The International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT) is a statutorily independent body and exercises a quasi-judicial function under the International Protection Act 2015. I can confirm that a report was received from the Tribunal’s chairperson on the matter referred to by the Deputy. Given the circumstances, it would not be appropriate for me to comment further at this time.
Any decision in relation to reviewing decisions made on appeals is a matter for the Chairperson of the Tribunal, who is independent in their functions under the International Protection Act 2015.
IPAT also has a process in place to quality assure decisions taken, including external validation, on an ongoing basis.
Ireland follows the guidance of the UNHCR and the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) in relation to claims for international protection. Training for International Protection Office (IPO) caseworkers and interviewers and IPAT Tribunal Members is very comprehensive and is conducted in conjunction with the UNHCR and EASO. The IPO training includes a module in relation to interview techniques and how interviews are conducted. The Tribunal provides initial as well as ongoing training to its Members, including modules on evidence and credibility assessments and the conduct of hearings.
The Difference, Stigma, Shame, Harm (DSSH) model has also been incorporated into training for caseworkers and Tribunal Members. The model is designed to help the applicant provide a detailed narrative and to be a sensitive and appropriate way of assessing credibility in sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) claims. The DSSH model is endorsed by the UNHCR and has been adopted by Finland, Sweden, the UK and Ireland amongst other countries. In addition, further written guidance on assessing SOGI claims has been provided to all staff and panel members.