Skip to main content
Normal View

Employment Support Services

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 21 April 2021

Wednesday, 21 April 2021

Questions (1112, 1113, 1130, 1137, 1154, 1155, 1170, 1179, 1190)

Seán Sherlock

Question:

1112. Deputy Sean Sherlock asked the Minister for Social Protection the measures she will put in place to ensure that the proposed tendering for public employment services reflects the provision of a tailored, personalised service that includes a range of progressions appropriate to the person's circumstances, and prevents the unemployed person from being turned into a commodity whose sole purpose is to deliver a profit, protects the terms and conditions and offers job security to highly qualified and skilled staff who currently provide this service (details supplied). [18357/21]

View answer

Brendan Howlin

Question:

1113. Deputy Brendan Howlin asked the Minister for Social Protection if she plans to change the funding mechanism for the local employment services from a cost met model to a cost bid model; the implication of this change on guidance counsellor mediation services provided by local employment services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18360/21]

View answer

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

1130. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Social Protection when tenders will be sought for the provision of local employment services throughout the State; if it will be a condition of bidding to provide such services that the area of operation of each service will be coterminous with the existing social inclusion and community activation programme, SICAP, provision areas or local action group, LAG, areas for the LEADER programme; if the operating companies will be required to have a partnership structure to their boards; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18885/21]

View answer

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1137. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection , further to Parliamentary Question No. 989 of 24 March, if the future of employment service provision will ensure that schemes will continue to be community-focused; if her Department will avoid a move towards a cost-bid model as part of updates to local employment services in recognition of the extensive public costs of schemes such as JobPath; if a cost-meet model will be utilised; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19021/21]

View answer

Seán Canney

Question:

1154. Deputy Seán Canney asked the Minister for Social Protection her plans for the expansion of local employment services; if expansion will include the change in delivery from a cost-met to a cost-bid arrangement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19500/21]

View answer

Sorca Clarke

Question:

1155. Deputy Sorca Clarke asked the Minister for Social Protection if a commitment will be given to ensure community-based employment services, which provide certainty, capacity and equity in terms of access for jobseekers, that do not use a cost-bid basis for future contacts given the prospect of a wave of unemployment due to Covid-19; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19580/21]

View answer

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1170. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection the locations in which the local employment service will be rolled out as part of plans to roll out the service to areas not currently covered by existing providers; the timeframe for their establishment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19839/21]

View answer

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

1179. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will address concerns (details supplied) raised by local employment services staff in Drogheda, County Louth; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19954/21]

View answer

Dara Calleary

Question:

1190. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason she is proceeding with a new model of local employment service delivery; the cost basis on which the new model will be delivered; the relevant technical and previous experience necessary for a potential tender applicant; the proposed timeline for the process; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [20291/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1112, 1113, 1130, 1137, 1154, 1155, 1170, 1179 and 1190 together.

As part of the July stimulus, the Government committed to increase resources dedicated to the delivery of employment services within the Department’s own Intreo service, and, in addition, to expand the coverage of the Local Employment Services to areas not currently covered by existing providers. My Department has already increased its own complement of employment service staff and now intends to issue a Request for Tender (RFT) to expand local employment services into some geographical areas where a Local Employment Service does not currently exist. The specific lots will be detailed in the RFT when it is published.

The forthcoming RFT will primarily focus on the quality of services to be provided, while expanding the capacity of the Public Employment Service (PES). This RFT, which is required to comply with EU procurement rules, will have no impact on the contracts of existing providers in other areas and it is expected that the tender will prove attractive to local community-based organisations, including the Local Development Companies.

In practice, the annual "cost met" funding approach requires a level of scrutiny of day-to-day expenditure, which places an undue administrative burden on both the employment service provider and my Department. Such an approach diverts valuable resources away from supporting clients and as such does nothing to enhance employment outcomes for the long-term unemployed. Moving to a new multiannual funding approach, which pays for each jobseeker referred to the service, coupled with a strong emphasis on quality of service provision is more likely to deliver enhanced outcomes for those availing of the service.

The process I have described is not a cost-cutting exercise. My Department is investing more in our communities by expanding employment services across the State and providing more support and assistance to the long term unemployed.

Regarding the governance of any potential service providers, the Department has never been in the position of dictating the board structure of service delivery contractors.

Separately, the current contracts for all contracted PES provision expire at the end of 2021 and my Department is therefore developing RFTs to ensure that sufficient high-quality employment services are procured in a manner that is compatible with EU and national procurement rules.

Organisations with strong experience in the delivery of similar services at a community and local level will be in a strong position to respond to the RFTs when they issue.

I trust this clarifies matters for the Deputies.

Top
Share