external stakeholders.

However, I do know from meeting with Regional Skills Forums throughout the country that there is a real excitement among the business community, educators and citizens in the regions about the difference TUs are making and will make to a number of key regional priorities including higher education access, research capacity building, the skills agenda and socio-economic progression.

Business owners, employers, students, education providers will be able to sit down together with the TUs and plan the skills needed for the regions as appropriate. TUs will also transform the decisions that younger people can make. If they can stay in their own community and access a university education, they are more likely to maintain their roots in that community and to contribute to the broader societal good.

Research and Development

Questions (119)

Thomas Gould

Question:

119. Deputy Thomas Gould asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his plans to encourage qualitative research methodology in Irish research given a shift towards quantitative methods in recent years and the importance of qualitative research in developing rich and deep understandings of human behaviour. [43215/20]

View answer

Written answers

There is no doubt that research and innovation will play an essential role in Ireland’s recovery from the current crisis and will assist us in being more prepared for the impacts of other challenges we are facing in the future.

The creation of a single department encompassing further and higher education, research, innovation and science demonstrates the recognition of the centrality of Research and Innovation to the Irish economy and society.

With this new Department we now have a great opportunity to bring further cohesion and investment to research and innovation strategy and funding and to ensure a balanced portfolio of excellent research across the full continuum, embracing all disciplines and, increasingly important, at the interface between disciplines.

Having three key research funding organisations, representing over 50% of national public research funding, brought together under one roof will help to achieve this balance. I am delighted that Science Foundation Ireland, which has traditionally focused on the STEM areas, the Irish Research Council, which funds researchers at all stages across all disciplines and the Higher Education Authority, which administers the core grant to higher education institutes will be working more closely together under the auspices of my new department.

It is important that research is carried out using the most relevant methodologies to ensure the research question or problem is addressed. Many international organisations and national governments have begun to embrace Mission-Oriented Investment programmes or Grand Challenges to channel multi-annual funding and a multi-disciplinary approach to enable research and innovation address significant societal challenges. We see examples of the missions that are proposed under the next EU Framework Programme, Horizon Europe.

As signalled in the Programme for Government, adopting a mission or grand challenge approach to solving societal challenges here in Ireland will not only ensure that we optimise our research and innovation capabilities to meet current and future challenges but through this approach we will further develop the skills of our talented researchers and academics to understand how the discoveries of the future can benefit us all.

Covid-19 Pandemic

Questions (120)

Gerald Nash

Question:

120. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if he has ring-fenced funding from budget 2021 for covering the cost of providing rapid testing and tracing on college campuses in the years ahead; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41675/20]

View answer

Written answers

The provision of services related to rapid testing and tracing are a matter for the Department of Health, my Department has no role in this provision.

Student Universal Support Ireland

Questions (121)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

121. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the increase in the income limits that have taken place in relation to the means testing of the SUSI grants since 2010; the increase in the average income during that period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41110/20]

View answer

Written answers

The increase in the income limits that have taken place in relation to the student grants since 2010 have been in respect of the Special Rate of Grant. This is the highest rate of maintenance grant support available. The income threshold for the Special Rate of Grant is linked to movements in the Old Age Pension (OAP) and the increases in the OAP payments in recent years are reflected in the changes to the income threshold which has increased from €22,703 in 2010 to its current figure of €24,500.

According to the CSO, the increase in the average weekly income during the period Q3 2010 to Q3 2020 was 16%. Therefore, based on CSO data, annual average income for 2010 was €36,371.92 compared to €42,201.12 in 2020.

The student grant scheme has gradations to the income thresholds to further extend the coverage of eligibility for different grant values at the rates of 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of maintenance grant. The Student Grant Scheme also provides for different levels of income thresholds where families have (i) less than 4 dependent children (ii) between 4 and 7 dependent children and (iii) 8 or more dependent children. In recognition of the additional cost to families where more than one person is attending college, income thresholds may also be increased by up to €4,830 for each additional family member attending college at the same time. In this way, the Student Grant Scheme is responsive to the individual circumstances of particular families.

Before adjustments for the number of dependent children, additional persons in college and income disregards, which can bring the qualifying income threshold up, the highest standard income threshold for a fee only grant is €54,240.

I do recognise that there is an immediate challenge which we must meet in responding to the changed economic circumstances brought about by Covid-19 and the likely effects of Brexit. I also want to look strategically at the wide range of issues related to the SUSI scheme and that is why I recently announced plans to review the scheme. It is intended that the review will commence shortly and will be completed by summer 2021. The review, which will include stakeholder consultation, will inform future decisions regarding the future direction of the SUSI scheme.

Technological Universities

Questions (122)

David Cullinane

Question:

122. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the status of a technological university for the south-east; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42535/20]

View answer

Written answers

Following the appointment of a new programme executive director in July 2020, there has been significant progress in advancing the project by Carlow and Waterford Institutes of Technology, as the TUSEI development consortium, to develop a technological university (TU) for the South East.

I met and was updated by the Institutes’ presidents and governing body chairpersons on 28 October and, in turn, I updated the Cabinet earlier this month on the development of the TUSEI project plan. This overarching plan is the culmination of activity by 8 work streams, 33 working groups and some 300 members comprising staff, students and stakeholders across both Institutes and the wider region.

The Department is engaged with the consortium in monitoring progress on the project plan in the period up to the submission of an application under the legislative procedures set out in the Technological Universities Act 2018. The Department understands that an application for TU designation under the Technological Universities Act 2018 is aimed to be submitted by the consortium in April or May of 2021.

On 7 October I announced the first funding allocation of €34.3 million under the Technological University Transformation Fund to assist consortia seeking to achieve TU designation, and established TUs, in their development. The Fund will provide €90 million in funding to 2023. In this first funding tranche the TUSEI consortium was allocated €5.1 million, bringing total Exchequer funding of the project to date to €8.8 million. Government has provided significant support, and continues to support the TUSEI consortium at all stages of the TU development process.

Top
Share