Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 20 May 2021

Written Answers Nos. 329-343

Alcohol Sales

Questions (329)

Carol Nolan

Question:

329. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Justice the number of age cards issued pursuant to the scheme established by the Intoxicating Liquor Act 1988 (Age Card) Regulations 2010 for each year since its establishment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27136/21]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Garda authorities that the below table sets out the number of cards issued from 1999 up to the end of April 2021:

YEAR

NO OF CARDS ISSUED

COMMENTS

1999

1,205

2000

7,246

2001

12,973

2002

39,600

2003

57,695

2004

45,760

2005

41,867

2006

33,856

2007

31,653

New Card Launched

2008

35,268

2009

36,351

2010

39,952

2011

41,054

On Line Application launched - CCS

2012

47,625

2013

50,148

2014

48,093

2015

47,698

2016

45,545

2017

44,777

2018

44,364

2019

36,516

2020

24,492

2021

4,010

For the first 4 months of 2021

Constitutional Amendments

Questions (330)

Richard Bruton

Question:

330. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Justice the status of plans to amend Article 41.3 of Bunreacht na hÉireann in order to recognise a wider range of families; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27200/21]

View answer

Written answers

Article 41.3.1° of the Constitution provides that “The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.”

The Citizens’ Assembly on Gender Equality, which published its recommendations on 24 April 2021, recommended the amendment of Article 41 of the Constitution so that it would protect private and family life, with the protection afforded to the family not limited to the marital family.

The Programme for Government “Our Shared Future” contains commitments to respond to each recommendation of the Citizens’ Assembly on gender equality and to act on the recommendations.

The Government will consider the recommendation of the Citizen’s Assembly regarding the provisions of Article 41 of the Constitution relating to the protection of the family with a view to bringing forward proposals in due course.

Immigration Status

Questions (331)

Michael McNamara

Question:

331. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Justice if she will issue a renewed stamp 4 to a person (details supplied) awaiting a decision on an application for certificate of naturalisation whose previous stamp 4 was extended three months at a time when it expired on 21 May 2020, most recently up to the April 2021, but whose passport was not stamped to that effect in circumstances in which the person needs to leave the State for essential reasons. [27209/21]

View answer

Written answers

The person referred to by the Deputy was issued with a letter requesting further documentation on 14 May 2021, in support of their application for Leave to Remain. Upon receipt of this documentation their application can continue to be processed.

Any visa required national that wishes to re-enter the State must have a valid passport and either a valid Irish Residence Permit (IRP) or a valid re-entry visa. Normal processing of re-entry visa applications has recommenced. This service is strictly a postal service. All re-entry visa applications must be submitted by Registered Post to the address on the application form.

Further details on how to apply for a re-entry visa and to download application forms can be found on our website at:

http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/visas-reentry-decisions

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS of my Department by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility (inisoireachtasmail@justice.ie) which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

An Garda Síochána

Questions (332, 333, 334, 335)

Michael McNamara

Question:

332. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Justice if the report of the inquiry into the adequacy of the An Garda Síochána investigations and disciplinary inquiries following the death of Mr. Patrick Nugent, which she received on 3 November 2020, will be shared with the family. [27214/21]

View answer

Michael McNamara

Question:

333. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Justice when she will share the report of the inquiry into the adequacy of the An Garda Síochána investigations and disciplinary inquiries following the death of Mr. Patrick Nugent, which she received on 3 November 2020, with the Nugent family. [27215/21]

View answer

Michael McNamara

Question:

334. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Justice if the report of the inquiry into the adequacy of the An Garda Síochána investigations and disciplinary inquiries following the death of Mr. Patrick Nugent, which she received on 3 November 2020, will be published. [27216/21]

View answer

Michael McNamara

Question:

335. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Justice when she will publish the report of the inquiry into the adequacy of the An Garda Síochána investigations and disciplinary inquiries following the death of Mr. Patrick Nugent, which she received on 3 November 2020. [27217/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 332 to 335, inclusive, together.

The Deputy will be aware that an inquiry under section 42 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 was conducted by former Judge Patrick Clyne into the Garda Síochána investigation relating to the death of Mr Patrick Nugent in 1984.

I can inform the Deputy that Judge Clyne completed his inquiry on 31 October 2020 and my Department received Judge Clyne’s report on 3 November 2020. The advice of the Attorney General was sought on the issue of publication and related matters. That advice is currently being considered within the Department. I expect to be in a position to advise on the timelines further, but unfortunately I am not in a position to do so at this juncture. I do appreciate that Mr. Nugent's family are most anxious to receive the outcome of Judge Clyne's investigation and I will be in touch with them as soon as it is possible to do so.

Question No. 333 answered with Question No. 332.
Question No. 334 answered with Question No. 332.
Question No. 335 answered with Question No. 332.

An Garda Síochána

Questions (336)

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

336. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice if she will establish a dedicated transport division of An Garda Síochána; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27230/21]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, under section 26 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 (as amended), the Garda Commissioner is responsible for the management and administration of Garda business, including the recruitment, training and deployment of Garda members and staff. Under section 33 of the Act, the Commissioner is responsible for the distribution and stationing of the Garda Síochána throughout the State, including the establishment of dedicated units within An Garda Síochána. As Minister I have no direct role in these decisions.

I am advised by the Garda authorities that An Garda Síochána work closely with partner agencies including the National Transport Authority, Irish Rail (DART and InterCity rail) and Transdev Ireland (Luas) to provide a high visibility presence through a co-ordinated approach.

I am further informed that An Garda Síochána do not propose to establish a dedicated transport policing unit at this time.

Prison Service

Questions (337, 338)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

337. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice if a person from this State and serving a prison sentence in Northern Ireland can apply under the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Act 1995 to serve the prison sentence in this jurisdiction; the conditions under which such an application can be made; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27251/21]

View answer

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

338. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice if a person who is Irish and lives ordinarily in Northern Ireland and is serving a prison sentence in Northern Ireland can apply under the Transfer of Sentenced Person Act 1995 to serve the prison sentence in this jurisdiction on the basis of their Irish citizenship; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27252/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 337 and 338 together.

I wish to advise the Deputy that the Council of the Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons provides a procedural framework for such transfers and seeks to provide a simple and relatively expeditious mechanism whereby the repatriation of sentenced persons may take place.

The Convention sets out six conditions which must be fulfilled if a transfer is to be affected and these conditions were transposed into national law in the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Acts, 1995 and 1997. It is of course open to an Irish person serving a sentence in Northern Ireland to apply for a transfer under the Acts. However, it should be noted that even where all of the conditions are satisfied, there is no obligation on a State to comply with a transfer request.

As the Deputy may be aware, in 2014 a High Court judgement relating to the transfer of prisoners from the United Kingdom was appealed to the Supreme Court. The judgments in this case were received in July 2016. A subsequent Appeal Court ruling in another case in 2018 directed that the Minister must consider each application on its own merits under the existing legislation and give detailed reasoning for the decision reached.

The Government has approved the General Scheme of the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Amendment Bill in 2019 in order to amend the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Acts 1995 and 1997. The relevant 2016 Supreme Court judgments raises the issue of how best to adapt and administer under Irish law a foreign sentence that contains features not found in Irish sentences. This (Amendment) Bill is designed to address this issue.

Officials in my Department are currently working with the Office of the Attorney General with a view to progressing this matter so that a finalised Bill can be brought to Government and presented to the Oireachtas as soon as possible.

Legislation to transpose Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA is also being progressed and is on the Government Legislative Programme Priority List for publication this session.

Question No. 338 answered with Question No. 337.

Prison Service

Questions (339)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

339. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice the details of each contract placed in each of the years 2015 to 2019 and up to November 2020 for works awarded to a company (details supplied) by the Prison Service other than for those services specifically provided for in the schedule at appendix 1, Requirements and Specifications of the Request for Tenders dated December 2013 as published by the Prison Service; and if she will provide a schedule of contracts that were awarded following a specific procurement and tender procedure for those works and contracts in which no procurement procedure or tender was issued. [27268/21]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Director General of the Irish Prison Service that the information requested by the Deputy is not readily available.

However, the information is being collated by the Irish Prison Service and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy as soon as possible.

The following deferred reply was received under Standing Order 51
I refer to your recent Parliamentary Question Number 339 for written answer on 20 May 2021 with regard to details of contracts placed by the Irish Prison Service to a named company (details supplied). A response to the question was not available at the time as the information requested was not readily available as it required a manual examination of records and I undertook to respond to you as soon as possible.
[the details of each contract placed in each of the years 2015 to 2019 and up to November 2020 for works awarded to a company (details supplied) by the Prison Service other than for those services specifically provided for in the schedule at appendix 1]
I can inform the Deputy that the company referred to was the successful tenderer in the 2013-2015 tender process for Facilities Management Services undertaken by the Irish Prison Service. In this regard, a contract was awarded on 15 December 2014 to the company in question for the provision of these services and the contract was scheduled to run from 02 February 2015 until 01 February 2019.
I can also inform the Deputy that the company was also the successful tenderer in a tender competition for Facilities Management Services, which was run by the Office of Government Procurement on behalf of the Irish Prison Service from 2018 to 2020. The current contract for Facilities Management Services came into effect on 20 July 2020 and is scheduled to run for seven years.
The Deputy will be aware it is normal in tender exercises that the consequential contractual agreements with the successful tenderer are not just limited to the details contained in the Request For Tender (RFT) as issued at the time of tendering, and they incorporate an extensive suite of documents including for example:
- The tender documentation
- Tender Workshop Discussions/Presentations
- Clarifications
- Minutes of Meetingz
- Pre contract discussions
- The Letter of Acceptance and associated attachments
- Ongoing contractual discussions, amendments and agreements between the contracting parties.
All of the above applied to the 2013/2015 tender competition for Facilities Management Services.
The Letter of Acceptance issued in December 2014 stated an annual amount of €1.5M (vat exclusive) based on the outcome of the tender exercise and related only to planned preventative maintenance, as the then potential value for reactive maintenance was unknown (in common with such contracts). Following the tender there were discussions with the winning tenderer (and advice from the Chief States Solicitor’s Office and the Technical Advisors) culminating in rates being agreed, for callouts and management costs for reactive, urgent and emergency maintenance.
However, given that the annual cost of reactive maintenance would have been available in the years prior to the tender, I am advised that it is accepted by the Irish Prison Service, that notwithstanding some uncertainty around these costs, a more comprehensive estimate of the annual value of the contract should have been provided in the tender documentation, including the letter of acceptance. As it transpired, the reactive maintenance costs were multiples of the planned preventative maintenance costs. A more comprehensive estimated cost has been included in the recent tender process.
I am advised by the Irish Prison Service that the agreed approach, taken by the officials involved in the tender competition at that time, was that an RFT would issue for planned preventative and reactive maintenance and an indicative non exhaustive list of Plant and Equipment was provided (as per Appendix 1 appended to the RFT).
It was recognised and acknowledged that there was a large element of unknowns associated with the facilities management services to be procured (in keeping with the nature of such services) because:
- The full extent of assets that would fall to be maintained in the period of the contract could not be defined (an indicative list was provided but it was acknowledged in the tender documentation that it was not definitive).
- Part of the service procured was to include a comprehensive asset identification and verification exercise (approximately 100,000 assets have been identified over the course of that contract).
- There was an unknown and unquantifiable level of demand for the management and delivery of reactive, urgent and emergency callouts and works (this is commonplace for such facilities management contracts).
- There was an unknown and unquantifiable requirement for spares, parts and consumables associated with repair and maintenance of fabric, plant, systems and equipment.
This information was communicated to all of the contractors who competed in the tender process back in 2013/2014 and lessons learned from that process were incorporated into the tender process which was completed in 2020, as the associated RTF stated:
“The Contracting Authority estimates that the expenditure on the Services to be covered by the proposed Services Contract may amount to some €71M (excl. VAT) over the term and any possible extensions. Tenderers must understand that this figure is an estimate only, based on current and future expected usage.”
The scope of services sought from the tenderers was as follows:
- “Planned preventative maintenance covering mechanical, electrical, security, fabric, machinery and equipment assets;
- Reactive maintenance and call out service on 24/7basis;
- Provision of supplementary trade resources;
- Specialist FM services for terminal cleaning (ie) to control spread of infections and legionella control measures;
- Small projects related to the refurbishment, adaptation of buildings and replacement of elements of the IPS Estate.”
[if she will provide a schedule of contracts that were awarded following a specific procurement and tender procedure for those works and contracts in which no procurement procedure or tender was issued].
The scope of the work agreed with the Contractor since the first contract was implemented in 2015 has been significant and extensive, and has included the usual broad range of facilities management services, such as:
- the commissioning and maintenance of mechanical and electrical plant, fabric and systems
- repairs, renewals, replacements, reconfigurations and upgrades, general, reactive and planned preventative and infection control related maintenance at all IPS locations,
In addition to the provision of Facilities Management Services, a number of small works contracts were also awarded to this contractor following procurement exercises issued via the Irish Prison Service’s Small Works Framework between 2015 and 2020 as follows:
- Cloverhill High Dependency Unit - €406K
- Mountjoy West Campus Laundry - €470K
- Wheatfield Training College - €373K
- Cloverhill Windows Replacement - €408K
In 2018, the Office of Government Procurement commenced a tender process for the provision of Facilities Management Services. This process was completed in 2020 culminating in the contract being awarded on 20 July 2020. Therefore, in order to ensure continuity of the necessary service provision for the prison estate, the 2015 contract was in rollover from March 2019 to July 2020.
Over the duration of the roll-over period in 2019 and 2020, amounts of €9.3 million and €6.2 million respectively, were paid to the contractor. These payments have been recorded and reported as non-competitive for the years in question, in accordance with Government accounting procedures and also recorded on the Irish Prison Service annual 40/02 return.

Prison Service

Questions (340)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

340. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice if her attention has been drawn to any irregularities involving procurement issues within the estates and or building services divisions of the Prison Service unit: if so, the details, nature and extent of same. [27269/21]

View answer

Written answers

I would like to inform the Deputy that my Department received correspondence on September 13, 2019, in relation to alleged procurement irregularities involving the Irish Prison Service and a named company. This was forwarded to my Department’s Internal Audit Unit for examination. I am informed that an investigation in relation to the complaint commenced in March 2020 and that this investigation will be finalised in 2021.

The nature of the allegations relate to the extension of a supplier contract and the awarding of works from this contract, and to allegations around purchases, payment rates and the utilisation of supplier maintenance staff.

A new tender was completed in 2020 and I am informed that this was a complex and lengthy tender process involving extensive engagement with a number of parties including the Office of Government Procurement, the Chief State Solicitor's Office, and technical consultants.

I understand that the previous contract remained in operation until the new contract commenced in 2020. This was to ensure continuity of service provision for the prison estate and involved various works, ranging from commissioning and maintenance of mechanical and electrical and associated plant and systems, repairs, renewals and upgrades, and general, reactive and planned preventative maintenance.

Where work was carried out beyond the original contract date, the expenditure has been reported in line with government accounting rules.

A further allegation was received in 2020. This allegation is currently being investigated.

Cybersecurity Policy

Questions (341)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

341. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice if a schedule will be provided of IT and email security costs incurred over the past five years to date; and the contractor engaged to deliver the services and or system. [27282/21]

View answer

Written answers

My Department implements a security-by-design and defence-in-depth approach to cyber security. Our technical staff operate and monitor all relevant systems to the highest levels, and are closely engaged with experts in the Office of the Government Chief Information Officer (OGCIO) and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) to ensure that we follow best practice as it relates to all aspects of Cybersecurity. For operational and security reasons, we are advised by the NCSC not to disclose details of systems and processes which could in any way compromise those efforts. In particular, it is not considered appropriate to disclose information which might assist criminals to identify potential vulnerabilities in departmental cybersecurity arrangements. Therefore it is not considered appropriate to disclose particular arrangements in place in relation to cyber security tools and services and my Department does not comment on operational security matters.

Data Protection

Questions (342, 343)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

342. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Justice if her Department is fully compliant with GDPR EU requirements, the EU network and Information Security Directive and standards with respect to her Department’s IT infrastructure including Article 29 of GDPR which requires that data processors access only the data they need for their task; if ISO 27001 Annex 9 standards on privileged access are fully met; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27343/21]

View answer

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

343. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Justice if any state or semi state bodies which report to her Department are fully compliant with GDPR EU requirements and the EU network and Information Security Directive and standards with respect to their IT infrastructure including article 29 of GDPR which requires that data processors access only the data they need for their task; if ISO 27001 annex 9 standards on privileged access are fully met; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27362/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 342 and 343 together.

My Department is fully compliant with EU requirements under the GDPR and the EU Network and Information Security and standards with respect to IT Infrastructure. The delivery of my Department’s ICT operations is supported by a managed service provider who is accredited to ISO 20000 standard. While my Department is not ISO 27001 certified, it operates a number of similar standards and specifically operates a Role Based Access Control policy and standard in relation to data access on the shared service which delivers ICT services to my Department and connected agencies. I am informed that the offices, agencies and bodies under my Department’s aegis that are not part of the shared service also operate within these guiding principles and meet the appropriate standards on privileged access.

Question No. 343 answered with Question No. 342.
Top
Share