Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 27 Jul 2021

Written Answers Nos. 1094-1113

Employment Support Services

Questions (1094, 1095, 1096, 1112, 1119, 1122, 1124, 1125, 1134, 1187)

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1094. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection the way a payment per person model will benefit those most in need of employment supports with regard to the request for tender for employment services in view of the proposed model generating income through client referral which will likely favour those who are job ready and the removal or merging of key service supports which are currently available on a walk-in basis; the reports or data which advised this decision; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39120/21]

View answer

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1095. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection if consideration was given to local community development companies client-centred ethos as part of the proposed changes to employment services (details supplied) and the financial risks this model presents to not-for-profit employment service providers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39121/21]

View answer

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1096. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection the way her Department arrived at a proposed model of employment services by which providers derive income from a reliance on client referral numbers including the process for determining specific key performance indicators for this proposed model; if her Department has met its targets for referrals to the local employment services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39122/21]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

1112. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection the way in which local employment services can operate under financial uncertainty in view of the fact local employment service income is dependent on referrals from her Department and given that to date her Department has never met its target for referrals to the local employment services. [39448/21]

View answer

Catherine Connolly

Question:

1119. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Social Protection the engagement she has had to date in 2021 with the local employment services sector in Ireland with regard to the recent change to the regional employment service model; her plans to establish a stakeholder forum to allow for ongoing engagement between the sector and her Department; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39621/21]

View answer

Seán Canney

Question:

1122. Deputy Seán Canney asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will consider ceasing the tendering process for the delivery of local employment services in order for her Department to actively engage with all stakeholders to find the best way forward for the delivery of the services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39758/21]

View answer

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

1124. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Social Protection if it will be ensured that local employment services are not outsourced or privatised; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39823/21]

View answer

Seán Haughey

Question:

1125. Deputy Seán Haughey asked the Minister for Social Protection her plans for changes to the local employment services tender; if her attention has been drawn to concerns from communities regarding these proposed changes; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39825/21]

View answer

Brendan Smith

Question:

1134. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Social Protection if consideration will be given to the issues outlined in correspondence (details supplied) in relation to local employment services, if it will be ensured that the present delivery model is retained; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40077/21]

View answer

Cormac Devlin

Question:

1187. Deputy Cormac Devlin asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will arrange a meeting with representatives of an organisation (details supplied) to discuss its proposal for a stakeholders forum prior to any decision on any new employment service contract being signed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [41421/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1094, 1095, 1096, 1112, 1119, 1122, 1124, 1125, 1134 and 1187 together.

Following on from a review of public employment services in my Department, my officials have commenced a series of procurement exercises to secure appropriate services to engage with the long-term unemployed and other cohorts throughout the State. The focus throughout this exercise is the customer, their needs and how they can be met through customer-centric services delivering the necessary supports in their journey to employment. My Department is conscious of the need to have supports in place at the time that the customer needs them and to be able to respond rapidly to changes in the labour market and the demand for services.

This process was preceded by extensive engagement both at Ministerial and official level since 2019, including site visits by officials to every Local Employment Service, Job Club and Employability service in the State, a briefing to stakeholders on the Indecon Reviews of Local Employment Services and Job Clubs, engagement with stakeholders by external consultants on behalf of the Department and numerous meetings at official and Ministerial level with the representative body, the ILDN, and other stakeholders.

The Regional Employment Service model used for phase one was the product of extensive stakeholder engagement and the input of external consultants. It is fully in line with the recently published Pathways to Work 2021-2025 strategy. In addition, ensuring any new employment service was legally compatible with EU and national procurement regulations was an absolute imperative.

The new service is not a privatisation of Government services. These services have been outsourced by the State since the mid-1990s. Instead, it is a shift to competitive procurement as required by law. The possibility of retaining the current LES model, which was developed a generation ago, with rolling contracts under a closed procurement process, was not an option.

The procurement of the new approach requires tenderers to demonstrate their ability to deliver a high-quality service to the long-term unemployed and others furthest from the labour market. The approach place a significant focus on tenderers ability to access a wide range of supports and services locally in order to assist their clients progress towards employment.

Tenders have been received for the first phase of this procurement or a Regional Employment Service, with four lots covering seven counties in the Midlands and the North-West and the preferred bidders will be notified in due course. Any learnings from this process will feed into the second phase.

The second phase, still under development, will see the expansion of the Regional Employment Service throughout the State, as well as the procurement of additional employment services on a national level through a separate request for tenders.

The Regional Employment Service is aimed at cohorts furthest from the labour market and has been designed to be accessible to tenders from the community and voluntary sector, giving due regard to their experience and competencies.

As the request for tenders is still under development, I am not in a position to reveal details of the forthcoming phase two procurement for employment services. However, as with phase one, the emphasis on designing a request for tender that places no obstacles to the community and voluntary sector will remain a guiding principle.

Question No. 1095 answered with Question No. 1094.
Question No. 1096 answered with Question No. 1094.
Question No. 1097 answered with Question No. 1089.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1098)

Malcolm Noonan

Question:

1098. Deputy Malcolm Noonan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 251 of 8 July 2021, the reason such a cost-analysis has not taken place to date in view of the fact that this measure was a key recommendation of the 2018 Oireachtas Committee on Transport report (details supplied); if her Department will now carry out this analysis; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39196/21]

View answer

Written answers

The Free Travel scheme provides free travel on the main public and private transport services for those eligible under the scheme. These include road, rail and ferry services provided by companies such as Bus Átha Cliath, Bus Éireann and Iarnród Éireann, as well as Luas and services provided by over 80 private transport operators. There are currently approximately 1,003,000 customers with direct eligibility. The estimated expenditure on free travel in 2021 is €95 million.

While the Report of the Oireachtas Committee on Transport that the Deputy refers to did recommend uncoupling the link between receipt of particular social welfare payments and eligibility for the free travel scheme, it did not specifically recommend a cost analysis of establishing the free travel scheme as a standalone directly applicable benefit.

In any event, as explained in response to Parliamentary Question 251 of 8 July 2021, it would not be possible for my Department to conduct such a cost analysis on the basis of the Report as my Department would need in-depth details of any proposed changes including, but not limited to, the new qualifying criteria which would be envisaged as being applicable for the scheme; any processes, systems or dependencies associated with such criteria; the type of travel pass that would be issued in particular circumstances (e.g., single or companion pass etc.); the services to which the revised free travel pass would apply; the number of journeys made using the free travel pass and the means by which this would be assessed; the prevailing fares; and the type of journeys undertaken, i.e., rail, bus or Luas, etc.

Furthermore, implementation of the proposed recommendation would entail a fundamental change to the very nature of the free travel scheme and a significant increase in the numbers qualifying for the scheme – beyond the customer base of the Department – the details of which would not be available to this Department. In essence, uncoupling the link between receipt of particular social welfare payments and eligibility for the free travel scheme would so fundamentally alter the scheme that it would move it away from the Department of Social Protection to become a general transport initiative.

It could also be expected that extensive negotiations, including negotiations around levels of recompense would have to be undertaken with transport operators to ensure their continued participation in such a considerably revised scheme.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1099)

Paul Murphy

Question:

1099. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection if an instruction can be given by her Department to a recipient of rent supplement to apply for the housing assistance payment; and the circumstances under which such an instruction would be issued. [39220/21]

View answer

Written answers

Rent supplement continues to play a key role in supporting families and individuals in private rented accommodation, with the scheme supporting 17,700 active recipients at the end of June 2021.

The scheme provides short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source. The scheme ensures that those who were renting, but whose circumstances have changed due to temporary loss of employment or income, can continue to meet their rental commitments.

Where rent supplement has been paid for a continuous period of 18 months or more, a designated person can request a rent supplement recipient to apply for social housing with their local authority. Where a person refuses to engage in resolving their long term housing difficulties, rent supplement can be discontinued.

Where a person is not eligible for the rent supplement scheme, they are referred to their local housing authority to have their housing needs assessed and, if successful, will be placed on the housing list.

Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) which is administered by local authorities, continues to provide long term housing to those who have verifiable long term housing needs. Policy relating to the qualifying conditions for access to HAP is a matter for the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 1100 answered with Question No. 1089.
Question No. 1101 answered with Question No. 1089.
Question No. 1102 answered with Question No. 1089.

Employment Support Services

Questions (1103)

Holly Cairns

Question:

1103. Deputy Holly Cairns asked the Minister for Social Protection number of referrals her Department has made to each local employment service office in each of the years 2017 to 2020, inclusive; the targets for referrals for each office for the same time period; and the targets for 2021. [39306/21]

View answer

Written answers

The Local Employment Services (LES) provide a one-to-one employment assistance and advice service primarily for the long-term unemployed.

Referrals to this service are managed by the local Intreo Centre and are based on a replacement rate dependent on the speed of movement of clients through the LES and on the agreed capacity of the relevant service provider. Referrals to each LES are also subject to changing local labour market conditions. There are no annual targets for referrals to the LES, rather the Department contracts capacity on an annual basis.

It should be noted that, due to public health restrictions, referrals to all contracted public employment services including the LES were suspended on three separate occasions during 2020 ( March, October and December). Referrals for 2021 recommenced in March 2021.

Table 1 Reflects the number of persons who were referred directly by Intreo and who engaged with Local Employment Service, by provider, in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, inclusive.

Table 1

2017

2018

2019

2020

Northside

864

696

654

651

Ballymun

562

831

624

552

Dublin City NW

851

1055

760

774

Blanchardstown

759

628

410

421

Dublin City SW

231

165

275

258

Dublin City Docklands/Eastside

218

322

328

565

Dublin South City

244

130

257

171

Dublin 12

454

262

435

450

Ballyfermot

292

354

543

543

Clondalkin

925

950

1160

765

Tallaght

1580

1279

1374

992

Southside

271

845

567

169

Kildare

1259

1367

1257

840

Bray

452

610

552

429

Monaghan

267

408

365

216

Dundalk

447

264

378

166

Drogheda

549

856

858

394

Mayo

65

308

855

553

Galway

316

350

322

354

Limerick

996

1339

1234

1157

Cork

1053

886

831

601

South Kerry

175

484

427

366

Tralee

648

665

564

358

Waterford City

792

379

510

332

Waterford County

338

346

363

229

Wexford

937

901

886

644

-

15545

16680

16789

12950

Social Welfare Eligibility

Questions (1104, 1152, 1158)

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1104. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection if those transitioning from the pandemic unemployment payment to a jobseeker’s payment will have to comply with the rules in relation to seeking work while in receipt of jobseeker’s; if so, the way this will work for those in the arts sector or for taxi drivers who are not unemployed but will be treated as such while in receipt of a jobseeker’s payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39316/21]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

1152. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social Protection her views on the fairness and legality of her plans to transition workers in the music and entertainment industry from September 2021 from being pandemic unemployment payment recipients to jobseeker’s, despite them having jobs already that they are not allowed to do due to Government restrictions; if these workers will be targeted by job activation schemes once jobseeker's; if this change in status will mean music and entertainment workers will be required to seek employment outside of that sector and leave those jobs in order to receive basic income supports; and the research that has been conducted into the devastating harm this move could have on Ireland’s music and entertainment sector in the medium and long- term. [40714/21]

View answer

Mattie McGrath

Question:

1158. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will address a series of matters in relation to Covid-19 supports (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40743/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1104, 1152 and 1158 together.

The Pandemic Unemployment Payment (PUP) was introduced as an emergency measure for qualifying employees and self employed people who lost their employment as a direct result of the Covid-19 pandemic. To date expenditure on PUP is approximately €8.3 billion.

The requirement for emergency measures is diminishing as more and more people return to work as restrictions are gradually lifted. Government announced changes to PUP including a transitional approach to its withdrawal on a tapered basis over 6 months. From 7th September 2021 the rate will begin to be gradually reduced on a phased basis in increments of €50 per week. Two further phases of rate changes are scheduled to take place from 16th November 2021 and 8th of February 2022. As PUP recipients go on to the €203 rate in each phase, they will be transitioned to standard jobseeker terms.

Arrangements will continue for self-employed PUP recipients, including taxi drivers and those who work in the arts sector, to take up some limited self-employment. A person can earn up to €960 over an eight week period and maintain their full PUP - this figure is net of expenses. I was pleased to introduce this provision to support artists following engagement with the sector last year. Furthermore, if a self-employed person takes up limited self-employment of up to 24 hours per week they can retain income support under the Part Time Job Incentive and a single person will be paid €128.60 per week. There is no income limit applied in these cases. The extension of the Part Time Job Incentive to self employed people will continue until the end of the current year.

The €1,000 Covid-19 Enterprise Support Grant to assist self-employed people to restart their business will continue to be available to self-employed people closing PUP claims until the end of 2021. A self-employed person closing their PUP claim to reopen their business will be able to avail of this grant even if they have previously claimed it as part of a reopening in 2020.

The Deputy should be aware that the scheme for self-employed artists on Jobseeker’s Allowance is open to professionals from a wide range of artistic disciplines. The artists on the scheme are exempt from participating in the normal labour market activation activities for a period of 12 months; however, all other scheme conditions apply.

I can assure the Deputy that the staff of the Department of Social Protection will take a sensible, common sense approach, as they have done throughout the pandemic, and there is absolutely no expectation that artists will be required to look for work in other sectors.

I trust that this clarifies the position at this time.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1105)

Paul Murphy

Question:

1105. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons who have been cut-off rent supplement in each of the past five years. [39329/21]

View answer

Written answers

Rent supplement continues to play a key role in supporting families and individuals in private rented accommodation, with the scheme supporting 17,711 active recipients at the end of June 2021.

The scheme provides short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source. The scheme ensures that those who were renting, but whose circumstances have changed due to temporary loss of employment or income, can continue to meet their rental commitments.

Since the introduction of HAP, rent supplement continues to revert to its original role of providing short-term support to those who have become temporarily unemployed and require income support to meet their tenancy cost whilst they seek alternative employment. The main driver for rent supplement claims closing over the last five years has been the on-going transfer of long term rent supplement tenancies to HAP.

All of my Department’s schemes, are subject to on-going control reviews and eligibility checks. The main reason for rent supplement claims closing over the past five years, (some 35%,ofclaim closures) was due to customers changing address and establishing new rent supplement tenancies. A further 27% were closed as customers transferred to HAP and other social housing options; and 15% were closed as customers regained full-time employment. Approximately15% of the closures arose due to outstanding documentation or signatures not being provided in a reasonable timeframe; and the remaining 8% of claims were closed due to the customer not qualifying for the scheme at the point of application, or upon review. For those claims closed upon review this would generally be due to the customer regaining full-time employment. In all cases, were a claim is closed the customer can re-apply or can appeal the decision.

Tabular statement 1 - provides details of the number of rent supplement claims closed in: 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; and January to end of November 2020.

Tabular statement 2 - provides details of the number of rent supplement recipients at the end of each month for the period December 2020 to June 2021.

Detailed statistics on the number of rent supplement claims closed for the period from end of November 2020 to date are not available.

Table 1 - Number of Rent Supplement Closed Claims

Year

Closed Claims

2016

30,785

2017

23,409

2018

16,218

2019

12,279

2020 Jan – Nov

15,057

Table 2 - Number of Rent Supplement recipients at the end of each month for the period December 2020 to June 2021 .

Month Ending

Number of Rent Supplement Recipients

December 2020

19,304

January 2021

19,657

February 2021

19,977

March 2021

19,976

April 2021

19,570

May 2021

18,851

June 2021

17,711

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Eligibility

Questions (1106)

Seán Sherlock

Question:

1106. Deputy Sean Sherlock asked the Minister for Social Protection if the Covid-19 enhanced illness benefit will be adapted and made available for those who experience prolonged long-Covid symptoms; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39350/21]

View answer

Written answers

My Department provides a suite of income supports for those who are unable to work due to an illness or disability. It is important to note that entitlement to these supports is generally not contingent on the nature of the illness or disability but on the extent to which a particular illness or disability impairs or restricts a person’s capacity to work.

In March of last year, under the Health (Preservation and Protection and other Emergency Measures in the Public Interest) Act 2020 (No. 1) and subsequent regulations, the Government provided for entitlement to illness benefit for persons who have been diagnosed with Covid-19 or are a probable source of infection with Covid-19.

The rate of payment of the enhanced Illness Benefit payment in respect of Covid-19 is higher than the normal maximum personal rate for a limited period only. The measures were designed to ensure that where a registered medical practitioner or a HSE medical officer diagnoses a person with Covid-19 or identifies him or her as a probable source of infection of Covid-19, the person can comply with medical advice to isolate, while having their income protected. This is essential to limit and slow down the spread of the virus, to keep the number of people affected to a minimum, and to reduce a peak of cases which would cause extreme pressure on the health system.

The enhanced rate of Illness Benefit was brought in as a short-term public health measure and is not a long-term income support payment. It is payable for 2 weeks where a person is isolating as a probable source of infection of Covid-19 and up to 10 weeks where a person has been diagnosed with Covid-19. The purpose of the enhanced Illness Benefit payment in respect of Covid-19 is to encourage people to not go to work due to financial constraint when they should be in isolation.

In a case where a person continues to be ill beyond 10 weeks, standard Illness Benefit may be paid for an extended period, based on the person’s continued eligibility. Illness Benefit is the primary income support payment for people who are unable to attend work due to illness of any type. Additional payments may also be made in respect of a qualified adult and qualifying children.

Apart from these income supports, my Department also provides means tested supports under the Supplementary Welfare Allowance scheme for people who are ill but who do not qualify for Illness Benefit. The Department may also make an Exceptional Needs Payment (ENP) to help meet essential, once-off expenditure which a person could not reasonably be expected to meet from their weekly income.

Given the comprehensive set of supports available to people who are unable to work due to illness, I do not propose to extend the duration of the enhanced Illness Benefit payment at this time.

Pensions Reform

Questions (1107)

Pádraig O'Sullivan

Question:

1107. Deputy Pádraig O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Social Protection when the Pensions Commission will finalise its report; if a timeline is in place for same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39361/21]

View answer

Written answers

The Pensions Commission was established in November 2020 to examine the sustainability of the State Pension system and the Social Insurance Fund, in fulfilment of a Programme for Government commitment. The Commission was also asked in its Terms of Reference to examine the issue of retirement ages in employment contracts that are set below the State Pension qualifying age, and how to further accommodate long-term carers in the State Pensions system.

This is a major and complex body of work. The Commission has had 17 meetings, and held a public consultation process including a Stakeholder Forum. Details of the Commission's work can be found on its website, pensionscommission.gov.ie.

The Chairperson of the Commission has written to me to advise that the Commission plans to meet at the end of July to finalise its draft report. Some time will also be required after that to complete the report's production.

I look forward to receiving the report in due course. I anticipate that I will bring the Report to Government shortly after the summer recess. The intention is to publish the report at that time. In accordance with the Programme for Government, the Government intends to take action having regard to the recommendations of the Commission within six months of receiving the report.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Schemes

Questions (1108)

Claire Kerrane

Question:

1108. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of claims that have been made to her Department in respect of job clubs staff for enhanced redundancy payments; the number of those awards paid; the number that remain unpaid; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39433/21]

View answer

Written answers

Since 2013, 11 Job Clubs did not enter into a new contract and 4 of these Job Clubs made enquiries to my Department in respect of redundancy. Claims for enhanced redundancy are a matter for employers.

The Job Club contracts are contracts for service, and they are negotiated and agreed separately with each contracting body. The contracting body as per the terms of the contract is responsible for all matters related to the employment and remuneration of its staff. My Department has no role in this regard and is not party to any contracts of employment.

Where a company / employer is unable to pay statutory redundancy to employees it is open to them to avail of my Department’s redundancy and insolvency payments’ scheme.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (1109)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

1109. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons who had their disability allowance removed in each year since 2016; the number who had their disability allowance removed to date in 2021; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39435/21]

View answer

Written answers

Disability Allowance (DA) is a weekly allowance for people aged between 16 and 66 with a disability that is expected to last for at least one year and who satisfy the medical condition, means test and are habitually resident in Ireland.

The number of persons who had their DA stopped in each of the years 2016 to 2020 and to the end of June 2021 is outlined in the table below:

Year

DA payments removed

2016

7,951

2017

7,691

2018

8,392

2019

9,721

2020

7,409

2021 to the end of June

3,726

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Schemes

Questions (1110)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

1110. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Social Protection if a list of categories for removing a disability allowance will be provided; the number removed under each category since 2016; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39436/21]

View answer

Written answers

Disability Allowance (DA) is a weekly allowance for people aged between 16 and 66 with a disability which is expected to last for at least one year and who satisfy the medical condition, means test and are habitually resident in Ireland.

The Department does not collate data in a format that would enable definitive reporting on the reason DA payments are stopped. Details in respect of the total number of DA payments stopped are available and have been provided in answer to parliamentary question 39435/21.

It is important to note that these DA payments may have been stopped for a number of reasons. These include not meeting any one, or more, of the range of qualifying conditions for receipt of DA. Payment stops may also be due, for example, to moving to a different social welfare payment, returning to work or training, or if the customer is now deceased or has moved outside the state.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 1111 answered with Question No. 1089.
Question No. 1112 answered with Question No. 1094.
Question No. 1113 answered with Question No. 1089.
Top
Share